Trucker's Convoy

[OftenWrong]

4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Nope, not at all.

Conversing with a narrow-minded asshole issue. Easy to have on this forum.

Almost like discussing things with you.

Oh oh. Look out, he’s gonna pop

[Dougie93]

1 hour ago, OftenWrong said:

Oh oh. Look out, he’s gonna pop

much as he is a complete & total dickhead politically

and whenever cornered, resorts to ad hominem ridiculously

Ex Flyer is growing on me

he's an Ottawa NDHQ staff weenie

of course he's going to side with the government

Jordan Peterson is right

most Canadians simply cannot accept that the government is nefarious

that is too terrible to contemplate

but ultimately, the Freedom Convoy has no natural enemies

Canadian good ol' boys

happy warriors

the protest is a party

[Nefarious Banana]

7 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Conversing with a narrow-minded asshole issue. Easy to have on this forum.

Almost like discussing things with you.

Conversation doesn't seem to be something you're capable of.   Liken you to a deflating bag of fetid gas.

Carry on . . . . . 

[Nationalist]

The convoy and the over the top reaction to it has exposed Canadian Libbies to the light. The entire world now sees the crap we have as leadership. A coward and his dutiful Libbie minions.

The results...our small business base may never recover fully, inflation and a shiny new recession. Oh goodie. 

The level of hatred these Libbies must have for humanity is staggering. 

[ExFlyer]

12 hours ago, OftenWrong said:

Oh oh. Look out, he’s gonna pop

Not even close and certainly not from your banter

[ExFlyer]

8 hours ago, Nefarious Banana said:

Conversation doesn't seem to be something you're capable of.   Liken you to a deflating bag of fetid gas.

Carry on . . . . . 

Au Contraire, conversation require 2 or more being reasonable and having understanding of each others opinon and meaning.

This is an entirely unknown concept to you. Your idea of conversation is to demean and call names.

A waste of letters on the screen .

[Nefarious Banana]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

The convoy and the over the top reaction to it has exposed Canadian Libbies to the light. The entire world now sees the crap we have as leadership. A coward and his dutiful Libbie minions.

The results...our small business base may never recover fully, inflation and a shiny new recession. Oh goodie. 

The level of hatred these Libbies must have for humanity is staggering. 

But, at least we're partially addressing our huge  0.015% of world carbon emissions with our huge increased prices of imported fuel. All the while, we sit on the third largest oil reserves in the world.

Thanks Justin, thanks a lot . . . you stupid prick.

[WestCanMan]

21 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

You know, it is not easy to have a reasonable discussion without your bullshit smeared all over it.

Get over your paranoia and try to have a decent discussion instead your constant biased BS.

Go stroke Vizi, it seems the only thing you have going for yourself.

 

It's impossible to have a reasonable discussion with you because of your infantile bullshit.

If I said something that was inaccurate then why don't you try to make your case instead of just flinging poop like a monkey in a zoo? 

Do you think that there is something inaccurate about this part:

Quote

Do you find it weird that CNN was calling the violent riots in the US "mostly peaceful" and then advocating for an abrupt end to the Freedom Convoy and their dastardly bouncy castles of death? 

FYI CNN was calling the violent riots "mostly peaceful". 

Were they not calling for an abrupt end to the Freedom Convoy protests? 

What's your issue with the above statement EF?

 

What about this:

Quote

Is it weird that CNN didn't cover the story of a peaceful protester who surrendered on his knees and then got beaten severely by the shrouded cops without bodycams? I'm pretty sure that if a Floyd Protester had surrendered on his knees and then got beaten up by cops, CNN would have made that headline news for a month. "Rodney King v 2.0!!!"

The vicious beating of a peaceful protester who surrendered on his knees with his hands behind his head in a western democracy should be a major news story, but for some reason it was completely ignored. 

Do you think that it would have been ignored at the BLM riots?

State your case, don't just make childish accusations. 

Quote

Showing "things"?

They showed Vizi get out of his truck, get on his knees with his hands behind his head, then instantly get thrown down to the ground and 4 cops beat him. They drove their knees into him from both sides. It was a vicious beating and our cancerous MSM ignored it.

You said that there were videos "showing things". That's pathetic.

The Rodney King video didn't "show things". It showed  the police beating the fuck out of a guy who was, for all intents and purposes, in their custody.

The Floyd video didn't "show things". It showed a bunch of police kneeling a guy to death over the course of about 8 minutes. 

The Timpa video didn't "show things". It showed a bunch of police kneeling a guy to death over the course of about 13 minutes. 

