Jump to content

Left Wing fringes and the U.S. Supreme Court, Trump too.


Contrarian

Recommended Posts

there are some posters from the fringes of the left that do not like the Supreme Court. 

Well, they are judges at the end of the day, not dogmatic like the propaganda which a business like MSNBC puts out. 

Here it is:  Supreme Court denies Trump request to withhold tax returns.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/22/supreme-court-trump-taxes/

Edited by Contrarian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Contrarian changed the title to Left Wing and the U.S. Supreme Court, Trump too.
  • Contrarian changed the title to Left Wing fringes and the U.S. Supreme Court, Trump too.
1 hour ago, Contrarian said:

Well, they are judges at the end of the day, not dogmatic like the propaganda which a business like MSNBC puts out. 

Did you read the Dobbs opinion? Ruling against Trump's frivolous lawsuit does not make them "not dogmatic."

 

Draft Overturning Roe v. Wade Quotes Infamous Witch Trial Judge With Long-Discredited Ideas on Rape

Quote

Justice Alito’s leaked opinion cites Sir Matthew Hale, a 17th-century jurist who conceived the notion that husbands can’t be prosecuted for raping their wives, who sentenced women to death as “witches,” and whose misogyny stood out even in his time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Did you read the Dobbs opinion? Ruling against Trump's frivolous lawsuit does not make them "not dogmatic."

 

Draft Overturning Roe v. Wade Quotes Infamous Witch Trial Judge With Long-Discredited Ideas on Rape

 

The Supreme Court showed the far left that the rule of law is master, so therefore not ideology, and here you are, still deflecting. 

Edited by Contrarian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

The Supreme Court showed the far left that the rule of law is master, so therefore not ideology, and here you are, still deflecting. 

No, I'm pointing out that YOUR CONCLUSION is in ERROR.

Reaching a slam dunk decision in one case DOES NOT prove anything about their general trend.

Let us know when the SCOTUS enforces the law against a Justice ruling on a case in which his wife was directly involved. TWICE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...