Jump to content

Another Mass Shooting


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Here's what a left wing source tells me the great replacement theory is:

Seems perfectly appropriate to me for the left to be defining what you people  are given the great license you guys seem to have for defining what lefties are.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Boges said:

Cite where non-citizens in the US can vote Federally. 

Hopefully, they can't. At least, not legally. However the Dems are even currently all the time pushing to allow greater "rights" including voting rights for what they call "Dreamers" and others.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Seems perfectly appropriate to me for the left to be defining what you people  are given the great license you guys seem to have for defining what lefties are.

No idea what you're talking about. Best guess says it has nothing to do with what the rest of us were talking about though.

Accusing Tucker Carlson of pushing the great replacement theory is BS depending on a reimagining of the definition of the term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/16/2022 at 7:57 AM, dialamah said:

So what are you saying?  Ten people aren't dead?  Or the ten dead people don't matter?

An avowed white supremacist and anti semite guns down 10 black people with the intent to kill more but, "nothing to see here".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

That's not the great replacement theory. 

Here's what a left wing source tells me the great replacement theory is:

"The original theory states that, with the complicity or cooperation of "replacist" elites,[a][4][7] the white European populations are being demographically and culturally replaced with non-white peoples — especially from Muslim-majority countries — through mass migration, demographic growth and a drop in the birth rate of white Europeans.[4][8][9] Mainstream scholars have dismissed these claims as rooted in an exaggerated reading of immigration statistics and premised upon an unscientific, racist worldview.[10][11]"

Tucker is talking about how Biden and the Dems have been hoping to open the border up to illegals to attract more Democrat support in elections. He's made no assumptions concerning color.

He has all kinds of evidential support for that theory. You don't for yours on him supporting the great replacement theory.

Try again.

How would refugees find their way to voting? Seems like a shelter for their racism. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Sure but it's anti-immigrant...

"They're trying to CHANGE THE POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES"

Uh, well yes.  The population... goes... up... 

Simpleton politics for anger-bots.

*Smirk*

You, quite conveniently, ignore something we like to call...THE LAW!

It is not "anti-immigrant" to be opposed to open border policies that are, indeed, changing the demographics of the USA, as such acts did in Germany, ILLEGALLY! By ordering INS and ICE to stand down, the Biden administration has broken the laws of the land, as they are accomplices to illegal immigration. And they hide their heads up their arses with the word..."ASYLUM". Its sick and once again...incredibly transparent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Wanna play word games huh?

If, as you "suggest" here, that a New American is a LEGAL Citizen of the USA, then why would anyone bend reality, except in order to "suggest" an unreal motive exists within any person...like Tucker Carlson...who uses the term...New American? What purpose does such an accusation serve, if not to promote the idea that anyone inside the USA, should be considered a citizen?

The Libbie news and the Dumbocrats really should try harder to not be so...transparent.

They also might wanna be careful to not be slanderous...

Letting them in is one thing. Letting them vote as a citizen is something else. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

*Smirk*

You, quite conveniently, ignore something we like to call...THE LAW!

It is not "anti-immigrant" to be opposed to open border policies that are, indeed, changing the demographics of the USA, as such acts did in Germany, ILLEGALLY! By ordering INS and ICE to stand down, the Biden administration has broken the laws of the land, as they are accomplices to illegal immigration. And they hide their heads up their arses with the word..."ASYLUM". Its sick and once again...incredibly transparent.

These people won't be voting. At worst they'll be taking jobs that Americans seem unwilling to do. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Boges said:

Letting them in is one thing. Letting them vote as a citizen is something else. 

 

 

13 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Hopefully, they can't. At least, not legally. However the Dems are even currently all the time pushing to allow greater "rights" including voting rights for what they call "Dreamers" and others.

Progs play the long game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Google is a Progressive Socialist's friend. Not mine.

I did go to Duck Duck Go though to find out who provided that definition. Near as I can find IAW is some sort of women's forum. Is that who you and Google are using for your authority on what words mean or is IAW something else?

Nationalist asks a key question you didn't answer. Are whatever IAW is talking about legal or illegal immigrants. Tucker is most often talking about illegals or Biden allowed but should be illegal immigrants.

Duck Duck Go ??   LOL 

Here, from Duck Duck Go. Definition of New American

https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/new-american

and a little more help

https://blog.authenticjourneys.info/2019/03/what-or-who-is-new-american.html

Hope that helps you LOL

Same answer.

Edited by ExFlyer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

No idea what you're talking about. Best guess says it has nothing to do with what the rest of us were talking about though.

Accusing Tucker Carlson of pushing the great replacement theory is BS depending on a reimagining of the definition of the term. 

No idea at all? Bullshit.

Take Carlson for example, like most of the right wing posters around here and everywhere you go his entire shtick is to describe in great detail what a lefty is and why a lefty is the way they are.

It's an endless tirade that's polluted and poisoned discourse in the west and particularly the US to the point it's translating into violent reactions like the one in Buffalo.

The youthfulness of the Buffalo shooter coupled with the apparent content of his manifesto should be ringing alarms in older right wingers who should know better than to lose or give up their grip in such a way.

Words, rhetoric and bullshit matter.

Edited by eyeball
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

I see.

So any person who can manage to get his or her backside into the USA, regardless of what the legality of their presence is...is a "New American".

