Jump to content

85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

And you dig up shit.

I dug up the truth about Ivermectin in less than 2 minutes.

I dug up actual medical studies and data.

You - Mr. Accountability - what have you dug up?

Nothing, because you don't really believe in accountability.  The government hands you a slice of 💩pie and you ask for seconds.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Let's see what you found.

I haven't found anything useful that relates to COVID. Neither has a single member of my medical team.

I have the same GP I've been with for over 40 years, plus a cardiologist and a urologist.  I also have two medical examiner's who I report to on a scheduled basis as per the certification process I go through for my occupation.

Like I said, I have no trouble at all understanding the reviews written by people with a lot more knowledge about these things than me, or you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, eyeball said:

That no one but kooks use Ivermectin for COVID.

Let's see what you found. 

Because I suspect you're about 4 years and a lot of misinformation behind in that regard, due to your inability to assimilate information and proclivity to believe everything the gov't says.

There are now over 80 studies that show IVM is efficacious against covid, from 82-95%.  And I posted many of them years ago.

I also recently posted how the Frontline Doctors group sued the CDC and FDA over IVM and....won.  The FDA and CDC had to remove all their posts and pages on their website demonizing it.

I've also explained why it was demonized - if there was a treatment for covid, then Pharma could not have gotten the Emergency Use Authorization for the jabs and wouldn't have made $billions.

It's also on the list of important medications that every country should have....for humans.  It's like Tylenol for safety.

Millions of Africans take it weekly.

Chris Cuomo just came out talking about his vaccine injury and how he is now prescribed and taking.....ivermectin.

Do you deny all this?

 

 

 

Just now, eyeball said:

I haven't found anything useful that relates to COVID.

How odd.

There's over 80 studies showing it is 82-95% effective against covid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I have the same GP I've been with for over 40 years, plus a cardiologist and a urologist.  I also have two medical examiner's who I report to on a scheduled basis as per the certification process I go through for my occupation.

If these people are telling you only "kooks" use ivermectin, you're being lied to.  I dont' care how many letters they have after their name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

I've also explained why it was demonized - if there was a treatment for covid, then Pharma could not have gotten the Emergency Use Authorization for the jabs and wouldn't have made $billions.

Now you just have to prove the allegations you made but as I pointed out you can't.  No one can without cameras microphones and human witnesses to public officials and MSM/corporate officials coordinating and orchestrating things as per your explanations.

If you had these so would the W5’s and 60 Minutes' of the world, it would be all over the media, public officials would be swinging from lampposts and there would be blood in the streets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

Now you just have to prove the allegations you made but as I pointed out you can't.

Ah yes, I forgot about this thing with you - you believe that bad people tell you when and why they are doing bad things.

When my kids were little and I saw cookie crumbs and chocolate chips melted all over their faces and shirts, and I asked them "Were you eating cookies?" and they said "Nooooooo."  I knew they were  lying.

Some things are just obvious.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Goddess said:

If these people are telling you only "kooks" use ivermectin, you're being lied to.  I dont' care how many letters they have after their name.

Then they're being lied to as well. So are all their peers and institutions and associations that represent them.

The scope and scale of the lying you're talking about would have to involve thousands of people.

It defies logic and reason not to mention simple human decency. It's clear to me your bullshit filter is hopelessly clogged up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Some things are just obvious.

Except the vast VAST conspiracy you're never able to show.

You mentioned a couple of psyop dudes once but... seriously? That's all you got?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

9 minutes ago, eyeball said:

The scope and scale of the lying you're talking about would have to involve thousands of people.

You keep saying you need thousands to be "in on it."

But you really don't need thousands.

You only need a few.

And a bunch of useful id io ts.

Like yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Millions of Africans take it weekly.

For parasites, at about one percent of the dose needed to see any of the affects reported for SARS-CO2.

AFAIK there isn't a single national academy of medicine anywhere on the planet prescribing it for COVID.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You keep saying you need thousands to be "in on it."

But you really don't need thousands.

You only need a few.

How few exactly? You should know their names by now you've been taking about them for so long.

And on that note, if they're as skilful and competent enough to have pulled all this off with just a handful of people don't you think we should invite them to run the planet instead of the millions of public officials around the planet who can't even make buses run on time?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Goddess said:

Canada Unity Memorandum of Understanding (Freedom Convoy 2022) : Canada Unity : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

That MOU, as I explained to you 2 years ago - was from a group that tried to attach themselves to the Convoy, called "Canada Unity" and it's leader was James Bauder, not Tamara Lich.  As you can see from the above link.  None of the authors of that MOU were with the Freedom Convoy.