Downplaying the extent of what happened in these kinds of videos is disgusting. You're disgusting. Try to prove me wrong, EF.  

[ExFlyer]

17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's impossible to have a reasonable discussion with you because of your infantile bullshit.

If I said something that was inaccurate then why don't you try to make your case instead of just flinging poop like a monkey in a zoo? 

Do you think that there is something inaccurate about this part:

FYI CNN was calling the violent riots "mostly peaceful". 

Were they not calling for an abrupt end to the Freedom Convoy protests? 

What's your issue with the above statement EF?

 

What about this:

The vicious beating of a peaceful protester who surrendered on his knees with his hands behind his head in a western democracy should be a major news story, but for some reason it was completely ignored. 

Do you think that it would have been ignored at the BLM riots?

State your case, don't just make childish accusations. 

You said that there were videos "showing things". That's pathetic.

The Rodney King video didn't "show things". It showed  the police beating the fuck out of a guy who was, for all intents and purposes, in their custody.

The Floyd video didn't "show things". It showed a bunch of police kneeling a guy to death over the course of about 8 minutes. 

The Timpa video didn't "show things". It showed a bunch of police kneeling a guy to death over the course of about 13 minutes. 

Downplaying the extent of what happened in these kinds of videos is disgusting. You're disgusting. Try to prove me wrong, EF.  

Give it up Dude, You are one trick pony.

When trucker debacle goes away, you have nothing. Back to being a zero.:)

[Queenmandy85]

Something the supporters of the illegal occupation of downtown Ottawa seem to gloss over is the Memorandum of Understanding issued by the leadership of the occupation. It demanded the overthrow of the lawful government of Canada. 

[Queenmandy85]

3 hours ago, Nefarious Banana said:

But, at least we're partially addressing our huge  0.015% of world carbon emissions with our huge increased prices of imported fuel. All the while, we sit on the third largest oil reserves in the world.

What do you propose we do when we've given all that petroleum away? It makes better sense to conserve it by transitioning to nuclear power. Western Canada is the Saudi Arabia on nuclear fuel and when it is gone in a couple of centuries, we will also have several thousand years worth of thorium. But all that nuclear fuel is useless without lubricating oil to allow the generators to run. 

[WestCanMan]

41 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Give it up Dude, You are one trick pony.

When trucker debacle goes away, you have nothing. Back to being a zero.:)

Wrong.

I'm a guy who says things which are true, that you don't like, and you don't have any legitimate counterpoints so you fling poo. 

You're a zero on practically every topic here. 

[ExFlyer]

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Wrong.

I'm a guy who says things which are true, that you don't like, and you don't have any legitimate counterpoints so you fling poo. 

You're a zero on practically every topic here. 

Ha, Ha,Ha, Ha,  yeah, sure.

fling poo?? Oooo how subtle LOL

No trucker debacle, no WestConMan. So,... zero or at best a caricature of, well, nope, just a one trick pony.

 

Edited August 1, 2022 by ExFlyer

[WestCanMan]

6 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Ha, Ha,Ha, Ha,  yeah, sure.

fling poo?? Oooo how subtle LOL

No trucker debacle, no WestConMan. So,... zero or at best a caricature of, well, nope, just a one trick pony.

 

Ha ha ya for sure? Is that what passes for an answer from you? 

Again, I make truthful & declarative statements which I can back with ample links, you fling your little poopies. 

If you think that I was wrong then why don't you just experience the joy of stating facts and citing legitimate sources for once, instead of just snivelling?  

[WestCanMan]

6 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said:

Something the supporters of the illegal occupation of downtown Ottawa seem to gloss over is the Memorandum of Understanding issued by the leadership of the occupation. It demanded the overthrow of the lawful government of Canada. 

If you need to know the truth, that's what the bouncy castles were for. 

By day kids jumped on them, but they were supposed to be moved to the walls of the HoC at midnight so that big fat truckers could all jump down on one side, and the little kids on the other side would be propelled up over the walls. But not just any kids - Special Ops Boy Scouts (SOBs).

I can't even talk about phase 2 of the plan. It's too gory for this site. I'd get banned. 

[Dougie93]

6 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said:

Something the supporters of the illegal occupation of downtown Ottawa seem to gloss over is the Memorandum of Understanding issued by the leadership of the occupation. It demanded the overthrow of the lawful government of Canada. 

that is how a Westminster Parliament works

you demand that the MP's vote the Prime Minister out and replace him

entirely constitutional

no Canadian is bound to have fealty to the government nor the Prime Minister

only to Her Majesty The Queen

[West]

7 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said:

Something the supporters of the illegal occupation of downtown Ottawa seem to gloss over is the Memorandum of Understanding issued by the leadership of the occupation. It demanded the overthrow of the lawful government of Canada. 

