Jump to content

WEF 2023


West

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

Freeland has really revealed her bad character over the past 18 months.  Of course she won’t answer any questions. She’s the poster child of behind the scenes international central planning.  She should be forced to resign.  What has she discussed?  What plans is she returning to force on Canadians?  Oh right, we’ll never know.  She’s unaccountable to the Canadian taxpayers who pay her to represent Canadians. 

I think her "Let them eat cake" moment was when she said Canadians have to get used to sacrificing and used herself as an example since her family had to make the difficult choice to cancel their Disney+ subscription.

Someone mentioned "dystopian futures".  You really owe it to your children and grandchildren to read what all the WEF has planned for Canadians to sacrifice.  It's not like they're hiding it, they're just using this time before implementation to convince everyone it's "for the greater good."

None of the sacrifices they impose on us will affect them in any way except to enhance their already ballooning wallets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting article from the National Post about Chrystia Freeland and the WEF.

Rupa Subramanya: Chrystia Freeland's side gig with the WEF is endangering Canadian democracy | National Post

It's been quite a journey for Freeland since being a journalist at one time. In 2012 she had authored a book, Plutocrats:The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, ironstone said:

An interesting article from the National Post about Chrystia Freeland and the WEF.

Rupa Subramanya: Chrystia Freeland's side gig with the WEF is endangering Canadian democracy | National Post

It's been quite a journey for Freeland since being a journalist at one time. In 2012 she had authored a book, Plutocrats:The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else.

Freeland should NOT be allowed to sit on the WEF as a trustee as it’s a clear conflict of interest.  Oh the irony when it turns out that all the “anti-establishment activist” really wanted was to be the establishment.

Notably, Freeland is the only government minister presently on the board.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Can't you read?  I said Schwab was taking about them at the WEF.

You've already forgotten that COVID vaccine contained nano-chips and that Bill Gates is into the COVID conspiracy up to his eyeballs? Wow Michael was right, we've reached new nadir in the history of conspiracies.

It's really never occured to you that WEF is in on the whole COVID thing too?

Wow they're pretty good at what they do.

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Your comments are getting more and more bizarre. 

My comments go where thinking logically about the stuff you guys put forward dictates.

Of course when I run it all through my CTD (critical thinking discombobulator) instead all I get is static interspersed with bursts of bwahahaha's!, several of them I might add.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

Yeah because China’s vaccine worked so well.  It’s incredible how few people today want to think for themselves, ask important questions, and make decisions for themselves.  Zombie apocalypse already here.  

Awwww, it's cute how you guys think you're the ones employing their critical thinking capabilities and they're what's brought you to this place you're in.

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

You've already forgotten that COVID vaccine contained nano-chips and that Bill Gates is into the COVID conspiracy up to his eyeballs?

I think you're confused.

What I have talked about and posted medical studies for is the lipid nanoparticles in the inoculations.

Not nano-chips.

The only time micro or nano chips has been mentioned on my thread, has been by you.  And I've had to ask you politely 3 times now to stop doing it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

I think you're confused.

What I have talked about and posted medical studies for is the lipid nanoparticles in the inoculations.

Not nano-chips.

The only time micro or nano chips has been mentioned on my thread, has been by you.  And I've had to ask you politely 3 times now to stop doing it.

Oh I see, you must imagine your thread is strictly about your conspiracy. Well excuse me for saying but when you folks rub up and off and God knows what else against other conspirators ya'll just kinda look like so many other fetishists freakin' at a freaker's ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Oh I see, you must imagine your thread is strictly about your conspiracy. Well excuse me for saying but when you folks rub up and off and God knows what else against other conspirators ya'll just kinda look like so many other fetishists freakin' at a freaker's ball.

Why are you so dishonest? Such a vile 😫😪 human being

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, West said:

Why are you so dishonest? Such a vile 😫😪 human being

Nope it's the honest truth.  Lots of stories warning about Bill Gates and COVID vaccines containing microchips as part of the master plan to track and enslave everyone around the interweebs.

 

 
 
Quote

 

Replying to @oneunderscore__
She pushed the false vaccine microchip conspiracy theory last year soon after it started to go viral on social media.
 
