Jump to content

What do you think of the Disney debacle?  Are you on Disney’s or DeSantis side?


Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

@WestCanMan nothing to say about the Republican pedos? ?

Nothing to say about the CNN pedos? 

I brought them up first, got called a batshit crazy conspiracy theorist even though I was 100% correct, and then Beave just cited one of his ridiculous sources to draw attention away from the fact that CNN had high-ranking employees who were long-time, serious pedos. One of them was training children to perform sexually. The only thing worse is a guy like Olson who had sex with them and then killed them. But honestly, what even happens to kids who get trained to perform sexually? Do they allow them t become adults and maybe testify against them, or do they kill them?

Beave's sources to this point have always been bogus, and even if some of it is true there are people accused of things like "having sex with a 17 yr old", which is legal in Canada. In fact, pre-Harper the age of consent here was 14 if you can believe it.

Another one of those guys was charged with having a small amount of child porn. When you consider the lengths that the Dems went to when they were trying to frame Trump for Russian collusion (Hillary's lawyer - Sussman - was charged criminally for providing false evidence, an FBI lawyer - Clinesmith - was charged criminally for providing false evidence, and other top members of the FBI like McCabe, Orr and Strzok were fired or demoted for their own malfeasance) I think that it's normal to assume that some of these charges are bogus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Considering Republicans have so many sexual predators in their midst its no surprise that you guys are like “Wow only 2 pedos you liberals are lightweights lol”

Dems have just as many, but if you Google them you just get stories about Marjorie Green being called crazy for pointing out the fact that there are so many Dem Pedos. You have to Google Dem pedos by name, like the guy who had an affair with a 17 yr old while he was married, who's now married to that girl and has 4 kids with her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://californiaglobe.com/uncategorized/the-most-trusted-name-in-sex-scandal/

CNN's producer had his electronic devices seized by police over a year before he was fired. 

Quote

Regarding John Griffin, Fox News reported that some of his personal electronic devices had been seized by authorities in September of 2020, more than a full year prior to his arrest. “… Authorities first became aware of Griffin’s depraved proclivities 18 months ago – yet the FBI didn’t arrest him until Friday in Connecticut for allegedly soliciting three mothers and their underage daughters for ‘training’ on fetish sex.”

If Fox knew, and reported on it, then CNN knew, so why did they let that guy keep his job for a year when they knew how fucked up he was? Because, believe it or not, they're even worse than we thought. I had no idea that leftists were such groomers until the past 6 months. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I guess I'm glad they were called out ?  I doubt there's any grouping of people who are more responsible for this kind of crime, except maybe on the surface white males.

Back to you then

They were arrested/fired..... over a year after the FBI seized Griffin's electronic devices because they knew that he was a pedophile....

How long would it take you to fire a pedophile? 

Is it possible that Fox knew but CNN didn't? 

How is it that both of their pedos were only outed in the ONE week before Ghislaine Maxwell was reported to be on the verge on naming names

If there wasn't a credible threat that Maxwell was about to shame famous pedos publicly would the FBI even have done anything? Would CNN have done anything?

Let's be honest, the FBI does everything that they can to shield Dems and they have broken laws and committed crimes to frame Republicans recently. The timing of those arrests would have been extremely suspicious even if we didn't already know about the FBI's criminal level of bias. 

 

I'll ask you again: "Do you find it odd that in CNN's 42-yr history they never outed a single pedophile in 2,184 weeks, but in the week leading up to Ghislaine Maxwell being about to out famous pedophiles, CNN outed two of them?

Zero in 2,184 weeks followed by two unrelated incidences in one week. Hmmmmmmm, that's outside of the standard of deviation I think. Maybe 1,000 standards of deviation outside the mean. Something like that should happen once every 10,000 years. When it happens in that one specific week, it's not by chance. 

Edited by WestCanMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1. "Do you find it odd that in CNN's 42-yr history they never outed a single pedophile in 2,184 weeks, but in the week leading up to Ghislaine Maxwell being about to out famous pedophiles, CNN outed two of them?

 

1. I think you qualified that to say 'Democrat' right ?  Yes I would find it odd but I don't really believe it.  If you have a single link I will look.

Do you want to comment on the Republicans now ?  Do you actually believe one party is more likely to offend in this way ?  I sure don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

 

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. I think you qualified that to say 'Democrat' right ?  Yes I would find it odd but I don't really believe it.  If you have a single link I will look.

