Jump to content

Is God ok with lesbians?


TreeBeard

Recommended Posts

On 11/10/2022 at 2:22 PM, French Patriot said:

To ask a sexless God to rule on sexual matters that it can never experience makes it the worse judge to ask about sex, gender and reproduction.

So He's a really old man that can only get His kicks from watching others do the dirty... heh heh that explains it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2022 at 8:47 PM, herbie said:

So He's a really old man that can only get His kicks from watching others do the dirty... heh heh that explains it.

Laws on Earth are to match those in heaven. 

Yahweh's first example of his law was to choose to have Jesus step up to pay for what Yahweh did, create sin, even before the fool created us or the ability to sin.

That God is really stupid and to have him guide us in anything would be as stupid a thing as I can think of.

Moral people will agree.

Regards

DL

 

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On 8/30/2022 at 2:33 PM, TreeBeard said:

We all know the anti-gay passages in the bible used to justify things like opposition to gay marriage.  
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus 20&version=KJV

The most popular being Leviticus 20:13.  
These passages describe male homosexuality.  
 

Where are the passages condemning lesbianism?  
 

From a biblical perspective, it seems lesbians are alright, but not gay men.  Why do you think that is?  

God is not a "respector of persons". If it's wrong for a man to do it, it's wrong for a woman to do it too. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/29/2022 at 11:14 AM, French Patriot said:

Laws on Earth are to match those in heaven. 

Yahweh's first example of his law was to choose to have Jesus step up to pay for what Yahweh did, create sin, even before the fool created us or the ability to sin.

That God is really stupid and to have him guide us in anything would be as stupid a thing as I can think of.

Moral people will agree.

Regards

DL

 

You and morality fight each other at every turn. 

Best, 

Deluge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, French Patriot said:

While you just accept and end in calling evil good.

I fight to know the best. You run away and never know.

That is why you are a moral coward.

Regards

DL

You place God beneath you. 

You have no standing in scriptural discussions. 

Best, 

Deluge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2022 at 4:33 PM, TreeBeard said:

We all know the anti-gay passages in the bible used to justify things like opposition to gay marriage.  
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus 20&version=KJV

The most popular being Leviticus 20:13.  
These passages describe male homosexuality.  
 

Where are the passages condemning lesbianism?  
 

From a biblical perspective, it seems lesbians are alright, but not gay men.  Why do you think that is?  

I also noticed the death penalty for adultery, incest, and having sex with a statute (Molech). Apparently a man having sex with a woman on her period only rated being cut off from his people.

Nothing about a woman doing it to a woman in Leviticus.

The closest I've seen the Bible come to condemning that would be Romans 1, 26-27.  Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural one.

It's a stretch, but two women going at it IS an unnatural act.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

How is it “unnatural”?   I think you and I will have very different definitions of the word “natural”. 

Only in a world with no standards. I guess it's "NATURAL" to have sex with animals, huh? (Since we're ALL supposed to be mammals anyway.) I guess it's okay to have sex with children, huh?

Male on female sex is natural. It has existed throughout the history of the Earth and is one of the main reasons the human race has not gone extinct. Anything else is unnatural.

It's okay to call it that. Doesn't mean I'm going to turn Muslim and start tossing queers off tall buildings. It's just a term. And consenting adults are free to do whatever they want to likewise consenting legal adults. I have no problem with that happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, reason10 said:

I guess it's "NATURAL" to have sex with animals, huh?

I would not call it un-natural as that would make people able to do the un-natural or supernatural, which you have yet to describe.

Having said that;  I too am against extra species sex.

You forget though that Yahweh himself, dirty evil God, did what we both hate when he cuckolded Joseph, a human, with himself, of the God species.

Why do you hate what your God does?

Regards

DL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, French Patriot said:

I would not call it un-natural as that would make people able to do the un-natural or supernatural, which you have yet to describe.

Having said that;  I too am against extra species sex.

You forget though that Yahweh himself, dirty evil God, did what we both hate when he cuckolded Joseph, a human, with himself, of the God species.

