Jump to content

Resume lies? Santos? How about Unelected Joe?


Recommended Posts

https://www.yahoo.com/news/george-santos-scandal-brings-renewed-223355981.html

Quote

 

The controversy surrounding Rep.-elect George Santos', R-N.Y., lies about his résumé on the campaign trail has brought renewed attention to President Biden’s long history of fabrications, including embellishments about his college career that helped derail his 1988 presidential campaign.

Santos, who defeated Robert Zimmerman in the November general election, had falsely claimed he graduated from Baruch College and worked for Goldman Sachs and Citibank. After an investigation by the New York Times revealed major portions of his biography were fabricated, Santos’ purported employers confirmed to Fox News that he never worked for them, and Baruch College said he never attended there.

Santos admitted he lied in an interview Monday with the New York Post.

"I am not a criminal," he said. "I’m embarrassed, and sorry for having embellished my résumé.

 

Unelected Joe makes Santos look more innocent than Mother Teresa.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-house-burned-wife-embellished-stories

Biden says house burned ‘with my wife in it,’ adding to long list of embellished stories

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-repeats-debunked-amtrak-story-fifth-time

Biden repeats debunked Amtrak story for fifth time during presidency

https://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/biden-a-lifetime-of-lying-and-plagarism-documented/

Biden: A Lifetime of Lying and Plagarism–Documented

Ap
Quote

 

ril 12, 2020 By Stephen Frank 5 Comments

Joe Biden has lived a life that children need to know.  By lying, cheating and stealing thoughts and words of others, he is the example of the “Peter Principle”, someone who has reached beyond his abilities.  Just before the media turned him off, silencing him, his gaffes, incoherent comments and forgetting facts, names and places, he was disintegrating on the national TV shows.

“Biden is a serial cheater. He cheated in law school by presenting many pages of a law review article as his own. His professor judged his plagiarism sufficiently serious to deserve an “F.”

Biden was just getting warmed up. From that experience, he failed to learn not to cheat, and even failed to learn not to get caught.

As a politician, he copied a speech from a British politician who spoke of the adversity his ancestors had overcome in the coal mines. Biden’s own ancestors had not worked in the coal mines, but no matter.

He bragged that he graduated law school (not a particularly good one, by the way) in the top half of his class. In point of fact, he’d graduated in the bottom 10%. He also falsely claimed he’d graduated college with three degrees.

The Democrats need to find an excuse to get another candidate—otherwise Biden will create for the Democrats in 2020 what Nixon created for the Republican in 1974.

 

When it comes to false resumes, Unelected Joe makes Santos look like an amateur.

And anyone wagging his/her finger at Santos is just an imbecile.

And if you liberals do not like these FACTS, just remember that facts don't care about your feelings. It's not our fault you're STUPID.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

When there's no excuse, invent whataboutisms.

Joe's "stories" had nothing to do with his qualifications for the job, except the plagiarism, for which he paid dearly.

Yes, he seems to like making up anecdotes but hasn't lied about important stuff.

Edited by Aristides
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

When there's no excuse, invent whataboutisms.

Joe's "stories" had nothing to do with his qualifications for the job, except the plagiarism, for which he paid dearly.

I wouldn't make any excuses for this guy Santos. If he lied or embellished his record that's not good. But the current President of the US also happens to have a long record of lying and embellishing and it hasn't really hurt him. Your comment seems to indicate that you're willing to ignore or overlook any and all transgressions from the Democrat side of the aisle.

Republicans lie and embellish while Democrats merely tell "stories". Got it.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ironstone said:

I wouldn't make any excuses for this guy Santos. If he lied or embellished his record that's not good. But the current President of the US also happens to have a long record of lying and embellishing and it hasn't really hurt him. Your comment seems to indicate that you're willing to ignore or overlook any and all transgressions from the Democrat side of the aisle.

Republicans lie and embellish while Democrats merely tell "stories". Got it.?

Joe's plagiarism hurt him badly. He had to drop out of his first run for POTUS and it took him YEARS to recover his reputation.

You got nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/31/2022 at 1:35 AM, robosmith said:

Joe's plagiarism hurt him badly. He had to drop out of his first run for POTUS and it took him YEARS to recover his reputation.

You got nothing.

In truth, no-one is absolutely perfect.  Many people have cheated on tests in school. We’ve all done something we aren’t proud of.  
 

But Santos is a whole different ballgame. He said he graduated from a school he never even attended. Turns out he hasn’t gone to college at all, and he lied about ALL of his jobs, his evictions, his criminal charges, and his family history. 
 

Worst of all, he went from earning $50,000 per year to $2 million, with no explanation. He was able to lend his campaign $700,000.  THAT, right there, is a major red flag, and it’s highly likely that he’s committed or been involved with crime. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/30/2022 at 1:15 PM, robosmith said:

When there's no excuse, invent whataboutisms.

Joe's "stories" had nothing to do with his qualifications for the job, except the plagiarism, for which he paid dearly.

Paid dearly means not elected to any public office. (Which technically, he WASN'T legally elected to the Presidency.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/31/2022 at 1:19 AM, herbie said:

Lies, dishonesty, deception? Those are qualifications to be eligible for the GOP. Pay for abortions and run as a pro-life? Diddle young boys? Grab 'em by the snatch? Bring guns to a 'peaceful demonstration'?

Like one of those "have you ever" lists on FB but only despicable acts on  it

You've just described EVERY Democrat who has been elected to public office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/31/2022 at 1:35 AM, robosmith said:

Joe's plagiarism hurt him badly. He had to drop out of his first run for POTUS and it took him YEARS to recover his reputation.

You got nothing.

He STILL wasn't legally elected to the presidency. He didn't recover his reputation, not to LEGAL voters. He ran against Trump, the greatest president in history, and somehow 2000 Mules handed him an office he could not earn with legal votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, reason10 said:

He STILL wasn't legally elected to the presidency. He didn't recover his reputation, not to LEGAL voters. He ran against Trump, the greatest president in history, and somehow 2000 Mules handed him an office he could not earn with legal votes.

You can repeat that lie all you want, but it won’t change anything. The elections were audited, reviewed, the Electors legally appointed and the Congress accepted them. Trump filed 64 suits and lost them all. He asked for recounts and lost them all.  

Republicans also lost the House and the Senate in that election, so no surprise they also lost the Presidency, considering their disgraced fraud of a candidate was the worst President in history.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Rebound said:

You can repeat that lie all you want, but it won’t change anything. The elections were audited, reviewed, the Electors legally appointed and the Congress accepted them. Trump filed 64 suits and lost them all. He asked for recounts and lost them all.  

Republicans also lost the House and the Senate in that election, so no surprise they also lost the Presidency, considering their disgraced fraud of a candidate was the worst President in history.  

You can repeat those lies all you want but it won't change anything. The election was fraudulent. PERIOD.

Pedophile Joe did NOT win that election legally.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, reason10 said:

Evidence is there. Intelligent people get it. You don't.

Just like Bigfoot. Only the really super smart people can understand the evidence and all the coverup involved to keep the mighty sasquatch hidden!

 

Meanwhile, I'm counting this as another troll sighting. You continue to prove that the troll is one cryptid that definitely walks among us.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,722
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    phoenyx75
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • User went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • User went up a rank
      Contributor
    • User earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Fluffypants earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...