 

5 days apart: https://californiaglobe.com/uncategorized/the-most-trusted-name-in-sex-scandal/

Quote

Five days following the arrest of producer John Griffin at CNN for engaging in unlawful relations with underage girls, it appears another CNN producer has followed suit. Last night, Project Veritas dropped a bombshell exposing another producer soliciting sexual material involving an underage girl.

 

https://nationalpost.com/news/will-ghislaine-maxwell-name-names-in-exchange-for-a-reduced-sentence

Quote

Ghislaine Maxwell’s guilty verdict on Dec. 29 bodes ill for some high-profile names allegedly mentioned in her ‘little black book’. Maxwell, who turned 60 in prison last week and faces up to a 65-year sentence, will have ample time to mull over her expected appeal, and strategize on whether naming names will work to her benefit.

So right at the exact time that everyone was expecting Ghislaine to threaten elites with some name-dropping in order to avoid jail-time, CNN was cleaning house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Do you actually believe one party is more likely to offend in this way ?  I sure don't.

No, but I wasn't talking about Dems vs GOP, I was talking about CNN's pedos being ousted at the height of the Ghislaine trial. Beave switched the topic to GOP pedo allegations. 

Personally, I have a theory that the most decent people among us don't "crave" power as much as the scumbags do, and that's why we end up with the leaders that we have, but for whatever reason politicians are far scummier than the average Joe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/26/2022 at 1:18 PM, WestCanMan said:

Nothing to say about the CNN pedos? 

I brought them up first, got called a batshit crazy conspiracy theorist even though I was 100% correct, and then Beave just cited one of his ridiculous sources to draw attention away from the fact that CNN had high-ranking employees who were long-time, serious pedos. One of them was training children to perform sexually. The only thing worse is a guy like Olson who had sex with them and then killed them. But honestly, what even happens to kids who get trained to perform sexually? Do they allow them t become adults and maybe testify against them, or do they kill them?

Beave's sources to this point have always been bogus, and even if some of it is true there are people accused of things like "having sex with a 17 yr old", which is legal in Canada. In fact, pre-Harper the age of consent here was 14 if you can believe it.

Another one of those guys was charged with having a small amount of child porn. When you consider the lengths that the Dems went to when they were trying to frame Trump for Russian collusion (Hillary's lawyer - Sussman - was charged criminally for providing false evidence, an FBI lawyer - Clinesmith - was charged criminally for providing false evidence, and other top members of the FBI like McCabe, Orr and Strzok were fired or demoted for their own malfeasance) I think that it's normal to assume that some of these charges are bogus.

LMAO “It was only a small amount of child porn!”””

 

Shameful and disgusting   But what can you expect from a supporter of the party that holds the trophy for elected members with child porn/pedophile convictions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/26/2022 at 3:21 PM, WestCanMan said:

No, but I wasn't talking about Dems vs GOP, I was talking about CNN's pedos being ousted at the height of the Ghislaine trial. Beave switched the topic to GOP pedo allegations. 

Personally, I have a theory that the most decent people among us don't "crave" power as much as the scumbags do, and that's why we end up with the leaders that we have, but for whatever reason politicians are far scummier than the average Joe. 

The “whatever reason” is that in a country as corrupt as the USA, the wealthy powerbrokers in the proverbial “smoke-filled backroom” are the ones who decide who gets on the ballot, who gets dark money, who gets introduced to VIPs on the cocktail and country club circuit etc.  And as part of their usual due diligence to ensure they’re backing the right horse they typically hire Private investigators and try to dig up dirt on their potential candidate pick. I believe that sometimes they deliberately choose those whom they know to be compromised with dirty secrets and who will therefore be easily controlled. 

Edited by BeaverFever
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

LMAO “It was only a small amount of child porn!”””

 

Shameful and disgusting   But what can you expect from a supporter of the party that holds the trophy for elected members with child porn/pedophile convictions 

You can expect the truth from me, like always. 

Your sources are discredited trash and the guy who had "a small amount of porn on his computer" could easily have been set up. It's not that hard to put a file on someone's computer - just think how much less effort it would take than they put into their Russian collusion farce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You can expect the truth from me, like always. 

Your sources are discredited trash and the guy who had "a small amount of porn on his computer" could easily have been set up. It's not that hard to put a file on someone's computer - just think how much less effort it would take than they put into their Russian collusion farce.

