War of the Worlds U.N. Migration Compact

[GostHacked]

We take part in bombing the middle east with is helping create the crisis and then saying we need to do something and take these people in.

We can start by not bombing the shit out of the M.E and then engineering 'arab spring' uprisings causing 'civil wars'  which creates more destruction and migration.

All of this was predicted.

[taxme]

On 12/1/2018 at 8:08 AM, scribblet said:

I'm surprised there isn't a discussion on this or maybe I missed it.   Either way even though most western countries are not signing on, Canada is and IMO, we should not.   What is very alarming is the intent to define criticism of migration as 'hate speech'  so would become a criminal offense.  “Media outlets that give room for criticism of migration,can be shut down.“

https://www.spectator.co.uk/2018/09/the-war-of-the-world/?fbclid=IwAR3CYLDBEhqxZ_cghgQX_WA_KR3jKvNNdtPJnC8lcqpQHofxHFv9lvO2Ooc

To properly understand the trend of world political events in recent years, it is essential to appreciate that a titanic struggle for supremacy between two implacably opposed ideologies is raging right across the Western world. It is an undeclared war waged largely behind the scenes.

The attackers are powerful globalist and multi-national interests such as the EU and the UN, supported by many leftist groups funded, paradoxically, by mega-rich financiers. Their ultimate aim is the abolition of borders, migration between countries at will, the dismantling of national identity, the transfer of power to supra-national bodies, and eventually the imposition of a post-democratic unitary world government. The defenders are those who believe that Western-style democracy based on the nation-state remains the least-worst way yet devised of safe-guarding the life, liberty and prosperity of its citizens.

Public awareness of the struggle is almost non-existent because, with very few exceptions, the free world’s mainstream media long ago aligned themselves with the globalists and have shamefully failed to

Dutch politician and European Parliament member Marcel de Graaff      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lORLGL2no_U

Ezra Levant of The Rebel has brought this up on his website. The only website that I know of right now that has done so. Of course we all should know by now that our leftist liberal pro globalist Canadian media party is in cahoots with the world globalists to try and flood all Western countries with millions of third world immigrants at all costs. It is said that there are approx. 257 million third world refugees around the world. A book called "The Camp of the Saints" written by a french writer from France pretty much explained that all of this refugee migration into Europe was going to happen one day in Europe. And this book was written several decades ago. I looks like he was bloody well right because it is now happening in Europe. 

It does appear as though the globalists want to flood all Western countries with this masse of refugee humanity and chaos going on in the world which was all created in the first place by these international globalists themselves. In the next three years our prime mistake of Canada and his Somali immigration minister wants to bring in another one million new immigrants on top of thousands of new third world legal/illegal refugees in the next three years into Canada. This is insane madness that is being pushed by our dear leaders here in Canada on Canadians, and being pushed on all other Western countries and it's citizen's by their traitorous politically correct pro UN/EU puppet on a string politicians.

Our dumb downed politicians do not serve we the people. They serve the globalist masters instead. It is good to see that many countries are not falling for this refugee trap. But we sure do know as to who in Canada is trying to push this refugee trap and crap and who has many Canadians believing that more immigration is good and will be great for Canada and Canadians. Utter bull chit indeed. And that fool must be stopped with his immigration madness and insanity before Canada will never be recognized as a Western country anymore in the near future. If we keep voting in liberals and socialists and red tories here in Canada this insane madness will only get worse. It's up to all of us to put a stop to this refugee insanity. 

[-TSS-]

This is a treaty which binds nobody but please sign it as we are told. 

This is exactly the treaty after which we have signed we can wave goodbye to any national sovereignty. 

I bet that in all countries which sign this treaty there will a lot of yellow vests in the future. 

[scribblet]

Sure, just like it's not binding, just like the Paris accord isn't binding - tell that to Trudeau who seems to care nothing about Canada as his gross neglect of his own country is starting to show. 

Another good piece here which should give everyone pause for thought.   Where would we house them, what land would we develop to build on, bearing in mind most people gravitate to the GTA, they sure won't want to go to Elliot Lake for instance.   The left is allready hysterical because they think Doug Ford is going to open some of the greenbelt area to development, well, if millions more come here there won't be a choice.  

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/oliver-get-ready-for-a-transformation-of-our-migration-policy? 

An estimated 250 million migrants, about 10 times the number of refugees, would have the right to move to wealthier countries offering superior social assistance. These numbers could rise dramatically, as the global population grows and more people try to escape poverty, limited opportunity and political oppression.

Edited December 9, 2018 by scribblet

[turningrite]

3 hours ago, scribblet said:

Sure, just like it's not binding, just like the Paris accord isn't binding - tell that to Trudeau who seems to care nothing about Canada as his gross neglect of his own country is starting to show. 

