Rebound Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, OftenWrong said: Prove it. I gave a link to the elementary teachers federation of ON. First, the link you provided is not curriculum at all. Second, the link you provided is not a description of Critical Race Theory, which is complex, graduate level curriculum. Edited November 17, 2022 by Rebound Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: I am changing my mind to say CRT concepts are used, at least in the formulation of lessons. But this term "Whiteness" as ambiguous and unfortunate as it is... seems to be used in framing the topic for the educators only. Whether the subject matter is problematic is a separate question. Of course there's a great desire to simplify these things by all kinds of people. I'd like to resist talking like a spokesman and deal with the heart of the matter. Terms used... white fragility.. white privilege.. microaggressions, etc etc.. All basically to make white people feel guilty that they are successful so that politicians can ram through detrimental policy they personally benefit from. In my area they decided to ram a homeless shelter in an attempt to sweep the homeless out of down town. Why? They want to build a hockey arena. If you have issues with addicts shooting up at your daughter's school than YOU are a racist.. basically the message given by the looney mayor of saskatoon Edited November 17, 2022 by West 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 1 minute ago, West said: The problem with the Democrats is they don't hold their crazies to account. Chuck Schumer is still a prominent Democrat and senate speaker i believe yet he can be out threatening Supreme Court justice for decisions he doesn't like. Then they wonder why Republican politicians get shot by crazy nut bags and major US cities get burned to the ground. Explain how Senator Schumer “threatened” a SCOTUS Justice. Definition of Threat: “A statement of an intention to inflict pain, injury, damage, or other hostile action on someone in retribution for something done or not done.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 1 minute ago, West said: Terms used... white fragility.. white privilege.. microaggressions, etc etc.. All basically to make white people feel guilty that they are successful so that politicians can ram through detrimental policy they personally benefit from. In my area they decided to ram a homeless shelter in an attempt to sweep the homeless out of down town. Why? They want to build a hockey arena. If you have issues with addicts shooting up at your daughter's school than YOU are a racist.. Are all homeless people heroin addicts? Are all homeless people black? Are there other reasons for building homeless shelters besides moving people away from hockey arenas? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 1 minute ago, Rebound said: Explain how Senator Schumer “threatened” a SCOTUS Justice. Definition of Threat: “A statement of an intention to inflict pain, injury, damage, or other hostile action on someone in retribution for something done or not done.” His comments while vague were certainly more than Donnies comments that supposedly led to an "insurrection" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 2 minutes ago, Rebound said: Are all homeless people heroin addicts? Are all homeless people black? Are there other reasons for building homeless shelters besides moving people away from hockey arenas? Certainly enough of them to raise concerns about community safety.. And no not everyone is a brownie tho any criticism is automatically "racist". Doesn't make sense I know 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 2 minutes ago, West said: Certainly enough of them to raise concerns about community safety.. And no not everyone is a brownie tho any criticism is automatically "racist". Doesn't make sense I know A “brownie”? You are the problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 5 minutes ago, West said: His comments while vague were certainly more than Donnies comments that supposedly led to an "insurrection" But you cannot find a single quote of Schumer’s? Cause I can find you quotes of Trump telling police officers to bang suspects’ heads into police cars, and telling security guards to beat the hell out of protesters at his rally’s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OftenWrong Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 12 minutes ago, Rebound said: First, the link you provided is not curriculum at all. Second, the link you provided is not a description of Critical Race Theory, which is complex, graduate level curriculum. The link proves it is in the elementary curriculum in Ontario, which is what I wanted to show. The link invites members to request material for download by email. That should be straightforward, no need to dismiss it. You did not explain in which graduate level program CRT is being taught. You don't need to answer if you don't want to. We know. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 “I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” ---Schumer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 6 minutes ago, OftenWrong said: The link proves it is in the elementary curriculum in Ontario, which is what I wanted to show. The link invites members to request material for download by email. That should be straightforward, no need to dismiss it. You did not explain in which graduate level program CRT is being taught. You don't need to answer if you don't want to. We know. You are obviously too stupid to know what curriculum is, if you think that document is curriculum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 21 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said: “I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” ---Schumer And Schumer retracted the comment the very next day, stating: ”The [comment] didn't come out the way I intended to," the senator said in 2020. "My point was that there would be political consequences—political consequences—for President Trump and Senate Republicans if the Supreme Court, with the newly confirmed justices, stripped away a woman's right to choose." "Of course, I didn't intend to suggest anything other than political and public opinion consequences for the Supreme Court, and it is a gross distortion to imply otherwise," he added. https://www.newsweek.com/chuck-schumer-brett-kavanaugh-roe-v-wade-pay-price-comment-1713964?amp=1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 3 minutes ago, Rebound said: And Schumer retracted the comment the very next day, stating: ”The [comment] didn't come out the way I intended to," the senator said in 2020. "My point was that there would be political consequences—political consequences—for President Trump and Senate Republicans if the Supreme Court, with the newly confirmed justices, stripped away a woman's right to choose." "Of course, I didn't intend to suggest anything other than political and public opinion consequences for the Supreme Court, and it is a gross distortion to imply otherwise," he added. https://www.newsweek.com/chuck-schumer-brett-kavanaugh-roe-v-wade-pay-price-comment-1713964?amp=1 He said it in front of an angry mob gathered at the SC. Damage done. He can retract it in the same fashion as Alec Baldwin can retract a bullet in flight. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 53 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said: He said it in front of an angry mob gathered at the SC. Damage done. He can retract it in the same fashion as Alec Baldwin can retract a bullet in flight. Did Trump retract anything he said on Jan 6? Did he retract when he told cops to bash suspects heads in? Did he retract when he told Proud Boys to stand by? Did he retract when he told people to beat protesters? No, No, No, and No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 On 11/16/2022 at 7:16 AM, West said: Just listen to CNN and MSNBC with their rage.. then you'll know what it is Like you listen to CNN and MSNBC. LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luz P. Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 So here we go again, a campaign full of bullshit promises to get the gullible to vote for him. Added bonus: We can expect a lot of name-calling and nicknames, he already started calling the GOP’s golden boy “DeSanctimonious”… a circus worth watching if a lower level of debate is your thing. Ugh! Trump Promises.mp4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 9 minutes ago, Luz P. said: So here we go again, a campaign full of bullshit promises to get the gullible to vote for him. Added bonus: We can expect a lot of name-calling and nicknames, he already started calling the GOP’s golden boy “DeSanctimonious”… a circus worth watching if a lower level of debate is your thing. Ugh! Trump Promises.mp4 Someday, this war is going to end. Republicans can not fight amongst themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 24 minutes ago, Rebound said: Did Trump retract anything he said on Jan 6? Did he retract when he told cops to bash suspects heads in? Did he retract when he told Proud Boys to stand by? Did he retract when he told people to beat protesters? No, No, No, and No. Oh my...you're upset. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrakHoBarbie Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 21 hours ago, West said: I would submit to you that 1. There seems to be this manipulation of statistics to support something that simply isn't true Surely you can support this moronic contention with a viable citation? But i suspect this is nothing more than parroted alt-right nonsense. 21 hours ago, West said: 2. Even if it is true that black people are more susceptible to run ins with the police, there is also an attitude of disrespect that likely leads to more serious encounters. Oh... So your implying that black people are "asking for it" because they are disrespectful....... Police are public servants... Their training is, allegedly, supposed to of conditioned them against allowing verbal taunts to sway their actions. So, if a public servant allows verbal taunts to cause them to retaliate against the very people they are hired to protect, that's a big problem. Anyone who is not ethically and morally deficit should understand that. Yet, somehow, you do not. 21 hours ago, West said: Cops go after criminals regardless of skin colour.. suggesting otherwise perpetuates the problem A truly disconnected and moronic statement. Widespread police brutality perpetuates more widespread police brutality. Conscientious adults know this. You, apparently, do not. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 2 hours ago, Rebound said: But you cannot find a single quote of Schumer’s? Cause I can find you quotes of Trump telling police officers to bang suspects’ heads into police cars, and telling security guards to beat the hell out of protesters at his rally’s. He said he'd release a whirlwind while standing outside the Supreme Court. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 14 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Surely you can support this moronic contention with a viable citation? But i suspect this is nothing more than parroted alt-right nonsense. Oh... So your implying that black people are "asking for it" because they are disrespectful....... Police are public servants... Their training is, allegedly, supposed to of conditioned them against allowing verbal taunts to sway their actions. So, if a public servant allows verbal taunts to cause them to retaliate against the very people they are hired to protect, that's a big problem. Anyone who is not ethically and morally deficit should understand that. Yet, somehow, you do not. A truly disconnected and moronic statement. Widespread police brutality perpetuates more widespread police brutality. Conscientious adults know this. You, apparently, do not. You are moronic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 44 minutes ago, Aristides said: Like you listen to CNN and MSNBC. LOL I used to be a hard leftist until I realized they are crazy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 1 hour ago, Rebound said: And Schumer retracted the comment the very next day, stating: ”The [comment] didn't come out the way I intended to," the senator said in 2020. "My point was that there would be political consequences—political consequences—for President Trump and Senate Republicans if the Supreme Court, with the newly confirmed justices, stripped away a woman's right to choose." "Of course, I didn't intend to suggest anything other than political and public opinion consequences for the Supreme Court, and it is a gross distortion to imply otherwise," he added. https://www.newsweek.com/chuck-schumer-brett-kavanaugh-roe-v-wade-pay-price-comment-1713964?amp=1 He threatened Supreme Court justices leading to continuous harassment by democrats outside their homes. Sad 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 On 11/16/2022 at 5:58 AM, Rebound said: LIAR. CRT is not taught in elementary schools because it is graduate school material. Not even college. And you don’t even know what it is. 🤣 It's not "graduate school material", it's drivel. If you're pro-BLM and against the nuclear family for whatever reason then it's like gospel truth to you, aside from that no one has the time for such a farce. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted November 17, 2022 Report Share Posted November 17, 2022 Just now, West said: He threatened Supreme Court justices leading to continuous harassment by democrats outside their homes. Sad And at least one person who travelled across the country to kill a SCJ. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.