ITS A CONSPIRACY!  All those Republican pedophiles and kiddie porners were framed and then forced to sign confessions!!!

Dennis Hastert -the highest ranking and longest serving Republican speaker in Congress paid hush money to his victims for decades and confessed to his lifelong predations on young boys and went to jail. BUT SOMEHOW HE MUST BE INNOCENT!!! 

VAST CONSPIRACYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!

LMAO is there any situation where  you won’t scream “conspiracy” or “false flag” whenever you feel the facts are inconvenient?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

in a country as corrupt as the USA, the wealthy powerbrokers in the proverbial “smoke-filled backroom” are the ones who decide who gets on the ballot, who gets dark money, who gets introduced to VIPs on the cocktail and country club circuit etc.  And as part of their usual due diligence to ensure they’re backing the right horse they typically hire Private investigators and try to dig up dirt on their potential candidate pick. I believe that sometimes they deliberately choose those whom they know to be compromised with dirty secrets and who will therefore be easily controlled. 

All of the things that you're talking about say "Dem, Dem, Dem, Dem, Dem...."

It was their news org, CNN, that kept highlighting Trump in the GOP primary, because they thought that it would be easier for Hillary (the candidate that they cheated for multiple times) to beat Trump than Bush.

Their power-brokers in the CIA and FBI pushed the witch hunt when they knew it was bogus, they acted like sleazy criminals to push fake 'intel' to the FISA court, "dozens of them" claimed that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation, they pretended the 2016 election was illegitimate when they knew it wasn't, they pretended to know that the 2020 election was 100% legitimate on election night and that questioning it was treason and now we know it was not legitimate, and they joined in on the Jan 6th histrionics. 

"Compromised with dirty secrets" = Joe Biden all the way. He is the biggest influence-peddler in the history of politics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BeaverFever said:

ITS A CONSPIRACY!  All those Republican pedophiles and kiddie porners were framed and then forced to sign confessions!!!

Dennis Hastert -the highest ranking and longest serving Republican speaker in Congress paid hush money to his victims for decades and confessed to his lifelong predations on young boys and went to jail. BUT SOMEHOW HE MUST BE INNOCENT!!! 

VAST CONSPIRACYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!

LMAO is there any situation where  you won’t scream “conspiracy” or “false flag” whenever you feel the facts are inconvenient?

I didn't say all, I said one was possibly framed, and I gave a good reason for thinking as much.

I also said that some of them are accused of having sex with 17 year olds and that's legal in Canada.

In fact, YOUR Trudeau gov't just lowered the legal age for consenting to sodomy to 16 in Canada. If those pedos lived in Trudeauland, the things that they were doing would be considered normal, or even that their partners were on the older side. 

I don't think that the facts are inconvenient, but every time I check into your frothy-mouthed posts your sources fall apart. 

 

And you're still dodging the question about whether or not you think the timing of CNN's pedos getting ousted was fishy. In CNN's 2,100 weeks there have only been two pedos outed there, and they were BOTH IN THE SAME WEEK, which just happened to be at the exact same week when Ghislaine Maxwell was reputed to be on the verge of naming high-profile pedos

You wanna talk about power-brokers? Reporters used to be lower- to midddle-class peons who sorta had it out for gov't types but CNN has a Vanderbilt (AC360), the son-and-brother of 2 NY State governors, and a lot of CNN's staff are either family with or married into the Democrat party. 

If you look at the pedigrees of people like Carlson, Hannity, Gutfeld and D'Souza and compare them to people like Anderson Cooper and Chris Cuomo you can quickly guess which media outlet represents the power brokers that you seem wary of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I didn't say all, I said one was possibly framed, and I gave a good reason for thinking as much.

I also said that some of them are accused of having sex with 17 year olds and that's legal in Canada.

In fact, YOUR Trudeau gov't just lowered the legal age for consenting to sodomy to 16 in Canada. If those pedos lived in Trudeauland, the things that they were doing would be considered normal, or even that their partners were on the older side. 

I don't think that the facts are inconvenient, but every time I check into your frothy-mouthed posts your sources fall apart. 

 

And you're still dodging the question about whether or not you think the timing of CNN's pedos getting ousted was fishy. In CNN's 2,100 weeks there have only been two pedos outed there, and they were BOTH IN THE SAME WEEK, which just happened to be at the exact same week when Ghislaine Maxwell was reputed to be on the verge of naming high-profile pedos

You wanna talk about power-brokers? Reporters used to be lower- to midddle-class peons who sorta had it out for gov't types but CNN has a Vanderbilt (AC360), the son-and-brother of 2 NY State governors, and a lot of CNN's staff are either family with or married into the Democrat party. 

