Jump to content

The Steele Dossier Was Russian Disinformation


Recommended Posts

As it turns out, every single person that pushed the Steele Dossier as facts, was pushing Russian disinformation.  Congratulations. ?

The main source of the Steele Dossier was arrested and indicted today by the Biden Justice Department   Anyone who believed this bull plop is an utter fool, used like a puppet by the mainstream media.  You people know who you are.  Perhaps it’s time to do a little soul searching and some understanding of confirmation bias.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only were Christopher Steele's sources bad, but also corrupted, which further implicates the clinton campaign and democratic national committee.  First to be indicted was Michael Sussman (a Clinton campaign and DNC lawyer) for lying to the FBI.  Now we have the indictment of Igor Danchenko also for lying to the FBI (five times) who received some of his misinformation from Chuck Dolan, a former Clinton campaign advisor.  Unless you're naive enough to believe that Clinton campaign and DNC officials knew nothing of what was going on, pressure is going to put on those indicted to spill the beans on everyone else to avoid long jail sentences. That's just the way it works.  What goes around, comes around.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ironstone said:

I don't even have to look to know there will be little or no mention of this in the MSM with the exception of FOX. The Clinton's don't have to worry much.

Conspiracy thinking.... 

Of course it was on the top stories of CNBC , BBC, CNN, NY Times.

 

Let's all watch now as you withdraw the claim and admit your mistake like an honest poster. ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Conspiracy thinking.... 

Of course it was on the top stories of CNBC , BBC, CNN, NY Times.

 

Let's all watch now as you withdraw the claim and admit your mistake like an honest poster. ?

Will the admission that the whole thing was fake get as much coverage and air time as when this fake story first surfaced?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

 They still won't release the JFK evidence....

I agree with you up until this last sentence. I was deeply interested in the JFK files, and when they were released I determined that the revelations were just the names of CIA agents whose employment status was not known previously. They were releasing the names after the agents had died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They gave themselves Pulitzers for their Russian collusion reporting.  They interfered and swayed an election over their Russian collusion reporting.  All the while censoring any Hunter Biden stories until they could be “verified”.  This is criminal.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/5/2021 at 3:32 PM, Michael Hardner said:

Conspiracy thinking.... 

Of course it was on the top stories of CNBC , BBC, CNN, NY Times.

 

Let's all watch now as you withdraw the claim and admit your mistake like an honest poster. ?

There's absolutely no need whatsoever to withdraw that claim. 

The coverage that CNBC , BBC, CNN, NY Times, etc give to this story will be a mooncast shadow of the coverage that they gave to collusion.

The collusion fiasco is now officially the biggest witch hunt in the history of politics. The FBI has been exposed as a corrupt, politically motivated dumpster fire. 

Do you think that those media outlets are going to offer the apology that's owed? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny thing about this latest round of "revelations", Hannity said all this stuff 4 years ago. I watched his show a couple of times this week expecting to see the victory laps but he wasn't even covering it.

FACT: Sean Hannity has been proven to have been the most accurate & on-point media personality of the last 5 years re: collusion.

 

Edited by WestCanMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

I agree with you up until this last sentence. I was deeply interested in the JFK files, and when they were released I determined that the revelations were just the names of CIA agents whose employment status was not known previously. They were releasing the names after the agents had died.

Biden has recently delayed the release of classified government files of JFK:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/23/biden-postpones-release-jfk-assassination-files-citing-pandemic-related-delays/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

There's absolutely no need whatsoever to withdraw that claim. 

The coverage that CNBC , BBC, CNN, NY Times, etc give to this story will be a mooncast shadow of the coverage that they gave to collusion.

The collusion fiasco is now officially the biggest witch hunt in the history of politics. The FBI has been exposed as a corrupt, politically motivated dumpster fire. 

Do you think that those media outlets are going to offer the apology that's owed? 

If the POTUS and his campaign folks are chumming with Russian contacts with links to its government, it would be wise for the FBI to investigate.

