Jump to content

Returning to normal


myata

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, OftenWrong said:

You’ll have to take up your concerns with Mr. Trudeau. I have yet to hear your stammering hand-waving argument for what he meant about the “opportunity” for a great reset.

What is the great reset? Most never even heard of it before. Obviously Mr. Trudeau knows, and has been having conversations about it with someone, but not Canadians.

Tells you where we are at as far as he’s concerned- a buncha peons. That remark about the great reset wasn’t meant for us. You just do what you’re told, by the great, visionary leader.

Agenda 21 didn't want any of that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Goddess said:

I don't know if anyone else remembers, but early in his time as PM he was interviewed and was praising China's dictatorship and said how much he admired the control they had over the people.

*That* was when a huge red flag appeared for me, and I thought, "Hoo boy, we are in troooooooouble."

Some remember, others conveniently disremember.   ;)

When I heard it I thought, that was absurd yet for him, clearly necessary. Mr. Trudeau said that to appease someone.

IMO, it was the very moment he got elected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/2/2021 at 1:51 PM, myata said:

That may not be your last normal, by any measure as the things are going. Let's wait for the year five, variant omega-epsilon-omicron-175 and keep the spirits up!

Here in BC, we have a really dangerous scariant variant virus going around. It's called the Bonnie Henry variant. This has to be one of the most worse and dangerous scariant variant that I have ever seen or heard of.

This Bonnie Henry scary variant needs to be eradicated now. it has done so much damage now. No one is safe from this scary Bonnie Henry variant. And this scary Bonnie Henry variant is one virus that you can actually see for yourself with your own eyes unlike all the others. This Bonnie Henry virus can actually be kicked in the ass if one comes across it. Just saying. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No need to pick on individuals. In a feudal system lords always look down on the peasants while taking care of their safety and security (in the sense they understand it, and who else is here?). "The politicians lords and scientists priests scramble to keep the populations safe" (13th century or 21st, make your guess).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wondering where the people who insist that the vaccine has no effect on fertility are getting their information from.

@Boges

@ Dialamah

Care to share where it says it's perfectly safe for pregnant women?

Because according to the package insert and the manufacturers, the vaccines were never tested on pregnant women:

Package Insert - COMIRNATY (fda.gov)

Page 13

Quote

 

8 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

8.1 Pregnancy

There is a pregnancy exposure registry that monitors pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to COMIRNATY during pregnancy. Women who are vaccinated with COMIRNATY during pregnancy are encouraged to enroll in the registry by visiting https://mothertobaby.org/ongoing-study/covid19-vaccines/. Risk Summary All pregnancies have a risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. In the US general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2% to 14 4% and 15% to 20%, respectively. Available data on COMIRNATY administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy.

 

 

Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine EUA Fact Sheet for Health Care Providers (fda.gov)

 

Page 24

Quote

 

*Serious Adverse Events are defined as:

Revised:

Nov/19/2021 25

• Death; • A life-threatening adverse event; • Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; • A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions; • A congenital anomaly/birth defect; • An important medical event that based on appropriate medical judgement may jeopardize the individual and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.

 

 

Is it ethical to force everyone to take this experimental vaccine - whose trials in humans are going to be for 2 years, humans are the guinea pigs - which has DEATH listed as an adverse event, and possible congenital/birth defects and has not been studied as to future fertility issues?

If a pregnant woman reads this and decides she does not want to risk death or birth defects or be part of this experiment, should she lose her job?

There are several places in Canada that are reporting large increases in still births - one said they usually see 1-2/month, and they saw over 85 from January to June this year.

And Scotland has launched an investigation, also due to large increases in still births.

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

I'm wondering where the people who insist that the vaccine has no effect on fertility are getting their information from.

@Boges

@ Dialamah

Care to share where it says it's perfectly safe for pregnant women?

Because according to the package insert and the manufacturers, the vaccines were never tested on pregnant women:

Package Insert - COMIRNATY (fda.gov)

Page 13

 

Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine EUA Fact Sheet for Health Care Providers (fda.gov)

 

Page 24

 

Is it ethical to force everyone to take this experimental vaccine - whose trials in humans are going to be for 2 years, humans are the guinea pigs - which has DEATH listed as an adverse event, and possible congenital/birth defects and has not been studied as to future fertility issues?

If a pregnant woman reads this and decides she does not want to risk death or birth defects or be part of this experiment, should she lose her job?

There are several places in Canada that are reporting large increases in still births - one said they usually see 1-2/month, and they saw over 85 from January to June this year.

And Scotland has launched an investigation, also due to large increases in still births.

How about you cite some of the ridiculous claims you make. You're so frustrated to converse with because you parrot the crap you read on blogs like its verified facts. 

Can you cite a study directly linking miscarriages with the vaccine? 

Studies have found that pregnant women fare much MUCH worse when infected with COVID. 