If you look at the pedigrees of people like Carlson, Hannity, Gutfeld and D'Souza and compare them to people like Anderson Cooper and Chris Cuomo you can quickly guess which media outlet represents the power brokers that you seem wary of. 

Deviant sex is in the LPOC party platform. 

And yes pretty well all liberal news anchors have connections to either wealthy bankers (Erin Burnett) or liberal politicians (Chris Cuomo)

Edited by West
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

All of the things that you're talking about say "Dem, Dem, Dem, Dem, Dem...."

It was their news org, CNN, that kept highlighting Trump in the GOP primary, because they thought that it would be easier for Hillary (the candidate that they cheated for multiple times) to beat Trump than Bush.

Their power-brokers in the CIA and FBI pushed the witch hunt when they knew it was bogus, they acted like sleazy criminals to push fake 'intel' to the FISA court, "dozens of them" claimed that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation, they pretended the 2016 election was illegitimate when they knew it wasn't, they pretended to know that the 2020 election was 100% legitimate on election night and that questioning it was treason and now we know it was not legitimate, and they joined in on the Jan 6th histrionics. 

"Compromised with dirty secrets" = Joe Biden all the way. He is the biggest influence-peddler in the history of politics.

LMAO NOPE

 

CNN and all the mews networks focused on trump because they are for-profit business trying to chase ratings and make a profit. That’s the problem with the state of news media today especially the 24-hr near channels. 
 

I’m not re-litigating your Russia collusion lies. Trump fired his way through attorney generals until he found one who promised not to prosecute him. Congratulations   
 

Influence peddling was the main racket of the Trump administration. There are countless examples. The Trump hotel basically became a second home to every grifter and suck-up seeking Trump’s favour, especially the Saudi, throughout the his administration. And then as soon as Trump’s out of office they’re nowhere to be found.
 

Yet Jared Kushner’s new hedge fund suddenly gets $2 BILLION  in Saudi government investment money to manage despite fact that Jared has no hedge fund management experience and against the advice of the Saudi’s own investment advisors ?  Oh I know this is the fourth time you’re hearing of it because you live in a propaganda bubble that’s meant to  keep you from learning about these things 

 

Report: Jared Kushner’s $2 Billion Saudi Check Appears Even More Comically Corrupt Than Previously Thought

 

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/05/jared-kushner-affinity-partners-saudi-arabia/amp

 

 

Massive Saudi investment raises questions about Jared Kushner’s business dealings

By — Geoff Bennett 
By — Tess Conciatori

Apr 15, 2022 06:35 PM EDT
 

A $2 billion investment to Jared Kushner from a fund led by the crown prince of Saudi Arabia has raised questions about the ethics of post-White House business. Kushner’s private equity firm secured the investment after Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman overruled a host of objections from the sovereign wealth funds’ advisers.
 

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/show/massive-saudi-investment-raises-questions-about-jared-kushners-business-dealings
 

JARED KUSHNER FLAUNTED HIS INFLUENCE WITH SAUDI ARABIA, RUSSIA IN PITCH TO INVESTORS

Affinity Partners boasts of “accelerating transformation through connectivity” in a slide deck obtained by The Intercept.

Ken Klippenstein


April 18 2022, 6:34 p.m.

https://theintercept.com/2022/04/18/saudi-russia-jared-kushner-affinity-partners/
 

 

Wait wait let me guess your response:  “SOMEHOW IT MUST ALL BE A CONSPIRACYYYYYY!!!!!”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

LMAO unlike conservative news anchors?

Make the connections then...

Which Fox New reporter is a Vanderbilt, Rothschild, etc? 

Which one has a father and a brother who's a former/current governor? 

Which members of Fox News are married to high-ranking members of the GOP? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

CNN and all the mews networks focused on trump because they are for-profit business trying to chase ratings and make a profit. That’s the problem with the state of news media today especially the 24-hr near channels. 

CNN doesn't focus on Trump, they focus on whatever the Dems need. 

They lied about Russian collusion for over 3 years when they knew that it was bogus. They lied about Cuomo when he was killing people and they helped him cover it up. They lied about the "Don't say gay" law, they lie about the recession, they lie about Ukraine Russia, they lied about the laptop, they lied over and over about every topic ever since the M Brown fiasco.

