Jump to content

Another Mass Shooting


Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Obama wasn't president when he said that but it was still a dumb thing to say.

It was but if you want to get wound up in a technicality I'll say Sean Connery wasn't the Democrat Candidate for President of the United States like Obama was when he was suggesting violent solutions against political enemies.

There, happy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

It all started under Joe McCarthy in the 50's.

Did it? Wasn't Lincoln heavily demonized? Remember that actor jumping onto the theatre balcony with a pistol, screaming "Sic semper tyrannis?" 

Speaking of McCarthy though, and if you'd like to get way out there in the weeds, progressive socialists always want to forget McCarthy was right. Later documents proved there were Russian Communist operatives infiltrating the Government.

Doesn't really matter though because your original premise of the right initiating and nurturing violence doesn't follow.

Although...kind of, maybe.

Demonizing MacArthur and discrediting the factual occurrence of Communist infiltration did allow the Allinskyites and Cultural Marxists to make further inroads into American society and today we do see violent chaos out of neo-Marxist organizations like BLM and Antifa.

But that's kind of circuitous and doesn't really lead us to the instigator(s) behind your proposal of a perp or perps creating and nurturing the current sectarian violence phenomena. For that we have to go back to the Obama era.

Edited by Infidel Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try these 2 if you don't want to believe there was communist infiltration:

Former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov exposes the four stages of a Communist takeover of a country in rare 1984 interview

Like I said, McCarthy was right.

The only violence initiated by McCarthy was the violence that came of not believing him.

Edited by Infidel Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Except that isn't what he said and there were companies that later offered solutions similar to what he was asking about. He was curious if it was possible. Apparently it was.

He actually did and Dr. Brix looked like she just wanted to disappear. Have you ever read a label on any bottle of disinfectant that didn't say, don't take internally, or do you even read labels?

What companies offered solutions that involved taking disinfectants internally?

Edited by Aristides
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

It was but if you want to get wound up in a technicality I'll say Sean Connery wasn't the Democrat Candidate for President of the United States like Obama was when he was suggesting violent solutions against political enemies.

There, happy?

Actually he was suggesting a greater degree of violence in response to an act of violence, or do you not think a knife attack is an act of violence. It was still a dumb thing to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Try these 2 if you don't want to believe there was communist infiltration:

Former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov exposes the four stages of a Communist takeover of a country in rare 1984 interview

Like I said, McCarthy was right.

The only violence initiated by McCarthy was the violence that came of not believing him.

And the violence America reacted with was every bit as unprincipled as anything they were afraid of.

If you expect to be taken seriously as a Shiny Beacon you better act like one.

AFAIC the act of overthrowing Iran under Eisenhower was a seminal moment that gave birth to an America that is the antithesis of everything it stands for.

The rest of history since then has been...well deserved karma for all intents and purposes. America's allies got it coming too for not speaking up against it.

 

Edited by eyeball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

And the violence America reacted with was every bit as unprincipled as anything they were afraid of.

In reaction to a Russian Communist instigated culture attack as described in the video in your quote, you mean?

Which specific violence are you talking about and how would that have been "created and nurtured" by Republicans, as you claim?

Quote

AFAIC the act of overthrowing Iran under Eisenhower was a seminal moment that gave birth to an America that is the antithesis of everything it stands for.

The rest of history since then has been...well deserved karma for all intents and purposes. America's allies got it coming too for not speaking up against it.

Could be I'm not sure how that would connect to this current phenomena you tell us exists of what you call "sectarian violence." Don't just infer, explain. How exactly does whatever connection Eisenhower may have had to the Shah's coup lead to say BLM riots or Antifa attacks in the street.

Because to me it has no connection whatsoever.

Edited by Infidel Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

In reaction to a Russian Communist instigated culture attack as described in the video in your quote, you mean?

Which specific violence are you talking about and how would that have been "created and nurtured" by Republicans, as you claim?

Could be I'm not sure how that would connect to this current phenomena you tell us exists of what you call "sectarian violence." Don't just infer, explain. How exactly does whatever connection Eisenhower may have had to the Shah's coup lead to say BLM riots or Antifa attacks in the street.

Because to me it has no connection whatsoever.

