Jump to content

First a trickle....Now a flood


Recommended Posts

It seems maybe the narrative is starting to shift a bit to reflect reality.

These are MSM articles.  Surprise, surprise.

Opinion: Draconian COVID measures were a mistake, let's not repeat them (msn.com)

Quote

Additional vaccine doses should be tailored to the specific circumstances of the person, not a “one-size-fits-all” solution. One thing has remained constant since the pandemic began: the young and healthy under age 50 seldom have severe outcomes from COVID-19, so guidance on vaccination should be tailored to age, immunity and risk factors. While a very small number of people remain vulnerable, either prior infection, or vaccines received many months ago still prevent serious outcomes for almost everyone — that’s what matters most to protect the health-care system. Even our higher risk elderly are seeing disease that is less severe than what we see with other common viruses, including other coronaviruses. The mortality rate for those in elder care homes was eight per cent with other (non-COVID) coronaviruses, similar to what we see with COVID now.

^^^^   Alllllllmmmmoooooossssst called it a flu there.  So close.  ^^^^^

This one is actually from April:

 

Opinion: Misuse of the term 'misinformation' has muzzled scientific COVID-19 debate | National Post

Quote

As COVID-19 recedes, many strident voices continue to call for ongoing restrictions — mainly on such social media platforms as Twitter. These fiercest proponents of “COVID-zero” need to acquiesce that the coronavirus is here to stay, variant upon variant. To be fair to this group, in the early days of the pandemic, they believed wholeheartedly that COVID-19 could be eliminated, as did the WHO and the Public Health Agency of Canada. Unfortunately, this was the only accepted perspective until recently. Those who expressed reservations about the feasibility and societal and economic costs of this approach were silenced on social media, sometimes reported to professional colleges for discipline, and subjected to calumny — both publicly and privately. Even now, as public health moves to a more balanced approach to COVID-19, social media tactics that have been honed over two years of the pandemic continue to polarize the debate, slowing our return to normal.

Huh. 

"True misinformation is calculated and self-serving.  They know what they're saying is false but they keep it up, with ulterior motives."

Kind of what lots of us have been saying for almost 2 years. Follow the money.

Kind of like how all these CEOs and institutions are now saying "Ya, we knew the vaccine wouldn't stop infection."  But they lied anyways.

 

Quote

Misinformation is also a charge used against nuanced interpretations of complex facts countering an overly simplified one-size-fits-all approach (e.g. not every member of the population has the same need for booster doses of vaccine). This is an appropriate response to complexity. Likewise, it is wrong to label as “misinformation” the interpretation of the same facts to arrive at disparate conclusions — this is healthy scientific discourse. True “misinformation” is calculated and self-serving. Purveyors of misinformation know that what they are saying is false, but they forge ahead, often with an ulterior motive.

 

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Denmark, who earlier this year banned vaccination for those under age 18, is now not offering vaccination to those under age 50.

Their health website says that vaccination does not prevent infection, only severity of disease and those under 50 do not have that risk, so it is no longer required or offered to under age 50.

Finally, some countries are starting to actually follow the science.

Meanwhile,  in Canada, Trudeau threatens lockdowns this winter if 90% of the country doesn't get jabbed every 6 months and Universities are denying education to young people without a third or fourth jab.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check out the viral Twitter thread #TrudeauMustGo

Ordinary and some famous Canadians post pics of themselves, tell what they do and what hobbies they have, where they volunteer and how many kids they have. Then they say "Trudeau says I'm an extremist, racist, misogynist and thinks I need to be dealt with".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A new report prepared by a group of highly qualified experts analyzed the government data in Ontario and concluded that the vaccines don’t reduce hospitalization and death in those under 60.

In other words, we’ve been lied to. Are you surprised?

Also, don’t assume the report endorses vaccination for those over 60. It doesn’t.

