Neo-Marxists cannot be reasoned with

[Great American]

Neo-Marxists cannot be reasoned with.

Marxism, and Liberalism it has been correctly said, is mental illness, a delusional cult. They aren’t the original 19th century communists who were just anti-intellectuals rednecks. They are degenerated trained dogs, they train themselves to share the same beliefs and to hold them systematically.

With such a drastic economical change advocacy, you’d think they were all about talking about economics and incentives, you’d think their circles would be all about economical theory and how to apply their totalitarian commie policies in a way that doesn’t completely destroy society, after all, if they manage to make incentives and allocation just slightly worse than capitalism they’ll become a third world shithole in five years. But nope, they are not talking about that, they are not even remotely interested in knowing how their system should look like, they don’t even care.

So what do they talk about? They talk about feminism, they talk about racism, they harp about the class struggle, they talk about veganism and trannies. It is a conglomeration of mental illnesses, a pile of degeneracy. They are a lost cause. There’s no economical argument that they’ll accept, there’s no moral argument they’ll accept, there’s no philosophical axioms they’ll accept as long as those go against their commie beliefs. They are the human beings that failed at dealing with nihilism. They don’t believe they can define truth for themselves, they only care about defending their fantasies and dreaming about an utopia of ultimate pleasure where you don’t need virtue to survive.

Thus, they cannot be debated in forums either. The come to destroy, disrupt, argue, provoke, derail, anything to avoid the actual facts of a discussion.

Liberalism/Marxism is indeed a disease, but the effect of that disease is hate and chaos they they spread like the filth they wallow in. Democrats are the pandemic in America, and their equivalents in Canada are the same.

In America today there is no longer Liberal American patriot debating Conservative American patriot. There is American patriots (conservatives) against the new American Marxists and their anti-American ideology of hate, racism, sexual perversion, all meant to destroy our great nation, cause havoc and chaos, and use the havoc and chaos to bring for a Marxist nation. In Canda you also have your two sides with two similar positions.

The Left are the enemy. They are evil. Wade into them. Destroy them. (Metaphorically speaking of course.) That includes those who reside in this very forum. Don’t let their faux friendliness fool you. They ae your enemy. They would see your children and grandchildren subjects of a Marxist state.

 

Antifa

Edited May 14, 2022 by Great American

[eyeball]

9 hours ago, Great American said:

Nothing. (Literally)

.

[Great American]

And thus eyeball actually proves my point

Edited May 15, 2022 by Great American

[Michael Hardner]

12 hours ago, eyeball said:

.

You may want to know that he called for our destruction. And by our, I mean pretty much all of Canada because conservatives are to the left of the Democrats. 

Then he added it to say it was metaphorical. But it wasn't.

[Michael Hardner]

I don't consider reason to be the highest order of human governance, I consider morality to be.

No such there is really no reasoning to be had with people who wish harm upon others, calling for the destruction of humans. It's just morally repugnant to me, but there's nothing else to be said in terms of reason.

 

It would be easy to explain why Marxism and American Democrat politics are different, just by citing the definition. But these people aren't interested in discussion, they're interested in violence and destruction.

[blackbird]

38 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I don't consider reason to be the highest order of human governance, I consider morality to be.

No such there is really no reasoning to be had with people who wish harm upon others, calling for the destruction of humans. It's just morally repugnant to me, but there's nothing else to be said in terms of reason.

 

It would be easy to explain why Marxism and American Democrat politics are different, just by citing the definition. But these people aren't interested in discussion, they're interested in violence and destruction.

He said destroy them "metaphorically".  

Granted, he should have avoided using the word "destroy", but the fact he gave a long, detailed post of what the problem is demonstrates he is using words, not violence.  He also showed his support for discussion but stressed the liberal/Marxists are not interested in discussion.  I don't think he is advocating physical violence.  So can you refute or debate the points he makes on feminism, racism, the class struggle, etc.?

[blackbird]

55 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I don't consider reason to be the highest order of human governance, I consider morality to be.

