Jump to content

War In Ukraine


Recommended Posts

Ok, so here is the Polish Secret Service not being able to screen a call, to the Polish president. 

Anyhow here it is: 

The Polish president spoke to a hoax caller pretending to be France’s Emmanuel Macron on the night that a missile hit a village near the Ukrainian border, his office has admitted. “Emmanuel, believe me, I am extra careful,” Duda tells the caller in a recording of the call posted on the internet. “I don’t want to have war with Russia and believe me, I am extra careful, extra careful.”

Additional reporting Reuters and Associated Press via The Guardian. 

Also the psychopathic Russian army leadership destroyed a maternity today. Don't think because Ukraine has their fanatics (yesterday's story), Russia is the good. 🤣 At the end of the day, they are still the invaders. 

Same father in the FSB and SBU though: The KGB. 

Edited by Contrarian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Stay tuned! Remember you heard it here first!

 

Kremlin Plans False-Flag Attack on Russian Soil to Gain Public Backing: ISW

 

Russia is planning to carry out a "false-flag" attack on its own territory to bolster public support for its war in Ukraine, according to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).

An ISW report released Tuesday night found that the Kremlin is setting the stage for a fake Ukrainian invasion of southern Russia's Belgorod region, which borders Ukraine near Kharkiv. The think tank suggested that the "absurd" Ukrainian invasion claims pushed by "Kremlin propagandists" could serve to gain public support and appease "the Russian pro-war nationalist community."

"The Kremlin appears to be setting information conditions for a false-flag attack in Belgorod Oblast, Russia, likely in an effort to regain public support for the war in Ukraine," the ISW report states. "Russian claims of an imminent Ukrainian attack on Belgorod Oblast are absurd and only aim to scare the general public to support the war."

"Ukraine has no strategic interest in invading Russia and no ability to do so at such a scale," it continues. "These ridiculous speculations about a fantastical Ukrainian invasion of Russia may also be part of the Kremlin's effort to acknowledge and appease the Russian pro-war nationalist community."

https://www.newsweek.com/kremlin-plans-false-flag-attack-russian-soil-gain-public-backing-isw-1761591?utm_source=Flipboard&utm_medium=App&utm_campaign=Partnerships

 

The desperation is strong in this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BeaverFever said:

Yeah. The MSM reported something convenient for you so you suddenly believe them just this one time after all the time claiming the MSM is just a Ukrainian/Nato/Biden /Nazi propaganda machine   Explain yourself 

When a main stream media source begins turning on Zelinsky, you know that its MUCH worse than made out to be.

I doubt this has even occurred to you...so go home...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

When a main stream media source begins turning on Zelinsky, you know that its MUCH worse than made out to be.

I doubt this has even occurred to you...so go home...

So your new belief  is the MSM  “has turned on Zelensky” and you will believe them from now on?

Edited by BeaverFever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

So if Russia suddenly starts claiming Ukrainians have invaded Belgorod exactly as this piece describes will you believe it then?

Beave...you mistake me for someone who cares about either Russia or Ukraine. I do not.

My only position is that NATO must stay out of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nationalist said:

Beave...you mistake me for someone who cares about either Russia or Ukraine. I do not.

My only position is that NATO must stay out of this.

As expected you dodged the question. Answer the question:
 

So if Russia suddenly starts claiming Ukrainians have invaded Belgorod exactly as this piece describes will you believe it then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

As expected you dodged the question. Answer the question:
 

So if Russia suddenly starts claiming Ukrainians have invaded Belgorod exactly as this piece describes will you believe it then?

Remember all the occupied regions wanted the Russians there. . . And then the people of Kherson celebrate in the streets when the Russians leave. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

They don’t have thousands of scuds ready to use in occupied areas of Ukraine. Their forces there are firing what they have available  

 

Why would there be a vast conspiracy all the way back in July to falsely report something so obscure and specific to the public as s300s being fired at ground targets?  Quit being such a nutjob 

 

The S-300 isn't in active service with the Russians, that's why...nutjob. And if they're going to pull them out of reserve storage due to "lack of ballistic missiles", they're going to haul out the Scuds first...which are actual surface to surface ballistic missiles. But you have your pro-Nazi agenda to support...so keep blaming Russia for the Nazi's mistakes. I expect nothing less from you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

As expected you dodged the question. Answer the question:
 

So if Russia suddenly starts claiming Ukrainians have invaded Belgorod exactly as this piece describes will you believe it then?