It's also a fact that most of the mainstream media hates Trump and has been out to undermine him politically since the beginning.  He has every right to dislike many media outlets.  Funny because he's increased the viewership for many of them and made them a lot of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump exposed most of the US mainstream media as subjective and unreliable garbage.  The amount of anti-Trump propaganda the US media has put out 24/7 for the last 6 years is extremely disturbing.  And it was  great for ratings so they doubled-down.  American journalism is a joke run by corporate whores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

If the POTUS and his campaign folks are chumming with Russian contacts with links to its government, it would be wise for the FBI to investigate.

An example of having contacts that you need to worry about is Hunter Biden in China, who only started doing business there after his dad became VP. He did over $1B in business there all of a sudden, with a subsidiary of The Communist Bank of China no less.

Another example of having contacts that you need to worry about is Jerry Swallwell, who had a Chinese spy as his campaign finance manager for the beginning of his political career. Was he actually placed in a position of power in the US gov't by Chinese government money? No one even knows. Why is he still allowed to serve on the intel committee? Where is the public FBI smear campaign into Swallwell? Where is the FBI's pre-dawn raid with locked & loaded assault rifles and the CNN cameras buzzing all around? LMAO. The FBI is a joke.

FYI Trump's Russian connections weren't anything to worry about. Most of the 'connections' didn't even exist to begin with, and Carter Page was a CIA asset, not a Russian spy:

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/474570-an-apology-to-carter-page

https://www.wfmz.com/news/politics/realclearwire/timeline-how-the-fbi-repeatedly-disregarded-evidence-carter-page-was-no-traitor---/article_d6a8fc50-d769-5d62-a67c-ae30d03f7217.html

Quote

Though the FBI regrets the numerous “errors and omissions” it made in a series of wiretap warrant requests to spy on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page as an alleged “Russian agent," it insists they were benign mistakes. 

These aren't even the errors and omissions that FBI officials were fired for, or are being criminally charged for. The FBI investigation had the subtlety of a raging bull in a china shop: they broke laws and publicized/'leaked' intel that they knew to be false on a regular basis. 

The FBI didn't need to stage a public smear campaign, period. The FBI certainly didn't need to stage a public smear campaign after they already knew that the dossier was Hillary/Russian disinformation.

Like I said from the beginning, the only person who actually conspired with Russia was Hillary, and now it's out in the open.

How did CNN wind up being on the scene to cover the FBI's raid on Roget Stone's home? That's just disgusting political theatre.

The end result of the collusion hoax is that the FBI, Dems and the MSM have lost 100% of whatever credibility they had.

Honest to god, anyone who watches CNN or supports the Dems is an absolute dolt now.

 

Quote

It's also a fact that most of the mainstream media hates Trump and has been out to undermine him politically since the beginning.  He has every right to dislike many media outlets.  Funny because he's increased the viewership for many of them and made them a lot of money.

What you said there is just a repudiation of the MSM in the US. 

Who cares if they don't like Trump? That's no reason to lie about him. 

If there are things about Trump that are unlikable, stick to the story. Don't just make other things up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/7/2021 at 2:10 PM, Moonlight Graham said:

The Clinton's, Obama's, and Biden's etc are just better at hiding their corruption from the public than Trump, who seemingly doesn't give a crap besides not going to jail.

The magnitude of the witch hunt scandal is mind-boggling. I know that it's cliche to compare everything to Watergate, but that was chump change by comparison to this one.

The fact that the FBI was such a willing, huge and integral part of a high-profile political smear campaign that lasted for 4 years against a duly elected POTUS should be sending shock waves around the globe. Instead, leftists just shake it off and say "Too bad the Dems'/FBI's crimes didn't pay dividends, because I really appreciate their criminal efforts."

The fact that leftists don't feel stooged, used and completely ashamed just makes me think even less of them. They truly are an inferior breed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

Whoops, sorry Mr. President.

 

Indeed...I recall spending a few YEARS listening to these leftists ass-wipes say that Trump was guilty. They were wrong...as they always are.

Edited by DogOnPorch
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,721
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    paradox34
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • User went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • User earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • User went up a rank
      Rookie
    • User earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...