Here's the report:

OntarioDatawithDiscussionJune2022 (skirsch.com)

It concludes:

Quote

 

Given the statistical evidence provided in this report, the public health policy tools such as mass vaccination campaigns, mandates, passports and travel restrictions need to be reevaluated for relevance in this phase of SARS-CoV-2. The abundance of evidence documented by Public Health Ontario (PHO), Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and top-tier scientific journals demonstrates that the vaccines do not prevent infection or hospitalization. The Ontario data show that vaccination currently makes little difference in terms of hospitalization and death rates for those below age 60. Additionally, since there are known risks of adverse events and unknown long term effects, these must be considered in developing vaccine policies.

The empirical evidence investigated in this report from PHO and PHAC does not support continuing mass vaccination programs, mandates, passports and travel bans for all age groups. Rather, it may be prudent to utilize a more targeted and cost-effective approach focused on vaccinating the high-risk group, while factoring in an individual’s potential risk of vaccine-related adverse events.

 

That’s what you get when the people writing the report remain anonymous and are free to speak the truth without fear of retribution. Interesting, isn’t it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2022 at 9:50 AM, Goddess said:

Meanwhile,  in Canada, Trudeau threatens lockdowns this winter if 90% of the country doesn't get jabbed every 6 months and Universities are denying education to young people without a third or fourth jab.

 

Denmark follows the Science.

Canada follows the Science TM. ® ©

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Response_Package_HTH-2021-13807.pdf (gov.bc.ca)

Bonnie Henry's FOIA'ed emails.

Edit:

If you're not sure who Dr. Charles Hoffe is - he was one of the first doctors in Canada who started raising alarms about the jabs.

He was a small town GP in Lytton, BC.  He knew all his patients.  When they started having issues post-jab, he started doing d-dimer testing on them and found the clots.  He raised the alarm and then was sanctioned by the BC College of Physicians.

Justice Centre defends free speech, Dr Charles Hoffe, against College of Physicians | Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (jccf.ca)

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, Israel - who Albert Bourla (Pfizer CEO) called "the world's laboratory" - had NO reporting system for adverse events during the whole of 2021.

Breaking: Leaked Video Reveals Serious Side-Effects Related to the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Covered Up by the Israeli MOH (rtmag.co.il)

Quote

The Israeli MOH had no adverse events reporting system for the entire year of 2021. They commissioned a research team to analyze the reports from a new system implemented on December 2021. A leaked video reveals that in June, the researchers presented serious findings to the MOH, that indicated long-term effects, including some not listed by Pfizer, and a causal relationship – so the Ministry published a manipulative report, and told the public that no new signal was found

Quote

In an internal Zoom meeting in early June, the recording of which was leaked to the press, Prof. Berkowitz warned MOH senior officials that they should think carefully how to present his study's findings to the public, otherwise they may be sued, since they completely contradict the MOH's claims that serious side effects are rare, short term and transient. After analyzing the reports received over a period of 6 months, the research team found that many serious side effects were in fact long-term, including ones not listed by Pfizer, and established causal relations with the vaccine. 

Quote

Global implications
The discussion exposed in the leaked video has far-reaching and worrying implications, at a global level. While Israel is a relatively small country, it was dubbed "the world's laboratory". The eyes of much of the world were on it, and the FDA and other regulators have repeatedly cited its experience with the vaccine as a basis for policymaking, including for boosters and mandates and much else. So if Israel did not in fact have a functioning adverse event monitoring system in place and its data was a fiction, and even when it did launch a proper monitoring system a year too late, with analysis of the system's findings, completely ignored and withheld – what was the FDA really relying on? What were all those regulators relying on?

The things they hid include:

  1. The fact that, in most cases, these effects did not resolve quickly (in some cases lasting over a year)

  2. The proof that the vaccine caused the events

  3. The actual rates; they manipulated the rates by dividing the number of reports by all the doses, hiding the fact that they had the system for 6 months and only one HMO (15 percent of population reported). This makes the denominator huge and the numerator small which masks the significance.

