Jump to content

Returning to normal


myata

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

The ratio of vaccinated to unvaccinated hasn't changed much since you and the Ontario-yos were blustering about what they said was "95%" unvaccinated and a "Pandemic of the Unvaccinated." Yet the stat changed. The change would most likely continue if the wave continued but these variant waves diminish over time. I see that's happening in Ontario. But not to worry they say there's some sort of Delta 2 on the way.

We need to approach a mindset where through natural infection and vaccination, a COVID infection is "No Big Deal" to most people. 

The only way we know if that's happened is through Hospitalization numbers if ICU capacity stays low. 

We'll have to see if this UK Delta 2.0 breaks increases hospitalization. 

Quote

And yeah, Colin Powell - there's another example of a variant stat you don't see in the first couple weeks of a variant wave. I'm surprised you brought that up, but thanks.

It's a catch 22 in debating. It's likely the vaxxed that are getting sick have underlying conditions. But many in the anti-vaxxed community contend that anyone without underlying conditions and is of good health can usually deal with COVID (with or without a vaccine)

Largely that may be true, but healthcare systems can't usually cope with even a small fraction of people getting deathly ill from a communicable disease. Which is why we keep seeing places reach a crisis level. Alberta and Saskatchewan being the current example. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

No. The "excuse" is the overcrowding never really shows itself to be the crisis they predicted. Overcrowding happens from time to time even without covid and ways of dealing with it are in place. All those places you're currently pulling your hair out about will do just fine.

By what metric? 

Having to cancel elective surgeries and being forced into Triage protocol seems pretty bad, even if it's only temporary. 

Ontario is taking in several deathly ill patients from Saskatchewan. Is that normal? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Boges said:

Which is why we keep seeing places reach a crisis level. Alberta and Saskatchewan being the current example. 

Or you see this in substandard, over stressed even before the arrival of the epidemics healthcare systems. There's no overcrowding in Norway and Finland. No crying and waving hands, just good quality system worthy of the self-respecting citizens and solid, professional work.

And if you don't have a quality high standard system and competent professionals? Then what's left? Crying, waving hands, and warning of the next catastrophe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ineptitude, gross overspending, laziness and incompetence are neither justification nor excuse for imposing general restrictions and keeping them indefinitely. No, it's only ineptitude and substandard system and incompetence. Enough of it. Stop repeating it over and over. It makes no sense and does not explain or prove anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, myata said:

Or you see this in substandard, over stressed even before the arrival of the epidemics healthcare systems. There's no overcrowding in Norway and Finland. No crying and waving hands, just good quality system worthy of the self-respecting citizens and solid, professional work.

And if you don't have a quality high standard system and competent professionals? Then what's left? Crying, waving hands, and warning of the next catastrophe?

COVID healthcare crisis are/have happened globally. 

I'm sure you'll be eager to pay the taxes in Scandinavia, considering you're not thrilled with your property taxes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, myata said:

Ineptitude, gross overspending, laziness and incompetence are neither justification nor excuse for imposing general restrictions and keeping them indefinitely. No, it's only ineptitude and substandard system and incompetence. Enough of it. Stop repeating it over and over. It makes no sense and does not explain or prove anything.

Laziness?!?!?!!? From Healthcare professionals? 

What a POS thing to say. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Boges said:

It's a catch 22 in debating. It's likely the vaxxed that are getting sick have underlying conditions. But many in the anti-vaxxed community contend that anyone without underlying conditions and is of good health can usually deal with COVID (with or without a vaccine)

Largely that may be true, but healthcare systems can't usually cope with even a small fraction of people getting deathly ill from a communicable disease. Which is why we keep seeing places reach a crisis level. Alberta and Saskatchewan being the current example. 

I think what happens with people like Powell who can get a doctor to look at him when he first registers positive is the Doctor tells him it's OK because he's vaccinated and the vax will save him. Might be happening in homes for the elderly too.

An unvaccinated guy off the street will be at least kept overnight for observation and that can be a disaster waiting to happen. Bad things happen in hospitals. Then there are the ones that come into the hospital with something and discover they're also covid positive. I don't trust hospital bureaucrats with those stats. They have something they want to prove and it's so easy to just list the patient's presence in the ICU or death as one thing or the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Faramir said:

COVID 19 turned out to not be the great scare we were told it was 2 years ago.  1% of the population did NOT succumb and die from it.  Hospitals were not overwhelmed.  In general around the world less than one 10th of 1 percent have died from it.

Around 2% of the people who got it have died from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristides said:

Around 2% of the people who got it have died from it.

Note naive (or could be deliberate) confusion here. In the UK one of the highest infection levels in the developed world, one in 60 tested positive for Covid. And of the fatalities, over 90% were in the over 70 or preexisting conditions group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Boges said:

By what metric? 