Yes, in reaction to the threat of communism. I've never said anything against having a negative reaction to communism but the cruel indifferent manner of that reaction is an entirely different matter. Our's was as violent as it was inhumane when all it did was create and empower dictators who emulated the very attributes we found most egregious and disgusting about communists - especially where human rights are involved. We became disgusting ourselves and even more so I figure because as Shining Beacons for liberty and democracy around the world we should have known better than to behave this way.

Like I said Republicans clearly started America down this dark geopolitical road against alleged commies in Iran and elsewhere around the world while pursuing a similarly poisonous path domestically. Commies have always been at the heart of Republican fears - its their dominant cultural outlook now. EVERYTHING that isn't with them or strays from the path by even a smidge is by default a commie or some variant thereof. 

And that's pretty much all there is to the connection to ANITFA and BLM today. You were expecting something even more shallow, why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Antifa and BLM are only the examples of Domestic sectarian that immediately jump to mind. They were created out of a foreign infection of neo-marxism. They were not created by Republicans and are not nurtured by it. By Democrats possibly but not Republicans. Your original contention was a phenomena of sectarian violence was created in America by Republicans.

You've yet to give a single example of that being the case. You keep wanting to talk about foreign policy which has nothing to do with what I was taking issue with. Foreign policy has no connection to mass shootings in America.

And because you have no support for your actual point I'm going to say you don't have one. You're wrong. If there is a problem with sectarian violence in America it was created by and is being nurtured by the left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Antifa and BLM are only the examples of Domestic sectarian that immediately jump to mind. They were created out of a foreign infection of neo-marxism. They were not created by Republicans and are not nurtured by it.

You've yet to give a single example of that being the case.

The Neo-Marxist infection you speak of is a fantastical creation of conservatives/Republicans that you're nurturing yourself right now.

Quote

You keep wanting to talk about foreign policy which has nothing to do with what I was taking issue with. Foreign policy has no connection to mass shootings in America.

The connection is the Republican Party's irrational reaction to communism. The irrationality that it nurtures creates the conditions for violence either by its own hand, by that of its supporters and naturally enough by people who've had their fill of it.

Quote

And because you have no support for your actual point I'm going to say you don't have one. You're wrong. If there is a problem with sectarian violence in America it was created by and is being nurtured by the left.

No it isn't. You wouldn't have to beat up on the world if it would only stop making you so angry and fearful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

The Neo-Marxist infection you speak of is a fantastical creation of conservatives/Republicans that you're nurturing yourself right now.

Then explain this:

"Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors said in a newly surfaced video from 2015 that she and her fellow organizers are “trained Marxists” – making clear their movement’s ideological foundation, according to a report."

https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/

I already linked you to an ex-KGB agent that not only told you how the soviets planned to infiltrate and corrupt western society but told you of his personal part in the strategy.

Obama began his political career in far left bomber group founder, Bill Ayers' kitchen.

And it goes on and on. 

The Marxist infection is supported by massive amounts of evidence.

Your claim of "nothing to see here" has none. 

And the current varieties of Marxists are as free of violence as the Bill Ayers, Weather Underground's bombs or an Antifa riot. 

And if you're suggesting what you called "sectarian violence" such as that perpetrated by neo-anarcho or other flavors of Marxists are what you claimed were "nurtured and created" by Republicans which you now seem to be saying happened after Republicans bothered to notice them, don't be ridiculous.

 

Edited by Infidel Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Plus the shooter.

They never count him because we're supposed to hate him.  We have to, otherwise we might wonder why mentally ill people are handed guns without a concern...

True. There's always a lot more excuses to do nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/15/2022 at 2:37 AM, Great American said:

I am an American. I don't give a flying f*ck what other countries do. If I wanted to be like other countries I'd move there. I own guns and f*ck any socialist b*tch who wants to take them. Pussies in other countries may be okay with leaving themselves defenseless but not me. Break into MY house and you buy a face full of lead. 

Yuck. So toxic.

After having read a few of the comments, I am surprised people are still indulging and are trying to have a conversation with this person and people like him.

To me it's clear that technology and an increase in the standard of living is preventing evolution from weeding out the dummies.

image.thumb.png.49c763d8bedcc3b9b15ed8b2ea83b2af.png

Edited by marcus
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Yep.  A lot of unarmed puzsies die... So what.  F*** 'em

Where are the "what is mass shootings" posters now?

Where are the mass shooting deniers now? 

This was not gang or drug related, where are you now??

Where are the deflectors claiming Neo Marxism or other off topic BS now?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,713
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...