Jump to content

The transgender insanity movement


Argus

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Argus said:

1. I find this a confusing answer as the numerous posts you have made in this and other forums in support of trans rights have contained no exemptions or doubt on any aspect of what activists are demanding, as far as I can recall. 

2. Would you also suggest there are topics on legal rights, issues and societal belief which women should not comment on because the discussion should be exclusively male?

3. I don't accept the woke belief that every identity group must remain within its own 'silo' and speak only to its own issues and problems.

4. And if this is 'angertainment' it is only because of the fanaticism and extremism of the trans supporters, their determination to punish wrongthink, and their refusal to accept any compromise,

5. The rest of us are just ordinary people reacting to stupid ideas, unrealistic demands, and illogical positions.

 

1. I am a trans supporter but not by the stringent definition you have provided.  For example, I don't' believe you are a woman.

2. I suspect there are such issues, though I can't think of one at the moment.

3. I don't think that's a woke belief, that's just something I have learned from my study of 'publics' in political philosophy.  It has nothing to do with identity politics, but can be applied there.

4. In other words, it's not angertainment because I am justifiably angry ?  Well, no, that is why it's angertainment.

5. Hey, baby, you're talking to a guy who was actually diagnosed with TDS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/24/2021 at 2:15 PM, Michael Hardner said:

1. I am a trans supporter but not by the stringent definition you have provided.  For example, I don't' believe you are a woman.

Do you realize that in countries where the transactivists have been most successful, like the UK, you could literally find police at your door for making that statement online?

On 8/24/2021 at 2:15 PM, Michael Hardner said:


4. In other words, it's not angertainment because I am justifiably angry ?  Well, no, that is why it's angertainment.

First, you're assuming I'm angry simply because I comment negatively on this subject. It doesn't impact me. I am speaking from the view of fundamental justice, which I have always had a strong interest in. Second, many aspects of politics draw strong disapproval from many people. Should we not discuss any of them?

On 8/24/2021 at 2:15 PM, Michael Hardner said:


5. Hey, baby, you're talking to a guy who was actually diagnosed with TDS.

Shady and Infidel Dog diagnose almost everyone with that particular problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barbara Kay talks about the Trudeau government's feminism - a brand which discounts the importance of womens rights and safety in favour of the faddishness of trans rights.

For a more off-putting example that speaks directly to this government’s irresponsibility regarding women’s rights, we have the following story — apparently not considered newsworthy enough by the CBC — reported by True North’s Lindsay Shepherd. It springs directly from 2017 rules established by the Trudeau government, decreeing that a self-identity gender claim alone — no reassignment surgery necessary as was previously required — would be sufficient for biologically male prison inmates to request transfer to a women’s prison.

Two weeks ago, about 75 women assembled at the Fraser Valley Institution for Women (FVI) in Abbotsford, B.C., to protest the policy. According to former inmate and prisoners’ rights advocate Heather Mason, representing Canadian Women’s Sex-Based Rights, of the 92 inmates housed at FVI, five are males who claim to identify as women. A former Correctional Service of Canada deputy commissioner for women told Mason in 2019 that 50 per cent of the males who request to be transferred to a female prison are sex offenders.

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/barbara-kay-trudeau-the-fake-feminist-ignores-female-inmates-concerns

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Argus said:

1. Do you realize that in countries where the transactivists have been most successful, like the UK, you could literally find police at your door for making that statement online?

2. First, you're assuming I'm angry simply because I comment negatively on this subject. It doesn't impact me. I am speaking from the view of fundamental justice, which I have always had a strong interest in. Second, many aspects of politics draw strong disapproval from many people. Should we not discuss any of them?

3. Shady and Infidel Dog diagnose almost everyone with that particular problem.

1. Yes 

2. I don't assume that

3. I have a prescription: my new age life coach has me listening to an hour of Al Gore a day.

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...