robosmith Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 On 9/25/2022 at 4:07 AM, Nationalist said: ROFLMAO! The USA...and Canada more and more these days...has a two-tiered justice system. If you're a Libbie...you can finance a lie and attack a sitting president with it. If you are NOT a Libbie...you should sleep fully clothed because the FBI will come to your home, in force, armed to the teeth, with CNN in tow, to drag you out of bed and haul you away. THAT'S how the justice system works today. And considering this, I think watching the Republicans take control of government and proceeding to roast all of these warped fcks... Will be a breath of fresh air. Enjoy the mid-terms. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed with a simple YOU'RE WRONG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 On 9/25/2022 at 5:49 AM, Nationalist said: I think you should try living in reality...instead of a comic book. YOU should pay more attention to Republican state legislatures in the US, cause you are MISSING a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 On 9/25/2022 at 5:56 AM, ExFlyer said: The only reason Trump is not a "criminal" is that he has enough money to constantly appeal and when he runs out of appeals he either throws someone else under the bus or pays out or declares bankruptcy or some other weasel way out. Every court action he has initiated (since being president) has been thrown out, dismissed or proven wrong. There is ALSO the OLC memo which prohibits the indictment of POTUS while in office, and Barr adopted that AS POLICY. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 On 9/25/2022 at 11:13 AM, WestCanMan said: Who gives a shit if Trump didn't jump through all their hoops? Russian collusion was just a witch hunt from day 1 and Trump knew it. He also had a country to run. The FBI committed enough crimes that are far more serious than "obstruction" to try and get something on Trump and they failed. Hillary destroyed evidence that was subpoenaed and you don't care. What do you care about some weak claims of "obstruction"? IE, the guy who told the truth about Jan 6th... Obstruction is a made-up charge which basically amounts to how the FBI feels about the level of effort he put into bending over backwards for him. They're known criminals ffs. Who cares how they feel? It's not even half the crime that destruction of evidence is (Hilary Clinton) or tampering with evidence and then providing it to a judge (the FBI "collusion dream team") in order to get warrants to spy on the sitting president. Your arbitrary dismissal of evidence against Trump just shows the depth of your irrational belief system. AKA, allegiance to your CULT leader. Trump is a conman and you've been conned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: LOL...you Tweenkies...so disingenuous. No wonder nobody but your own brain-dead Libbies, believe anything you say anymore. You KNOW you have lost the argument when ALL YOU HAVE is name calling. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 3 hours ago, Nationalist said: Of course he's a politician. He's worked in politics for decades. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=Politician&stick=H4sIAAAAAAAAAONgFuLUz9U3MC2ySLJQ4gAx07Is07RkspOt9AtS8wtyUoFUUXF-nlVBUX5aanFxZn7eL0aF8IzEEoXMYoWg_PTUIoXikvy81GKF_OTk0oLEEqAK-0WsXAH5OZklmcmZiXm32CQZTD-2Mt3rKq6NFMrpduzk3bUtK7lVLKtaFQAAgTDKgQAAAA&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj3l422xLf6AhXSq4kEHfodCooQs9oBKAB6BAgCEAI&biw=1536&bih=731&dpr=1.25 He is a POLITICAL ADVISER. I guess Canadians don't understand the difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExFlyer Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 19 minutes ago, robosmith said: There is ALSO the OLC memo which prohibits the indictment of POTUS while in office, and Barr adopted that AS POLICY. He is no longer president. Moot point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 24 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: He is no longer president. Moot point. Garland has bigger fish to fry and most of the witnesses to Trump's obstruction of the Mueller investigation were pardoned so no incentive to flip. In reality, Jan 6th insurrection and fake electors makes Mueller investigation obstruction pale in comparison. Trump is the criminal who just keeps giving LEO and attorneys full employment. MAGA = Make Attorneys Get Attorneys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExFlyer Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 46 minutes ago, robosmith said: Garland has bigger fish to fry and most of the witnesses to Trump's obstruction of the Mueller investigation were pardoned so no incentive to flip. In reality, Jan 6th insurrection and fake electors makes Mueller investigation obstruction pale in comparison. Trump is the criminal who just keeps giving LEO and attorneys full employment. MAGA = Make Attorneys Get Attorneys. Again, "He is no longer president. Moot point. ". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 5 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Again, "He is no longer president. Moot point. ". Again, he is a candidate for 2024 and MAY win, so NOT moot. There is also precedent. If his crimes go unpunished, they will more likely be repeated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 1 hour ago, robosmith said: That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed with a simple YOU'RE WRONG. Cool. YOU'RE WRONG. Well now...I've earned my beer for the day. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 1 hour ago, robosmith said: YOU should pay more attention to Republican state legislatures in the US, cause you are MISSING a lot. Perhaps. But I got my eyes on the mid-terms for Congress right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 1 hour ago, robosmith said: He is a POLITICAL ADVISER. I guess Canadians don't understand the difference. Boy I'm sure glad education is such a high concern down there now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExFlyer Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 8 minutes ago, robosmith said: Again, he is a candidate for 2024 and MAY win, so NOT moot. There is also precedent. If his crimes go unpunished, they will more likely be repeated. He is not the president so he can be criminally charged. The republicans have not selected a candidate yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Minor violations by individuals ONLY TAR the entire organization in your FANTASY. Question