Jump to content

Great Reset Coming Soon


Recommended Posts

I don´t know if the people behind this video are genuine or not.
But what they describe is similar to how World Economic Forum want their "Great Reset". There are some out there telling you that this reset is just a "conspiracy theory" even though everything is on WEF´s website.

A spiritual contact tells me the global economy will collapse this year. Not recession. More like the end of this debt based system i suppose.
It must end because debt can not grow forever. Within this system total debt can not ever stop expanding though.

Chaos, bread lines, sky rocketing crime....
After some time people are offered a "solution".

Military in the streets, social credits, surveillance and a new financial system. In short fascism/communism.

Would the government be able to control riots?

My spiritual contact tells me the vaxx lead to AIDS so those people may not be able to fight anyway.
And they depend on the government to much. Why AIDS? Probably because there are studies showing the vaxx hurt natural immunity (Imprinting/OAS)
And chronic Covid damage your t cells. So similar to AIDS.


Of course then governments and media will tell the collapse happened because of Putin, a virus etc.

The number one reason is the financial weapons of mass destruction. Some believe they gamble with up to 20 times the worlds economy. So everyone will have to pay. But i bet they prefer if ordinary people take care of that.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Complete Lock Up of The System Will Occur.

 

By Gregory Mannarino 

https://gregorymannarino.substack.com/p/a-complete-lock-of-the-system-will

 

Why is the world awash in never ending and inflating debt? Moreover, why does global debt keep expanding relentlessly every day, every month, and every year, in what seems like some kind of twisted mass insanity?

 

What is THE REAL TRUTH behind all this?

 

The answer is simple, and frightening. The expansion of debt cannot ever stop! Additionally, it must constantly and ceaselessly be expanded on EXPONENTIALLY.

 

What this means is that the amount of debt being borrowed into existence CANNOT EVEN REMAIN STATIC! It must be expanded on VASTLY every moment, every day, every week, every month, and every year, just to allow the system itself to function day to day. If the amount of debt being borrowed into existence were to remain at its current level, without being expanded on, the entire system would FREEZE UP in an instant.

 

The insanity of all this actually gets even worse.

 

Despite the FACT that global debt is continually expanding, there is not enough of it.

 

As most people who follow my work are already aware, the current central bank run global financial system is debt based, and at its core what this means is every conceivable reason, including things which the average person could not even dream of, must and will be utilized to continually find reasons/create more reasons to borrow more cash into existence. As of late the two biggest machinations being forced upon the people of the world and are currently being used as mechanisms to pull EPIC sums into the now by more borrowing are:

 

1. Global disease processes like Covid and the various variants thereof, also

 

2. Expanding war(s).  

 

It’s this crisis-to-crisis economic model which has given world leaders a blank check, spending which is not allowed to even be questioned! As they have turned this upside down on the people of the world as ANYONE who now dares question as to why all this crisis-to-crisis spending is being done is then branded as being “unpatriotic!” Or a person who does not care about “helping” people.  

 

NOT ONE mainstream media source will EVER be allowed to explain the truth behind the crisis-to-crisis borrowing debt expansion mechanism, nor will a single world leader, OR a central banker explain it.

 

 

Will it ever end?


YES! The system, despite ever expanding debt, will eventually become illiquid.

 

A lack of liquidity in the system, despite finding ever more reasons to borrow, will eventually reach a saturation point. This saturation point will, and is already, manifesting itself in the form of skyrocketing inflation worldwide.

 

The inevitable end of the current debt-based system is rapidly approaching, and a move to yet another central bank run system is coming. A system of extreme control, a cashless system, where every single transaction is tracked down to the ten thousandth of a cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well there are many “What me worry?” naive people, including on this site, who will write all of these ideas off as conspiracy theories, but there’s a plausibility about at least some of this content.  We see how our government continues to maintain new layers of bureaucracy to enjoy basic rights like the ability to work and travel through mandated health programs (vaccine proof and the ArriveCan app).   We see that government will ignore constitutional rights and scientific evidence to do this.  We saw government use force, asset seizures, and defamatory remarks against mandate protesters, including martial law.