By the metric that it keeps happening. Remember all the cries and bleating during the first wave? Look back at them now and try to justify them with figures.

I suppose you could point to a place like New York state but Cuomo was stuffing the covid infected into retirement homes even though he had a freaking hospital boat ready to take hundreds on in the harbor if he'd wanted to use it. He didn't because he thought it might make Trump look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, myata said:

Note naive (or could be deliberate) confusion here. In the UK one of the highest infection levels in the developed world, one in 60 tested positive for Covid. And of the fatalities, over 90% were in the over 70 or preexisting conditions group.

Going by Johns Hopkins which monitors numbers from all countries. We know you think anyone over 60 has lived too long already and doesn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Aristides said:

That way he gets to ignore them all

You only need to show it, something that exists in this reality not only heroic imagination. A modern high standard health care system. With sufficient resources operated by competent professionals. With competent and effective management. Where is it, in what alternate "travel from Wuhan" reality?

Aiiii the sky is falling!! Oiiiii new wave is coming!!!

Edited by myata
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Infidel Dog said:

By the metric that it keeps happening. Remember all the cries and bleating during the first wave? Look back at them now and try to justify them with figures.

I suppose you could point to a place like New York state but Cuomo was stuffing the covid infected into retirement homes even though he had a freaking hospital boat ready to take hundreds on in the harbor if he'd wanted to use it. He didn't because he thought it might make Trump look good.

Now we're playing hindsight. 

The first wave's reactions were largely proactive. "Don't see Granny, you could kill her."

Do you see what's happening in New York and Italy?!?!?! Can't happen here. LOCKDOWN!!! Testing and cases could never justify the numbers, but medical professionals also didn't know how to treat it. 

The pandemic has evolved multiple times since then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristides said:

Going by Johns Hopkins which monitors numbers from all countries.

Seeing as we're currently so worried about Alberta I checked out their flu stats.

https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/37a9f967-13d1-4db5-a5b5-6c8e527fa069/resource/a0a976de-a035-44ec-b405-024071ca751e/download/hta-2015-06-02-influenza-mortality.pdf

1999-2000 was a bad year. The fatality rate was 2.5%.

So you're saying the international stats for Covid fatality rate are almost as bad as a bad flu season in Alberta.

Yeah, OK...and? 

Pay close attention. Fatality Rate is the rate of fatality within cases not mortality rate that looks at total population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Boges said:

Now we're playing hindsight. 

The first wave's reactions were largely proactive. "Don't see Granny, you could kill her."

Do you see what's happening in New York and Italy?!?!?! Can't happen here. LOCKDOWN!!! Testing and cases could never justify the numbers, but medical professionals also didn't know how to treat it. 

The pandemic has evolved multiple times since then. 

Yeah, we've been seeing it with the Delta wave too. I could show you (and have here) hysterical news reports of crowded hospitals where patients are supposed to be stuffed into the hallways.

Then the skeptic go there with their cellphones sneakily taking video and can't find any evidence of it. Just the odd bored nurse wondering what they're doing there.

But nobody wants to accept that as evidence. Very well, I reject your hysterical news anchors of the corporate or state-run news.

Edited by Infidel Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Infidel Dog said:

Yeah, we've been seeing it with the Delta wave too. I could show you (and have here) hysterical news reports of crowded, patients in hallways, hospitals then people go there with there cellphones sneakily taking video and can't find any evidence of it. Just the odd bored nurse wondering what they're doing there.

But nobody wants to accept that as evidence. Very well, I reject your hysterical news anchors of the corporate or state-run news.

Overloaded hospitals are just a conspiracy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Yeah, we've been seeing it with the Delta wave too. I could show you (and have here) hysterical news reports of crowded hospitals where patients are supposed to be stuffed into the hallways.

Then the skeptic go there with their cellphones sneakily taking video and can't find any evidence of it. Just the odd bored nurse wondering what they're doing there.

But nobody wants to accept that as evidence. Very well, I reject your hysterical news anchors of the corporate or state-run news.

Of course Hospital ICUs are open to the public right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Seeing as we're currently so worried about Alberta I checked out their flu stats.

https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/37a9f967-13d1-4db5-a5b5-6c8e527fa069/resource/a0a976de-a035-44ec-b405-024071ca751e/download/hta-2015-06-02-influenza-mortality.pdf

1999-2000 was a bad year. The fatality rate was 2.5%.

So you're saying the international stats for Covid fatality rate are almost as bad as a bad flu season in Alberta.

Yeah, OK...and? 

Pay close attention. Fatality Rate is the rate of fatality within cases not mortality rate that looks at total population.

If you want to cherry pick, a bad influenza year in the US is 60,000 deaths. Covid killed 10 times that between the spring of 20 and the spring of 21.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...