 

 

Quote

Furthermore, it turns out that in order to downplay the rate of reports on menstrual irregularities, the MOH used a denominator of the total number of all adult doses – ~16 million – and thus, absurdly, included men in the equation of how common menstrual irregularities are.

 

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Subject #12312982 the Key to Proving Pfizer Vaccine Trial Fraud?

Is Subject #12312982 the Key to Proving Pfizer Vaccine Trial Fraud? (substack.com)

Quote

 

Subject # 12312982 in Pfizer study C4591001 is Augusto Roux, a 35-year old lawyer from Buenos Aires, Argentina who volunteered for Pfizer’s stage 3 trial of its COVID-19 vaccine (or whatever you want to call it) in order to protect his mother with emphysema.

His story and some of the shenanigans surrounding the Argentinian trial site have been amply covered by Dr. David Healy in three sprawling but extremely important blog posts: 1, 2, 3. The first one was published March 1st, but it was only last week that I caught on to this story, so I’m assuming most of you probably aren’t familiar with it. So please share this — we’ve got to get the word out, because Augusto Roux may very well hold the key to bringing down the Pfizer vaccine trial, or a least proving fraud at the largest trial site that was home to over 10% of the participants in the trial.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said, there are no investigative journalists  in MSM any more. They're nothing but paid lapdogs who report what they're told to report.

The truth isn't going to be seen on the 6 o'clock news.  So stop getting your "science" from them.

They're lying to you.

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

 

Quote

The agency has withheld critical data on boosters, hospitalizations and until recently wastewater collections

Let’s be clear. The CDC is hiding the data because the data proves they were lying to us. That’s the real reason.

If the data was favorable, I guarantee you, they would be releasing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In case you hadn't noticed from real life, vaccinated people are getting covid over and over and over.  Albert Bourla - CEO of Pfizer - and Biden are poster children for this.

This issue is hugely important since if people can catch Covid more than once, this pandemic has the potential to never end.

The data is really starting to come in now, that these reinfections and re-reinfections are vaccine driven.

Let's look at the data from several countries - Bulgaria, Portugal and South Africa.

Bulgaria is 30% vaccinated.  Portugal is 95% vaccinated and 70% boosted.  At one time they said there was nobody left in Portugal to vaccinate.

Portugal is a steaming pandemic dumpster fire, whereas Covid basically does not exist in Bulgaria.

These two countries are also an experiment.

The outcome of the experiment is that Covid vaccines failed.  Check out this chart of covid cases per million:

1890487583_bulgandport.thumb.JPG.85e14657e6e53514cc73572aafe0a912.JPG

Here's South Africa, one of the lowest vaxxed countries.  S. Africa is 35% vaccinated and 5% boosted:

sa.jpg.ef2f2599a181b389cc6b3f1b62e3f561.jpg

The situations in these countries could not be any more different: while Ba4 and Ba5 were blips on the radar in South Africa, these same variants are driving a deadly wave of Covid in highly vaccinated Portugal.

The deaths in Portugal are coming fairly close to the level of the first Omicron wave and are still rising, so there is no telling how high they will go. In South Africa however, deaths are about 1/6th of their winter deaths and generally look like Ba4/5 wave was a non-event there.

Mind you, Portugal has a decent Western medical system and South Africa is a poorer country. While Portugalians are older on average, about 20% of South Africans are infected with HIV. So even though these are not perfectly equal countries, these differences balance each other.

Just about everyone in Portugal had covid by the end of last winter. This current wave of infections and deaths in Portugal is driven by reinfections.

Infections and reinfections drove vaccinated Portugal deaths way past the unvaccinated South Africa deaths, despite a better medical system in Portugal. 

Why are reinfections happening? Because boosted people are unable to acquire proper immunity upon infection. They are forced to endure endless covid reinfections, that further damage their immune systems, inviting more illness.

This is, sadly, happening in the over-vaccinated West, as the unvaccinated countries of the world are enjoying herd immunity. Yes, herd immunity comes at a cost, but that cost is behind the people of those countries.

