Army Guy Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 Quote NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh is the most prominent person who has suggested the incident would have had a worse ending if Hurren weren't white. The incident at Rideau Hall followed weeks of stories about police officers treating people of colour, especially Indigenous people, harshly, to the point of killing them. Originally, I thought all these protests were about 2 things, one black lives matter, and 2 , the excessive use of force ,plus the use of deadly force by police officers... but I guess not, this is now about the RCMP not shooting the white man during the attack on parliament .... because RCMP got this one right it , this incident is now being used to display an example of racism to the rest of the country .... And he is an elected official in our nations parliament, I wonder does he have a security detail of RCMP, and what do they think about these accusations....Or am i making something out of nothing... https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/rcmp-disappointed-by-talk-that-race-a-factor-in-quiet-rideau-hall-arrest/ar-BB16AREG?ocid=msedgntp 3 Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
Moonlight Graham Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 Apparently Jagmeet thinks 100% of non-white criminals are shot or killed by police upon arrest? 2 Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
WestCanMan Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 1 hour ago, Moonlight Graham said: Apparently Jagmeet thinks 100% of non-white criminals are shot or killed by police upon arrest? Jagmeet is a piece of crap. Unfortunately for Canada, that means that the NDP won't be drawing voters away from the Libs. Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth.
cougar Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 2 hours ago, Army Guy said: NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh is the most prominent person who has suggested the incident would have had a worse ending if Hurren weren't white. So he believes he has been discriminated against in the past? Well, he is right. I discriminate against Hindu's based on past negative experience with each and every one I have had any business dealings with. But then you have government sanctions against other nations for just the same reason. So if a government is Kocher with issuing sanctions against a whole country, or an Ebay seller is allowed to ban shipments to countries of choice, I too have a right on a personal lever to select people I want t o do business with, or elect to represent me! I've said it before and will say it again , multiculturalism does not work for so many different reasons. Quote
Argus Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 No one has been able to demonstrate to me that 'systemic racism' even exists today. Usually when you ask they get angry and give you specific instances where someone allegedly did or said something racist. At best, they mention the Indian Act, but nobody likes the Indian Act and we'd love to get rid of it if we could get the indians to agree. 3 Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Infidel Dog Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, Army Guy said: Originally, I thought all these protests were about 2 things, one black lives matter, and 2 , the excessive use of force ,plus the use of deadly force by police officers... but I guess not, this is now about the RCMP not shooting the white man during the attack on parliament .... because RCMP got this one right it , this incident is now being used to display an example of racism to the rest of the country .... And he is an elected official in our nations parliament, I wonder does he have a security detail of RCMP, and what do they think about these accusations....Or am i making something out of nothing... https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/rcmp-disappointed-by-talk-that-race-a-factor-in-quiet-rideau-hall-arrest/ar-BB16AREG?ocid=msedgntp Once you accept the existence of "systemic racism" you can't win. Anything can be an example of it and any contradiction gets shouted down by the "Whose streets? Our Streets!" minority. For them it's us versus them. But you can't accept that and shout back because if you do you're the bad guy. There's a third side. The wishy washy middle. They can't accept the idea that there is a conflict. Although they're shy to admit it too loud they've bought into the lie of the victimized racial minority. They don't want to be seen as the bad guy so they just say there is no battle and attack anybody noticing that there actually is one as being combative and the cause of the conflict. I think those of us who know there is a conflict need to take our eyes away from the cause for a bit and deal with what think of themselves as moderates. We need to clarify the enemy for them so even they can recognize the obvious conflict with an obvious enemy. And the enemy isn't 'people of colour." It's what call themselves "Progressives" through socialists to the admittedly communists. Or as I like to call them, the 'Prog->comms.' Progcomms invented this 'systemic racism' lie to cause division. We need to clarify the enemy and shout back. Once they realize that we've identified the real enemy and object to the nonsense they are creating they'll back away like they always do. For awhile after FDR, "Progressive" became a slur and they backed away. We need to make it one again. Without the Progs the Comms are no threat. With them they are. The comms create the term 'systemic racism.' When they get the progs to start believing in it, that's when you've got a problem. Edited July 12, 2020 by Infidel Dog 2 Quote
Army Guy Posted July 12, 2020 Author Report Posted July 12, 2020 1 hour ago, cougar said: So he believes he has been discriminated against in the past? Well, he is right. I discriminate against Hindu's based on past negative experience with each and every one I have had any business dealings with. But then you have government sanctions against other nations for just the same reason. So if a government is Kocher with issuing sanctions against a whole country, or an Ebay seller is allowed to ban shipments to countries of choice, I too have a right on a personal lever to select people I want t o do business with, or elect to represent me! I've said it before and will say it again , multiculturalism does not work for so many different reasons. But your white , your already been tagged a racist, with white privilege.. but here comes the third strike your a liberal as well.... Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
Shady Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 1 hour ago, Argus said: No one has been able to demonstrate to me that 'systemic racism' even exists today. Usually when you ask they get angry and give you specific instances where someone allegedly did or said something racist. At best, they mention the Indian Act, but nobody likes the Indian Act and we'd love to get rid of it if we could get the indians to agree. Exactly. On one occasion I asked Michael Hardner. His proof was linking to laws from the 1920s that have been out of existence for decades and decades. That’s the best they can do. Which really means, it doesn’t exist. 1 Quote
