Jump to content

Charlie Kirk DESTROYS the racist White Privilege myth


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

It is not the slave’s fault for being enslaved. It is the fault of the perpetrators.  The US Constitution legally institutionalized slavery in America. This was a terrible sin. 
 

You are a racist and you’re trying to inflame. 

No one said the slaves were at fault. You have the reading skills of a typical blue stater (inferior to Florida by a lot). Try to keep up with the class, DUMB ASS.

I said AFRICANS SOLD AFRICANS INTO SLAVERY. (Find a red stater to read that to you and explain it.)

HOMEWORK: Find the phrase "legally institutionalized slavery" in this document, or admit you are a liar who knows nothing.

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/

Oh, and THIS was an actual America document that upheld the concept of slavery.

https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/dred-scott-v-sandford

It was based on a brand new concept called "Substantive Due Process," which meant that a person's property could not be taken away without due process (this creating the concept of a HUMAN BEING designated as property.)

Substantive due process was used in the next century for THIS Holocaust.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/roe_v_wade_(1973)

 

YOUR SIDE OF THE AISLE, NUMB NUTS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Hodad said:

Trump was not a laborer, lol. You cannot seriously believe that.  His daddy gave him millions of dollars, a cushy job in the family business and a silver spoon--exactly like Trump did for his own children.

If Donald Trump HAD ever worked as a construction laborer (I can't even type it with a straight face) then he wouldn't have become notorious for cheating honest laborers out of their hard-earned wages. Those pudgy little baby-soft hands have never touched a shovel handle for more than a ceremonial groundbreaking. All mansions and private schools and limousines for little Donald.

 

 

 

I gave you the history of Trump in a reliable source. If you are too stupid to read it, you are definitely an ignorant blue stater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Aristides said:

That must make him the greatest in the world then.

Considering Florida has had 46 governors that covers a lot of territory and must make you a real expert.:rolleyes:

Try learning reading comprehension.

I didn't mention greatest in the world.

Are you ALWAYS this stupid or are you high on meth every time you post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Business Insider is a left wing opinion rag. It is not a reliable source.

I gave you a reliable source. If you are too stupid to read it, not my problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, reason10 said:

Business Insider is a left wing opinion rag. It is not a reliable source.

I gave you a reliable source. If you are too stupid to read it, not my problem.

It is common knowledge that Donald's education was paid for by his Father and that he received substantial loans from his Father to start his business's. You are just so enamored with Donald that the fog of puppy love has clouded your ability to reason (10). 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

It is common knowledge that Donald's education was paid for by his Father and that he received substantial loans from his Father to start his business's. You are just so enamored with Donald that the fog of puppy love has clouded your ability to reason (10). 

 

You are a LIAR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, reason10 said:

Business Insider is a left wing opinion rag. It is not a reliable source.

I gave you a reliable source. If you are too stupid to read it, not my problem.

Here is a video of Donald himself admitting he got a million dollar loan from his dad. How will you deny this, fool?

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DTXEOFHf1q9A&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjzgPzjxsT7AhV0LEQIHehGD5AQtwJ6BAgLEAE&usg=AOvVaw046bhWyZUPzEkubgDe1SUj

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, reason10 said:

I gave you the history of Trump in a reliable source. If you are too stupid to read it, you are definitely an ignorant blue stater.

You mean the article from the BBC that you posted in another thread - the one that says nothing at all about Trump working as a construction laborer, but does mention that he got million dollar loan and cushy job from daddy after college?

Mr Trump says he got into real estate with a "small" $1m loan from his father before joining the company. He helped manage his father's extensive portfolio of residential housing projects in the New York City boroughs, and took control of the company - which he renamed the Trump Organization - in 1971.

You are just comically foolish. Now I have to cite your own post back to you. It's too much.?

Also love that you're on record that BBC is a reliable source. You're correct (for once). They are a reliable source. I'm sure they'll be honored to have ascended in your esteem to the level of Pinterest posts and opinion pieces and other sources you respect.

 

ETA: There is no secrecy here and no controversial history. Trump's dad gave him millions of dollars, bailed out his dumb son's failed businesses over and over again and left him the company--the hotel and casino portion which Trump developed and subsequently bankrupted FOUR TIMES.

If Trump hadn't been born into extreme wealth he'd be a wildly successful used car salesman, still full of sh*t and full of himself. That's not really fair to used car salesmen, actually. Some of them are decent people.

Edited by Hodad
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You mean the article from the BBC that you posted in another thread - the one that says nothing at all about Trump working as a construction laborer, but does mention that he got million dollar loan and cushy job from daddy after college?