Really?  What would you say about liberal progressivism on subjects like abortion, same-sex marriage, sexual orientation and gender identity, medical assistance in dying and now in the process of being legalized to include the mentally ill?  Would you say liberal support of these agendas are "moral"?

Edited May 15, 2022 by blackbird

[Jack9000]

Dear god seek help buddy seriously

[Michael Hardner]

9 minutes ago, blackbird said:

1. He said destroy them "metaphorically".  

2. stressed the liberal/Marxists are not interested in discussion. 

3. I don't think he is advocating physical violence. 

4. So can you refute or debate the points he makes on feminism, racism, the class struggle, etc.?

1. He edited the post after I complained.

2. Liberal/Marxist is an oxymoron

3. I wouldn't make excuses

4. Liberal Marxist is a made up thing.  Marxism came from Marx's exile in England, not 'rednecks'.  People making up words and demonizing non existent groups is just silliness, we shouldn't have to comment on it.  It's just nonsense.

There are plenty of right wing pundits and academics.  Why not quote them, instead of making up baby words?

It's like me saying dog-cat hybrids are cute, prove me wrong.

[Michael Hardner]

14 minutes ago, blackbird said:

1.  What would you say about liberal progressivism on subjects like abortion, same-sex marriage, sexual orientation and gender identity, medical assistance in dying and now in the process of being legalized to include the mentally ill? 

2. Would you say liberal support of these agendas are "moral"?

1. I agree with progressives on some of these topics but not others.

2. I don't agree with the morality of all of these positions, but they are moral questions in the end, whatever position someone arrives at.

[blackbird]

4 minutes ago, Jack9000 said:

Dear god seek help buddy seriously

I don't think the true God listens to liberal progressives that support or legalize things that oppose the Bible.  The only god liberal progressives follow is the evil one, commonly called the prince of this world, the Devil.

[Great American]

19 minutes ago, blackbird said:

He said destroy them "metaphorically".

Correct

19 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Granted, he should have avoided using the word "destroy", but the fact he gave a long, detailed post of what the problem is demonstrates he is using words, not violence.  He also showed his support for discussion but stressed the liberal/Marxists are not interested in discussion.  I don't think he is advocating physical violence.  So can you refute or debate the points he makes on feminism, racism, the class struggle, etc.?

No, he cannot refute anything I said. He never even attempts to refute any of my posts in any thread. Hence this topic.

He wants to say I am inciting violence, which is a lie, for the same reason they lie about Trump inciting violence, so they can have an excuse to silence us.

@Michael Hardneris engaging in the textbook example of Marxist speech suppression: Label your opponent with some fake crime in order to silence him and thus avoid arguments that he is incapable of winning.

[blackbird]

4 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. I agree with progressives on some of these topics but not others.

2. I don't agree with the morality of all of these positions, but they are moral questions in the end, whatever position someone arrives at.

Which ones would you agree with and which would you oppose or disagree with?

[Great American]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

I don't consider reason to be the highest order of human governance, I consider morality to be

And you side with the most evil abominable policies. You are pro infanticide (abortion) you are pro-sodomy (gay marriage) just to name two of the worst. You have NO morals.

20 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Really?  What would you say about liberal progressivism on subjects like abortion, same-sex marriage, sexual orientation and gender identity, medical assistance in dying and now in the process of being legalized to include the mentally ill?  Would you say liberal support of these agendas are "moral"?

He will dodge that question

3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. I agree with progressives on some of these topics but not others.

2. I don't agree with the morality of all of these positions, but they are moral questions in the end, whatever position someone arrives at.

LOL!!! What did I say.

Here is a tip buddy: If you vote for them, you support them.

You support them!

 

11 minutes ago, Jack9000 said:

Dear god seek help buddy seriously

Oh shuttup stupid

[blackbird]

14 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. He edited the post after I complained.

2. Liberal/Marxist is an oxymoron

3. I wouldn't make excuses

4. Liberal Marxist is a made up thing.  Marxism came from Marx's exile in England, not 'rednecks'.  People making up words and demonizing non existent groups is just silliness, we shouldn't have to comment on it.  It's just nonsense.