Michael Hardner Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 14 minutes ago, Shady said: Exactly. On one occasion I asked Michael Hardner. His proof was linking to laws from the 1920s that have been out of existence for decades and decades. That’s the best they can do. Which really means, it doesn’t exist. Doesn't sound like my style. I would probably just ask if you think racism really doesn't exist. I also threw you a bone that 'systemic' is too vague to be meaningful, but you forgot that part. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Michael Hardner Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 And... A bunch of middle-aged white guys posting to each other, agreeing that there's no racism is about the best description of the relevance of this forum btw. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Moonlight Graham Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, cougar said: So he believes he has been discriminated against in the past? Well, he is right. I discriminate against Hindu's based on past negative experience with each and every one I have had any business dealings with. Jagmeet is a Sikh, not a Hindu. I do not stereotype many millions of people based on a few bad apples. I've had both wonderful and horrendous experiences with all sorts of South Asians including Hindus, Sikhs, Christian Tamils etc. Jagmeet's religion or ethnicity is not the reason he said something stupid here. Edited July 12, 2020 by Moonlight Graham Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
Moonlight Graham Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 4 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: And... A bunch of middle-aged white guys posting to each other, agreeing that there's no racism is about the best description of the relevance of this forum btw. There is racism. But saying a non-white person would have been treated differently in the Rideau Hall incident is stupid. It's race-baiting BS. I mean, maybe he would have been, but making a truth claim that he would have been is stupid. The guy was charged with 22 offenses. 1 Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
Moonlight Graham Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 On the other hand though, there's a fair share of straight up sexist and racist a-holes in the RCMP. Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
Michael Hardner Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said: But saying a non-white person would have been treated differently in the Rideau Hall incident is stupid. It's race-baiting BS. I mean, maybe he would have been, but making a truth claim that he would have been is stupid. It's speculation, is what it is. Stupid? It's a guess. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Moonlight Graham Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said: It's speculation, is what it is. Stupid? It's a guess. Yes it is speculation you're right. it's a stupid thing for a federal party leader to say. This is the 2nd time he's race-baited the government, the other time was in the House of Commons not long ago where he was removed from the HOC for those remarks of calling a Bloc MP racist and refusing to apologize. You can't just blast people with baseless accusations of racism whenever you feel like it. It's slander. 2 Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
Michael Hardner Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 49 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said: ...it's a stupid thing for a federal party leader to say. Only if he's trying to actually win vs keep his job. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
cougar Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 1 hour ago, Moonlight Graham said: Jagmeet is a Sikh, not a Hindu. That's OK. I make no distinction. There are at least 50 different languages and ethnicities in India. There are probably over 50 different shades of white too, but Singh would call all of them white. Quote
Moonlight Graham Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said: Only if he's trying to actually win vs keep his job. No it''s totally stupid under all circumstances. Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
Michael Hardner Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Moonlight Graham said: No it''s totally stupid under all circumstances. Not if it gets the right kind of voter to vote for him. Nobody who counts is calling for him to step down. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Moonlight Graham Posted July 13, 2020 Report Posted July 13, 2020 2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: Not if it gets the right kind of voter to vote for him. Nobody who counts is calling for him to step down. So you think he's race baiting to get people to vote for him? Well then you're right he wouldn't be stupid just be a disgusting piece of turd. 1 Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
Argus Posted July 13, 2020 Report Posted July 13, 2020 5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: And... A bunch of middle-aged white guys posting to each other, agreeing that there's no racism is about the best description of the relevance of this forum btw. You keep doing this - exaggerating what people say to make it sound bad when it really isn't. NO ONE has denied that racism exists. And by the way, what has our race got to do with it? What has our age or gender to do with our opinions? And how do you even know what age, race or gender we are? Have you presumed something not in evidence? 1 Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Argus Posted July 13, 2020 Report Posted July 13, 2020 (edited) Here's a perfect example of the horrific 'systemic racism' in policing! Aaagh! Aaagh! In 2019, 14 unarmed Black Americans were shot and killed by police. Of those 14 unarmed Black Americans, only 5 of them were NOT physically attacking the police. Of those 5 incidents, only 2 of the police officers were White. Edited July 13, 2020 by Argus 1 1 Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Michael Hardner Posted July 13, 2020 Report Posted July 13, 2020 26 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said: Well then you're right he wouldn't be stupid just be a disgusting piece of turd. Well that would mean every politician who did that was a turd! Spoiler: they are Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Michael Hardner Posted July 13, 2020 Report Posted July 13, 2020 1 hour ago, Argus said: You keep doing this - exaggerating what people say to make it sound bad when it really isn't. NO ONE has denied that racism exists. I admit that I exaggerated and reacted knee-kick style to Shady's claim: "Which really means, it doesn’t exist." Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Moonlight Graham Posted July 13, 2020 Report Posted July 13, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Argus said: Here's a perfect example of the horrific 'systemic racism' in policing! Aaagh! Aaagh! In 2019, 14 unarmed Black Americans were shot and killed by police. Of those 14 unarmed Black Americans, only 5 of them were NOT physically attacking the police. Of those 5 incidents, only 2 of the police officers were White. Where did you get this info? Link? Edit: I followed the links in your pic above. The stats seem to check out. Edited July 13, 2020 by Moonlight Graham Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.