West Posted January 27 Report Share Posted January 27 Just wondering if they've proven their theory about the bat giving everyone Rona. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nefarious Banana Posted January 27 Report Share Posted January 27 'On the Origin of the Deadliest Pandemic in 100 Years' . . . . . Elaine Dewar. Excellent book . . . gives the timeline, dates, places, and names. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted January 27 Author Report Share Posted January 27 4 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said: 'On the Origin of the Deadliest Pandemic in 100 Years' . . . . . Elaine Dewar. Excellent book . . . gives the timeline, dates, places, and names. The conspiracy theorists must be up about 50-nil by now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted January 27 Report Share Posted January 27 They didn't even need to look for the bat that caused Rona. It was right there in its cage the whole time, 'ronaing like it was 1999. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/u-s-intel-report-identified-3-wuhan-lab-researchers-who-n1268327 Quote May 24, 2021, 9:31 AM PDT Quote WASHINGTON — A U.S. intelligence report identified three researchers at a Wuhan lab who sought treatment at a hospital after falling ill in November 2019, a source familiar with the matter tells NBC News. I hear cricket noises coming from the left side of my laptop... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goddess Posted January 27 Report Share Posted January 27 10 hours ago, WestCanMan said: They didn't even need to look for the bat that caused Rona. It was right there in its cage the whole time, 'ronaing like it was 1999. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/u-s-intel-report-identified-3-wuhan-lab-researchers-who-n1268327 I hear cricket noises coming from the left side of my laptop... The US DoD has said that it almost certainly came from the Wuhan lab and the gain of function work that Fauci was funding. The only reason we can't be 100% sure is because the Chinese have refused to release information. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legato Posted January 27 Report Share Posted January 27 1 hour ago, Goddess said: The only reason we can't be 100% sure is because the Chinese have refused to release information. It's in a garage next to a "sports car" but needs to be vetted. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted January 27 Report Share Posted January 27 1 hour ago, Goddess said: The US DoD has said that it almost certainly came from the Wuhan lab and the gain of function work that Fauci was funding. The only reason we can't be 100% sure is because the Chinese have refused to release information. Do you have some kind of link to that? I just keep coming up with the same BS. Quote New studies agree that animals sold at Wuhan market are most likely what started Covid-19 pandemic By Jen Christensen, CNN Updated 11:05 AM EDT, Wed July 27, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myata Posted January 27 Report Share Posted January 27 Fauci email intercepts on lab origin "Pond added that there was no data then, and there is no data now, that would definitively indicate that a lab origin like the one contemplated in “Proximal Origin” is not at least plausible." Jan. 19, 2023 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted January 27 Report Share Posted January 27 (edited) Here's a good one. Apparently "new studies" have found evidence of covid in part of the wetmarket. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11676679/Covid-lab-leak-fears-Federal-report-says-NIH-failed-tabs-Wuhan-lab.html Quote By CONNOR BOYD HEALTH EDITOR FOR DAILYMAIL.COM and MANSUR SHAHEEN DEPUTY HEALTH EDITOR FOR DAILYMAIL.COM PUBLISHED: 14:34 EST, 25 January 2023 "New studies"? Yup. "New studies" were done to see where the virus was 3 years ago. (OK, maybe they tested old samples, but the WHO investigators got there in mid-January, two months after the breakout. What good are samples from then? How easy would it be for lab techs to orchestrate a second breakout there in two months?) Oh my goodness. If "new studies" found covid somewhere then it must be the original source, right? I mean, look at that picture, it totally shows red areas right where the animals were. "It's literally impossible for humans to just draw something like that, only real scientific evidence looks like that." - Science The author forgot to report on "who found that evidence". Was it: - Chinese virologists? If so, I wonder where they came from... A nearby lab, perhaps? - The WHO? They weren't even given access to the lab. The Chinese gov't just said "Look over there for evidence, right in that spot", so they did. - Americans? See ^above^. Quote ttps://apnews.com › article › who-team-arrives-wuhan-virus-origins-db3e9adcbfa801d3e8274c1976ea5fcd WHO team arrives in Wuhan to investigate pandemic origins Jan 13, 2021WUHAN, China (AP) — A global team of researchers arrived Thursday in the Chinese city where the coronavirus pandemic was first detected to conduct a politically sensitive investigation into its origins amid uncertainty about whether Beijing might try to prevent embarrassing discoveries. Like I said, by January 13th 2020, when WHO investigators initially arrived in Wuhan to start investigating, workers from the lab had plenty of time to get the virus to the wetmarket for a second "breakout" if they wanted to. And again, the WHO investigators didn't get to go near the lab to see if it came from there. This is strong enough evidence to satisfy someone's confirmation bias: "Oh look, a sciencey diagram!", but it's not evidence of anything. It's a joke. Edited January 27 by WestCanMan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PIK Posted January 27 Report Share Posted January 27 Bat stew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted January 27 Report Share Posted January 27 (edited) 2 hours ago, PIK said: Bat stew? Nope. Strawberry tart.... with a bit of bat in it. Edited January 27 by WestCanMan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herbie Posted January 27 Report Share Posted January 27 Have they looked inside your head? Certainly a lot of guano in there.... must be 'the' bat. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted January 27 Report Share Posted January 27 7 minutes ago, herbie said: Have they looked inside your head? Certainly a lot of guano in there.... must be 'the' bat. Even at 150 Mbps, your posts are a huge waste of bandwidth. Save the planet. STFU. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herbie Posted January 28 Report Share Posted January 28 Upset how only 128 bytes can demolish petabytes wasted on lies and disinformation are we? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted January 29 Report Share Posted January 29 3 hours ago, herbie said: Upset how only 128 bytes can demolish petabytes wasted on lies and disinformation are we? The only things you ever demolished here were the English language and your own credibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.