You gobbled up misinfo from CBC.

I didn't get the information from the CBC, just a bad brain.  Mea Culpa, I stand corrected.  But honestly, the protests were loosely organized so maybe it was all random dudes.  I can only remember the two main folks who were on trial.

Somebody had some document that said the governor general was supposed to take over the government. But why are we even talking about this again? I thought this was about claims I made about them all being Nazis and me not sympathizing. Can you at least acknowledge that you were wrong about me there? I've already admitted I was wrong just now. 

What's the point of this? Are we just going to tit for tat talk about who is wrong about this or that? I don't see the point. 

All I wanted to say is I never hated the Convoy people. That's it.

Edited by Michael Hardner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Goddess said:

Frankly, I'm not even seeing "overthrow the government" anywhere in there.  

I see a lot of "end the mandates."

They form a new committee to govern.  It's nonsense.

 

Also.. here's the Western Standard calling MOU author a convoy organizer.  So maybe I was only slightly confused.

https://www.westernstandard.news/news/convoy-organizer-james-bauder-loses-bid-to-move-trial-out-of-ottawa/article_f157ffa2-abab-11ed-9b8b-6379ffb5af78.html

 

 

Edited by Michael Hardner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Yes.  I do some of their names.  They're testifying right now at the Subcommittee for lying.

How few did it take to bamboozle the entire planet. Less than 20 liars or was it even less than 10?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Goddess said:

But you really don't need thousands.

You only need a few.

And a bunch of useful id io ts.

Although wildly off topic (and admittedly not comparable in substance), I found the "Hunter Biden laptop "Russian disinformation" saga analogous for three reasons: first it shows what can be accomplished when the media and national security forces (in this case intelligence) are aligned with, and weaponized by, a motivated government. Secondly, it serves as an example of how long it takes to sort through the trail of deception (usually two years or more). And thirdly, by the time the trail is uncovered and documented voters (mostly) don't remember and/or don't care anymore... 

The people doing this aren't dummies, they carefully analyze the cost / benefit ratio before any action is taken and plausible deniability (at all levels) is anticipated in advance.

It's done in "bite size chunks" and each chunk (on its own) doesn't initially appear to be part of the same zebra that's being systematically devoured by a pride of ravenous lions. You have to reassemble the pieces... it takes time, effort, a box of rubber gloves and nose plugs to accomplish.

All of that simply to say, that like some of the more liberal posters here, I was intrigued by the motivations of the 50 (or so) analysts who cosigned the document asserting that the laptop (and information contained) was "clearly" a Russian disinformation effort intended to effect the election outcome. I questioned how and why it could possibly be.

But suspecting that it was the exact opposite of what was on offer, I went looking for the names and bios of the analysts, their likely motivations for making the assertion, and the markers/evidence that lead them to do so.

It was another example of "thirsty work" and limited search skills on my part. I got nowhere with it and abandoned the chase after a bit but it does show how easily it was deployed, how effectively it was communicated and how fleeting voter interest in the deception was. It seems to me that it serves as the perfect example of a well thought out cost/benefit analysis and I can only say "well done."

When considering the ease of deployment vs the difficulty of disproving/overcoming it, the NS wolf hoax (accidental deployment by reservists) is instructive... and IMO, cute and funny. But that's just me. 

Done purely by accident, it was harder to undo and more embarrassing than you would think if viewed as a hypothetical before the fact. Bogus stationary and recorded wolf howls (on a loudspeaker) had greater deployment efficacy than anyone could have reasonably anticipated in advance.

That said the effects were certainly limited in both scope and duration but if carefully fed and left to fester, it would have been fun to see how long its legs could have grown. In this case it's noteworthy that that the provincial government shut down all rumours immediately and the media was in lockstep with them. 

In short, deployment efficacy requires all members of the trinity (government, media and security forces) to be onside. Taking one of those entities out of the equation results in the total collapse of the 3 legged stool that the deception sits on.  

  

 

 

Edited by Venandi
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Venandi said:

Although wildly off topic (and admittedly not comparable in substance),

It's certainly comparable in its lunacy.