The idea that people’s levels of freedom can be determined based on levels of current privilege and compliance, while horrifying and oppressive, doesn’t seem far fetched if a new “unprecedented crisis” is the excuse to implement such measures.

The questions we should be asking now are how can we prevent our governments from implementing oppressive policies against citizens, who is the source of such policies, and how do we remove such evil directors from the levers of power?

I fear that we can’t prevent such policies because of public gullibility.  Even after watching farmers in Europe and truckers in Canada try to protest and salvage constitutional rights, our media continues to throw softballs at our government and maintain the climate change, Covid, and racism hysteria.  The public aren’t seeing how these narratives are used to justify widespread oppression.

We should be very concerned about any top-down programs that curtail our rights and freedoms, no matter the excuse: climate change, Covid, debt, inflation, etc.  We’ve seen lockdowns, vax passes, and restrictions enforced by police.   We accepted this in the name of “public safety”, so there are good reasons to worry about what new oppression future “crises” might bring.

Edited by Zeitgeist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Some of these things are not like others.

Poilievre, Mr. Freedom, wanted us to invest in Bitcoin...

You may just be coming into awareness of the large forces that have to be dealt with in a political economy.

Poilievre just wants Canada to collect commissions as a centre of digital currency transactions.  He’s against a central bank digital currency replacing hard currency, as it would be easier to attach social credit scores and conditions to people’s bank accounts, freeze them, etc.  Want Canada to become China?  Go down that road.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

1. Poilievre just wants Canada to collect commissions as a centre of digital currency transactions.  

2. He’s against a central bank digital currency replacing hard currency, as it would be easier to attach social credit scores and conditions to people’s bank accounts, freeze them, etc.  Want Canada to become China?  Go down that road.  

1. ? Like a speculation tax ?

2. Ok that sounds good but also acknowledges that technology is encroaching on us from the rest of the world.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. ? Like a speculation tax ?

2. Ok that sounds good but also acknowledges that technology is encroaching on us from the rest of the world.

 

Well this is the new peasant revolt.  It’s been called populism, but more deeply it’s about the underprivileged pushing back against the financial costs and loss of liberty resulting from global elite policies that always sound wonderful on paper: ESG, Stakeholder Capitalism, Sustainable Development Goals.  Corporations and governments co-create these policies that may have some good goals but that are paid for and implemented on the backs of workers and consumers.  In fact these costs to ordinary people and citizens likely far outweigh the benefits.  The rich can bear the added costs and feel good about themselves as they fly on their private jets to Davos and plot new schemes without the votes or consent of citizens to “save the planet” based on dubious metrics and limited input. Technology and A.I. just supercharge the blunt instrument data collection and air tight oppression, backstopped by the police and banking sector.  Trudeau is all-in on this top down global elitist unshackled Leviathan. 

Edited by Zeitgeist
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

Well this is the new peasant revolt.  It’s been called populism, but more deeply it’s about the underprivileged pushing back against the financial costs and loss of liberty resulting from global elite policies that always sound wonderful on paper: ESG, Stakeholder Capitalism, Sustainable Development Goals.  Corporations and governments co-create these policies that may have some good goals but that are paid for and implemented on the backs of workers and consumers.  In fact these costs to ordinary people and citizens likely far outweigh the benefits.  The rich can bear the added costs and feel good about themselves as they fly on their private jets to Davos and plot new schemes without the votes or consent of citizens to “save the planet” based on dubious metrics and limited input. Technology and A.I. just supercharge the blunt instrument data collection and air tight oppression, backstopped by the police and banking sector.  

Well, ok.

What's the alternative look like?  Should I trade my MacBook in for a hoe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Well, ok.

What's the alternative look like?  Should I trade my MacBook in for a hoe?