Mr Trump says he got into real estate with a "small" $1m loan from his father before joining the company. He helped manage his father's extensive portfolio of residential housing projects in the New York City boroughs, and took control of the company - which he renamed the Trump Organization - in 1971.

You are just comically foolish. Now I have to cite your own post back to you. It's too much.?

Also love that you're on record that BBC is a reliable source. You're correct (for once). They are a reliable source. I'm sure they'll be honored to have ascended in your esteem to the level of Pinterest posts and opinion pieces and other sources you respect.

 

ETA: There is no secrecy here and no controversial history. Trump's dad gave him millions of dollars, bailed out his dumb son's failed businesses over and over again and left him the company--the hotel and casino portion which Trump developed and subsequently bankrupted FOUR TIMES.

If Trump hadn't been born into extreme wealth he'd be a wildly successful used car salesman, still full of sh*t and full of himself. That's not really fair to used car salesmen, actually. Some of them are decent people.

That is a lie and you know it is a lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Here is a video of Donald himself admitting he got a million dollar loan from his dad. How will you deny this, fool?

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DTXEOFHf1q9A&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjzgPzjxsT7AhV0LEQIHehGD5AQtwJ6BAgLEAE&usg=AOvVaw046bhWyZUPzEkubgDe1SUj

 

 

Hey, LIAR.

I never said The Donald did not get a million dollar loan from his father. I said he got the loan and had to pay it back with interest.

https://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/donald-trump-father-loan-1-million-dollars-215154

 

Quote

 

“It has not been easy for me. It has not been easy for me. I started off in Brooklyn. My father gave me a small loan of a million dollars,” Trump remarked. “I came into Manhattan, and I had to pay him back, and I had to pay him back with interest. But I came into Manhattan and I started buying properties, and I did great

Trump said his father had told him that going to Manhattan would not work, and later in his life, other people told him that a presidential campaign would not pan out.

NBC’s Matt Lauer followed up on Trump’s “small loan” remark: “By the way, let’s just put this in perspective, you said it hasn’t been easy for you, but my dad gave me a million-dollar loan. That probably is going to seem pretty easy to a lot of people.”

“You’re right, but a million dollars isn’t very much compared to what I’ve built,” Trump countered. “I mean, I’ve built one of the great companies, but it’s always been, you know, you can’t do this, you can’t do that.”

 

You are a liar. You are stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, reason10 said:

Hey, LIAR.

I never said The Donald did not get a million dollar loan from his father. I said he got the loan and had to pay it back with interest.

https://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/donald-trump-father-loan-1-million-dollars-215154

 

You are a liar. You are stupid.

Aww, it's not pleasant when you find out your "self made man" has been supported financially with Daddy's money from day one, huh... Well, you can verbally denigrate the attendant's at your nursing home. That should make you feel better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Aww, it's not pleasant when you find out your "self made man" has been supported financially with Daddy's money from day one, huh... Well, you can verbally denigrate the attendant's at your nursing home. That should make you feel better.

Every self made, successful person came from a family who supported him/her. My family supported me, until I went to work on my own.  I don't credit my parents directly for graduating college Magna Cum Laude, (which occurred in my 40s when I went back to school.) And my parents died before I became an educator. 

I DO credit my father for my work ethic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, reason10 said:

So you lose an argument with me and you now want to cancel me?

Are you REALLY that fcking ignorant and stupid?

I sincerely doubt anyone has ever "lost" and argument to you. You're a lunatic, calling your own citations from reliable sources a lie. 

I don't want to cancel you for that. It's one of the best satires around. The racist rants, OTOH, have no place in public discourse.

 

ETA:  Is it 4? Am I close? Higher?

 

Edited by Hodad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, reason10 said:

No one said the slaves were at fault. You have the reading skills of a typical blue stater (inferior to Florida by a lot). Try to keep up with the class, DUMB ASS.

I said AFRICANS SOLD AFRICANS INTO SLAVERY. (Find a red stater to read that to you and explain it.)

HOMEWORK: Find the phrase "legally institutionalized slavery" in this document, or admit you are a liar who knows nothing.

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/

Oh, and THIS was an actual America document that upheld the concept of slavery.

https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/dred-scott-v-sandford

It was based on a brand new concept called "Substantive Due Process," which meant that a person's property could not be taken away without due process (this creating the concept of a HUMAN BEING designated as property.)

Substantive due process was used in the next century for THIS Holocaust.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/roe_v_wade_(1973)

 

YOUR SIDE OF THE AISLE, NUMB NUTS.

The US Constitution institutionalized slavery right here:

Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3;

”Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. ”

 

Article 4, Section 2:

No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.”

Edited by Rebound
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2022 at 2:53 PM, Rebound said:

You are a racist. Just my personal opinion of course.  
 