The Ukrainians are not gonna invade Russia, Beave. Get realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boges said:

Remember all the occupied regions wanted the Russians there. . . And then the people of Kherson celebrate in the streets when the Russians leave. 

Remember how Putin had Kherson evacuated? All or most of the ethnic Russians left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

So you will continue to selectively pick and choose reported reality and switch your MSM conspiracy on and off as is convenient to support your preformed belief of Russia good, Ukraine bad. 
 

Gotcha

More brick-ish comments from The Peanut Gallery.

Tell ya what Beave...show me where I ever said "Russia good"...or go home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Remember how Putin had Kherson evacuated? All or most of the ethnic Russians left.

Oh so that's how this works. Yet when Ukrainians flee invading Russians, the democratic will of those left shall be honoured. 

 

3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

You can say anything you like. But when facts disagree with Libbie, war-mongering howling, there are only 2 choices:

1. Stupid

2. Automated bot.

I could say the same about you. 

You can see that reckless terror campaigns against Ukrainian civilians can cause damage to NATO nations, even unintentionally. So it's in NATOs interest to reduce Russia's influence here. But that's war-mongering. . . to you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Boges said:

Oh so that's how this works. Yet when Ukrainians flee invading Russians, the democratic will of those left shall be honoured. 

 

I could say the same about you. 

You can see that reckless terror campaigns against Ukrainian civilians can cause damage to NATO nations, even unintentionally. So it's in NATOs interest to reduce Russia's influence here. But that's war-mongering. . . to you. 

1. The Russians had not invaded anywhere when the first referendum happened.

2. Oh for Gawd's sake. It was a UKE missile that hit that farm in Poland. You should stop making a mockery of facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

1. The Russians had not invaded anywhere when the first referendum happened.

You're joking right? These sham elections happened a few months ago when Ukraine was poised to take back huge swaths of occupied territory. Putin even tried to annex territory that he didn't control. 

 

Quote

2. Oh for Gawd's sake. It was a UKE missile that hit that farm in Poland. You should stop making a mockery of facts.

Trying to defend against a Russian barrage against Civilian infrastructure and people. How is that not terrorism? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Boges said:

You're joking right? These sham elections happened a few months ago when Ukraine was poised to take back huge swaths of occupied territory. Putin even tried to annex territory that he didn't control. 

 

Trying to defend against a Russian barrage against Civilian infrastructure and people. How is that not terrorism? 

1. No...but you're doing a very good job of making yourself out to be a joke. But for your edification:

First Referendum in Donbas Region: May 11, 2014

Russian Invasion of Donbas Region: February 24, 2022

2. Perhaps the Ukes need to learn to aim their missiles so they don't kill people in Poland? Or better yet...maybe they should begin real peace talks so the Ukes don't freeze to death this winter? Or would you be happy to watch thousands die of exposure?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

1. No...but you're doing a very good job of making yourself out to be a joke. But for your edification:

First Referendum in Donbas Region: May 11, 2014

Russian Invasion of Donbas Region: February 24, 2022

I'm talking about Annexation Votes taken in late September. 

https://www.npr.org/2022/09/28/1125543244/ukraine-sham-referendums-russia-annexation

 

Quote

2. Perhaps the Ukes need to learn to aim their missiles so they don't kill people in Poland? Or better yet...maybe they should begin real peace talks so the Ukes don't freeze to death this winter? Or would you be happy to watch thousands die of exposure?

And yet you still contend to not be Pro-Putin. You feel that all Putin's actions are a reasonable means to an end. And that Ukraine trying retain freedom and not be a Putin Puppet state is war-monger. It shows where your true motives come from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Boges said:

I'm talking about Annexation Votes taken in late September. 

https://www.npr.org/2022/09/28/1125543244/ukraine-sham-referendums-russia-annexation

 

And yet you still contend to not be Pro-Putin. You feel that all Putin's actions are a reasonable means to an end. And that Ukraine trying retain freedom and not be a Putin Puppet state is war-monger. It shows where your true motives come from. 

So don't say dumb shite and you won't look like a joke.

Again...I'm not "pro" any of them, Tweenkie-poo. I'm not the one trying to justify a protracted war that the Ukraine cannot win without NATO aid and I'm not the one supporting more NATO aid. All I want is for NATO to stay the hell out of a war that is none of their Gawd-Damn business.

Oh and...peace would be nice...before thousands freeze to death. But it might already be too late for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,501
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AntonioCraig
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...