I don’t think it’s about a Luddite rejection of technology, but rather ensuring that unelected bodies don’t form policies or have a large influence on elected bodies, and that we don’t simply create metrics and data collection processes that then rule our lives as though they’re an accurate and permanent representation of reality.  The people must be in control of the systems to prevent enslavement.  Also, utopian policies can have draconian, oppressive costs.  Quite simply, there must be a rule about full transparency and reporting to voters of any involvement and discussions with international economic and political bodies and influencers.  The WEF, closed meeting Bildenburger Group, WHO, and other international organizations are driving too much of our policy to be taken so lightly and with so little scrutiny.  If such organizations can’t articulate a clear and precise raison d’être, they should be actively ignored by governments.  Some organizations do have clear humanitarian value for poverty-stricken countries.  Arguably the WHO fits that category, but even that organization might be heavily influenced by malevolent governments or players.  

Edited by Zeitgeist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

Well this is the new peasant revolt.  It’s been called populism, but more deeply it’s about the underprivileged pushing back against the financial costs and loss of liberty resulting from global elite policies that always sound wonderful on paper

That's the best part of this whole deception though.  The "underprivileged" Trumpies are just picking a different poison.  Republican (and those similar to them) rarely/never help their poor/uneducated base, but they DO channel their anger against wokeism, immigration and green stuff.  Meanwhile, they and their pals continue to get richer with lax regulation and tax breaks and don't generate the jobs they promise.  You're exchanging the woke elite and their virtue-signaling for the old-school DOW Jones fat cats.  Neither give a shit about the "underprivileged".  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

That's the best part of this whole deception though.  The "underprivileged" Trumpies are just picking a different poison.  Republican (and those similar to them) rarely/never help their poor/uneducated base, but they DO channel their anger against wokeism, immigration and green stuff.  Meanwhile, they and their pals continue to get richer with lax regulation and tax breaks and don't generate the jobs they promise.  You're exchanging the woke elite and their virtue-signaling for the old-school DOW Jones fat cats.  Neither give a shit about the "underprivileged".  

 

This is where my thinking has changed.  I used to agree with your perspective on the whole.  The problem is that you can’t have double standards.  Policies have to on the most part benefit everyone.  That will often include the wealthy, whether or not that wealth is earned.  We also know that high taxation and regulation tends to kill the golden goose that lays the jobs and tax revenues, though the best economic recipe is one that benefits small and medium sized businesses.  Overspending and debt are now hurting everyone through inflation and higher interest rates, especially the poor, which is why fiscal conservatism is almost always a better long term policy.

With regard to wokism, while I agree that sometimes the attacks on it are from racists, homophobes, etc., the fair and important criticism is that new forms of bias and oppression are being ushered in, such as putting representation ahead of competence.  Most people, myself included, would agree that if two people are equally qualified for a position and one is a minority, and the organization doesn’t reflect the wider community, employ the minority.  That’s different from promoting unqualified people and undermining meritocracy, which can only breed contempt and resignation.  What’s more, much of our leadership may have worked their way up over decades when the community was whiter.  Wokesters often make the mistake of judging the past through today’s lenses and values.  There’s a de-emphasis on context and a tendency to rush to judgment or cancel opposing viewpoints.

On the subject of “Trumpsters”, you can’t dismiss around 50% of the electorate as racist or backward just because they voted Trump.  People voted for him for different reasons, including poor, working class, and minorities.  One compelling argument as to why is that many people felt that Trump was honest about his motives, while many left-wing politicians say all the progressive things but live like fat-cat elitists.  They’re great at rhetoric.  It’s important to remember the historic alliances of the parties.  The Dems were KKK supporters who are now woke champagne socialists.  The Republicans were actually the emancipators who now are seen as pro business and traditional values.