So what? 

The MOU was about collecting enough signatures to dissolve parliament. It's part of the democratic process... not sure why you are claiming it's an "overthrow" of the government... just more pathetic smears of a peaceful demonstration, no violence, no destruction of property... yet we act like the police brutality was warranted.   Pathetic and ashamed you call yourself Canadian

[ExFlyer]

9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Ha ha ya for sure? Is that what passes for an answer from you? 

Again, I make truthful & declarative statements which I can back with ample links, you fling your little poopies. 

If you think that I was wrong then why don't you just experience the joy of stating facts and citing legitimate sources for once, instead of just snivelling?  

I think in the case of Vizi, you ar misguided and believe only a small fraction of what happened. Like I said, beginning ,middle and end. just the end, explains nothing.

And truly, you are saying a facetime video is your valid source?? Just goes to show how easily you can be manipulated.

[Queenmandy85]

11 hours ago, West said:

So what? 

The MOU was about collecting enough signatures to dissolve parliament. It's part of the democratic process... not sure why you are claiming it's an "overthrow" of the government... just more pathetic smears of a peaceful demonstration, no violence, no destruction of property... yet we act like the police brutality was warranted.   Pathetic and ashamed you call yourself Canadian

How many signatures are required to dissolve Parliament?

Edited August 2, 2022 by Queenmandy85

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

I think in the case of Vizi, you ar misguided and believe only a small fraction of what happened. Like I said, beginning ,middle and end. just the end, explains nothing.

And truly, you are saying a facetime video is your valid source?? Just goes to show how easily you can be manipulated.

I'm saying that multiple people got the same thing on video, so it happened.

If it didn't happen, and it was just an incredible fake, then why hasn't anyone made that case?

The only defence of the police that I have ever seen is your "I can't see it because my head is up my ass, and you're a poopyhead". 

[ExFlyer]

16 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I'm saying that multiple people got the same thing on video, so it happened.

If it didn't happen, and it was just an incredible fake, then why hasn't anyone made that case?

The only defence of the police that I have ever seen is your "I can't see it because my head is up my ass, and you're a poopyhead". 

All small segments of time, no beginning, no middle just and end result which in no way is indicative of the event.

Never ever said it didn't happen, just that there was way more than the snippet you proclaim to be the entire event.

"poopyhead"?? Wow, how feeble LOL

[West]

2 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said:

How many signatures are required to dissolve Parliament?

So your belief that signing a petition to dissolve parliament is something akin to an overthrow of a government? 😆.. 

[Queenmandy85]

32 minutes ago, West said:

So your belief that signing a petition to dissolve parliament is something akin to an overthrow of a government? 😆.. 

It carries no weight in law. If 1000 people can get the Crown to dissolve Parliament over the wishes of the rest of the population, we have a serious problem. 

I still cannot get an answer to the question why were there American flags flown by the occupiers and why were they getting American money? 

Edited August 2, 2022 by Queenmandy85
grammer

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

All small segments of time, no beginning, no middle just and end result which in no way is indicative of the event.

Never ever said it didn't happen, just that there was way more than the snippet you proclaim to be the entire event.

Some of the video is shot from behind. You can see him walk over and get on his knees with his hands behind his head. At that point you can see officers grab his hands and throw him down to the ground. 

At the point when he's thrown to the ground you can no longer see what's happening from the camera angle because it's all happening at knee-level, and there is a crowd of police between the camera and the man who's getting beaten by police.

Other camera angles do show the man being beaten by several police officers while he's on the ground. 

The man absolutely was beaten by police after he surrendered peacefully on his knees, there's no doubt about it. 

The MSM refuses to acknowledge any of it, they've never tried to look into it, the police refuse to talk about it, some of the video equipment that was used to film it was even seized by police. 

As a citizen of a "free" country you should be concerned by it. If this happened to a pro-abortion activist or a vax-Nazi you'd care. 

Quote

"poopyhead"?? Wow, how feeble LOL

Yes, and yet it's the crux of your argument. 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Queenmandy85 said:

I still cannot get an answer to the question why were there American flags flown by the occupiers and why were they getting American money? 

Who cares? 

Why shouldn't Americans support democracy?