Jump to content

Breaking: Trudeau officially broke the law


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Nefarious Banana said:

Trudeau's named in the title of this thread . . . . 

Are you taking 'deflection instruction' from Michael Hardner?

So sorry,  will Conservative voters go after Sheer to make the arrest and prosecution of Trudeau the main plank of his election platform this fall?

If not, why?

Edited by eyeball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GostHacked said:

Again this is partisan hackery thinking. I've complained more about Trudeau than Harper regarding SNC-Lavalin.

Go here to understand that.

I'm in the thread on page one and you come in on page 2. I could not find any specific example in the 41 page thread were you explicitly complain about Trudeau.

Rather, what I do see is that when it involves Trudeau, his supporters revert to the "let's not be a bunch of partisan hacks" stance, that after all, all governments are corrupt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of partisan hacks...they'll never actually push Sheer to properly investigate or prosecute Trudeau because they know any future PM's and governments of theirs would be open to the same treatment but even more importantly exposing Trudeau and his government to the legal spotlight it deserves might also reveal the crooked little avenues and back-channels Conservatives also like and need to use on occasion.

Partisans parked on this shit-stained fence are even more responsible than the politicians they elect for the corruption that persists in our governance year after year after decade after decade.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Speaking of partisan hacks...they'll never actually push Sheer to properly investigate or prosecute Trudeau because they know any future PM's and governments of theirs would be open to the same treatment but even more importantly exposing Trudeau and his government to the legal spotlight it deserves might also reveal the crooked little avenues and back-channels Conservatives also like and need to use on occasion.

Partisans parked on this shit-stained fence are even more responsible than the politicians they elect for the corruption that persists in our governance year after year after decade after decade.

It's a de facto one party state, the Cons are just the Nanny Prohibitionist wing of the Canadian racist apartheid police state, they are interchangeable with the Liberals, may their children go blind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

Speaking of partisan hacks...they'll never actually push Sheer to properly investigate or prosecute Trudeau because they know any future PM's and governments of theirs would be open to the same treatment but even more importantly exposing Trudeau and his government to the legal spotlight it deserves might also reveal the crooked little avenues and back-channels Conservatives also like and need to use on occasion.

Partisans parked on this shit-stained fence are even more responsible than the politicians they elect for the corruption that persists in our governance year after year after decade after decade.

Complete nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eyeball said:

Well duh, but that only explains why it exists in the first place.

I don't know about that.  If it ever lost people money, I can see it becoming less fashionable.

Of course, it does occasionally get people killed, so who knows, really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

I don't know about that.

Well I don't what else you could possibly need to to know about it.  It's for gain, personal, corporate, political. Gain, advantage, profit, call it what you will its the why alright.

But as you can see that's not what I really asked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Well I don't what else you could possibly need to to know about it.  It's for gain, personal, corporate, political. Gain, advantage, profit, call it what you will its the why alright.

But as you can see that's not what I really asked.

No, I meant that also explains its longevity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Corruption of the type under question in this thread?  How do voters profit from that?

I haven't been reading the thread, sorry. 

I just saw your question, and I wanted to help you out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, eyeball said:

Partisans parked on this shit-stained fence are even more responsible than the politicians they elect for the corruption that persists in our governance year after year after decade after decade.

And yet here you are, still playing along as well. All your life you've supported and paid them with your taxes, and cast your ballot in their elections.

Somehow it seems even more incorrigible when you have people who claim they know about the problem, but keep supporting it anyway. Those people are the worst scum there is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, OftenWrong said:

And yet here you are, still playing along as well. All your life you've supported and paid them with your taxes, and cast your ballot in their elections.

Somehow it seems even more incorrigible when you have people who claim they know about the problem, but keep supporting it anyway. Those people are the worst scum there is.

You don't pay your taxes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

Exactly, Canadians have no choice. Trust that I have explained it well enough for you... 

Only that you regard yourself as being no better than scum and probably better than anyone who doesn't.  The true mark of a toadying sycophant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Shady said:

True.  It’s also part of human nature unfortunately.

Profits?  Well now let's see ....

Ottawa's LRT is 1.5 B over budget  and 1.5 years late ............

All while SNC has been reporting record losses this year in profits ( in the billions)

SNC-Lavalin failed to meet the technical score TWICE, yet phase 2 was given to them.

Still the LRT is not ready.

 

Now with government level widespread corruption we have...

Local government corruption - Jim Watson

Provincial government corruption Ontario - Doug Ford , Cathleen Wynne. ( I am sure we can the same corruption findings in other provinces

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, GostHacked said:

Profits?  Well now let's see ....

Ottawa's LRT is 1.5 B over budget  and 1.5 years late ............

All while SNC has been reporting record losses this year in profits ( in the billions)

SNC-Lavalin failed to meet the technical score TWICE, yet phase 2 was given to them.

Still the LRT is not ready.

 

Now with government level widespread corruption we have...

Local government corruption - Jim Watson

Provincial government corruption Ontario - Doug Ford , Cathleen Wynne. ( I am sure we can the same corruption findings in other provinces

 

 

Yep.  Which is weird that you’ve turned from libertarian to wanting the government in control of everything.  #Socialism

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/17/2019 at 1:43 PM, dialamah said:

Someone was wondering about a 10-year-ban for companies convicted of corruption, saying they couldn't find any information.  I found some information and posted it, along with the information that it wasn't all about JT "not following the law".  

Despite the desperation of partisans (of any stripe) to want to pretend that their own side has never done anything wrong, incoming governments are affected by what previous governments have done, at least for the first year or so.  

I intend to, though I'm not voting for Scheer or Bernier.  That leaves me May, Singh or Trudeau.   I'd be fine with a minority gov, either Conservatives or Liberals, this time around, Liberals need some humility and I don't want Conservatives to have unfettered power - history does suggest there are advantages to minority governments.

If only Michael Chong had been elected leader of Conservatives; I very likely have voted for him last time and potentially this time.

I'm not sure you know whom your going to vote for , your all over the place the only ones your certain your not voting for is Scheer or Bernier...You've spent time slagging both Cons and Justin, who by the way has taken a shit on your door step, lite it on fire, and Now your standing there in ankle deep  burning shit and Justin  is giving you the finger....And yet he is still on the maybe list....And you talk about partisanship....What does this Justin have to do to change your mind ? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...