 I no longer see our NDP and Liberal parties as the voices of workers and the middle class.  I see them as self-preserving elitist hypocrites who know how to say the right things to get elected.  I also think they have superficial notions of what progress means.  They’re like the irritating activist university student who needs to get a real job and get out of the ivory tower to see how most people actually live and to feel their pain.  The Liberals used to be quite good in that respect, as in the days of Chrétien. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

1. I don’t think it’s about a Luddite rejection of technology, but rather ensuring that unelected bodies don’t form policies or have a large influence on elected bodies, and that we don’t simply create metrics and data collection processes that then rule our lives as though they’re an accurate and permanent representation of reality.  

2. The people must be in control of the systems to prevent enslavement.  Also, utopian policies can have draconian, oppressive costs.  Quite simply, there must be a rule about full transparency and reporting to voters of any involvement and discussions with international economic and political bodies and influencers.  

3. The WEF, closed meeting Bildenburger Group, WHO, and other international organizations are driving too much of our policy to be taken so lightly and with so little scrutiny.  If such organizations can’t articulate a clear and precise raison d’être, they should be actively ignored by governments.  Some organizations do have clear humanitarian value for poverty-stricken countries.  Arguably the WHO fits that category, but even that organization might be heavily influenced by malevolent governments or players.  

1. 2. Ok.  That's clear.  Others have also expressed concerns about multinationals' increasing power.  But what specifically does this idea manifest as with regards to policy ?  And how would you ever get there given the incredible power corporations have today ?

3. The WEFs of the worlds have far less influence than the SuperPACs that elect candidates.  Furthermore, getting rid of WEF will not eliminate their ideas.  They also are pretty clear about their goals.

And how would you set a rule to limit the involvement of WEFs but not other groups ?  If you want to outlaw one group then another one will step in to the patronage void.  

I suggest you make political contributions and expenses 100% transparent and also limited.  That allows governments to help sectors and businesses as long as they help people who elect them.  Harper's government did this very thing years ago.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, cj8 said:

Better to tell the truth so people are motivated to tell others. Exposing the plan is a life insurance.

The truth according to conspiracy theorists. Ha Ha Ha

Will never be proven but will thrive in certain circles.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. 2. Ok.  That's clear.  Others have also expressed concerns about multinationals' increasing power.  But what specifically does this idea manifest as with regards to policy ?  And how would you ever get there given the incredible power corporations have today ?

3. The WEFs of the worlds have far less influence than the SuperPACs that elect candidates.  Furthermore, getting rid of WEF will not eliminate their ideas.  They also are pretty clear about their goals.

And how would you set a rule to limit the involvement of WEFs but not other groups ?  If you want to outlaw one group then another one will step in to the patronage void.  

I suggest you make political contributions and expenses 100% transparent and also limited.  That allows governments to help sectors and businesses as long as they help people who elect them.  Harper's government did this very thing years ago.

 

We don’t really have superpacs in Canada and I agree that Harper set important policies for transparency.  With regard to multinational corporations, the big threat now is their marriage with governments and world bodies as so-called activists for a better world.  We would never have the government police itself, yet that’s what’s going on with corporations under stakeholder capitalism.  Though we know that these companies are trying to make big money for shareholders, often at the expense of workers, they can use talk of the environment and anti-black racism as cover.  It’s an old idea, a kind of bread and circuses virtue performance.  In the process government gets to look like it’s part of the progressive party while letting these corporations take over because they recycle or have rainbow flags behind their logos.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Moonbox said:

That's the best part of this whole deception though.  The "underprivileged" Trumpies are just picking a different poison.  Republican (and those similar to them) rarely/never help their poor/uneducated base, but they DO channel their anger against wokeism, immigration and green stuff.  Meanwhile, they and their pals continue to get richer with lax regulation and tax breaks and don't generate the jobs they promise.  You're exchanging the woke elite and their virtue-signaling for the old-school DOW Jones fat cats.  Neither give a shit about the "underprivileged".  

 

Just another TDS inflicted stooge...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

The truth according to conspiracy theorists. Ha Ha Ha

Will never be proven but will thrive in certain circles.

 

Have you not been paying attention?

