Jump to content

Conservatives Silent on Homosexuality


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, paxamericana said:

You've no idea what fundamental Islam is do you? The majority of Muslim practice Islam as it is spelled out in the Koran. Any deviation from the holy book is considered sacrilegious. Good luck with reconciling those philosophy with the enlightenment Judaeo Christian West. The humanities and social sciences have been hi-jacked by post modern marxist, they could care less about your individual identity. All they preach is rights while dispensing with thousand of years worth of wisdom borne out of the Judaeo Christian West call logos aka responsibility of self and meaning derived from stoicism. 

Justice warrior prof...

 

You're new aren't you...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, bcsapper said:

Normal doesn't require your approval.  The fact that it is so, and has been so as long as we've been a species, means that it is normal.

Just because homosexuality has been around forever does not mean that it is natural. Two gay men or two gay women cannot produce any children. Only a woman and a man can do that. Without that combination of man and woman none of us would be here. Only that combination meets with my approval. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, taxme said:

Just because homosexuality has been around forever does not mean that it is natural. Two gay men or two gay women cannot produce any children. Only a woman and a man can do that. Without that combination of man and woman none of us would be here. Only that combination meets with my approval. 

Maybe that's just nature's way of making sure the population doesn't grow too fast.  Trying to weed out certain types that she doesn't want around.  Doesn't always work, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Truth Detector said:

Homosexuality is definitely natural.  It’s a natural genetic defect.  That’s why people that say it’s unnatural or that it’s a sin or whatever are ridiculous.

I think there is some evidence that there is genetics involved, although consensus is hard to come by at the moment.  I wouldn't describe it as a defect, though, any more than being white is a defect.  It's just what makes up a person.  Some people don't like it, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, bcsapper said:

Maybe that's just nature's way of making sure the population doesn't grow too fast.  Trying to weed out certain types that she doesn't want around.  Doesn't always work, of course.

Maybe nature should leave the west alone now and start working on trying to slow down the population growth in the third world, uhmm? They keep growing by the hundreds of millions every year. Get cracking nature. Leave the west alone. 

But then again it may have nothing to do with nature at all but more to do with some unknown groups or internationalists who have and are still working on trying to lower the growth of the west population with their lower population projects and agendas like massive non-western immigration into the west that has been going on for several decades now to try and weed out the people in the west for some nefarious reason. Hey, you never know, eh? 

It would work out well for me if nature did try a little harder to try to take out many of those liberals/socialists/communists who serve no purpose on earth at all except to destroy all things normal and decent, and help create chaos and mayhem, and trying to destroy the truth, common sense and logic. For now that is not working fast enough for me. :D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nature has no agenda, and no empathy. 

As a means of slowing population growth, homosexuality doesn't do it. Homosexuals have been having children for as long as there have been people. Some gay people may have been childless, King Richard the Lion heart comes to mind, but then so do some straight people not have children.

And Taxme, can we include Social Credit in that weeding process?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/16/2018 at 2:26 PM, Queenmandy85 said:

Nature has no agenda, and no empathy. 

As a means of slowing population growth, homosexuality doesn't do it. Homosexuals have been having children for as long as there have been people. Some gay people may have been childless, King Richard the Lion heart comes to mind, but then so do some straight people not have children.

And Taxme, can we include Social Credit in that weeding process?

Homosexuality is a start in the slowing down of population growth alright especially in the west where it is practiced and promoted every day. And thanks to the promotion of homosexuality in the western world this is one of the reasons why the birth of more white children has been slowed down. White people are even being told not to have any more children because of population growth. It is the third world that needs to practice birth control and not the west. The third world is where one needs more homosexuality to try to slow down their birth rates. 

Homosexuals cannot have children on their own. Only heterosexual couples can have children. Homosexuals adopting children is not the same as having a real actual birth which only heterosexuals can do. Nature has made that quite clear for all to see. If heterosexuals decide that they do not want to have any children then that is up to them. 

Clarify as to what you mean by "Social Credit in the wedding process"? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/16/2018 at 2:47 PM, taxme said:

It would work out well for me if nature did try a little harder to try to take out many of those liberals/socialists/communists who serve no purpose on earth at all except to destroy all things normal and decent

 

7 minutes ago, taxme said:

Clarify as to what you mean by "Social Credit in the wedding process"? 