Another good piece here which should give everyone pause for thought.   Where would we house them, what land would we develop to build on, bearing in mind most people gravitate to the GTA, they sure won't want to go to Elliot Lake for instance.   The left is allready hysterical because they think Doug Ford is going to open some of the greenbelt area to development, well, if millions more come here there won't be a choice. 

 

Sage caution from Joe Oliver: "Trudeau should not sign this attempt at international social engineering without extensive public consultation and a debate in Parliament." I don't think people realize how radical the globalist agenda that Trudeau supports has become. When I discuss the issue with others I often notice that eyes glaze over. Few can believe that politicians are transforming the country into a gigantic social laboratory. A lot simply can't comprehend the extent of the sunny ruse to which we/they are being subjected. The social support system ordinary Canadians fought to establish in the post-WWII era simply won't withstand the stress of an open border, particularly because the subsidy class will explode in size. Trying to support this system under the current model will result in a reaction that will make the 'yellow vests' protest by lower-income taxpaying workers in France look like child's play. Those of us living in the most apparent Canadian laboratories for this experiment, the Toronto and Vancouver regions, are already experiencing many of the emerging problems. Populations in these regions are, according to polling, the most unhappy in the country. This won't end well.

[Zeitgeist]

3 hours ago, scribblet said:

Sure, just like it's not binding, just like the Paris accord isn't binding - tell that to Trudeau who seems to care nothing about Canada as his gross neglect of his own country is starting to show. 

Another good piece here which should give everyone pause for thought.   Where would we house them, what land would we develop to build on, bearing in mind most people gravitate to the GTA, they sure won't want to go to Elliot Lake for instance.   The left is allready hysterical because they think Doug Ford is going to open some of the greenbelt area to development, well, if millions more come here there won't be a choice.  

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/oliver-get-ready-for-a-transformation-of-our-migration-policy? 

An estimated 250 million migrants, about 10 times the number of refugees, would have the right to move to wealthier countries offering superior social assistance. These numbers could rise dramatically, as the global population grows and more people try to escape poverty, limited opportunity and political oppression.

This is where I have to get off the Ford train.  He screwed up an important Ontario Power Generation acquisition through political interference that will cost Ontarians over $100,000,000.  He is letting GM pull up stakes in Oshawa without a fight.  Now he's messing with transit and land use planning (taking over the Toronto Transit Commission, weakening the Greenbelt).  He could kill the golden goose if he isn't careful.  Yes Wynne and the Liberals were too activist, but they were careful planners, adding higher learning infrastructure, scrapping coal generation, preparing Ontario for the new high tech green economy by building a cap and trade partnership with Quebec and California.  Ford is being ham fisted.  It seems like we've got too many dinosaurs in charge.  I'd include Trump in that with his steel and aluminum tariffs that are hurting the auto industry.  Trudeau is also wasting what's left of his political capital by grandstanding about leftist values and funding his pet projects on the backs of Canadians.  We need smart managers in charge.  There's nothing wrong with controlled immigration.  I'm not sure Trudeau has thought through the costs or impacts of his policies on immigration.  The problem for Canada, as always, is that it's hard for us to maintain progressive policies on climate, refugees, or much else if our southern neighbor isn't willing to pay the same price.  The US is accepting far fewer refugees than Canada and it is pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement.  When Canada has to bare these costs on its own, the playing field is no longer balanced. 

[Michael Hardner]

2 hours ago, turningrite said:

.... I don't think people realize how radical the globalist agenda that Trudeau supports ... the sunny ruse to which we/they are being subjected... the subsidy class will explode in size... ...  apparent Canadian laboratories for this experiment...

I shall continue to roll my eyes over these conspiracy theories.  They are, in short, retarded.

There was one about 5 or six years ago called Agenda 21 that Glenn Beck was meowing about... George W Bush signed some part of it.  It amounted to zero, as will this horse shit.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21

[turningrite]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

I shall continue to roll my eyes over these conspiracy theories.  They are, in short, retarded.

There was one about 5 or six years ago called Agenda 21 that Glenn Beck was meowing about... George W Bush signed some part of it.  It amounted to zero, as will this horse shit.

 

You can conjure conspiracy theories if it's your predilection to do so. It's an easy and often intellectually lazy form of putdown. However, what we're talking about here is much more concrete. When a former federal finance minister, Joe Oliver, who himself was a member of a government that promoted economic globalization, warns that "the [Trudeau] government intends to embark on this radical lurch to an uncertain future without a debate in Parliament, let alone any public consultation", perhaps it's wise to take note. Other apparently more sensible democracies, including the U.S. and Australia, are giving this pact a swerve. But, for Trudeau's crowd, what's not to like about a pact that promotes censorship and government-mandated narratives among other shiny social engineering schemes preferred by today's uber-progressive tribe? Call it whatever you like, but much of the pact's verbiage is clearly not consistent with democratic principles.

