Jump to content

Trump actions kill 63 Canadians


Recommended Posts

I get a little tired hearing how America is paying more than its fair share for defence.

As I understand it, the buy in to sit down at the NATO table is 2% of GDP.  The UK pays this and the US pays 4%. Why should I feel shamed into paying more than my obligated buy in just because the US pays twice what it needs to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, godzilla said:

i might add that if Trump doesn't like the Iran deal he has every right to introduce modifications... he has not. he has no ideas. all he does is tear up existing agreements and then introduce new ones that are 95% the old ones with 5% window dressing and call it the best deal ever. the guy has no ideas.

The Iran Deal sucked, tearing it up was totally the right move.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I'm implying is as a nation we should STFU, until we are willing to contribute to solutions to these problems we love to whine about....Make us a member of the UN council....

For what, because we signed onto all the  UN policies and yet once back home disregard them....same as our commitments to NATO, and NORAD, and the ABCAZ pact, we can not keep our word why would anyone give us a say in the UN. or take us serious in any world matters...Yes Canada is a military power house that has 30 year old tanks , 40 year fighters, and 30 year old ships...that can not seem to mange to buy simple trucks....so much for spending to much.... 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Iceni warrior said:

I get a little tired hearing how America is paying more than its fair share for defence.

As I understand it, the buy in to sit down at the NATO table is 2% of GDP.  The UK pays this and the US pays 4%. Why should I feel shamed into paying more than my obligated buy in just because the US pays twice what it needs to?

It's those not paying 2% who are the deadbeats, you're not even paying attention.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Iceni warrior said:

I get a little tired hearing how America is paying more than its fair share for defence.

As I understand it, the buy in to sit down at the NATO table is 2% of GDP.  The UK pays this and the US pays 4%. Why should I feel shamed into paying more than my obligated buy in just because the US pays twice what it needs to?

yeah, its like my fence with my neighbor. he owns the fencing company that will build the fence and suspiciously he wants a fancy fence that i don't think we need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

You'll note how the Progressive media led by the CBC frames this as America v. Iran with Canada as a neutral.

This is simply not the case, Canada is with America, against Iran, Canada is fully complicit in all actions taken in the theater, as a member of the coalition.

You're wrong on both accounts.

CBC frames this as Donald Trump vs Iran, and Canada is not with America at all as long as Trudeau is PM. Trudeau's statement that:

Quote

If there were no tensions, if there was no escalation recently in the region, those Canadians would be right now home with their families,

is his own watered-down way of shifting blame away from Iran and placing some of it on Trump. With friends like Trudeau who needs enemies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Iceni warrior said:

I get a little tired hearing how America is paying more than its fair share for defence.

As I understand it, the buy in to sit down at the NATO table is 2% of GDP.  The UK pays this and the US pays 4%. Why should I feel shamed into paying more than my obligated buy in just because the US pays twice what it needs to?

America has far more obligations than simply NATO, America is defending and upholding the entire Western Hegenomy, worldwide, not just in one theater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

It's those not paying 2% who are the deadbeats, you're not even paying attention.

My point was, why does the US pay twice what it needs to unless they want to?

You think they will pay less if Germany coughs up a little more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

America has far more obligations than simply NATO, America is defending and upholding the entire Western Hegenomy, worldwide, not just in one theater.

Is the US keeping the SLOC open out of altruism or do they do it out of self interest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Yzermandius19 said:

I mean clearly America is doing the heavy lifting when it comes to defending and upholding the entire Western Hegemony, if you disagree, you simply don't want to give America credit where it is due.

utter bullshit. this is an old ruse that the US are doing all this for "the West". its a protection racket, pure and simple. if any country wants to be an "ally" of the US then we all know what they need to give up in return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, godzilla said:

utter bullshit. this is an old ruse that the US are doing all this for "the West". its a protection racket, pure and simple. if any country wants to be an "ally" of the US then we all know what they need to give up in return.

Except many of them don't give up what they are required to, some protection racket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Iceni warrior said:

I get a little tired hearing how America is paying more than its fair share for defence.

As I understand it, the buy in to sit down at the NATO table is 2% of GDP.  The UK pays this and the US pays 4%. Why should I feel shamed into paying more than my obligated buy in just because the US pays twice what it needs to?

The US provides military strength around the globe, not just in Europe....most of the NATO countries including Canada have been living the dream, and peace dividends to the point that a lot of these militaries are gutted, like Germany, Holland, you name it...mean while China and Russian have been increasing expenditures on their militaries , to the point that concerns US military forces, that if something did happen, they the US would not be able to handle it themselves, and the NATO allies would struggle to commit forces that would not make much difference...Hence the 2 % GDP number... if Europe or Canada does not like it , get the phack out....it is really that simple....the US would fold it's tents in Europe and pull out ,leaving Europe poorly defended..

why should you feel ashamed, we have signed onto these defensive commitments , promising to maintain the 2 % expenditures....historically we have NEVER s[ent that much unless we were at war...but then again if you looked at the state our forces are in you would see there needs to be some investment.... 

America is getting tired of spending all it's tax payers money with no return while others profit from it...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Iceni warrior said:

So let them. I'd rather spend my money on clean air.

Lack of clean air is not a big problem in the UK, you don't live in China dude. I'd rather spend money on something that's already been achieved as excuse not to pay for something that actually benefits the UK, that's just pointless virtue signalling.

Edited by Yzermandius19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, godzilla said:

yeah, its like my fence with my neighbor. he owns the fencing company that will build the fence and suspiciously he wants a fancy fence that i don't think we need.

right now you don't even have a fence....nothing that would keep anyone out....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Army Guy said:

The US provides military strength around the globe, not just in Europe....most of the NATO countries including Canada have been living the dream, and peace dividends to the point that a lot of these militaries are gutted, like Germany, Holland, you name it...mean while China and Russian have been increasing expenditures on their militaries , to the point that concerns US military forces, that if something did happen, they the US would not be able to handle it themselves, and the NATO allies would struggle to commit forces that would not make much difference...Hence the 2 % GDP number... if Europe or Canada does not like it , get the phack out....it is really that simple....the US would fold it's tents in Europe and pull out ,leaving Europe poorly defended..

why should you feel ashamed, we have signed onto these defensive commitments , promising to maintain the 2 % expenditures....historically we have NEVER s[ent that much unless we were at war...but then again if you looked at the state our forces are in you would see there needs to be some investment.... 

America is getting tired of spending all it's tax payers money with no return while others profit from it...

I wonder why China and Russia feel so threatened by America?

We've tried doing an arms race before. All we got was enough bombs to blow the world up many times over and a flag on the moon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

Lack of clean air is not a big problem in the UK, you don't live in China dude. I'd rather spend money on something that's already been achieved as excuse not to pay for something that actually benefits the UK, that's just pointless virtue signalling.

Air doesn't respect borders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Iceni warrior said:

I wonder why China and Russia feel so threatened by America?

We've tried doing an arms race before. All we got was enough bombs to blow the world up many times over and a flag on the moon.

No war between the major powers and a massive economic boom. Yeah we've tried it before, it worked fantastically. Peace Through Strength FTW.

Edited by Yzermandius19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,721
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    paradox34
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...