Why do you hate what your God does?

Regards

DL

Where in the Bible does it say that Joseph was cuckolded? Where is the evidence that someone other than him had sex with his wife? She was supposedly a virgin when she gave the world Jesus Christ.

Why do you hate the truth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, reason10 said:

Where in the Bible does it say that Joseph was cuckolded? Where is the evidence that someone other than him had sex with his wife? She was supposedly a virgin when she gave the world Jesus Christ.

Why do you hate the truth?

Having a baby is indicative of sexual union, stupid.

How else does one get pregnant?

Regards

DL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, French Patriot said:

Having a baby is indicative of sexual union, stupid.

How else does one get pregnant?

Regards

DL

I take it you never read the Bible. Jesus Christ, the SON OF GOD, was the product of immaculate conception. His mother was considered the VIRGIN Mary.

Last time I checked, virgins have not had sex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, reason10 said:

I take it you never read the Bible. Jesus Christ, the SON OF GOD, was the product of immaculate conception. His mother was considered the VIRGIN Mary.

Last time I checked, virgins have not had sex.

Check your facts, your half breed chimera God could not come out of a virgin.

If you are to believe B S and talk of things of fantasy, like pregnancy without sex or like talking serpents and donkeys, go away.

If you want to talk adult, I am here for you.

Regards

DL

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, French Patriot said:

Check your facts, your half breed chimera God could not come out of a virgin.

If you are to believe B S and talk of things of fantasy, like pregnancy without sex or like talking serpents and donkeys, go away.

If you want to talk adult, I am here for you.

Regards

DL

 

You are a child, with less than a child's brain. If you want to refer to the entire concept of Christianity as  BS and fantasy, such religious bigotry is no surprise. But in terms of the birth of the SON OF GOD, the Bible refers to it as a VIRGIN BIRTH. Maybe the SON OF GOD magically materialized on the night of his immaculate conception. The BIBLE does not give any details that would suggest the VIRGIN MARY was pregnant.

It's okay if you do not want to believe the  Bible, or the Torah, or the Koran. There's room in the world for those who are not religious. Nobody has ever said the Bible is a science book. It (and the ENTIRE concept of religion) is based on pretty much the same concept as the Climate Change nuts rely: FAITH.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_birth_of_Jesus#:~:text=The virgin birth of Jesus is the Christian,it rests on very slender historical foundations.
The virgin birth of Jesus is the Christian doctrine that Jesus was conceived by his mother, Mary, through the power of the Holy Spirit and without sexual intercourse.[1] The narrative appears only in Matthew 1:18–25 and Luke 1:26–38,[2] and the modern scholarly consensus is that it rests on very slender historical foundations.[3

AGAIN, boys and girls, nobody is suggesting this is science. The Bible had over 70 different authors and was written in a language that largely is no longer used today, (Aramaic) This is ALL based solely on faith.

If some children want to turn the miraculous virgin birth of Jesus Christ into pornography, it only proves there are some real sick fux in the world, most of them on the left.

Edited by reason10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/4/2023 at 2:29 PM, reason10 said:

It's okay if you do not want to believe the  Bible, or the Torah, or the Koran. There's room in the world for those who are not religious

 

Believe the bible is speaking a truth when saying that serpents and donkeys can talk human?

No. I am not that brain dead.

What does belief in the supernatural have to do with religions, other than saying that the weirder ones do?

Many religions are more intelligent and put man above the Gods we create.

The world is ours. I does not belong to a genocidal, homophobic and misogynous demiurge. 

I certainly hope your last is true as the non-religious are showing better stats on morality, law abidance and peaceful living.

Moral people are switching and the trend is unstoppable.

Regards

DL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 3/15/2023 at 1:13 PM, herbie said:

Some people actually expect serious answers to incredibly stupid questions.

Trying to justify incredibly immoral notions against LGBTQ+ and women, to control human sexuality, --- by putting decision-making to a sexless God, --- is what is incredibly stupid.  

All intelligent and moral people will agree.

I wonder why Christians put faith above good moral thinking.

Regards

DL

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...