Jump to content

The Lawsuits


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

So his objection/lawsuit prevailed ?   How 'bout that ?!

State still got certified for Biden 

 

Quote

So it was OK for Ted Kennedy to challenge incumbent Jimmy Carter, but not OK for Trump...just because he is "Trump" ?   Got it....

I didn't say that. I think it will be entertaining to see when/if Republicans do. 

Seems the GOP is scared of Trump. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Boges said:

State still got certified for Biden

 

Totally besides the point.   Election fraud is OK if Biden wins ?

 

Quote

I didn't say that. I think it will be entertaining to see when/if Republicans do. 

Seems the GOP is scared of Trump. 

 

It will be entertaining regardless.   Four years of Trump was very, very entertaining, even for Canada.   The GOP only cares about winning...with or without Trump, same as any other political party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boges said:

It has to be proven in court. Murika right?

 

Not necessarily....each state certifies its election results based on process and state law.   It doesn't take a court to trigger recounts, run-offs, etc.

And there are down ballot considerations as well.

We just gave thanks to President Trump for a fine Thanksgiving meal enjoyed by all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sharkman said:

What we have here, is another misinformed Canadian that thinks dead people voting doesn't immediately constitute fraud because it happens every election.

So this was effectively argued and proven in court. . . correct? 

And to the level that would result in an 80,000+ vote swing in Pennsylvania and a 100,000 vote swing in Michigan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Trump lawyers put their case before the Pennsylvania legislature yesterday.

Giuliani opened the hearing with the money quote noting it isn't ABC or CNN that gets to call the winner. The American constitution says the legislature appoints the electors. The legislature controls the process.

Now you might not like Giuliani but feel free to try to prove him wrong. Here's video containing the exact quote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V44a7ZUHobI&feature=emb_logo

 

 

Edited by Infidel Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Boges said:

And to the level that would result in an 80,000+ vote swing in Pennsylvania and a 100,000 vote swing in Michigan. 

 

Again, that is not the issue where election fraud is concerned.   Fraud should be investigated and prosecuted regardless of the election outcome or vote totals.

Why is that so hard to understand ?   Because...Trump ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Boges said:

So this was effectively argued and proven in court. . . correct? 

And to the level that would result in an 80,000+ vote swing in Pennsylvania and a 100,000 vote swing in Michigan. 

No, but that’s not my point.  Fraud.  Simple fraud.   Either it did or did not happen.  How much happened will be decided when the Trump team gets to SCOTUS.

Because the courts thus far haven’t been looking at the evidence.  Not one shred of evidence has been presented yet, according to Jenna Ellis.

They are right now at the 3rd District Court, and will shortly be booted up to SCOTUS.  Then your question of how much fraud will be presented.  
 

But more importantly, the issue of unequal treatment of votes in large cities versus towns will be under a microscope.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The media still has a lot of the gullibles obsessing over the victories of crooked officials and Obama judges from last week.

Their missing the increasing pitter pat of republican victories. Expect more screaming at the sky when the downpour begins.

Here's another one though:

Quote

Pennsylvania is prohibited from certifying the rest of its election results in down ballot races — and from taking any further action in regards to yesterday’s certification of the presidential race — pending a hearing on Friday in an appellate court, or intervention by the state Supreme Court.

https://www.post-gazette.com/news/crime-courts/2020/11/25/pennsylvania-vote-election-certification-sean-parnell-mike-kelly-commonwealth-court-appeal/stories/202011250159

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't just the Trump campaign fighting this fight for a fair election.

Lin Wood is still in it. He had a small victory too.

Quote

The 11th Circuit just granted Lin Wood’s appeal in Georgia challenging the validity of the Georgia election procedure.

The case was dismissed last week.

https://www.independentsentinel.com/lin-woods-case-in-georgia-is-back-on/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Sydney Powell released the Kraken:

"Flynn Attorney Abigail Frye posted this moments ago:

The Kraken came down to Georgia on this Thanksgiving Eve in the form of a 104 pg BOMBSHELL complaint exposing the massive fraud that overwhelmed the 2020 Georgia Elections. Georgia, you are most certainly on our minds. Link to filing to come, stay tuned!"

Quote

This civil action brings to light a massive election fraud, multiple violations of Georgia laws, including O.C.G.A. §§ 21-2-30(d), 21-2-31, 21-2- 33.1 and §21-2-522, and multiple Constitutional violations, as shown by fact witnesses to specific incidents, multiple expert witnesses and the sheer mathematical impossibilities found in the Georgia 2020 General Election.1 1. As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i] was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] voters would have voted if their [absentee] ballots had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result.”

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

And Sydney Powell released the Kraken:

"Flynn Attorney Abigail Frye posted this moments ago:

The Kraken came down to Georgia on this Thanksgiving Eve in the form of a 104 pg BOMBSHELL complaint exposing the massive fraud that overwhelmed the 2020 Georgia Elections. Georgia, you are most certainly on our minds. Link to filing to come, stay tuned!"

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

The whole document is riddled with typos and errors including multiple in the fucking title alone. Can you spot them?  “IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICCT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRCOICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION”

 

I thought lawyers were supposed to be the most thorough and meticulous of all professionals. Not these quacks and fraudsters.  Twitter is having a field day. 
 

image.thumb.jpeg.3c49aab1df0a0efeb60f34cd3f4bba70.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.4c5266b60e26acfe7d7f1402a9e581ff.jpeg
 

image.thumb.jpeg.9487a7f603cb3aabe85dc8665decdba5.jpeg

Edited by BeaverFever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

The whole document is riddled with typos and errors including multiple in the fucking title alone. Can you spot them?  “IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICCT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRCOICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION”

 

I thought lawyers were supposed to be the most thorough and meticulous of all professionals. Not these quacks and fraudsters.  Twitter is having a field day. 
 

image.thumb.jpeg.3c49aab1df0a0efeb60f34cd3f4bba70.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.4c5266b60e26acfe7d7f1402a9e581ff.jpeg
 

image.thumb.jpeg.9487a7f603cb3aabe85dc8665decdba5.jpeg

Most likely graduates of trump u.  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

That’s it, nullify the whole election and make Trump president. Because of Shirley Anne Faragalli of Cheektowaga.


Thanks Shirley Anne.

?

 

Isolated incidents of fraud are also common in every election. 

...And stop calling me Shirley!!

 

Sorry, old movie, classic line.  You all will just have to wait.  The evidence is so explosive that in my opinion, the lawyers involved are keeping the worst of it for the court case presentations.  That's right, they are not going to try the cases in the media.  Let that sink in because it's become quite common to sway public opinion for a second and then quickly take a poll.  This crime is too big, too devastating and with too many government agencies looking the other way.

By how things are developing in different states but starting to converge towards SCOTUS, it's starting to look like a giant KRAKEN is taking shape. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,714
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    wopsas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Venandi went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...