Jump to content

Trudeau's hand-wringing, virtue signaling holiday


Argus

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, ironstone said:

You do have some kind of electronic device made with rare earth minerals on the inside and it's wrapped in plastic which comes from the petroleum industry.  A lot of BC's electricity comes from hydroelectric but I suppose you are opposed to that because it does have some impact on the environment. What other things do you want modern society to give up?

Well, guess what?  I do not need this f-ing electronic device wrapped in plastic.

The only purpose it serves is to hurt my eyes and waste my time in aggravating eternal arguments with the likes of you and Argus!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Nope. Not true at all. I asked if you would still have voted for Trudeau if he looked like Butts. You said:

I said: Why is that?"

To which you responded:

We were talking about your last vote, IE Trudeau vs O'Toole. Your choice in the last election came down to those two.

You were actually choosing between one ruthless authoritarian crook and a conservative, but you said "two crooks", which was highly inappropriate.

 

Not sure why you need to spend that much time over nothing.   It might have sounded like I was choosing between Trudeau and O'Tool, but the reality is, O'Tool was the very last one I would have voted for, so he was eliminated before I even began wondering who to vote for.

But if you want me to call him a crook so you win this argument and have some peace, I will.

O'Tool is a crook!

Hope you sleep well now and leave me alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, cougar said:

Not sure why you need to spend that much time over nothing.   It might have sounded like I was choosing between Trudeau and O'Tool, but the reality is, O'Tool was the very last one I would have voted for, so he was eliminated before I even began wondering who to vote for.

But if you want me to call him a crook so you win this argument and have some peace, I will.

O'Tool is a crook!

Hope you sleep well now and leave me alone.

What's your thought process when you're deciding whom to vote for? What priorities are so near and dear to your heart that you would choose lame-brained and crooked socialists over democracy and capitalism?

Jagmeet Singh even trucks with terrorists ffs. How anyone could vote for a guy who's chummy with terrorists is beyond me. I get that they're "just Khalistani" terrorists, but I don't have a preference between the races/religions of planeloads of murdered people. I personally feel like all terrorists are bad.

Here's his brother, an MP, and another winner, just like Jagmeet: https://bramptonist.com/gurratan-singh-fuck-the-police-sign/. (By 'winner' I meant 'worthless man-child') 

Anamie Paul lol. The Greens are so daft and naive that even in election cycles where the environment is a top priority they can't get 3% of the popular vote. Paul got half of what May got, and May was a complete idiot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Jagmeet Singh even trucks with terrorists ffs. How anyone could vote for a guy who's chummy with terrorists is beyond me.

 

This one was a no go for another reason.

Can't vote for a Canadian with an orange bird nest on his head.  He seems to be an East Indian first before he is Canadian.  Can't vote in someone who will be defending India's interests.   We've got plenty of those already.   And let's not start another argument over this.

 

Arguments.jpe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Calling O'Toole a crook was a big deal, and I was just wondering what could possibly put him at the bottom of your list, aside from MSM propaganda. 

The pre election campaign  letters he mailed me were more than enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, cougar said:

This one was a no go for another reason.

Can't vote for a Canadian with an orange bird nest on his head.  He seems to be an East Indian first before he is Canadian.  Can't vote in someone who will be defending India's interests.   We've got plenty of those already.   And let's not start another argument over this.

 

Arguments.jpe

thats the defination of racist lol.. "cant vote cause of orange bird nest on head" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/9/2021 at 11:59 PM, cougar said:

Well, guess what?  I do not need this f-ing electronic device wrapped in plastic.

The only purpose it serves is to hurt my eyes and waste my time in aggravating eternal arguments with the likes of you and Argus!

then give it up

if you don't practice what you preach

then why should Canada?

if you are just gonna throw stones from your glass house

and demand everyone else be forced to change their behavior

while you don't do anything of the sort

no sane person is going to take you seriously

obvious hypocrisy is obvious 

Edited by Yzermandius19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/10/2021 at 2:35 PM, cougar said:

The pre election campaign  letters he mailed me were more than enough.

aKdfu57.gif 

Did he mail you letters that said that he was a crook?

Did he mail you letters saying that he was going to commit a crime?

Did he mail you letters asking you to commit a crime?

Just exactly how did you arrive at the conclusion that O'Toole was a crook from the mail that he sent you?

You've made a really serious accusation: you've said that O'Toole was a crook. I've never seen anything that would suggest that he's a crook, so I'm asking you to provide evidence to back your claim.

