scribblet Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 4 hours ago, betsy said: Sure....there are those who'd spend money to eat there......but there are those who are now messing it up. Last time I heard, Red Hen had to close its door due to so many "fake reservations" being made! One genuine customer who's made a previous reservation wasn't so happy to find it closed. http://www.newser.com/story/261025/restaurant-explains-why-sanders-got-the-boot.html The irony on her closed door sign: Democracy requires a principled government. DEMOCRACY REQUIRES WE RESPECT AND PROTECT THE RIGHTS WE HAVE IN THE CONSTITUTION! I wonder if they are closed temporarily or if it's permanent... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 And showing that there are no lows too deep form this presidency to sink to, Trump has weighed in to personally attack the constituents he is supposed to represent. Doesn't this guy have a country to run into the ground? What other president would even have time for such a petty squabble? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimmy Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 (edited) 6 hours ago, betsy said: Whoa! Holy petunia! Welcome back Kimmy! I check in every once in a while. 6 hours ago, betsy said: Anyway.....you seem to be upset. On the contrary! I'm quite delighted to see the red-hat people so triggered over this. Like typical schoolyard bullies, they love to dish it out but they can't take it. F--- their feelings! 6 hours ago, betsy said: This is about A BUSINESS THAT REFUSES SERVICE ...........based on nothing at all other than the fact that the person works for someone the owner/employees don't agree with! And, maybe Sanders' ideology doesn't agree with theirs either, but so what? Businesses can refuse service now, based on people's ideology? The US Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, religion, sex, and nation of origin, but doesn't prohibit discrimination against peoples' ideology. Communists, neo-Nazis, and Trumpists, for example, aren't protected groups. Suck it up, snowflakes! And of course SHS herself, and her dad, are well-known proponents of the idea that businesses should be free to discriminate against people they don't like, so her crying foul over this is hilarious hypocrisy. Perhaps this experience will give her some fresh perspective on that matter. The only one who broke the law here is SHS herself, who violated the Hatch Act by using government resources to pursue her grievance against a private citizen. 6 hours ago, betsy said: This is serious stuff! Some people cry Trump is a danger to democracy.....hello? The danger comes from people who cheer, support and protect the Red Hen employer. There will be those who'll say and do stupid things (like this employer).......but sensible people ought to recognize the stupidity........ and the danger that comes with such stupidity! An unpleasant woman being asked to leave a restaurant is a threat to democracy? Once again ... "womp womp" -k Edited June 25, 2018 by kimmy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribblet Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 (edited) According to Huckabee, the owner actually followed them across the street and harassed them there.. I guess the owner reaped what she sowed http://www.newser.com/story/261025/restaurant-explains-why-sanders-got-the-boot.html This restaurateur of The Red Hen Stephanie Wilkinson not only told @PressSec Sanders to leave--acc to @GovMikeHuckabee on my radio show today, she FOLLOWED Sanders' family across the street to harass them at the other restaurant they went to! Edited June 25, 2018 by scribblet 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 9 minutes ago, scribblet said: According to Huckabee, the owner actually followed them across the street and harassed them there.. I guess she's reaped what she sowed http://www.newser.com/story/261025/restaurant-explains-why-sanders-got-the-boot.html This restaurateur of The Red Hen Stephanie Wilkinson not only told @PressSec Sanders to leave--acc to @GovMikeHuckabee on my radio show today, she FOLLOWED Sanders' family across the street to harass them at the other restaurant they went to! Finally we agree on something! Yes, Sanders definitely reaped what she sowed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted June 25, 2018 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, kimmy said: I check in every once in a while. On the contrary! I'm quite delighted to see the red-hat people so triggered over this. Like typical schoolyard bullies, they love to dish it out but they can't take it. F--- their feelings! The US Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, religion, sex, and nation of origin, but doesn't prohibit discrimination against peoples' ideology. Communists, neo-Nazis, and Trumpists, for example, aren't protected groups. Suck it up, snowflakes! And of course SHS herself, and her dad, are well-known proponents of the idea that businesses should be free to discriminate against people they don't like, so her crying foul over this is hilarious hypocrisy. Perhaps this experience will give her some fresh perspective on that matter. The only one who broke the law here is SHS herself, who violated the Hatch Act by using government resources to pursue her grievance against a private citizen. -k Lol. Hillary deliberately broke ethics rule with her private emails! By the looks of it, the left don't care about ethics rules! Or, the Hatch Act! Only when it suits them! Quote Report: USPS improperly enabled workers who helped Clinton campaign OSC's report said the USPS's actions during the 2016 campaign violated the Hatch Act, a 1939 law intended to keep federal employees from directly supporting candidates. https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/19/politics/osc-usps-hillary-clinton-hatch-act/index.html Quote Ethics agency says HUD chief Castro violated Hatch Act "OSC concluded that Secretary Castro violated the Hatch Act by advocating for and against Presidential candidates," Special Counsel Carolyn Lerner wrote