Edited December 9, 2018 by turningrite

[Michael Hardner]

2 minutes ago, turningrite said:

1. You can conjure conspiracy theories if it's your predilection to do so.

2. It's an easy and often intellectually lazy form of putdown. However, what we're talking about here is much more concrete.

1. I don't need to.  I just have to look back at the last time.

2. Often ?  Maybe.  But, again, we heard the exact same thing about Agenda 21.   Non binding right ?  It's just a waste of time....

[turningrite]

51 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. I don't need to.  I just have to look back at the last time.

2. Often ?  Maybe.  But, again, we heard the exact same thing about Agenda 21.   Non binding right ?  It's just a waste of time....

I don't believe I've ever cited Agenda 21 in any of my commentaries about immigration, economics or social engineering schemes. You, however, seem fixated on such labeling. Perhaps you should more closely consider the specific arguments made by those who post on here even if you sometimes have to sift through a range of commentaries of varying quality. My academic background is in economic and social history and the interrelationship between the two. I try to provide objective and analytical critiques when considering the merits of government policy.

Edited December 9, 2018 by turningrite

[paxamericana]

5 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

Trudeau is also wasting what's left of his political capital by grandstanding about leftist values and funding his pet projects on the backs of Canadians.  We need smart managers in charge.  There's nothing wrong with controlled immigration.  I'm not sure Trudeau has thought through the costs or impacts of his policies on immigration.  The problem for Canada, as always, is that it's hard for us to maintain progressive policies on climate, refugees, or much else if our southern neighbor isn't willing to pay the same price.  The US is accepting far fewer refugees than Canada and it is pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement.  When Canada has to bare these costs on its own, the playing field is no longer balanced. 

So you're finally admitting that Canada's suicidal progressive policies are no longer sustainable? I thought Canada wanted to champion progressive/post-modern neo marxist ideologies? Since when was america obligated to be in lock step with Canada? Sounds like the lack of a Canadian identity and failed leadership makes Canada ripe for the taking. America should Carpe Diem and make Canada Great Again. 

[paxamericana]

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

I shall continue to roll my eyes over these conspiracy theories.  They are, in short, retarded.

There was one about 5 or six years ago called Agenda 21 that Glenn Beck was meowing about... George W Bush signed some part of it.  It amounted to zero, as will this horse shit.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21

Globalist exist friend, facts don't care about your feelings. 

[Michael Hardner]

14 minutes ago, paxamericana said:

Globalist exist friend, facts don't care about your feelings. 

Watch the skies.

[Zeitgeist]

1 hour ago, paxamericana said:

So you're finally admitting that Canada's suicidal progressive policies are no longer sustainable? I thought Canada wanted to champion progressive/post-modern neo marxist ideologies? Since when was america obligated to be in lock step with Canada? Sounds like the lack of a Canadian identity and failed leadership makes Canada ripe for the taking. America should Carpe Diem and make Canada Great Again. 

You’re screwing up your own country enough.  The US should be more like Canada, not the reverse.  My point is that the cost of good policies is higher when a country has to go it alone. Of course business will always chase the most unregulated and socially backward places to do business if it means lower costs.  That’s why international rules are important, to avoid the race to the bottom. 

[Zeitgeist]

1 hour ago, paxamericana said:

Globalist exist friend, facts don't care about your feelings. 

So where do the ‘globalists’ hang out?  Is there a club with memberships?  Wouldn’t mind checking it out. 

[bush_cheney2004]

2 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

So where do the ‘globalists’ hang out?  Is there a club with memberships?  Wouldn’t mind checking it out. 

 

Start with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, and World Trade Organization (WTO).

Tell them that Trump sent you....

[Zeitgeist]

Just now, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Start with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, and World Trade Organization (WTO).

Tell them that Trump sent you....

Will do...

[paxamericana]

34 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

That’s why international rules are important, to avoid the race to the bottom. 

You can bring that up to your globalist friends when you meet them. 

[Zeitgeist]

1 hour ago, paxamericana said:

You can bring that up to your globalist friends when you meet them. 

Okay great. If you have any suggestions for how to set up the One World Government, please let me know.  We can hold off on throwing you all into gulags until after Christmas.  Rest assured.  

[paxamericana]

3 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

Okay great. If you have any suggestions for how to set up the One World Government, please let me know.  We can hold off on throwing you all into gulags until after Christmas.  Rest assured.  

Word on the street was, start world war 3 under some pretense of either Russia vs China or US vs Russia and China, wipe out a good chunk of the population, start again and use the pretense of ending all war with a one world order....