As it stands right now, Trudeau is an actual crook and O'Toole is not a crook, and you're slandering O'Toole. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

aKdfu57.gif 

Did he mail you letters that said that he was a crook?

Did he mail you letters saying that he was going to commit a crime?

Did he mail you letters asking you to commit a crime?

Just exactly how did you arrive at the conclusion that O'Toole was a crook from the mail that he sent you?

You've made a really serious accusation: you've said that O'Toole was a crook. I've never seen anything that would suggest that he's a crook, so I'm asking you to provide evidence to back your claim.

As it stands right now, Trudeau is an actual crook and O'Toole is not a crook, and you're slandering O'Toole. 

 

you are slandering trudeau....   and otoole is a crook  .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, EastCanada90 said:

 

you are slandering trudeau....   and otoole is a crook  .

Trudeau is a crook, Canada's ethics commissioner agrees and there is actual proof of it.

If you want to say O'Toole is a crook, that requires proof or you actually are slandering him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yzermandius19 said:

O'Toole is a cuck

O'Toole is just the product of a country with an alt-left propagandist media. He'd be tarred and feathered if he didn't play Trudeau's game right now. 

Just look at how the PPC is doing. Businesses can't possibly support them or they'll be branded as genocidal racists. 

It wouldn't be ideal to elect the Conservatives as 'Trudeau lite', but at least it would stop Trudeau from using billions more taxpayer dollars to bribe leftist media, and put an end to his plans to control social media. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

You always refrain from name-calling, do you?

I call people liars when I can show where they just lied, or bigots when I can point out their bigotry, I think it's actually important. I don't like seeing people lie on TV and not called out for being exactly what they are. 

If there's an accurate criticism that someone wants to make about O'Toole that's fair. Yz's comment that he was a cuck is partly true, but I also think that O'Toole has no choice but to play within the constraints that the alt-left media has him in, or he'll sink the boat. 

On the other hand, when someone calls O'Toole a crook just because I correctly labelled Trudeau a crook and their feelings are hurt, that's childish. 

The short answer is, no - I don't engage in 'name-calling' when it's inaccurate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Just exactly how did you arrive at the conclusion that O'Toole was a crook from the mail that he sent you?

As I stated above (if you would ever bother reading and comprehending), I came up with the statement "O'Tool is a crook!"  so you sleep well and leave me alone.

But, no! This is still not enough for you.    Now you want me to find evidence in defense of a statement I wasn't meaning to make!

However, if it comes to it, I will find evidence right in the letters he mailed me!

 

P.S.   Can someone upload O'Tool's pre-election letters please?   I sent the first one back to him with my remarks on it.  Second one went straight into the black round office cabinet that gets emptied in the dumpster weekly.  Thanks to whoever kept the letters and can help!

Edited by cougar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, cougar said:

As I stated above (if you would ever bother reading and comprehending), I came up with the statement "O'Tool is a crook!"  so you sleep well and leave me alone.

But, no! This is still not enough for you.    Now you want me to find evidence in defense of a statement I wasn't meaning to make!

However, if it comes to it, I will find evidence right in the letters he mailed me!

Just learn from it. Don't lie in the future and then you won't get pressed.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Just learn from it. Don't lie in the future and then you won't get pressed.

What happened to "comprehension"?  Did you ever study English in school and did any analysis of what people said and what people meant?

You leave me very puzzled.

Yet, to prevent being considered a "liar"  I am prepared to prove that O'Tool is a crook, at least based on the narative coming from his office.   Waiting for someone to upload the letters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, cougar said:

What happened to "comprehension"?  Did you ever study English in school and did any analysis of what people said and what people meant?

You leave me very puzzled.

Yet, to prevent being considered a "liar"  I am prepared to prove that O'Tool is a crook, at least based on the narative coming from his office.   Waiting for someone to upload the letters. 

no one is going to upload the letters

and even if they did

that wouldn't prove what you think it would

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting article here: 

  The Ties that Bind the Trudeau Liberals to Communist China

"Canada-China relations dominated the news in the Nation’s Capital this week – more accurately, Canada’s many questionable dealings with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The fact is the governing Liberal Party has multiple tight relationships with the CCP and this factors into all matters between the two countries."     - The Niagara Independent

This makes me doubt whether the Liberals will be too eager to abandon Huawei.  They claim they will make a decision in the next few weeks.  We will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...