in a letter to President Barack Obama Monday. "Secretary Castro’s statements during the interview impermissibly mixed his personal political views with official agency business despite his efforts to clarify that some answers were being given in his personal capacity." When Couric turned from official matters to politics in the interview, asking about his endorsement of Clinton in the presidential race, Castro said, "Now, taking off my HUD hat for a second and just speaking individually, it is very clear that Hillary Clinton is the most experienced, thoughtful, and prepared candidate for President that we have this year." https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/julian-castro-ethics-hud-hatch-225732 Quote Cause of Action Exposes Potential Hatch Act Violation at the FAA Subordinates told “how to vote if they wanted to keep their job” https://causeofaction.org/cause-of-action-exposes-potential-hatch-act-violation-at-the-faa/ Quote An unpleasant woman being asked to leave a restaurant is a threat to democracy? Does it take much to imagine refusing service to anyone of differing ideology, or for disapproval of lifestyle, or employment can be used to intimidate, or coersce? Sit down and think about it. This Wilkinson doesn't understand democracy! That's usually the case it seems with the lunatic left - they tend to spout off about things they hardly understand! Edited June 25, 2018 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted June 25, 2018 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 (edited) Quote The Right to Refuse Service: Can a Business Refuse Service to Someone? you can refuse to serve someone even if they’re in a protected group, but the refusal can’t be arbitrary and you can’t apply it to just one group of people. To avoid being arbitrary, there must be a reason for refusing service and you must be consistent. There could be a dress code to maintain a sense of decorum, or fire code restrictions on how many people can be in your place of business at one time, or a policy related to the health and safety of your customers and employees. But you can’t just randomly refuse service to someone because you don’t like the way they look or dress. https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/the-right-to-refuse-service-can-a-business-refuse-service-to-someone-because-of-appearance Quote And it was important to her that Sanders was a public official, not just a customer with whom she disagreed, many of whom were included in her regular clientele. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2018/06/23/why-a-small-town-restaurant-owner-asked-sarah-huckabee-sanders-to-leave-and-would-do-it-again/?utm_term=.7506010d09ce She singled out Sarah Sanders. Edited June 25, 2018 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 1 hour ago, betsy said: Lol. Hillary deliberately broke ethics rule with her private emails! By the looks of it, the left don't care about ethics rules! Or, the Hatch Act! Only when it suits them! https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/19/politics/osc-usps-hillary-clinton-hatch-act/index.html https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/julian-castro-ethics-hud-hatch-225732 https://causeofaction.org/cause-of-action-exposes-potential-hatch-act-violation-at-the-faa/ Does it take much to imagine refusing service to anyone of differing ideology, or for disapproval of lifestyle, or employment can be used to intimidate, or coersce? Sit down and think about it. This Wilkinson doesn't understand democracy! That's usually the case it seems with the lunatic left - they tend to spout off about things they hardly understand! Actually not much came of Hillary's emails after many investigations, but they're still investigating how the Trump campaign conspired with a foreign adversarial government to illegally hack her emails. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 1 hour ago, betsy said: That's usually the case it seems with the lunatic left - they tend to spout off about things they hardly understand! You act concerned that western society will fall apart in a civil war, and yet you use language that can only serve to further divide us. Do you not feel partly responsible, given the way you talk? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted June 25, 2018 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 Just now, BubberMiley said: Actually not much came of Hillary's emails after many investigations, Exactly! Her gross negligence was given a pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 Just now, betsy said: Exactly! Her gross negligence was given a pass. No, it was thoroughly investigated. Pence's equal negligence is what got a pass, as well as Trumps's current use of an insecure smart phone. Also, Jared Kushner and his many felonies (which he will likely face charges for, however). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted June 25, 2018 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 (edited) 15 minutes ago, BubberMiley said: No, it was thoroughly investigated. Pence's equal negligence is what got a pass, as well as Trumps's current use of an insecure smart phone. Also, Jared Kushner and his many felonies (which he will likely face charges for, however). Hillary was given a clear pass. Quote "Although Director Comey's original version of his statement acknowledged that Secretary Clinton had violated the statute prohibiting gross negligence in the handling of classified information, he nonetheless exonerated her in that early, May 2nd draft statement anyway, arguing that this part of the statute should not be enforced," Grassley wrote. https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/07/politics/james-comey-hillary-clinton-grassley/index.html Edited June 25, 2018 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribblet Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 26 minutes ago, betsy said: She singled out Sarah Sanders. Because of her position and political affiliation. Ben Carson or Clarence Thomas should go in there, see what happens then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 Maybe members of the current administration didn't realize how much their policies are reviled by people. They should be happy that they know now, although it's hard to believe that they didn't. They owe the restaurant a thanks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: Maybe members of the current administration didn't realize how much their policies are reviled by people. They should be happy that they know now, although it's hard to believe that they didn't. They owe the restaurant a thanks. President Obama's policies were "reviled" by some Americans too.....so what ? 