Pixie-Dust has espoused the term "The Great Reset" on several occasions. So have most national leaders.

And what is this "Great Reset"? Well...they've told us that too. Yet you figure its all a conspiracy theory?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, West said:

I just visited a university campus and it's ripe with WEF propaganda about SDGs (corporate fascism). Sickening what our tax dollars fund

Yup the universities are unfortunately full of gullible, callow blow hards.  Many don’t understand how they are being manipulated by corporations and world bodies through stakeholder capitalism.  The Nazis had enormous support from university students, who tend towards totalitarian purity.  The Hitler Youth and the Taliban are testimonies to such misplaced zeal.

My guess is that if we end up with social credit scores that determine how much universal basic income we’re allowed and how much we’re allowed to express ourselves, it will be because of the young ideologues who can’t wait to give up hard currency for digital currency and let the WEF and other world bodies reign supreme.  They’ll brag to the baristas at Starbucks about how tech savvy they are compared to their retrograde Boomer parents.  Then one day, perhaps when their parents are dead, they’ll say the wrong thing on their political group chat and no longer have access to funds.  Other people will steer clear of the untouchable with the low social credit score.  But of course they won’t be able to sell off their clothes or furniture for cash in Kijiji to buy food because all currency will be digital — oh, and no one will hire them.

Edited by Zeitgeist
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/21/2022 at 9:15 AM, Nationalist said:

Have you not been paying attention?

Pixie-Dust has espoused the term "The Great Reset" on several occasions. So have most national leaders.

And what is this "Great Reset"? Well...they've told us that too. Yet you figure its all a conspiracy theory?

Never heard of "the great reset" until folks here keep harping on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Never heard of "the great reset" until folks here keep harping on it.

Willful ignorance and denial.  It’s okay, if you get too “out there”, there are plenty of expensive homes that will pump you full of fatty sweet food and drugs until you die or your power of attorney says to pull the plug because you would’ve wanted it that way.  Don’t worry about the Great Reset.  Sail off into the sunset on CTV-CBC pablum and let the “conspiracy theorist wing nuts” have at er.  I’m teasing but hopefully you get my point.  Wake up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

Willful ignorance and denial.  It’s okay, if you get too “out there”, there are plenty of expensive homes that will pump you full of fatty sweet food and drugs until you die or your power of attorney says to pull the plug because you would’ve wanted it that way.  Don’t worry about the Great Reset.  Sail off into the sunset on CTV-CBC pablum and let the “conspiracy theorist wing nuts” have at er.  I’m teasing but hopefully you get my point.  Wake up.  

Nothing "wilful."

I have never heard of "the great reset"  except here.

I asked a legitimate question. If you would explain then your credibility would improve.

Teasing with a valid explanation can be accepted but insulting is your  gets you nowhere.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

Yup the universities are unfortunately full of gullible, callow blow hards.  Many don’t understand how they are being manipulated by corporations and world bodies through stakeholder capitalism.  The Nazis had enormous support from university students, who tend towards totalitarian purity.  The Hitler Youth and the Taliban are testimonies to such misplaced zeal.

My guess is that if we end up with social credit scores that determine how much universal basic income we’re allowed and how much we’re allowed to express ourselves, it will be because of the young ideologues who can’t wait to give up hard currency for digital currency and let the WEF and other world bodies reign supreme.  They’ll brag to the baristas at Starbucks about how tech savvy they are compared to their retrograde Boomer parents.  Then one day, perhaps when their parents are dead, they’ll say the wrong thing on their political group chat and no longer have access to funds.  Other people will steer clear of the untouchable with the low social credit score.  But of course they won’t be able to sell off their clothes or furniture for cash in Kijiji to buy food because all currency will be digital — oh, and no one will hire them.

My guess is a right wing revanchist counterrevolution against the Woke Green Utopians

the hunters will become the hunted

guns, gas & gold shall rule the economies

the leftists who resist will be crushed

under the jackboots of the very paramilitary security mechanisms which they themselves made

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...