Jump to content

OK...if The Rona came from the Wuhan lab...where's Fauci?


Recommended Posts

https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisadellatto/2023/02/26/timeline-how-the-covid-lab-leak-origin-story-went-from-conspiracy-theory-to-government-debate/?sh=3cc37b3637b9

Sooo...looks like the Libbies have once again been proven wrong. What a shocker.

The question now becomes...'Where the hell is Fauci?'.

Fauci went way out of his way to convince the world The Rona was a natural occurrence. That's because his organization was funding this gain of function crap all over the world...including Wuhan.

This POS needs to be caged and the WHO needs to be disbanded. These fcks all knew that happened and denied it vehemently. 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

No. Just as I've never been shot. But I'm convinced it would hurt.

So you believe ^this is a valid analogy?

You're wrong. It is clearly a false equivalence. AKA, not even close.

Your own cite says it is up for DEBATE. AKA, points for both scenarios.

No one debates whether getting shot would hurt. LMAO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

So you believe ^this is a valid analogy?

You're wrong. It is clearly a false equivalence. AKA, not even close.

Your own cite says it is up for DEBATE. AKA, points for both scenarios.

No one debates whether getting shot would hurt. LMAO.

Ahh the almighty Libbie skirt of "false equivalence".

Lol...so silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Tell me precisely what the evidence is. 

Okay (not that you'll listen anyway)

1. The Wuhan lab was working on a variety of coronaviruses

2. There appeared to be a shut down of the virology lab. 

3. It was apparent that Chinese scientists in the lab came down with symptoms associated with Covid-19. 

4. The lab then destroyed a bunch of computers and scrubbed servers

5. The Chinese refused to allow any scientists in at the start of covid

6. Covid itself seemed far more advanced in the evolutionary cycle of a virus found in nature that it's probably more realistic to believe the virus was generically altered

7. They HAVE NOT found ANY credible link between bat species and covid

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, West said:

Okay (not that you'll listen anyway)

1. The Wuhan lab was working on a variety of coronaviruses

2. There appeared to be a shut down of the virology lab. 

3. It was apparent that Chinese scientists in the lab came down with symptoms associated with Covid-19. 

4. The lab then destroyed a bunch of computers and scrubbed servers

5. The Chinese refused to allow any scientists in at the start of covid

6. Covid itself seemed far more advanced in the evolutionary cycle of a virus found in nature that it's probably more realistic to believe the virus was generically altered

7. They HAVE NOT found ANY credible link between bat species and covid

I knew those things. Unfortunately, that is all circumstantial evidence. It is probable cause; it is a hypothesis. But it is not conclusive evidence by far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, West said:

Okay (not that you'll listen anyway)

1. The Wuhan lab was working on a variety of coronaviruses

2. There appeared to be a shut down of the virology lab. 

3. It was apparent that Chinese scientists in the lab came down with symptoms associated with Covid-19. 

4. The lab then destroyed a bunch of computers and scrubbed servers

5. The Chinese refused to allow any scientists in at the start of covid

6. Covid itself seemed far more advanced in the evolutionary cycle of a virus found in nature that it's probably more realistic to believe the virus was generically altered

7. They HAVE NOT found ANY credible link between bat species and covid

Good, you got a list of allegations from Fox Lies. Now what are FACTS that are evidence for OTHER scenarios?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Then what explains your empty nonsense responses?

If you got nothing of substance to say, you should remember to old adage:

"Tis better say nothing and be thought a fool, than to write a post and remove all doubt." LMAO 

Ya gits wut ya pays fer sonny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, herbie said:

Not hard to understand why someone who thinks logic is a left wing plot to ask why the guy trying to slow the spread didn't particularly give a shit where it came from.

Say again for those management trainees who think placing blame is more important than fixing anything.

RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA.

A PHONE CALL.

JANUARY 6, 2021.

Project much?

Edited by Nationalist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It matters that it came from the Wuhan lab, because the same "mad scientists" who were performing illegal gain of function on bat coronaviruses via grants from Fauci, are STILL at it.

Do you want this to happen again?

If it was an accidental release, then these people have already been proven reckless and careless and they need to be shut down.

If it was released on purpose, then these same reckless, careless people profited from its release and people died because of it.

The cover-up that took place is damning, in itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Goddess said:

It matters that it came from the Wuhan lab, because the same "mad scientists" who were performing illegal gain of function on bat coronaviruses via grants from Fauci, are STILL at it.

Do you want this to happen again?

If it was an accidental release, then these people have already been proven reckless and careless and they need to be shut down.

If it was released on purpose, then these same reckless, careless people profited from its release and people died because of it.

The cover-up that took place is damning, in itself.

What law makes gain of function research illegal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,721
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    paradox34
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • SkyHigh earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Proficient
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • gatomontes99 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...