Jump to content

White Nationalists pose threat of Civil War.


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I said...

Your next post said...

To which I responded...

At which point you decided you'd been made to look foolish, so you changed your question to...

I have a question for all you Libbies.

Why is it you can't seem to do anything without warping whatever rules happen to be in place? You ask silly questions that you already know the answers to and when we show you the silliness of your questions...you alter the questions and pretend its all OK.

ITS NOT OK!

If you childish little babies can't be mature and honourable enough to debate and argue points you yourselves get caught up in, then you're nothing more than a pack of immature little twits who really need to grow up before you entertain any ideas of leadership or respectability.

YOU'RE an ADMITTED TROLL, and STILL at it. ?

What goes around, comes around.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

It doesn't not constitute a poll tax. Everyone needs ID and not just for voting.

If you have your bank accounts and you don’t drive, you do not need to have a valid state issued ID. 
 

I have one, and you have one, but a lot of people don’t.  And they expire.  

Edited by Rebound
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Rebound said:

If you have your bank accounts and you don’t drive, you do not need to have a valid state issued ID. 
 

I have one, and you have one, but a lot of people don’t.  And they expire.  

In order to vote, one needs to be able to prove they are eligible to vote.!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

2000 mules to start.

Tell me...what proof so you have that Republicans cheat?

2000 mule is not evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. If it was Donald would of already submitted it. So, once again, I've proven that you've got squat. Your beliefs are based on gossip, speculation, innuendo and assumptions. How pathetic and weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

2000 mules to start.

EXACTLY what in that propaganda mockumentary constitutes proof in YOUR MIND?

The cell tower pings that showed random anonymous people passing SOMEWHERE in the vicinity of drop boxes? LMAO.

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Tell me...what proof so you have that Republicans cheat?

Trump demanding Russians to donate aid to his campaign for one.

Obstruction of the investigation into Russian collusion for another.

Senate Intel committee findings that Manafort SHARED PRIVATE POLLING data with a Russian agent, ostensibly to better target their online trolls and bots, to help Trump win, as ADMITTED by Putin.

Much more that was redacted by Barr. The list is EXTENSIVE. As is your IGNORANCE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

2000 mule is not evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. If it was Donald would of already submitted it. So, once again, I've proven that you've got squat. Your beliefs are based on gossip, speculation, innuendo and assumptions. How pathetic and weak.

That's OK. Really. You Libbies have shown how you want to play the game now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

EXACTLY what in that propaganda mockumentary constitutes proof in YOUR MIND?

The cell tower pings that showed random anonymous people passing SOMEWHERE in the vicinity of drop boxes? LMAO.

Trump demanding Russians to donate aid to his campaign for one.

Obstruction of the investigation into Russian collusion for another.

Senate Intel committee findings that Manafort SHARED PRIVATE POLLING data with a Russian agent, ostensibly to better target their online trolls and bots, to help Trump win, as ADMITTED by Putin.

Much more that was redacted by Barr. The list is EXTENSIVE. As is your IGNORANCE.

As I've said. You Libbies have shown us how you want to play the game. OK...I'm quite sure we can play that game too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

Currently less than half the states require no ID.

I expect this will change as basic ID is necessary to prove you are who you say you are.

Here is the bottom line: There is no evidence that fraud occurs because of a lack of Voter ID, and election systems have been steadily moving to absentee and vote by mail.  
 

Therefore, the only purpose of Voter ID laws is to prevent legitimate voters from voting.  This is not ok.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Here is the bottom line: There is no evidence that fraud occurs because of a lack of Voter ID, and election systems have been steadily moving to absentee and vote by mail.  
 

Therefore, the only purpose of Voter ID laws is to prevent legitimate voters from voting.  This is not ok.

No...The bottom line is, if you can't prove you're legally eligible to vote...you can't vote.

Letting anyone who wants to, to vote is...stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nationalist said:

No...The bottom line is, if you can't prove you're legally eligible to vote...you can't vote.

Letting anyone who wants to, to vote is...stupid.

Once again: There is no evidence that lack of ID has resulted in fraudulent voting.  
 

If that evidence existed, I might agree with you.  But voting is a Constitutional right, it has historically been illegally and unconstitutionally denied to people in America. Therefore, no restrictions on the right should be imposed without cause. And there is no cause. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,721
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    paradox34
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • User went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • User earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • User went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...