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/pregnancy.html

Quote

 

If you are pregnant or were recently pregnant, you are more likely to get severely ill from COVID-19 compared to people who are not pregnant. Pregnancy causes changes in the body that could make it easier to get very sick from respiratory viruses like the one that causes COVID-19. These changes in the body can continue after pregnancy.

Severe illness means that a person with COVID-19 may need:

Hospitalization

Intensive care

A ventilator or special equipment to help them breathe

People with COVID-19 who become severely ill can die. See why pregnancy is included in the list of underlying medical conditions that increase a person’s risk of severe illness from COVID-19.

 

Pregnancy is actually an underlying condition that makes COVID more deadly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Boges said:

How about you cite some of the ridiculous claims you make.

And then you cite a CDC page that shows no studies have been done on pregnancy and covid vaccines.  Because there are no studies on pregnant women and covid vaccines.

They're safe because the CDC  and FDA says so?

You know that all those commercials telling you that if you've been injured by a drug product you may be entitled to compensation - those drugs were all okayed by the CDC and the FDA.  But at least they went through some type of testing before being released AND none of them were ever forced on the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Boges said:

Can you cite a study directly linking miscarriages with the vaccine? 

NEJM_LTE.pdf (skirsch.com)

The authors of this paper show clearly that based on the data currently available, there is >82% spontaneous abortion rate at 82% rate. The key point is: we don’t know what the number is because nobody has the data and it shows that the CDC is pushing the vaccine on pregnant women even before the safety data is available! This has never happened before. In the past, we’ve always had to prove an intervention is safe BEFORE we recommend it to pregnant women. 

**As of June 11, there are 522 cases of spontaneous abortion after COVID-19 shots reported to VAERS.

You do know that many women are reporting horrific menstrual cycles after the jab, right? Women and teenagers are reporting heavy bleeding of 50-80 days straight.

 

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/6/2021 at 4:20 PM, Goddess said:

NEJM_LTE.pdf (skirsch.com)

The authors of this paper show clearly that based on the data currently available, there is >82% spontaneous abortion rate at 82% rate. The key point is: we don’t know what the number is because nobody has the data and it shows that the CDC is pushing the vaccine on pregnant women even before the safety data is available! This has never happened before. In the past, we’ve always had to prove an intervention is safe BEFORE we recommend it to pregnant women. 

**As of June 11, there are 522 cases of spontaneous abortion after COVID-19 shots reported to VAERS.

You do know that many women are reporting horrific menstrual cycles after the jab, right? Women and teenagers are reporting heavy bleeding of 50-80 days straight.

 

https://globalnews.ca/news/8401613/fact-check-covid-19-vaccines-stillbirths-pregnancy/

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2114466

Quote

Our study found no evidence of an increased risk for early pregnancy loss after Covid-19 vaccination and adds to the findings from other reports supporting Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy.3,4

Again it's a case of causation vs correlation. If you get vaccinated and experience a miscarriage, you may associate the two. When early pregnancy miscarriages are not all that uncommon, especially in older women. That's why people aren't supposed to announce their pregnancy until the second trimester. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Infection rate in Canada, at over 90% of adult vaccination (Ontario) is at 3.8% second only to 4.3% recorded in May, 2021 before mass scale vaccination in all age groups. These are facts and they're saying very clearly: vaccinations do not stop infection. They are good for personal protection against complications, especially for those with higher risk of them, but not a universal panacea and not by any objective measure. There's no reasons for overreaching authoritarian policies like forced vaccinations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Pfizer was forced to reveal their data collected so far, 500 pages per month. They wanted no reveal for 55 years, but a judge forced them and some journalists, doctors and scientists applied through FOIA to get the report.

Here is one doctor's analysis of the pages:

Chris Martinson.. Goes viral about phizer vaccine testing 1200 dead in First 90 days from Jab 55 year data coverup! – Investment Watch (investmentwatchblog.com)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone in Mexico? 

Wife and I escaped the Purge. Met a bunch of anti-vax snowbirds in Puerto V. Hoping they shut the borders for Moron-i-con so that we can get another 6 months on our visa. 

If anyone else is curious, you can buy a house for 230k and you get citizenship... we are hoping it doesn't come to that but prepared to if necessary. BTW, no vaxx bs here, wife and I are hitting buffets and great restaurants everyday, wish I had done this a long time ago. Never thought I'd see the day I felt safer in Mexico than I did in Canada. [Better food too]

Edited by ChristopherCross
Tacos and Tortillas
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The country feels sad and hopeless. Top health aristocracy feels that each new hiccup of the virus should mean some new form of punishment for the pueblo. Maybe if we did not have a new case for six months or what? eight? things could begin turning for the better, under the wise all-knowing "travel from Wuhan" exspert eyes. Can you estimate the chance of that happening, in your lifetime?

Yes and the weather too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,721
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    paradox34
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • SkyHigh earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Proficient
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • gatomontes99 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...