 
Image
 
 
 
 
 
 
fbtPJUYI_x96.jpg
 
LOL, every tweet links to an article so go ahead and tell people why the Gates Foundation was funding quantum dot tattoo technology and then tell them why Gates funneled money secretly through Epstein to MIT. I'll wait.

 

 
 

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/05/09/as-covid-19-vaccine-microchip-conspiracy-theories-spread-here-are-some-responses/?sh=2192a50e602d

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Nope it's the honest truth.  Lots of stories warning about Bill Gates and COVID vaccines containing microchips as part of the master plan to track and enslave everyone around the interweebs.

 

 
 
 
 

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/05/09/as-covid-19-vaccine-microchip-conspiracy-theories-spread-here-are-some-responses/?sh=2192a50e602d

 

She's already said she didn't say that multiple times. I don't care what the lefty media is using to trying and smear people with valid concerns. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, West said:

She's already said she didn't say that multiple times. I don't care what the lefty media is using to trying and smear people with valid concerns. 

This is how you know you're winning - they start getting foaming-at-the-mouth mad.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, dialamah said:

I think he's laughing at you.  I know I am.  :)

And what are you and eyeball laughing at?

Is it that this WEF advocates for population reduction? Maybe it's the idea that they are OK with imposing suffering on the general public in order to meet this zero emissions goal? Do you not believe your own senses? Or do you think it's funny that so many place on this "forum", such a high level of influence on western governments?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Maybe it's the idea that they are OK with imposing suffering on the general public in order to meet this zero emissions goal? Do you not believe your own senses?

The real problem is that Canada has signed onto this group's agenda, making us part of an experiment by radical "progressives" which ignorant Canadians know nothing about. 

We re-elected a total loser.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

The real problem is that Canada has signed onto this group's agenda, making us part of an experiment by radical "progressives" which ignorant Canadians know nothing about. 

We re-elected a total loser.

Progressives? Google "terrorist definition". The following is one of the definitions:

"One who favors or uses terrorizing methods for the accomplishment of some object, as for coercing a government or a community into the adoption of or submission to a certain course; one who practises terrorism."

Ya know...by definition, these people who call themselves "progressives", are actually "terrorists" and I think it's past time they were properly labeled as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OftenWrong said:

The real problem is that Canada has signed onto this group's agenda, making us part of an experiment by radical "progressives" which ignorant Canadians know nothing about. 

You mean by signing The Paris Accord?  If you have something specific you should say so, since there's a lot of fear mongering going around.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

You mean by signing The Paris Accord?  If you have something specific you should say so, since there's a lot of fear mongering going around.

Not sure why there would be confusion. It's about the WEF meeting. You know, where Canada has sent our FM.
She's on the Board of Trustees.

Here is your linky-dink
https://www.weforum.org/people/chrystia-freeland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

And what are you and eyeball laughing at?

Is it that this WEF advocates for population reduction? Maybe it's the idea that they are OK with imposing suffering on the general public in order to meet this zero emissions goal? Do you not believe your own senses? Or do you think it's funny that so many place on this "forum", such a high level of influence on western governments?

That anyone would believe this was possible in the near - or even the far - future:   Schwab talking about how, very soon, we will all have brain implants that will enable us to feel and understand other's points of view, thoughts and emotions.

It's hilarious how gullible some people are.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OftenWrong said:

Not sure why there would be confusion. It's about the WEF meeting. You know, where Canada has sent our FM.
She's on the Board of Trustees.

Here is your linky-dink
https://www.weforum.org/people/chrystia-freeland

What's the radical part?  Why are we bogey manning this thing after years of conservatives attending?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OftenWrong said:

Not sure why there would be confusion. It's about the WEF meeting. You know, where Canada has sent our FM.
She's on the Board of Trustees.

Here is your linky-dink
https://www.weforum.org/people/chrystia-freeland

Why aren't the identities of WEF a secret -  this is a cabal you're describing right?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

What's the radical part?  Why are we bogey manning this thing after years of conservatives attending?

Well they have taken it upon themselves to be the improvers of mankind. Post national stuff arises from here.

It may all seem good and well to you to be post-national state, but it might not be good for us since the rest of the world are all still national states. That's why I said radical experiment.

I couldn't care less whether they are attended by conservatives or not. I am the only true liberal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,503
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    BuyAResearchPaper
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...