Philip Hebbard Posted February 18, 2018 Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 The BC NDP/Green government has just approved spending of $1.4 billion to replace the "dangerously old" Pattullo Bridge. Dangerously old? What bloody nonsense. At 80 years, we're talking of the Pattullo Bridge. England's Tickford Bridge, built 1810, carries main road traffic today. It's not the oldest steel bridge, one being built in 1779. I see the replacement for the Pattullo as a gift to the Steelworkers for the cancellation (?) of a bridge, to replace the Deas Tunnel. That bridge started prematurely with the aim to get it to the point of no return, by the previous government. Whether a riveted or or bolted structure, there's no bridge that can't be strengthened by welding - if necessary. For the Steelworkers' Union much steel will also be required in a tunnel construction - if that is the path chosen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted February 18, 2018 Report Share Posted February 18, 2018 The Champlain bridge in Montreal is not even that old, about 60 years, but it seriously needed replacement. Certainly capacity was one issue, but even more serious is that it was falling apart. Many things built in the 50's,60', and 70's were done very poorly; before that time we had much better quality, and after that time we recognized the failures of that time and have improved on things. I can't answer for the Pattullo bridge, but age is not the only factor that needs be considered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Squid Posted February 19, 2018 Report Share Posted February 19, 2018 6 hours ago, Philip Hebbard said: The BC NDP/Green government has just approved spending of $1.4 billion to replace the "dangerously old" Pattullo Bridge. Dangerously old? What bloody nonsense. At 80 years, we're talking of the Pattullo Bridge. England's Tickford Bridge, built 1810, carries main road traffic today. It's not the oldest steel bridge, one being built in 1779. I see the replacement for the Pattullo as a gift to the Steelworkers for the cancellation (?) of a bridge, to replace the Deas Tunnel. That bridge started prematurely with the aim to get it to the point of no return, by the previous government. Whether a riveted or or bolted structure, there's no bridge that can't be strengthened by welding - if necessary. For the Steelworkers' Union much steel will also be required in a tunnel construction - if that is the path chosen. The Patullo bridge was constructed to last 50 years by its builder. It certainly needs replacing. http://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/pattullo-bridge-history-built-in-1937-the-span-was-expected-to-last-50-years Tell us again how it is supposed to last a few hundred more years.... I wish people would at least do a Google search before posting so they have a modicum of knowledge about what they’re posting.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 19, 2018 Report Share Posted February 19, 2018 I remember the Turf Hotel. I wonder if they're going to replace that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Hebbard Posted February 19, 2018 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2018 No, seriously? Many a DC3 has given over 50 years service. Are we really to believe that a bridge that at any moment may be supporting a thousand tonnes of traffic, may be toppled by the wind? With such a claim I'd look very closely for vested interest of those looking for a new bridge over renovating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Squid Posted February 19, 2018 Report Share Posted February 19, 2018 1 hour ago, Philip Hebbard said: No, seriously? Many a DC3 has given over 50 years service. Are we really to believe that a bridge that at any moment may be supporting a thousand tonnes of traffic, may be toppled by the wind? With such a claim I'd look very closely for vested interest of those looking for a new bridge over renovating. I didn’t say anything about being toppled by the wind, although it doesn’t meet current standards for wind or earthquake resistance. It is past due for replacement, so why not replace it? are you an engineer? How much do you know about bridges? What does a DC3 have to do wth this bridge? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted February 19, 2018 Report Share Posted February 19, 2018 2 hours ago, Philip Hebbard said: Many a DC3 has given over 50 years service. Not sure that comparison has any relevance. In addition to the design and stress issues being completely different, a 50 year old airplane has been rebuilt many times in order to keep flying. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxme Posted February 23, 2018 Report Share Posted February 23, 2018 On 2/19/2018 at 9:06 AM, ?Impact said: Not sure that comparison has any relevance. In addition to the design and stress issues being completely different, a 50 year old airplane has been rebuilt many times in order to keep flying. I say replace the bloody thing before the liberals get back in power. The liberals started putting tolls on all new bridges. They would do the same for a new Pattulo Bridge. At least the NDP took those tolls off which now saves many BC drivers hundreds of dollars every year. At least this is one time when I can say that I was quite happy to have an NDP government in power. They are saving me plenty of money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted February 23, 2018 Report Share Posted February 23, 2018 10 minutes ago, taxme said: They are saving me plenty of money. Great, then you are totally against any user fees. I will remember that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxme Posted February 24, 2018 Report Share Posted February 24, 2018 On 2/23/2018 at 1:46 PM, ?Impact said: Great, then you are totally against any user fees. I will remember that. I think that I made myself clear when I said that I was against tolls on bridges. Remember that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted February 25, 2018 Report Share Posted February 25, 2018 2 hours ago, taxme said: I think that I made myself clear when I said that I was against tolls on bridges. Remember that. I see, only user fees which apply to you personally. You want those who don't take that bridge to support your habit, but you don't want to reciprocate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxme Posted February 26, 2018 Report Share Posted February 26, 2018 On 2/24/2018 at 6:31 PM, ?Impact said: I see, only user fees which apply to you personally. You want those who don't take that bridge to support your habit, but you don't want to reciprocate. Well, when some BC roads in the interior get repaved, which I will probably never use, I am being forced to pay some of my taxes for those using that road. Maybe there should be tolls on some of those roads in the interior for their habit of using those roads? You need to think before you speak. It does work. Anyway life sucks, kid. Live with it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.