is, what is the source of the IRRATIONAL AXE you keep grinding here? Minor violations? Do you understand that Kevin Clinesmith altered an email and presented it to a FISA court judge in order to get warrants to keep the FBI's spying ring open? If Clinesmith hadn't altered that email, there wouldn't have been any spying on Carter Page because he was a known CIA asset. The fake collusion show trial would have ended months in advance. That's not a minor violation, it was a felony ffs. When the FBI claimed that the laptop was Russian disinformation they knew that they were lying to the American public in order to influence and election. That's not conjecture, or innuendo, or lies, it's a simple fact. The FBI knew that everything that was said about Hunter's laptop was true because they had it for a year. The FBI lied. It's a common theme now. That's the thing about integrity - you have it until you lose it, and you don't get it back (Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me). It wasn't just Clinesmith in on this, the FBI is rife with bad political actors. It's KGB west. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 18 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Perhaps. But I got my eyes on the mid-terms for Congress right now. The midterms could be rigged by what's happened in the Republican controlled state legislatures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 14 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: He is not the president so he can be criminally charged. The republicans have not selected a candidate yet. The POLS have not selected, but the R voters clearly want Trump. That's why FEW are challenging him. May change IF he is indicted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 7 minutes ago, robosmith said: The midterms could be rigged by what's happened in the Republican controlled state legislatures. LOL...you set the rules...welcome to your New Normal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 6 minutes ago, robosmith said: The POLS have not selected, but the R voters clearly want Trump. That's why FEW are challenging him. May change IF he is indicted. IF he's indicted...then a lot of Presidents and former Presidents can be too. Careful how you warp the law little guy... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 2 hours ago, robosmith said: I told you about the Senate Intelligence committee report, but you refuse to read it. Maybe you missed the OLC report which has been taken AS POLICY by the AG Barr that POTUS cannot be indicted. I don't care about the SICR: they didn't do the investigation and it's an entirely political outfit. The opinions of Chuck Shumer on collusion are as relevant as Hitler's opinions about Jews. The FBI is the group who made the serious accusations, they subpoenaed millions of pages of docs, spied on innocent Americans, took dozens of statements under oath, falsified documents, lied about independent corroboration, arrested people at gunpoint, arrested people for unrelated crimes from 2 decades ago and offered reduced sentencing in exchange for false testimony, etc. Still they came up with bupkis. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 2 hours ago, robosmith said: But you just look stupid when you post with that much ignorance. We both know who's wallowing in ignorance here, and it isn't me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 7 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Minor violations? Do you understand that Kevin Clinesmith altered an email and presented it to a FISA court judge in order to get warrants to keep the FBI's spying ring open? If Clinesmith hadn't altered that email, there wouldn't have been any spying on Carter Page because he was a known CIA asset. The fake collusion show trial would have ended months in advance. That's not a minor violation, it was a felony ffs. Sure. It was SO SERIOUS, he only got 12 months PROBATION. 7 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: When the FBI claimed that the laptop was Russian disinformation they knew that they were lying to the American public in order to influence and election. That's not conjecture, or innuendo, or lies, it's a simple fact. The FBI knew that everything that was said about Hunter's laptop was true because they had it for a year. The FBI lied. It's a common theme now. You have no idea what they "knew." One thing WE know is that was against Delaware LAW for the shop owner to reveal the confidential information on that laptop, and the chain of custody was highly suspect. 7 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: That's the thing about integrity - you have it until you lose it, and you don't get it back (Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me). It wasn't just Clinesmith in on this, the FBI is rife with bad political actors. It's KGB west. Like I said, you're grinding your axe on ONE INDIVIDUAL'S MINOR INFRACTION. DOES NOT tar the entire FBI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 4 minutes ago, Nationalist said: IF he's indicted...then a lot of Presidents and former Presidents can be too. Careful how you warp the law little guy... They ALWAYS COULD; if the evidence and crimes were as serious as the insurrection Trump attempted. Other countries do that ALL THE TIME. Just look at Italy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Take it up with Cohen who unlike you, actually KNOWS TRUMP. I don't need Michael Cohen to interpret Trump's quote for me. Unlike you, I speak perfect English. If you wanna let Cohen (Democrat - fraud & perjury) mansplain to you what "the press would love to know" (or whatever) meant, fill yer boots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 28, 2022 Report Share Posted September 28, 2022 5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: I don't care about the SICR: they didn't do the investigation and it's an entirely political outfit. The opinions of Chuck Shumer on collusion are as relevant as Hitler's opinions about Jews. The FBI is the group who made the serious accusations, they subpoenaed millions of pages of docs, spied on innocent Americans, took dozens of statements under oath, falsified documents, lied about independent corroboration, arrested people at gunpoint, arrested people for unrelated crimes from 2 decades ago and offered reduced sentencing in exchange for false testimony, etc. Still they came up with bupkis. It was LED BY REPUBLICANS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.