Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I would like MP Singh to answer the following. I hope, on behalf of our Charter rights to freedom of thought and other rights,  and Canadian values,  that he answers and that someone asks him these questions. 

 

Questions.  

You proposed a successful motion to have the Proud Boys labelled a domestic terrorist organization. What specific elements of their organization, Charter, mandate, philosophy, ideology promotes terror? 

 

Fact Check: None.

https://www.nationalobserver.com/2021/02/01/opinion/ndp-campaign-ban-proud-boys-young-voters

 

How many members of the Proud Boys have been convicted of domestic terror charges or criminal violence for actions related to their membership in the Proud Boys organization in Canada?

 

Fact Check: None.

 

You claim that white nationalists killed people on the January 6th trespassing incident in a foreign country. Name the people convicted of murder.

 

At 4:50:

 

 

Fact Check: No one has been charged with  murder from the trespassing incident on January 6th in Washington.  Oath Keepers, not Proud Boys,  have been charged, but not convicted, of sedition. No murder charges for anyone. 

https://www.businessinsider.com/doj-uphill-battle-prove-sedition-charges-capitol-riot-probe-2022-1

The most serious charges facing Proud Boys members is obstruction ". This does not seem in proportion to a domestic terrorist group. Also, these 4 were acting as individuals, not on an organization wide direction. The group is not responsible for individual behavior. Compare these charges to Singh's claims.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/12/28/proud-boys-members-must-face-january-6-charges-us-judge-rules

Singh claims:

"Given their involvement in the violence, in the undermining of democracy and the incitement of those horrible images that we saw out of Washington, D.C., I think it is very clear this is a group that should not be able to operate in Canada," said Singh.

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-the-monday-edition-1.5868846/ndp-leader-calls-for-proud-boys-to-be-designated-a-terrorist-group-1.5870383

 

 

 

Why do you allow events in foreign countries to influence  Canadian laws?

 

Do you believe there is a problem in the white  community in Canada with racism and hatred?

 

Fact Check: MP Singh routinely makes this claim.

Do you believe any other  community or just the white community has a problem with racism and hate?

 

Fact Check: MP Singh is silent on crimes of hate involving other communities. 

You claim that Canada has a serious problem with white racists who are a threat to the safety of non whites,  name the two most dangerous white supremacist organizations in Canada.  

 

Fact Check: Canada does not have a white nationalists problem.  There are no organized movements of hate involving white supremacists in Canada. 

 

How many members are in these dangerous white supremacist organizations?

 

Fact Check: Any such organization would have membership in the dozens , not thousands,  and many members would be feds and antifa. 

 

You support Bill C 229 to have kkk symbols banned in Canada.  Do you believe the kkk is a serious threat to the safety of Canadians in 2022? What is your evidence? When was the last incident involving the kkk in Canada?

 

 

Fact Check: The KKK has never been a threat to anyone in Canada and is not a real concern in 2022.

 

Toronto over the past four years has had over 400 shootings each year. How many have been linked to a white supremacist organization?

 

Fact Check: None.

 

https://data.torontopolice.on.ca/pages/shootings

 

Do you believe banning the Proud Boys, flags, and kkk symbols are more important than addressing gun violence by gangs?

 

Fact Check: MP Singh makes little to no comments about gang violence. In fact, the NDP supports defending the police which would allow shooters to kill more and be caught less.

 

 https://torontosun.com/news/provincial/warmington-star-ndp-candidate-carried-f-the-police-protest-sign

 

 

Most race based studies categorize people into one of three groups: White, Black, other. Stats Canada shows that other/ non whites are the most successful in Canada in terms of earnings, and an  OHRC study shows that other/non whites are treated the most favorable by police and a report based on Toronto School District Board  data shows "other" are the most successful.  Do you believe there is systemic racism? If so, whom does this system favour? You, MP Singh, would fall under other. Is the system designed for your success as an " other"? Do you have " other privileges " ?

 

Fact Check:

 

https://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/National Office/2019/12/Canada's Colour Coded Income Inequality.pdf

 

 

 

The following five groups are even with, above, or about equal to White earning power:

 

South Asian (25% of racialized population) are at 0.96 cents

 

Chinese (21%) are at 1.03

 

Arab (7%) are at 1.00 even

 

Korean (2.5%) are at 1.53

 

Japanese (1.2%) are at 1.24

 

Approximately, 60% of non-Whites (third generation or longer) are even or above White earning power. This data is especially telling because these groups actually experienced legitimate systemic racism.

 

Japanese Canadians who are at #2 were subjected to internment in the 1940's. 90% of Japanese Canadians were interned and they now earn more dollar than Whites. How can this be a system of oppression? How are they marginalized in 2021?

 

Chinese Canadians were subjected to the head tax and the exclusion act which are examples of legitimate systemic racism. Now, they earn 1.03 to a White dollar.

 

Arab Canadians are even with the White dollar despite claims of "Islamaphobia". Not all Arabs are Muslim but they are impervious to systemic racism on their ability to earn in Canada. 

https://edu.yorku.ca/files/2017/04/Towards-Race-Equity-in-Education-April-2017.pdf

 

 Figure 6 shows the outcomes for students at the end of the 5-year period. Within this cohort, 84% of White students had graduated from high school at the end of 5 years, compared to 87% of other racialized students. Other are graduating at a higher rate than White students. This is not evidence of systemic racism rather the contrary.

 

https://edu.yorku.ca/files/2017/04/Towards-Race-Equity-in-Education-April-2017.pdf

 

4.1.c Post-secondary confirmation (university): 60% to 47%

 

Figure 8 compares the post-secondary plans of Black and White high school students in the same cohort. As the graph shows, almost half (47%) of the White students in this cohort applied to and were accepted by an Ontario university.  A larger proportion of other racialized students (60%) in this cohort applied to and were accepted by an Ontario university. The group  " other " has the statistical advantage. 