[Zeitgeist]

13 hours ago, paxamericana said:

Word on the street was, start world war 3 under some pretense of either Russia vs China or US vs Russia and China, wipe out a good chunk of the population, start again and use the pretense of ending all war with a one world order....

Okay but let me finish my Christmas shopping.  Soros loves Rudolph ties.  

[turningrite]

19 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

You’re screwing up your own country enough.  The US should be more like Canada, not the reverse.  My point is that the cost of good policies is higher when a country has to go it alone. Of course business will always chase the most unregulated and socially backward places to do business if it means lower costs.  That’s why international rules are important, to avoid the race to the bottom. 

That's a pretty odd commentary, and the last sentence particularly so. Many believe the rules-based international order, including but not limited to the WTO, has served to fuel the race to the bottom. There's little doubt that corporate globalism, a component of which is the facilitation of international migration, has served to undermine wages in Western economies. We're now starting to witness the political consequences of wage stagnation and suppression in places like France, Belgium and the American rust belt. Where wage arbitrage is an explicit objective of the globalist system, as has been the case to date, the current international order is part of the problem rather than being part of any solution.

[Zeitgeist]

4 hours ago, turningrite said:

That's a pretty odd commentary, and the last sentence particularly so. Many believe the rules-based international order, including but not limited to the WTO, has served to fuel the race to the bottom. There's little doubt that corporate globalism, a component of which is the facilitation of international migration, has served to undermine wages in Western economies. We're now starting to witness the political consequences of wage stagnation and suppression in places like France, Belgium and the American rust belt. Where wage arbitrage is an explicit objective of the globalist system, as has been the case to date, the current international order is part of the problem rather than being part of any solution.

International labor rules on wages and conditions would prevent such rampant offshoring.  An example is the $16.00 minimum wage on some Mexican auto production in USMCA. 

[paxamericana]

On 12/10/2018 at 5:45 PM, Zeitgeist said:

International labor rules on wages and conditions would prevent such rampant offshoring.  An example is the $16.00 minimum wage on some Mexican auto production in USMCA. 

Un-surprisingly Canada is not on the list. 

Edited December 12, 2018 by paxamericana

[Army Guy]

On ‎12‎/‎7‎/‎2018 at 9:23 PM, TTM said:

 

Quote

 

No. They are being told they should attempt dispel misleading narratives that may arise.  They are not "given a script" as to what those narratives are.

Ex. a narrative starts that people from country A have a tradition of eating babies and this is causing "negative perceptions" to immigrants from country A.  If it is not true, government should adress this. 

 

this is the script....     eliminate all forms of discrimination, including racism , xenophobia and intolerance against migrants” "with a view to dispelling misleading narratives that generate negative perceptions of migrants" HOW DO YOU NOT SEE THAT AS DIRECTION FROM THE UN...

your example provides a negative view, which the UN has already addressed.

2. awesome deduction, we are already doing that so shit why not sign another compact or policy on something we already do, why not repeat all the other policies and compacts we are already signatory to....And when put in contrast to our problems at home right now, we do not need a diversion …. it sounds like the government is yelling squirrel to divert our attention of things going on here at home....but hey we already do that anyway why not....that sounds like a very well thought out response.....maybe you should try, why not scar di cat, I double dog dare you to sign it.... 

Quote

What started in white nationalist circles has expanded to mainstream right wing political talking points. The left aren't really clamoring for this, so for the most part there is no real domestic political benefits to sticking your neck out on this one once the right wing get all riled up.  I expect if a tipping point is reached this will fail, to be taken up at some point in the future ... because it is an important issue.

The left are pushing over each other to sign it before everyone starts asking questions....There has been no discussion on this topic in the commons, senate, or in the public so why are we rushing to sign it....without any of that....And it will be taken up in the near future once the liberals are thrown into the streets...

Quote

They have successes and failures.  

Your source is full of shit...

Quote

The United Nations was created to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, protect human rights, maintain international peace and security, and uphold international law. Its 70-year history is marked with many successes, but also disappointments. We need to look at both sides so that we can make the U.N. more effective in the future.

The UN has no military, no police force to uphold any mandate that it creates or dictates, it has very limited success in any of those quoted items it boosts about, in the last 30 years the UN has not had one positive result from any UN military missions infact it gives a list of huge failures in peace keeping, those missions were for the most part rescued by NATO....once the UN screwed things up so bad.... The world is more dangerous now than it was 70 years ago....when there was no UN

Quote

 ?? I said it should be discussed

This alone should be enough not to sign the compact....

Quote

Objective 2 tries to adress and eliminate the causes irregular migration ...

Yes it does, for the immigrant...nothing is said about the impact this free immigration will have on each nation....look at the problems Europe is having when immigration is not controlled...