3 hours ago, Venandi said:

...when the media and national security forces (in this case intelligence) are aligned with, and weaponized by, a motivated government.

So what about the scope of the lunacy, how many/few people did it take amongst the three institutions you've mentioned here?

Edited by eyeball
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, eyeball said:

For parasites, at about one percent of the dose needed to see any of the affects reported for SARS-CO2.

I'll say this one more time because I see you have not been able to comprehend any information from the last 4 years.

Doctors often prescribe medications for "off-label" use, you dingleberry.

For instance, birth control pills are often prescribed for things like acute acne.

Look it up.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Venandi said:

first it shows what can be accomplished when the media and national security forces (in this case intelligence) are aligned with, and weaponized by, a motivated government.

And everyone's motives for going along with the insanity are different - power, money, just not giving a sh!t.....

Eyeball has been bringing the exact same arguments to the table for years.  He truly believes that bad guys TELL YOU when and why they're being bad.  

He doesn't believe you should infer ANY motives when they're caught lying and obfuscating.  He's not in tune with reality at all - I mean, in the justice system, a prosecutor often has to infer motive, it's a major part of trying someone for crimes.

He says all his doctors are telling him Ivermectin is nothing but horse-dewormer and has no use in humans.  I'm not sure if HE'S lying about what he's being told or his doctors are lying or just plain incompetent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Venandi said:

The people doing this aren't dummies, they carefully analyze the cost / benefit ratio before any action is taken and plausible deniability (at all levels) is anticipated in advance.

It's done in "bite size chunks" and each chunk (on its own) doesn't initially appear to be part of the same zebra that's being systematically devoured by a pride of ravenous lions. You have to reassemble the pieces... it takes time, effort, a box of rubber gloves and nose plugs to accomplish.

I was just commenting on this in another thread. Hooters in general, but even more so democratic supporters, have come to a point where they only have an attention span of about 5 minutes. Anything said yesterday is discounted, and so it is entirely feasible to have contradictory positions.

If dems say something is wonderful today and terrible tomorrow Then their supporters will cheer for it today and tomorrow they will cry to the heavens about how terrible it is.

So all you need to do is basically every day get out there and tell them what you want them to think today. Doesn't matter what they thought yesterday. You can spend seven years demanding that Russian collusion is a thing despite all the evidence proving clearly it isn't and they will still believe it if If the democrats today say it's a thing.

 

As you say, until people learn to actually think Beyond the last 5 minutes and develop a coherent and consistent moral code that gets applied in all circumstances, it is the easiest thing in the world to lead them around by the nose. And the democrats have mastered that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, eyeball said:

That no one but kooks use Ivermectin for COVID.

And what kind of "person" advocates for the gov't to use coercion to get young, healthy people to take the jab? 

Far worse than a kook, I'd say. 

I put those kinds of people on par with Clifford Olson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

And what kind of "person" advocates for the gov't to use coercion to get young, healthy people to take the jab? 

Eyeball does.

It doesn't matter to him how many young people die, lose their health for life or lose careers.  As long as it gives him that 0.000002% more chance of feeling safer - it's all worth it to him.

Sort of betrays his actual trust in his miracle injections though.

How much efficacy do they really have if you get 7 of them and still don't feel safe enough to stop demanding children and young adults sacrifice everything for you?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, eyeball said:

How few did it take to bamboozle the entire planet. Less than 20 liars or was it even less than 10?

You're talking about people being bamboozled now? 🤣

That's pretty rich coming from a little snake-oil addict like yourself.

  1. Do you still believe that the bat-pangolin human origin is the only real possibility, and that people should be banned from social media for saying "Wuhan BSL4 lab"?
  2. Do you still believe that the jabs were safe?
  3. Do you still believe that you don't have to worry about covid if you're jabbed?
  4. Do you still believe that you don't have to worry about giving covid to granny if you're jabbed?
  5. Guess how many young people were killed by ivermectin, dummy...
  6. Guess how many young people got myocarditis from ivermectin...

To this day you've still never confessed to which level of vax-propaganda/drivel you're stuck at... 

Even if ivermectin is completely useless against covid, at least our gov't didn't waste billions of dollars on it, just to injure/kill people who didn't need it, right dummy? 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,752
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Dorai
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Venandi earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • CrazyCanuck89 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • DUI_Offender went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...