 

Mr. Singh,  Please advise how Chinese people make up almost 20% of Canada 'a population yet less than 6% of the incarceration rate. Why does " systemic racism " not apply to Chinese people in the justice system? 

Fact Check:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration_in_Canada

 

 

Name any law in 2022 that is racist in favour of whites.

 

 

Fact Check: There are none.  All provinces have Human Rights legislation that make it illegal for discrimination based on race.

 

You claim that the media engages in systemic racism by never discussing racism by whites. Are you unaware of media like cbc, Toronto Star, ctv, global news that consistently make news stories focused on racism? 

 

At 4:55

Fact Check: Trucker rally.  Subban and the flexing fight. Every news story,  every day is about how " racist " white people are.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/jagmeet-singh-anti-mask-far-right-1.6020777

 

Mr. SINGH DO YOU DISAVOW Babbar Khalsa?????

 

I hope someone asks this race baiting grifter anyone of these questions in question period or anywhere else.  

Edited by OntarioRacism2021
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Looks like a cut paste.

 

From what I can see, this happened 

 

Have you been working on this post for one year?

Yes,  I have. I wanted to wait and see the facts as opposed to relying on CNN, like Singh.  The facts are...no terror charges.  No murder. No pb organization involvement. Basically 4 individuals got a few charges and nothing else significant.  Facts come time. Not hysteria. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Anyway, you're a year late... With no support from parliament.. and the questions you're asking are irrelevant.

Sigh.  There was no context a year ago as no charges had been filed. It takes time to understand a situation.  The questions are relevant as time has proven the allegations of PB being involved in murder and domestic terror are now known to be false.  You don't seem to understand how facts work.  Keep on trolling,  sir. I'm not continuing this exchange. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OntarioRacism2021 said:

1.  There was no context a year ago as no charges had been filed. It takes time to understand a situation. 
2. You don't seem to understand how facts work. 
3. Keep on trolling,  sir. I'm not continuing this exchange. 

1. The article you posted was from a year ago.  The vote and the ban was a year ago.  Not much to understand.
2. I am posting facts
3. Good luck getting Jagmeet's attention on here.  He doesn't sign in often, I'm guessing.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And don't forget, Jagmeet does not like to answer tough questions.  He knows full well that as one of the leaders of the leftist parties he'll be coddled by our mainly leftist journalists.

All valid questions posted above.

As Jagmeet Singh condemns terrorism, second video shows him speaking alongside Sikh separatist | National Post

It speaks volumes about his character or lack thereof.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's bizarre that an actual terrorist supporter like Jagmeet Singh, whose own terrorist org has blown up an airplane killing hundreds of people, can accuse others of being terrorist when they haven't done, proposed or endorsed terrorist activities.

https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/as-jagmeet-singh-condemns-terrorism-second-video-shows-him-speaking-alongside-sikh-separatist

In this video, which is no longer available, Jagmeet just sits there chilling while the guy on his right talks about the need to use violence to achieve their goal of having a country of their own (no one ever gets killed when that happens, right? The partition of India was mostly peaceful by Dems' standards). Now Jagmeet calls peaceful protesters terrorists. Jagmeet Singh is a hypocritical piece of shit. 

(I just wanna make it clear that the vast majority of Sikhs are extremely decent people who only use violence as a means to protect themselves and others, their religion does not permit wars of aggression, but that didn't stop a small minority of them from becoming violent extremists/terrorists.) 

Edited by WestCanMan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/13/2022 at 3:39 PM, Michael Hardner said:

Looks like a cut paste.

 

From what I can see, this happened last year with unanimous consent of parliament and the organization disbanded.

 

Have you been working on this post for one year?

Aaand...the institution groupie has spoken...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I think it's bizarre that an actual terrorist supporter like Jagmeet Singh, whose own terrorist org has blown up an airplane killing hundreds of people, can accuse others of being terrorist when they haven't done, or proposed or endorsed terrorist activities.

https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/as-jagmeet-singh-condemns-terrorism-second-video-shows-him-speaking-alongside-sikh-separatist

In this video, which is no longer available, Jagmeet just sits there chilling while the guy on his right talks about the need to use violence to achieve their goals. Now Jagmeet calls peaceful protesters terrorists. Jagmeet Singh is a hypocritical piece of shit. 

But he has a pink turban so...ya...he's got that going for him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Singh may be a hypocrite

Is, but that was a fair comment.

Quote

but the Proud Boys are shit, according to Canada's House of Commons.

I don't think that they are/were a real thing in Canada. I never even heard of them before all the hubbub about disbanding them. 

Their leader in the US was a hispanic iirc, and if that's the case they obviously weren't very good at being white supremacists.

The Dems' militia, the KKK, didn't have any competition from that quarter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fact Check..the articles cited range from various years but are as recent as last month. It takes time to see what charges are laid in an investigation hence the delay.  But, the key point is that no Proud boys have been  charged with terror or murder as Singh claims.  That was the point. These are lies by a party leader. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OntarioRacism2021 said:

Fact Check..the articles cited range from various years but are as recent as last month. It takes time to see what charges are laid in an investigation hence the delay.  But, the key point is that no Proud boys have been  charged with terror or murder as Singh claims.  That was the point. These are lies by a party leader. 

I just don't understand how a known bigot/terrorist sympathizer like Jagmeet Singh is constantly going around accusing non-terrorists of terrorism.

Do sex offenders walk around accusing other people of rape? You'd think that they'd want to avoid the topic of rape. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...