Jump to content

Did they ever find the bat that supposedly spread the Rona?


West

Recommended Posts

They didn't even need to look for the bat that caused Rona. It was right there in its cage the whole time, 'ronaing like it was 1999. 

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/u-s-intel-report-identified-3-wuhan-lab-researchers-who-n1268327

Quote

May 24, 2021, 9:31 AM PDT

Quote

WASHINGTON — A U.S. intelligence report identified three researchers at a Wuhan lab who sought treatment at a hospital after falling ill in November 2019, a source familiar with the matter tells NBC News.

 

I hear cricket noises coming from the left side of my laptop...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

They didn't even need to look for the bat that caused Rona. It was right there in its cage the whole time, 'ronaing like it was 1999. 

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/u-s-intel-report-identified-3-wuhan-lab-researchers-who-n1268327

 

I hear cricket noises coming from the left side of my laptop...

The US DoD has said that it almost certainly came from the Wuhan lab and the gain of function work that Fauci was funding.

The only reason we can't be 100% sure is because the Chinese have refused to release information.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

The US DoD has said that it almost certainly came from the Wuhan lab and the gain of function work that Fauci was funding.

The only reason we can't be 100% sure is because the Chinese have refused to release information.

Do you have some kind of link to that?

I just keep coming up with the same BS.

Quote

New studies agree that animals sold at Wuhan market are most likely what started Covid-19 pandemic

Jen Christensen
By Jen Christensen, CNN
Updated 11:05 AM EDT, Wed July 27, 2022

 

1287660106_ScreenShot2023-01-27at7_47_06AM.thumb.png.c4f60171f12a14ae2c5ea5e74afc5561.png2139266156_ScreenShot2023-01-27at7_46_32AM.thumb.png.2d24a03db91a0ad55b4691278770382b.png771466974_ScreenShot2023-01-27at7_46_04AM.thumb.png.e18e46c3b0cd14a1ad631f63b0e50d23.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a good one.

Apparently "new studies" have found evidence of covid in part of the wetmarket. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11676679/Covid-lab-leak-fears-Federal-report-says-NIH-failed-tabs-Wuhan-lab.html

Quote

968642155_ScreenShot2023-01-27at7_54_31AM.thumb.png.d5273fb0fd846beed9646dfbb882a1c6.png

"New studies"? Yup. "New studies" were done to see where the virus was 3 years ago. (OK, maybe they tested old samples, but the WHO investigators got there in mid-January, two months after the breakout. What good are samples from then? How easy would it be for lab techs to orchestrate a second breakout there in two months?)

Oh my goodness. If "new studies" found covid somewhere then it must be the original source, right? I mean, look at that picture, it totally shows red areas right where the animals were.

"It's literally impossible for humans to just draw something like that, only real scientific evidence looks like that." - Science

 

The author forgot to report on "who found that evidence". Was it:

- Chinese virologists? If so, I wonder where they came from... A nearby lab, perhaps?

- The WHO? They weren't even given access to the lab. The Chinese gov't just said "Look over there for evidence, right in that spot", so they did. 

- Americans? See ^above^.

Quote
Jan 13, 2021WUHAN, China (AP) — A global team of researchers arrived Thursday in the Chinese city where the coronavirus pandemic was first detected to conduct a politically sensitive investigation into its origins amid uncertainty about whether Beijing might try to prevent embarrassing discoveries.

Like I said, by January 13th 2020, when WHO investigators initially arrived in Wuhan to start investigating, workers from the lab had plenty of time to get the virus to the wetmarket for a second "breakout" if they wanted to.

And again, the WHO investigators didn't get to go near the lab to see if it came from there.

 

This is strong enough evidence to satisfy someone's confirmation bias: "Oh look, a sciencey diagram!", but it's not evidence of anything. It's a joke. 

Edited by WestCanMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...