Thanks to the wonders of haphazardly developed and poorly tested “vaccines”, we have 70% of the Western population treated with experimental, unproven substances that ended up disabling immunity, enabling endless reinfections, and we have the pandemic that never ends, dumpster-fire-style.

There is no denying that some unvaccinated people also get reinfected.  I don't want to minimize their experience. However, the Pfizer trials show, that the largest share of reinfections is in the vaccinated and it is driven by vaccination.

This randomized controlled trial concerns vaccinating young kids and proved beyond doubt that vaccination causes repeated reinfections. Look at Page 38:

(RCTs are the gold standard of testing.)

trial.thumb.JPG.8580c966631adf93b87e39055bb08d98.JPG

What is that page saying? There were a total of 12 kid participants who managed to get two covid infections within the time frame of the trial. 11 of them were vaccine recipients and only one received no vaccine.  Because Pfizer did the scientifically forbidden and unblinded the trial too early, like they did with the adult trials.

Out of 12 kids who had two covid infections, only ONE was in the never-vaccinated group!

Mind you, as the above passage says, all of these 12 reinfected children, never had Covid prior to the trial. So what caused vaccinated children to develop a disproportionate amount of repeat infections? The vaccine, of course. It is a randomized controlled trial, after all.

Thanks to Pfizer, we finally know that Covid reinfections are real and that their vaccine causes them by disabling natural immunity.

In the 2-4-year-old group all reinfections happened in the vaccinated participants, five of six were from the first-vaccinated group. “All of these participants received 3 doses of assigned study intervention, except for one participant in the BNT162b2 group who received two doses”. We have a smoking gun that reinfections are vaccine driven.

Why do vaccinated people keep getting re-infected?

It's OAS.

Also, Chile is another country to watch - highly vaccinated, getting ravaged by Omicron Ba4 and Ba5.

 

 

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 1 | Malhotra | Journal of Insulin Resistance

Quote

 

Results: In the non-elderly population the “number needed to treat” to prevent a single death runs into the thousands. Re-analysis of randomised controlled trials using the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology suggests a greater risk of serious adverse events from the vaccines than being hospitalised from COVID-19. Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety. Mirroring a potential signal from the Pfizer Phase 3 trial, a significant rise in cardiac arrest calls to ambulances in England was seen in 2021, with similar data emerging from Israel in the 16–39-year-old age group.

Conclusion: It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally. A pause and reappraisal of global vaccination policies for COVID-19 is long overdue.

 

 

 
Quote

 

Results: Underlying causes for this failure include regulatory capture – guardians that are supposed to protect the public are in fact funded by the corporations that stand to gain from the sale of those medications. A failure of public health messaging has also resulted in wanton waste of resources and a missed opportunity to help individuals lead healthier lives with relatively simple – and low cost – lifestyle changes.

Conclusion: There is a strong scientific, ethical and moral case to be made that the current COVID vaccine administration must stop until all the raw data has been subjected to fully independent scrutiny. Looking to the future, the medical and public health professions must recognise these failings and eschew the tainted dollar of the medical-industrial complex. It will take a lot of time and effort to rebuild trust in these institutions, but the health – of both humanity and the medical profession – depends on it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, the author of that article is Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a former staunch advocate of the covid inoculations.

He is a highly respected British cardiologist and expert in evidence-based medicine and was prompted to take a critical look at the vaccine data after the unexpected death of his father 6 months after vaccination, which is totally consistent with the 5 month delay time for clotting. He spent 6 months carefully studying the data and consulting with other top scientists. He’s now calling for a halt to the vaccines based on the data.

He “slowly and reluctantly” came to the conclusion he was wrong about the safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccines. His journey was documented in his first paper. He mentions he teaches evidence-based medicine and follows all the principles.

How many journals refused to publish his papers? The answer is zero. He simply submitted the papers to one of the very few medical journals with no ties to big pharma and no advertising and would take a paper of 10,000 words.  It was split into two articles because the journal has a size limit for a single article. He started working on the paper 9 months ago.  After a 3 month double blind peer-review, the papers were accepted.

