Jump to content

US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Which one of those things was she wrong about? Which one of those things do Republicans support?

she is wrong about all of those things

none of her positions are pro life

and she opposes the actual pro life positions openly

Edited by Yzermandius19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

she is wrong about all of those things

none of her positions are pro life

and she opposes the actual pro life positions openly

Universal health care isn't pro life?

Being able to go to school or a store without getting shot isn't pro life?

Having a world you can actually live on isn't pro life?

Listening to medical professionals during a pandemic isn't pro life?

Ah but controlling women is pro life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Universal health care isn't pro life?

Being able to go to school or a store without getting shot isn't pro life?

Having a world you can actually live on isn't pro life?

Listening to medical professionals during a pandemic isn't pro life?

Ah but controlling women is pro life.

not killing babies is pro life

health care rationing death panels isn't pro-life

stopping people from defending themselves isn't pro life

Malthusian anti-human central planning isn't pro life

listening to doctors gone politicians who demand to shut everything down isn't pro life

Chelsea Handler is wrong about everything she said

Edited by Yzermandius19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristides said:

No I'm not. Everything you post confirms it.

no it doesn't

you just have shitty reading comprehension

and jump to ridiculous conclusions

to make yourself sound smarter by comparison

you are just making up my position based nothing that I said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

not killing babies is pro life

health care rationing death panels isn't pro-life

stopping people from defending themselves isn't pro life

Malthusian anti-human central planning isn't pro life

listening to doctors gone politicians who demand to shut everything down isn't pro life

Chelsea Handler is wrong about everything she said

Wow, you really are a conspiracy loving troglodyte.

Death panels. Oh my

45,000 Americans dying from firearms every year is pro life? Right

Any kind of central planning, bad, you exerting control over other peoples bodies is, FREEEDOM. For who?

Listening to nut bars instead of professionals you claim are politicians, bad. Cheering politicized judges put in place to advance an ideological agenda, good.

She is dead right about you.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aristides said:

Wow, you really are a conspiracy loving troglodyte.

Death panels. Oh my

45,000 Americans dying from firearms every year is pro life? Right

Any kind of central planning, bad, you exerting control over other peoples bodies is, FREEEDOM. For who?

Listening to nut bars instead of professionals you claim are politicians, bad. Cheering politicized judges put in place to advance an ideological agenda, good.

She is dead right about you.

your opinion of me isn't relevant 

your mind reading skills are about as bad as it gets

and you don't understand anyone who disagrees with you

so you just make shit up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Some think they should still have them.

Obviously.  US Supreme Court wants to revisit whether women should be allowed to use birth control.  It's  insane.

I don't think men really realize how women have been held back.  And it's not long ago history, it's recent.  Women couldn't get a credit card on their own until 1974.  That's AFTER I was born.  My mother couldn't get a mortgage on her own.  I know a woman younger than me who, in spite of being a mortgage broker, the bank made her get her ex-husband to cosign a mortgage for her.  Banks still make women jump through hoops to get loans, etc.  My sister last year needed a SMALL short term loan.  Despite having equity in her house and guaranteed income, they made it as difficult as possible and I ended up having to loan her the money.  The "old white guy" thinking is still rampant.

I grew up in the age where women in violent or emotional abusive relationships were stuck because by law, they were financially dependent on men - couldn't get a credit card, couldn't get a mortgage, couldn't get a job that paid a living wage.

This has changed for the better, but women are still disadvantaged compared to men.

A lot of men seem to think that granting human rights to women somehow takes something away from THEM.

When a child is conceived, it's generally not the man whose career takes a hit.  It's not his life being put in danger (childbirth is still a major killer of women).  If men assumed the risks - financial, emotional, physical - I dont' believe these laws would even be being debated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Especially when, throughout history, men have gotten special rights based on their gender.

so instead of equality

now women need extra rights

even though you're bitching about men having extra rights as an obvious bad thing

but the reverse is now somehow desirable?

that's not pro-women

that's just anti-men

you too easily confuse the latter for the former

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Scott Mayers said:

Trump is treasonist for intentionally attempting to turn over the election in an obvious coup. The fact that those like you continue to praise him KNOWING this alone is disgusting.

You can repeat what you hear on CNN, good for you. Unfortunately, none of it is true, and every adult in NA with an IQ over 80 knows that by now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Some think they should still have them.

y'all think women should have them

that's not equality you're after

that's superiority

fake feminist

the whole point of the 14th amendment is that no group should have less or more rights

yet you're under the impression it somehow bequeaths extra rights to women?

what are you smoking?

Edited by Yzermandius19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

now women need extra rights

They need different rights.

It's why your argument that since men don't need abortions, women shouldn't have the right, is laughable.

They want to ban birth control.  But they're not talking about banning viagara.  Why is that?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristides said:

Like men need a right to abortion. It just demonstrates your contempt for women.

It's your own leftist sheeple who are saying that men need to have access to abortions, are you saying that leftists are misogynistic?

41 seconds in she's asked, "Can men become pregnant, and have abortions?", and she says "Yes."

She's a certified leftard. That's the opinion that you'll eventually be regurgitating here, even while knowing that it's untrue. 

Now ya know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

yet you're under the impression it somehow bequeaths extra rights to women?

A woman experiencing an ectopic pregnancy needs to have the implanted embryo removed to save her life.

You are against this.

How does this affect you in any way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

y'all think women should have them

that's not equality you're after

that's superiority

fake feminist

the whole point of the 14th amendment is that no group should have less or more rights

yet you're under the impression it somehow bequeaths extra rights to women?

what are you smoking?

You don't want to give up your superiority bud. That much is very clear.

I'm not a feminist, I just think they are human, not objects I can control.

Edited by Aristides
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

They want to ban birth control.  But they're not talking about banning viagara.  Why is that?

That actually fits the same pattern with covid: the people in the real positions of power are self-serving 70-yr-olds, and their attitude is "screw the young". 

I wish I could take credit for the pun but the choice of words was coincidental. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Goddess said:

They need different rights.

It's why your argument that since men don't need abortions, women shouldn't have the right, is laughable.

They want to ban birth control.  But they're not talking about banning viagara.  Why is that?

take it up with the 14th amendment

no one is banning birth control

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Goddess said:

A woman experiencing an ectopic pregnancy needs to have the implanted embryo removed to save her life.

You are against this.

How does this affect you in any way?

I am not against that

you just assume that everyone who opposes abortion opposes it in all circumstances

yet the vast majority of them support some exceptions

the only way to make your argument seem good is to pretend only extremists are on the other side

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

 

no one is banning birth control

They are talking about it.  Do you realize how terrifying this is for women? 

 

3 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

you just assume that everyone who opposes abortion opposes it in all circumstances

yet the vast majority of them support some exceptions

the only way to make your argument seem good is to pretend only extremists are on the other side

The religious extremists are exceptionally vocal right now.  If you think some states are not going to ban abortions outright with no exceptions, your'e being misled by the extremists.

Instead of distancing yourself from them, you're supporting them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...