There are plenty of right wing pundits and academics.  Why not quote them, instead of making up baby words?

It's like me saying dog-cat hybrids are cute, prove me wrong.

No, it not a made up thing.  Liberal Marxist refers to such things as cultural Marxism which the liberals/NDP are always pushing and trying to force on society.  To them all cultures, all religions, all belief systems except Biblical Christianity, should be embraced by everyone.  If you don't embrace liberal / cultural Marxism, you are a racist.

[Michael Hardner]

3 minutes ago, blackbird said:

1. Liberal Marxist refers to such things as cultural Marxism which the liberals/NDP are always pushing and trying to force on society. 

2. To them all cultures, all religions, all belief systems except Biblical Christianity, should be embraced by everyone.  If you don't embrace liberal / cultural Marxism, you are a racist.

1. What is the earliest use of this term then?  I have to believe that it was recent.  Marx wasn't interested in socialism, or cultural programming.

2.  This is word salad.  You can't embrace all belief systems, including religions and Marxism and liberalism.  It's nonsense.  

[Great American]

Read the book

 

 

[blackbird]

18 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. What is the earliest use of this term then?  I have to believe that it was recent.  Marx wasn't interested in socialism, or cultural programming.

2.  This is word salad.  You can't embrace all belief systems, including religions and Marxism and liberalism.  It's nonsense.  

The words cultural Marxism refers to today's liberal ideology which I am sure you must have heard and are well aware of.  Multiculturalism is one of the official policies which tries to give equal prominence or respectability to all religions in Canada.  We have freedom of religion in the Constitution which I agree with, but that doesn't mean I have to agree with other religions.  I am still free to hold my own beliefs.  A good example of the government's pushing their cultural Marxism is the motion and law against Islamophobia.  Nobody tries to define exactly what that means, but we know what liberals think it means.  It is a form of cultural Marxism.  We still live in a western style, Judeo-Christian society and many of our laws are based on that.  But liberal ideology is trying to destroy that and create some kind of cultural Marxist society.  They want to root out all forms of what they see as institutional racism in the military for example and even have gone so far as appointing a special committee to examine the armed forces and change the culture.  They were going to get rid of all ministers in the military who did not fit in with their cultural Marxist ideology, but backed away from that and said they can stay now or at least for now. 

Edited May 15, 2022 by blackbird

[Army Guy]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

It would be easy to explain why Marxism and American Democrat politics are different, just by citing the definition. But these people aren't interested in discussion, they're interested in violence and destruction.

I can't help but notice in most Antifa groups, are made up normally of very young adults, like university students, and young red necks mostly with nothing to do except get into trouble.... could it be that the universities are partial to blame for pushing these students to the far left. 

[Michael Hardner]

56 minutes ago, Great American said:

Read the book

 

 

Read the review.  It was enough.

 

Or do I need to read to learn about the 'Franklin'school ??

 

Making up terms and name-calling isn't intellectualism.

[Queenmandy85]

Having an American try to lecture Canadians on politics is like having Kim Kardashian lecture Stephen Hawking on physics. 

[Great American]

12 minutes ago, Queenmandy85 said:

Having an American try to lecture Canadians on politics is like having Kim Kardashian lecture Stephen Hawking on physics. 

You are welcome for enjoying our benevolent protection under our nuclear umbrella for that last 75 years by the way. My taxes paid for that, asshole

Edited May 15, 2022 by Great American

[ExFlyer]

3 minutes ago, Great American said:

You are welcome for enjoying our benevolent protection under our nuclear umbrella for that last 75 years by the way. My taxes paid for that, asshole

Epitome of the arrogant American.

Is this why you all wear the Maple Leaf while travelling internationally ....so you don't get shit on LOL

[Great American]

40 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Epitome of the arrogant American

Insult from the ungrateful Canadian.

Quote

Is this why you all wear the Maple Leaf while travelling internationally ....so you don't get shit on LOL

Why would I wear the symbol of a weak vassal state. Have you been listening to your state controlled fake news again, Marxist boy?

 

 

Edited May 15, 2022 by Great American

[Great American]