The big problem they have in discrediting him is they can't figure out why he changed his mind (other than the scientific evidence of course). He has everything to lose by speaking out.

Dr. Aseem Malhotra is a hero. When he learned he was wrong, he did the right thing: publicly admitted his mistake and called for the halt to the vaccines.

He was publicly advocating for the vaccines and he himself is double jabbed with the COVID vaccines. When a personal event made him question what he had been told, he spent 6 months looking at the data and publicly admitted he was wrong.  I can relate to this.  It was my sister's vaccine injury that made me start looking at things more critically. He did this at considerable risk to his reputation.

He’s the type of doctor that the authorities and the medical community should be listening to. Instead they are trying to silence and discredit him and his work. They should be ashamed of their actions. History will not be kind to them.

The truth will eventually come out. Those who stonewall the inevitable will suffer the consequences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/18/2022 at 7:16 PM, Goddess said:

This happened in my city on last Wednesday. People are talking about it.  Most are shocked that everybody waiting in the lineup for the jabber, just kept waiting for the jabber.  After seeing a woman drop dead right after it.

 

toontown.thumb.jpg.73012ce8dda042826a8f64637eb0f1ce.jpg

 

So this case is causing quite a stir in my city.

SHS came out LESS THAN 24 HOURS after the death of this woman 7 mins after her booster shot and said "Natural causes, definitely not the vaccine."

Anyways, it's woken quite a few up to the BS.  No way they could have done all the tests or an autopsy to determine it was definitely not the vaccine, in less than 24 hours.

The daughter is raising a stink, she saw her mom minutes before she left for the shot and said she was happy, healthy, alert and active.  If it was a heart attack, she would have been tired, lethargic and possibly have a certain pallor. 

I think she should pay for an autopsy.

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

basedoc (doctors4covidethics.org)
 

Quote

 

The evidence

We herewith present scientific evidence that calls for an immediate stop of the use of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. We first lay out why the agents cannot protect against viral infection. While no positive effects can be expected, we show that the vaccines can trigger self-destructive processes that lead to debilitating illness and death.

 

Quote

 

Histopathologic studies:

Histopathologic analyses have been performed on the organs of 15 persons who died after vaccination. The age, gender, vaccination record, and time of death after injection of each patient are listed in the table on the next page. The following points are of utmost importance:

 Prior to death, only 4 of the 15 patients had been treated in the ICU for more than 2 days. The majority were never hospitalized and died at home (5), on the street (1), at work (1), in the car (1), or in home-care facilities (1). Therefore, in most cases, therapeutic intervention is unlikely to have significantly influenced the post-mortem findings.

 Not a single death was brought into any possible association with the vaccination by the coroner or the public prosecutor; this association was only established by our autopsy findings.

 The initially performed conventional post-mortems also uncovered no obvious hints to a possible role of vaccination, since the macroscopic appearance of the organs was overall unremarkable. In most cases, “rhythmogenic heart failure” was postulated as the cause of death

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Danielle Smith to replace Dr. Deena Hinshaw | CTV News

Quote

 

She said vaccine mandates at AHS were an example of "poor management" that created staffing problems, and vowed to make changes to its management team before the end of the year.

"This is a management problem, it is not a problem with our frontline workers. Our frontline workers need to be supported," Smith said.

"What happens in a business when they fail to meet targets and they fail to meet direction, you change the management. And so that's what we are going to do. We are going to change the management."

 

It should have been a team of health and other professionals making decisions from the beginning, as the world's pandemic plan called for.  No one person should have that kind of power with no accountability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meredith from Ontario | CAERS

Quote

Meredith is a kind soul, and like many Canadians, did what she was told—or coerced—to do. She was subsequently injured, and found herself with no one to help her. No one should suffer through being gas lit and getting no help from the Canadian government or health services. No one should suffer like this! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,721
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    paradox34
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Fluffypants earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • User went up a rank
      Explorer
    • gatomontes99 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • User went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...