myata Posted August 28, 2021 Report Share Posted August 28, 2021 1 minute ago, Argus said: This adjustment? Risk of hospital admission was twice as high ... Yes, this "adjustment" is called "clueless" because 196 cases out of 8,500 is 2.3% and not 4.4%, in the third grade math at least. And a hardly avoidable conclusion. 1. Continuation of uniform restrictions is not supported by the science and evidence. Up to 95% of population at this time can be expected to have strong protection against Covid hospitalization, with the risk lower than that of a flu complication and traffic injury. Continuation of uniform restrictions without justification and evidence can be a transgression toward arbitrary and voluntaristic use of authority. 2. PHO must return to the business of managing the disease, rather than the population, and judged on the effectiveness of methods that do not interfere with freedoms of citizens and achieved results. 3. The emphasis going forward needs to be on: a) protection of vulnerable part of the population; b) timely and effective treatment for those who need it; c) intelligent and effective methods to suppress infection in specific environments, including technology-based; d) and the foremost, honest, current and accurate information to the society. Covid fear mongering, pumping and pressing the fear on the society is not justified by the evidence and can be interpreted as an attempt at manipulation of the public opinion. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.