All that CNN does, 24/7 is lie for the Dems. 

Fox is biased too, they just don't lie like CNN does. By comparison you could say that they tell the truth 24/7. 

Quote

Vanity Fair again? LMAO, your last cite from Vanity Fair was proven to be absolute garbage and this one probably would too if I bothered to look. 

FYI every US gov't is in knee-deep with the Saudis. Do you honestly think that murdering one journalist was a huge black eye on their country? A low point? Do you think it sticks out like a sore thumb, or is that just the story that CNN finds convenient to highlight at this point in time?

Remember that CNN chose to look the other way when they knew that the US's own VPOTUS was influence in China and Ukraine, and then they lied about the laptop story, all of it.

How is it that CNN displays more outrage over Saudi Arabia's 10,000th extra-judicial killing than they do about massive government corruption in the US? 

Do you think that the Saudi Gov't or their financial advisors are really bent out of shape over $2B in investments? That's just a bit more than Trudeau used to buy favourable election coverage. 

I can't believe that you continue to get sucked in by Vanity Fair, CNN, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/25/2022 at 11:45 AM, Michael Hardner said:

Corporations self-governing is a bad thing.

Governments taking actions against a company because of a political grudge is a bad thing.

Doing so openly is a very bad thing.

The culture war is a bad thing.

My opinion -> it's all bad.

I agree corporations and government both need oversight

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/28/2022 at 7:35 PM, WestCanMan said:

Make the connections then...

Which Fox New reporter is a Vanderbilt, Rothschild, etc? 

Which one has a father and a brother who's a former/current governor? 

Which members of Fox News are married to high-ranking members of the GOP? 

They’re all mutimillionaires who make their money shilling for Republicans on and off the air. You don’t have to be married to a Republican in order to be biased towards Republicans.

Laura Ingraham used to work for Clarence Thomas.  

The network was founded and owned by Rupert Murdoch, a far-right conservative and major power broker in the Republican Party. 
 

Tucker Carlsons father was a US Ambassador and prior to that was director of Voice of America, and during the cold war ran several US government-run propaganda outlets, such as anti-Cuba radio. It’s how Tucker got into propaganda media after applying and being rejected by the CIA. Tuckers brother Buckley is a Republican political operative as well. 
 

Countless on-air personalities are former Republican politicians or Republican White House officials. Too many to list. 
 

If you think they’re non-partisan that’s hilarious 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/28/2022 at 7:49 PM, WestCanMan said:

CNN doesn't focus on Trump, they focus on whatever the Dems need. 

They lied about Russian collusion for over 3 years when they knew that it was bogus. They lied about Cuomo when he was killing people and they helped him cover it up. They lied about the "Don't say gay" law, they lie about the recession, they lie about Ukraine Russia, they lied about the laptop, they lied over and over about every topic ever since the M Brown fiasco.

All that CNN does, 24/7 is lie for the Dems. 

Fox is biased too, they just don't lie like CNN does. By comparison you could say that they tell the truth 24/7. 

Vanity Fair again? LMAO, your last cite from Vanity Fair was proven to be absolute garbage and this one probably would too if I bothered to look. 

FYI every US gov't is in knee-deep with the Saudis. Do you honestly think that murdering one journalist was a huge black eye on their country? A low point? Do you think it sticks out like a sore thumb, or is that just the story that CNN finds convenient to highlight at this point in time?

Remember that CNN chose to look the other way when they knew that the US's own VPOTUS was influence in China and Ukraine, and then they lied about the laptop story, all of it.

How is it that CNN displays more outrage over Saudi Arabia's 10,000th extra-judicial killing than they do about massive government corruption in the US? 

Do you think that the Saudi Gov't or their financial advisors are really bent out of shape over $2B in investments? That's just a bit more than Trudeau used to buy favourable election coverage. 

I can't believe that you continue to get sucked in by Vanity Fair, CNN, etc. 

So the gist of your gobbledygook is we should pay no attention to Kushner’s $2billion kickback from the Saudis  because:

1) everyone allegedly takes Saudi bribes (according to you)

2) Hunter Biden COMSPIRACYYYYYYY!!!

3) Fuck Trudeau!!!!!

4) CNN didn’t cover points 1-3 above to your satisfaction (as if that would even be possible)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...