How unbelievably silly. A "New American" would be a newborn to citizens of the USA, or folks who have gone through the process to become American citizens recently.

You might wanna get ur head outta ur ass...

I didn't make up the definition. It is in the dictionary. Take your disagreement to them, see how much they care about your take on it. LOL

https://blog.authenticjourneys.info/2019/03/what-or-who-is-new-american.html

Edited by ExFlyer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristides said:

Struck a cord it would seem.

 

A. Conservatives are against limitations on who can own what guns.

B. Many pro lifers seem very selective when it comes to which lives have value.

C. Many of these mass killers have no criminal records.

Yeah, it's the hypocrisy chord, not a pile of wood.

A Conservatives are against limitations on guns for law-abiding citizens. They are in favour of criminals being in jail. It makes sense if you think about it, but it also destroys leftist talking points so I get it if you refuse to think. 

B All pro-lifers care about all lives. No one likes mass killings.

C The two biggest mass killers from the past year actually did have criminal records, and almost all gang bangers are known to the police even when they don't have criminal records. Gang bangers do the vast majority of "mass shootings" by this thread's reckoning.

- The Christmas parade killer had just assaulted his baby momma and ran her over a week earlier, with the same vehicle that he used to run over the 40+ people at the Christmas parade. It was just a "car accident" though, according to leftist media sources. 

- The Buffalo shooter already spent time in a mental institute for threatening to murder his grad class, yet he was still roaming free as an 18 yr old. 

Edited by WestCanMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Duck Duck Go ??   LOL 

Here, from Duck Duck Go. Definition of New American

https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/new-american

Hope that helps you LOL

Same answer.

Thanks. It did help. Now that I see it at its original source without key info edited out it makes more sense. Google sucks.

So they're talking about legal American citizens then. The quote they use is from the leftist British rag the Independent. It's American Democrats angry about a comment Donald Trump made against what is called the Democrat "Squad" of 4. 3 American born and 1 legal immigrant.

"“As far as I’m concerned if you hate our country, if you’re not happy here, you can leave,” Mr Trump said."

 

Edited by Infidel Dog
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

I didn't make up the definition. It is in the dictionary. Take your disagreement to them, see how much they care about your take on it. LOL

https://blog.authenticjourneys.info/2019/03/what-or-who-is-new-american.html

Tell ya what...when you decide to quit trying to pull a fast one on people who already see the departure from reality you've taken here...we'll talk.

Until then...I'm afraid you're disqualified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Take Carlson for example, like most of the right wing posters around here and everywhere you go his entire shtick is to describe in great detail what a lefty is and why a lefty is the way they are.

If the left was a race would it make a difference in how the right talks about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

We've all heard the rhetoric and know where the Dems are headed with this BS.

That's just a shelter for racists complaining about the racial make up of the country. 

Didn't Trump celebrate the fact that more minorities voted for him in 2020?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Yeah, it's the hypocrisy chord, not a pile of wood.

A Conservatives are against limitations on guns for law-abiding citizens. They are in favour of criminals being in jail. It makes sense if you think about it, but it also destroys leftist talking points so I get it if you refuse to think. 

B All pro-lifers care about all lives. No one likes mass killings.

C The two biggest mass killers from the past year actually did have criminal records, and almost all gang bangers are known to the police even when they don't have criminal records. Gang bangers do the vast majority of "mass shootings" by this thread's reckoning.

- The Christmas parade killer had just assaulted his baby momma and ran her over a week earlier, with the same vehicle that he used to run over the 40+ people at the Christmas parade. It was just a "car accident" though, according to leftist media sources. 

- The Buffalo shooter already spent time in a mental institute for threatening to murder his grad class, yet he was still roaming free as an 18 yr old. 

A: Again, you have to commit a crime before you can go to jail. Many shooters have no records, many are kids. 

B: Bullshit. No one likes mass killings but plenty are willing to put with them by doing nothing. From them, "Thoughts and Prayers" to the victims of these crimes is nothing less than a cynical insult.

C. So how did they get their guns? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/14/2022 at 1:14 PM, ExFlyer said:

What is wrong down there??

What is right down there??

Racial issues, wealth issues, cultural issues, health issues, obsession with guns and violence.  

Then let everyone have a semi automatic as their god given right and there you go, your question answered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Boges said:

That's just a shelter for racists complaining about the racial make up of the country. 

Didn't Trump celebrate the fact that more minorities voted for him in 2020?  

Oh please.

All the Dems say is "Dreamers" and now all the sudden the law needs to be changed for the poor..."Dreamers".

who happen to be criminals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Boges said:

Didn't Trump celebrate the fact that more minorities voted for him in 2020?  

Yeah he did. What's your point? He was talking about legal American citizens. Mostly Latinos. Not that it matters but there were also increases in the black demographic that voted for him. He celebrated those too. You should check out his rally speeches.

Quote

That's just a shelter for racists complaining about the racial make up of the country. 

Or at least that's what you'd like to believe. Go ahead. Believe what you like. Some of us share Tucker's belief that immigration laws are there for a purpose and that's not racist. We believe it for a Somalian or a Brit.

Edited by Infidel Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Oh please.

All the Dems say is "Dreamers" and now all the sudden the law needs to be changed for the poor..."Dreamers".

who happen to be criminals.

Dreamers are criminals? 

Children who were brought to the US by their parents are criminals because they didn't immediately leave when they could? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,714
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    wopsas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...