1,000 seats lost to Republicans at state and federal level. Edited June 25, 2018 by bush_cheney2004 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted June 25, 2018 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 40 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: Maybe members of the current administration didn't realize how much their policies are reviled by people. They should be happy that they know now, although it's hard to believe that they didn't. They owe the restaurant a thanks. How do they owe the restaurant. There was a big backlash - the restaurant now know that their method didn't go by as they thought it would. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted June 25, 2018 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 Quote “If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,” Waters said, later telling MSNBC that protesters are “going to absolutely harass them.” . But the threats of more confrontation have raised security concerns and questions over whether a line is being crossed—separating legitimate political protest from outright harassment. Waters’ comments drew a strong rebuke from Republican lawmakers amid fears that the protests might escalate. A spokesman for House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, who was injured in the shooting at a congressional baseball practice just over a year ago, warned about the dangers of overheated rhetoric and protests. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/25/trump-accuses-low-iq-rep-waters-advocating-harm-against-his-supporters.html Loonies like Waters, are coming out. We are seeing the true colors of the alt-left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxme Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 20 hours ago, betsy said: Sarah Sanders tweeted: Sara Sanders tweeted: The owner of the Red Hen, gave her side of the story: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2018/06/23/why-a-small-town-restaurant-owner-asked-sarah-huckabee-sanders-to-leave-and-would-do-it-again/?utm_term=.6d4a1ac052d4 There is a note on the board of that restaurant, which is meant for employees. "86" is a code for "refuse service." Isn't it funny how the same people who indignantly say, "well, if you're open for business to the public - you can't discriminate on anyone," would find nothing seriously wrong with this? isn't that how they reason when they oppose bakers who refuse to bake wedding cakes for certain people? At least, religious owners who'd refused, have a ground to stand on - their right to freedom of religion! Trump has not been convicted of any crimes. No one has the right to judge Sanders based simply on her doing what she was hired for, and the man she works for. Does this mean people can now dictate if they don't like your employment? It's either you leave your employment, or get 86-ed? Is it okay then to turn away those who work as prostitutes and strippers in clubs, based on moral grounds? If you find adultery as immoral - can we use that to justify 86-ing them? The Red Hen discriminated on Sarah Sanders, based on her job, and the man she works for. And, looks like it's treated lightly. I can tell you that liberals, the lying fake stream liberal media, and the democrats must have really enjoyed as to what that restaurant owner had done to Sarah immensely. The woman did nothing at all to deserve this kind of sick liberal treatment. This is just showing us all as to how far these mentally ill crybaby liberal losers will go to seek their revenge on the POTUS. With so called comedians carrying the severed head of Trump, to another so called comedian calling Ivanka Trump a "feckless "c" word, to the insults done at Hollywood awards events by the likes of Robert Deniro saying F--k Trump out loud, to the audience, and all of them clapping in agreement, to Peter Fonda wishing that pedophiles would kidnap Trump's young son, and demorats like Maxine Waters calling on all good liberals to demonstrate against anyone working for Trump eating in restaurants or at their homes, and from late night talk show host morons who constantly attack and mock Trump should indicate to all of us decent and moral conservative folk out there that the liberals are nothing more than a bunch of sick and pathetic psychos and all of them really need to seek psychiatric medical help. When they cannot accept a loss and cannot live with it than something is seriously wrong with losers like them. They should really leave America. Works for me. I just hope that this restaurant gets boycotted by people who will not accept this kind of behavior and goes bankrupt. The gay employees of that restaurant hopefully will be out of a job soon and those gays have also shown us all that they to are alright with discriminating against people who do not want to suck up to their gay lifestyle. Deplorable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxme Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 2 hours ago, scribblet said: Because of her position and political affiliation. Ben Carson or Clarence Thomas should go in there, see what happens then. Why have we never heard of or ever seen this happen to any of the many people that worked for Obama? Many of his policies upset a lot of conservatives but conservatives didn't do anything like this to an employee of Obama who was eating in a restaurant. Stop supporting this kind of red guard communist action. Nothing would happen. They are black and that would have been seen as racism to boot them out. Sarah was white and worked for Trump and that made her vulnerable to attack by a bunch of sick and pathetic liberal/democrat Hillary supporters. What is going on these days is getting down right dangerous and serious and I will bet pretty soon that someone is going to get seriously injured or maybe even killed over all this nonsense that is being created by the liberal/democrat establishment. You lost, live with it, fools. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribblet Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 10 minutes ago, betsy said: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/25/trump-accuses-low-iq-rep-waters-advocating-harm-against-his-supporters.html Loonies like Waters, are coming out. We are seeing the true colors of the alt-left. Waters has always been a lunatic, but not dumb I suppose as she's managed to make a few million while in the job. Even Nancy Pelosi (must've been a cold day in hell) says her comments are unacceptable - mind you it was Trump's fault of course. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gC416Jfn60 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribblet Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 2 minutes ago, taxme said: Why have we never heard of or ever seen this happen to any of the many people that worked for Obama? Many of his policies upset a lot of conservatives but conservatives didn't do anything like this to an employee of Obama who was eating in a restaurant. Stop supporting this kind of red guard communist action. Nothing would happen. They are black and that would have been seen as racism to boot them out. Sarah was white and worked for Trump and that made her vulnerable to attack by a bunch of sick and pathetic liberal/democrat Hillary supporters. What is going on these days is getting down right dangerous and serious and I will bet pretty soon that someone is going to get seriously injured or maybe even killed over all this nonsense that is being created by the liberal/democrat establishment. You lost, live with it, fools. That's why I mentioned them, the owner would be in a pickle wouldn't she... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxme Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 6 hours ago, kimmy said: I check in every once in a while. On the contrary! I'm quite delighted to see the red-hat people so triggered over this. Like typical schoolyard bullies, they love to dish it out but they can't take it. F--- their feelings! The US Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, religion, sex, and nation of origin, but doesn't prohibit discrimination against peoples' ideology. Communists, neo-Nazis, and Trumpists, for example, aren't protected groups. Suck it up, snowflakes! And of course SHS herself, and her dad, are well-known proponents of the idea that businesses should be free to discriminate against people they don't like, so her crying foul over this is hilarious hypocrisy. Perhaps this experience will give her some fresh perspective on that matter. The only one who broke the law here is SHS herself, who violated the Hatch Act by using government resources to pursue her grievance against a private citizen. An unpleasant woman being asked to leave a restaurant is a threat to democracy? Once again ... "womp womp" -k Thanks for having me booted out on that other forum website you belong too. I guess my conservative opinions and points of view were just too much for you to handle and were not to be tolerated by you over there so you took the easy way out and had me booted. Personally, I wish you would check out of here for good. Would work for me. Just saying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OftenWrong Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 19 hours ago, BubberMiley said: Confronting these people is the only moral thing to do in this situation. I guess by situation you mean, with the kids being separated. But isn't it true that this 'situation' already existed with previous presidents? Yes, it's true. Ok, so agreed the situation is despicable, and they need to find a solution immediately. Explain how it now becomes their personal fault? Why is it right that individuals (Sanders...) should be confronted for what seems to be a practice put in place for years now, made into law long before they came into power? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxme Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 3 minutes ago, scribblet said: That's why I mentioned them, the owner would be in a pickle wouldn't she... One can only hope that the radical owner of that restaurant goes belly up. To do what she did was deplorable to someone that has done no harm to her or her business. Sarah was just a working woman trying to have dinner in peace. As a matter of fact Sarah might have been a great draw to that restaurant for the many Trump supporters out there who now may not want to go eat there now at all and will probably avoid that restaurant altogether which I can be pretty sure many will and teach this liberal a lesson. Good for them if they do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OftenWrong Posted June 25, 2018 Report Share Posted June 25, 2018 3 minutes ago, taxme said: One can only hope that the radical owner of that restaurant goes belly up. To do what she did was deplorable to someone that has done no harm to her or her business. Sarah was just a working woman trying to have dinner in peace. As a matter of fact Sarah might have been a great draw to that restaurant for the many Trump supporters out there who now may not want to go eat there now at all and will probably avoid that restaurant altogether which I can be pretty sure many will and teach this liberal a lesson. Good for them if they do. Those on the left are so thrilled, they are probably donating money to the restaurant in appreciation. I wouldn't doubt the owner gets on CNN wins a contract, does the rounds on all the talk shows, comedy, SNL.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.