Jump to content

Will eliminating vaccine mandates and vaccine passports reduce the freedom for the majority?


Recommended Posts

According to this article eliminating mandates and vaccine passports will reduce freedom for the majority.   The problem is in the case of health measures, imposing certain restrictions does reduce the freedom for some people who refuse to get vaccinated and removing those restrictions likewise reduces freedoms for other people.  For example, mandates are imposed to protect workers and people they deal with from the risk of catching Covid from unvaccinated people.  If you remove the mandates, then you increase the chances of people catching Covid in the workplace or spreading Covid to the public by unvaccinated workers.  A similar situation exists with the vaccine passports.  If you remove the passports some people who are unvaccinated will then start going to restaurants, gyms, movie theatres, etc. and increase the risk to the vaccinated people.  

Opinion: Ditching vaccine passport reduces freedom for the majority (msn.com)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, blackbird said:

According to this article eliminating mandates and vaccine passports will reduce freedom for the majority.   The problem is in the case of health measures, imposing certain restrictions does reduce the freedom for some people who refuse to get vaccinated and removing those restrictions likewise reduces freedoms for other people.  For example, mandates are imposed to protect workers and people they deal with from the risk of catching Covid from unvaccinated people.  If you remove the mandates, then you increase the chances of people catching Covid in the workplace or spreading Covid to the public by unvaccinated workers.  A similar situation exists with the vaccine passports.  If you remove the passports some people who are unvaccinated will then start going to restaurants, gyms, movie theatres, etc. and increase the risk to the vaccinated people.  

Opinion: Ditching vaccine passport reduces freedom for the majority (msn.com)

That’s nonsense, but I’m too lazy to tell you why right now.  Since you insist on reading propaganda, you deserve the ensuing delusions.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that vaccines should be mandated for those who can take it which is 99% of population and vaccine passports should be in place till summer time but all restrictions including mandatory wearing of masks should be gradually removed by end of March and we have to learn to live with Covid. More Pfizer treatment pills must be purchased and available for everyone with a prescription.

Edited by CITIZEN_2015
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

I guess that means abortion on demand right? My God!!!!!. Kill the babies even 9 months after pregnancy because that is her body her choice!!!!!!!.

No, because there is another person there, a vulnerable baby whose rights matter.   Stop the false equivalence. The state is mandating vaccines, not abortion.  China did coerce women to have abortions and Canada has definitely shifted closer to China ideologically.  

Edited by Zeitgeist
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

No, because there is another person there, a vulnerable baby whose rights matter.   Stop the false equivalence. The state is mandating vaccines, not abortion.  China did coerce women to have abortions and Canada has definitely shifted closer to China ideologically.  

Liberals have unfortunately always been about population control. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

If our risk tolerances are not the same, how should we resolve that?  

Get over it?  Or not?  Why is that anyone's problem?  People are free to deal with risk as they please.

Edited by Moonlight Graham
  • Like 1

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Winston said:

Use personal protection. You can decrease individual risk based on individual behavior and PPE. 

Is it fair to put the burden only on those who are willing to do all they can to be safe?   Isn’t this why we mandate car insurance and seatbelts and a host of other things?  To “force” people to live in a society together and share the burden?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Is it fair to put the burden only on those who are willing to do all they can to be safe? 

Individual safety is generally based on individual choice. You can choose to be more safe than others. But in general we do not force others to provide safety for the individual. The easiest method is the method already implemented, allow the individual to behave in a safe manner up to which the individual deems necessary. 

51 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Isn’t this why we mandate car insurance and seatbelts and a host of other things?  To “force” people to live in a society together and share the burden?

Could you please extrapolate, car insurance and seatbelts share the burden of what exactly?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Winston said:

Individual safety is generally based on individual choice.

Do you think the issue of the virus being easily transmissible makes it a little different than skydiving, or something else that could only harm yourself?

Also, individual safety is mandated all the time, isn’t it?  Helmets?  Seatbelts?  Steel toed boots?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TreeBeard said:

Do you think the issue of the virus being easily transmissible makes it a little different than skydiving, or something else that could only harm yourself?

We can agree that the virus is transmissible. I have no idea how one could prove transmission between people? Cold, flu ect could follow suit of such claims. 

I would also add, an uninfected person has zero ability to transmit the virus. 

4 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Also, individual safety is mandated all the time, isn’t it?  Helmets?  Seatbelts?  Steel toed boots?

Indeed, but keep in mind each of those safeties mentioned can be removed or "taken off", the vaccine is permanent. A permanent comparison would be more usable in this discussion.  Masks?

I would also add, what is the safety factor of say seatbelts vs masks or vaccines? Is it comparable? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Winston said:

We can agree that the virus is transmissible. I have no idea how one could prove transmission between people? Cold, flu ect could follow suit of such claims. 

I would also add, an uninfected person has zero ability to transmit the virus. 

Indeed, but keep in mind each of those safeties mentioned can be removed or "taken off", the vaccine is permanent. A permanent comparison would be more usable in this discussion.  Masks?

I would also add, what is the safety factor of say seatbelts vs masks or vaccines? Is it comparable? 

Why did you introduce vaccines, when we were discussing PPE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think eliminating the vaccine mandate would mean mandating that people cannot exercise their own freedom to protect themselves.  As far as I know, if anyone wants to wear a mask - triple layered,  if you want - you can do so.  If you want to get vaccinated, and get boosters every day - you can still do so.

I don't think we are going to be forced to enter crowded buildings, and that public places can no longer limit the capacity they want, if they want to. Heck, you can do whatever you want.................... WITH YOUR OWN BODY!

 

What we can't do is force somebody do something to....................... HIS OWN BODY!

Lol, you lefties pro-choice supporters of all people, should know that! ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

If our risk tolerances are not the same, how should we resolve that?  

:rolleyes:

Lol - you protect yourself!   Duh.

Like.......you can order online and  use pick-up only, among other things!

 

Why should people who don't believe and don't want vaccines in their bodies be the ones to be deprived of their rights......just to make people who don't have any common sense feel "protected?"

 

 

Anyway.....

Did booster shots protect  Trudeau?  Did vaccines protect his kid from getting it? He is the best poster boy to justify why some people don't believe in vaccines!

Edited by betsy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep saying before all these - those vaccine passports are only gonna make it worse!

They won't protect you!

What it does is, give you  false sense of security thinking that you're safe from getting it, just because you're in a place that allows only people with vaccine passport! 

 

Vaccine passports make you let down your guard!

Edited by betsy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,801
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlexaRS
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Mathieub earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Old Guy went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Mathieub earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Chrissy1979 earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • Mathieub went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...