You whine about communism and then complain about decisions made by capitalists.  The capitalist spends shareholder money for the purpose of making more money. Period.  If more black people in ads makes more money, the capitalist is obligated to do it, no matter how much racists like you don’t like it. 

My white homeland is slowly and slyly being removed and replaced by a non-white invasion in this country which has been going on for decades. This is fact, and not fiction. As you said, capitalists and communists could care less about a countries culture and traditions and freedoms. It's always and only just about the money.

Again, why do you need to have more blacks in commercials anyway? If blacks do not see themselves more involved with TV commercials are they then going to stop buying products and food from those capitalists? This has more to do with trying to push old whitey aside and out of the picture and nothing more. 

Just standing up and fighting for old whitey while I still can. No racism intended. Just common sense and logic. Just my personal opinion of course. ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2022 at 3:18 PM, reason10 said:

You're right on 90 percent of this. The black ad thing assumes that the black purchasing market has to be attracted, same as the others. You see ads where there is a proportional number of attractive black faces to white faces; that goes to a more particular minority demographic. In the early Seventies, there would be black owned radio stations where Afro Sheen would be air time in ads. Today, Mercedes wants that professional black man to buy the S-Series and spend as much on a vehicle as one might spend on a house. Even though black professionals are growing in number, they are still a small minority of a demographic, hence the push towards attracting their business.

You can tell a lot about ANY TV network, any news program, any entertainment program by its advertisers. Tells you right away what the execs think of this demographic.

Blacks may very well be in a tiny minority here in Canada, but here in the Lower Mainland of Vancouver, I see more and more blacks then ever on the streets of the Lower Mainland than ever before. It looks to me like those in control of our present day multicultural immigration policy for Canada are planning on increasing their numbers by more non-white immigration. I believe that it is safe to say that old whitey will have to accept and live with the fact that their majority numbers are in peril. Just saying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2022 at 3:22 PM, reason10 said:

You are so stupid. Black people DID SELL THEIR PEOPLE INTO SLAVERY. You have shit for brains if you deny that, especially after all the reliable links I provide.

White slave traders DID NOT run into the jungle to capture (in the words of historical novelist Frank Yerby) their black ivory.

And the ORIGINAL slave trade pre-dates the United States. The ORIGINAL slave trade was perpetrated by Muslim countries.

You are a liar and an ignoramus. You don't know ANYTHING.

Typical low information blue stater.

So true. It was the black Africans in Africa that kidnapped and sold their own black African brethren to the rest of the world. Charlie Kirk would know that this was a fact of life. But Rebounder being a white guilt ridden lefty liberal, who appears to constantly live on emotion rather than common sense and logic. He believes any and all liberal lies told to him. 

Sad person indeed. Aw well. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, taxme said:

My white homeland is slowly and slyly being removed and replaced by a non-white invasion in this country which has been going on for decades. This is fact, and not fiction. As you said, capitalists and communists could care less about a countries culture and traditions and freedoms. It's always and only just about the money.

Again, why do you need to have more blacks in commercials anyway? If blacks do not see themselves more involved with TV commercials are they then going to stop buying products and food from those capitalists? This has more to do with trying to push old whitey aside and out of the picture and nothing more. 

Just standing up and fighting for old whitey while I still can. No racism intended. Just common sense and logic. Just my personal opinion of course. ? 

The country you live in is not a “white homeland.” Why do you need a white homeland, anyhow? 

Edited by Rebound
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, taxme said:

So true. It was the black Africans in Africa that kidnapped and sold their own black African brethren to the rest of the world. Charlie Kirk would know that this was a fact of life. But Rebounder being a white guilt ridden lefty liberal, who appears to constantly live on emotion rather than common sense and logic. He believes any and all liberal lies told to him. 

Sad person indeed. Aw well. ?

So if you knowingly buy stolen goods, you are off the hook because you didn't steal them and the fact the thief wouldn't have any customers if people like you didn't buy them is of no consequence. You are a sad person. Very sad.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, taxme said:

My white homeland is slowly and slyly being removed and replaced by a non-white invasion in this country which has been going on for decades. This is fact, and not fiction. As you said, capitalists and communists could care less about a countries culture and traditions and freedoms. It's always and only just about the money.

Again, why do you need to have more blacks in commercials anyway? If blacks do not see themselves more involved with TV commercials are they then going to stop buying products and food from those capitalists? This has more to do with trying to push old whitey aside and out of the picture and nothing more. 

Just standing up and fighting for old whitey while I still can. No racism intended. Just common sense and logic. Just my personal opinion of course. ? 

So a third generation Asian Canadian has no homeland. FN would say you better get your ass back to Europe whitey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,721
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    paradox34
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • SkyHigh earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Proficient
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • gatomontes99 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...