Sorry for the spelling error. Nice catch. I was asking if you would include the communist front Social(ist) Credit Party in that weeding out process of "liberals/socialists/communists."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Queenmandy85 said:

 

Sorry for the spelling error. Nice catch. I was asking if you would include the communist front Social(ist) Credit Party in that weeding out process of "liberals/socialists/communists."

At least under the leadership of Tommy Douglas of the Social Credit Party many decades ago that tried to expose the internationalist globalist money changers who in 1913 were given the power and control and were allowed to be the only ones able to print the money we use today. It is called counterfeit today if you or me were to start to print money. 

I do not believe that Tommy Douglas was a socialist/communist at all even though the lying media in those days would try to make him appear to be a communist for trying to expose the money creators. The bankers have been given control and power over the creation of money, and not we the people government as it should be. When Canadians finally start to wake up and realize that they have been conned into believing that it is our government that creates the money and not private bankers there would be a revolution today. Maybe with Trump elected he will be the man to expose those liars and crooks who have been allowed to create debt, poverty, famine and wars for so long now. Hey, you never know, eh? 

Try punching in who controls and creates the money on the internet. It is there for all to see. It does make for interesting reading. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, taxme said:

At least under the leadership of Tommy Douglas of the Social Credit Party many decades ago

Are you sure you are from Vancouver? Tommy Douglas was leader of the New Democratic Party and Premier of Saskatchewan.

Social Credit was lead by  W.A.C. (Cece) Bennett in BC. Bennett expropriated a profitable B.C. Electric Corporation that provided good service at low cost and he paid the share holders pennies on the dollar. He called the new corporation BC Hydro, a government owned utility that was and is drowning in debt, providing poor service at high cost to the consumer. How can you live in Vancouver and never have heard of the Bennetts. They even sang a song about their corruption. Remember Rolf Harris..."There were two wild Kelowna boys and Bennett was their name..." It is probably on You tube. 

Edited by Queenmandy85
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, back on topic. The Conservatives are silent on homosexuality because there is nothing to say. The same percentage of people have been born gay throughout human history. Like red hair or left handedness, it is neither right nor wrong, it just is. What should a political party say about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/20/2018 at 12:40 PM, Queenmandy85 said:

Okay, back on topic. The Conservatives are silent on homosexuality because there is nothing to say. The same percentage of people have been born gay throughout human history. Like red hair or left handedness, it is neither right nor wrong, it just is. What should a political party say about it?

When it comes to homosexuality the liberals have a lot of wonderful and nice things to say about homosexuality. Real conservatives do not. We find it disgusting. Conservatives would have preferred to have it stay in the closet where it belongs. Besides, what is there to talk about anyway? And wasn't it the Chretien liberals that legalized gay marriage in Canada. Shame. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, taxme said:

Good on Jason Kenny than. Homosexuality needs not be discussed or promoted in Canada like Trudeau enjoys doing.   :D 

Exactly.  It should be like heterosexuality.  Ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Good.  So can we all agree that this issue goes in the 'loss' column for conservatives now ?  Homosexuality is normalized and only leftover bigotry remains to fade out, with the bigots ?

If you like.  I think conservatives are just people who do things you don't like.  I may or may not be one, but I've never thought there was anything wrong with homosexuality.  It's just not something that ever occurred to me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/11/2018 at 10:19 AM, Robert Greene said:

Toronto Pride festival is coming up, and there doesn't seem to be any resistance anymore. Why do you feel conservatives are afraid to defend traditional values, and won't speak up about their concerns over the LGBT indoctrination? You don't even hear the hard right talk about their concerns anymore? What do you think shut them up?

Why are conservatives afraid to speak up?

"Conservatives" being criticized for not speaking out against homosexuality? Such rubbish.
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bcsapper said:

If you like.  I think conservatives are just people who do things you don't like.  I may or may not be one, but I've never thought there was anything wrong with homosexuality.  It's just not something that ever occurred to me.

 

I like conservatives.  They really used to hate the gay though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

I like conservatives.  They really used to hate the gay though.

Nonsense. Many conservatives have gay family members, and they are not hated. Dick Cheney is perhaps a "celebrity" example. Hint: Conservative is not a unified culture. There is not a unified set or morals, code of ethics nor official position on "hating gays".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

Nonsense. Many conservatives have gay family members, and they are not hated. Dick Cheney is perhaps a "celebrity" example. Hint: Conservative is not a unified culture. There is not a unified set or morals, code of ethics nor official position on "hating gays".

They didn't want them dead, but they didn't want them married either.  They don't want rights for certain groups.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...