Omni Posted July 30, 2017 Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 1 minute ago, hot enough said: Are you doing the usual Omni lying routine? bye bye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted July 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Omni said: bye bye I see you are doing the usual Omni lying routine? Boges and Hal sure did make you sit up and realize just how badly you have been prevaricating. Edited July 30, 2017 by hot enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted July 30, 2017 Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 3 minutes ago, hot enough said: I see you are doing the usual Omni lying routine? Boges and Hal sure did make you sit up and realize just how badly you were prevaricating. bye bye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted July 30, 2017 Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 9 minutes ago, hot enough said: You are definitely....spectacular. Agreed...the USA is spectacular....that's why so many Canadians live there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted July 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 9 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said: Agreed...the USA is spectacular....that's why so many Canadians live there. That's not at all what I said. You really have no sense of shame at all. You are totally willing to prevaricate/fabricate, but hey, you are American. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted July 30, 2017 Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 (edited) 5 hours ago, hot enough said: You know that the official story is nonsense Well as I said probably 20 pages or more ago the most salient point in the government version, that 9/11 was a provoked retaliation, is missing. That's what makes it unsupportable IMO. Why 9/11 happened is as obvious as what happened, again, IMO. The funny thing is that the retaliation theory probably gets even less respect than the CD theory. The truth of the retaliation pudding is its ability to burrow under the skin of its critics as irritatingly as fibreglass whereas yours just makes them laugh. Your motive seems bizarre. As I also pointed out you seem to recognize the reason the US had it coming but why you insist on pursuing the tangent you've taken is really strange. It just seems so...unnecessary. Edited July 30, 2017 by eyeball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OftenWrong Posted July 30, 2017 Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 Seems to me that anyone smart enough to pull off such a conspiracy would certainly be smart enough not to use an explosive that could only be traced to one source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 30, 2017 Report Share Posted July 30, 2017 8 minutes ago, OftenWrong said: Seems to me that anyone smart enough to pull off such a conspiracy would certainly be smart enough not to use an explosive that could only be traced to one source. Or leave the wrong jet engines on the road under the towers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted July 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 18 hours ago, eyeball said: Well as I said probably 20 pages or more ago the most salient point in the government version, that 9/11 was a provoked retaliation, is missing. Of course the US had it coming. There were US professors who were saying on 911, "I can count on my fingers very quickly any ten countries that had a legitimate beef to have done this. Quote That's what makes it unsupportable IMO. Why 9/11 happened is as obvious as what happened, again, IMO. You are so nebulous. WTF is "it"? What is it that "happened that is so obvious"? Quote The funny thing is that the retaliation theory probably gets even less respect than the CD theory. The truth of the retaliation pudding is its ability to burrow under the skin of its critics as irritatingly as fibreglass whereas yours just makes them laugh. The laugh you hear is that highly nervous laugh that comes from people who know they are guilty. The defenders of any US evil are the same way. They know full well that there were no Arab hijackers. Notice how in addition to never offering ANY evidence for the USGOCT, they avoid the hijackers issue like the plague. Quote Your motive seems bizarre. As I also pointed out you seem to recognize the reason the US had it coming More nebulous. Of course I recognize the US had it coming, and I have spoken to this myriad times by cataloging the myriad illegal invasions, the myriad war crimes, the myriad and constant terrorism. You rarely talk about those things even though you know, Quote but why you insist on pursuing the tangent you've taken is really strange. It just seems so...unnecessary. WHAT TANGENT! Spell it out! It is so hard to discuss anything with you because you have so many isolated pronouns, so many nebulous statements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted July 31, 2017 Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 11 minutes ago, hot enough said: They know full well that there were no Arab hijackers. So 8 competent airline pilots went suicidal on the same day and flew their airliners into buildings or a cornfield. Do you realize how utterly ridiculous that idea is? you're just a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted July 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 11 hours ago, OftenWrong said: Seems to me that anyone smart enough to pull off such a conspiracy would certainly be smart enough not to use an explosive that could only be traced to one source. It was almost never discovered. It was only by happenstance. If Richard Gage hadn't heard David Ray Griffin speaking on the radio he wouldn't have started AE911Truth. If he hadn't done that Steven Jones may never have heard anything either which led him to start investigating a few things, which led to him finding the red gray chips, the unreacted nanothermite in the dust samples, which led to Neils Harrit watching a video of WTC7 come down and he, like any rational human being, knew it was a controlled demolition, which led him to contact Dr Jones and ... . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted July 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 9 minutes ago, Omni said: Not 9 minutes ago but a couple times Omni said: bye bye Are you again doing the usual Omni lying routine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted July 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 11 hours ago, bcsapper said: Or leave the wrong jet engines on the road under the towers... You can't be this thick. Wait a second, you have always been thick when it comes to the events of 911. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted July 31, 2017 Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 1 minute ago, hot enough said: Are you again doing the usual Omni lying routine? You seem to be incapable of answering some very obvious questions. But that's the legacy of conspiracy theory wackos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted July 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 8 minutes ago, Omni said: You seem to be incapable of answering some very obvious questions. You are doing the usual Omni lying routine again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted July 31, 2017 Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 Just now, hot enough said: You are doing the usual Omni lying routine again. "No hijackers"? and you're accusing me of lying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted July 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 11 hours ago, bcsapper said: Or leave the wrong jet engines on the road under the towers... How do you think it is possible for a 767 to fly into WTC2 and be half in and half out and the building in perfect shape? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted July 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 Omni says "bye bye" and here he is again. You are doing the usual Omni lying routine again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 31, 2017 Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 18 minutes ago, hot enough said: You can't be this thick. Wait a second, you have always been thick when it comes to the events of 911. Sorry, didn't happen. Understood. I must have been thinking of some other plane crash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 31, 2017 Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 9 minutes ago, hot enough said: How do you think it is possible for a 767 to fly into WTC2 and be half in and half out and the building in perfect shape? This is new. Isn't that a still from the video? The video is a fake then? What about the people on the ground? Mass hypnosis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted July 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 9 minutes ago, bcsapper said: Sorry, didn't happen. Understood. I must have been thinking of some other plane crash. Another nebulous guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted July 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 9 minutes ago, bcsapper said: This is new. Isn't that a still from the video? The video is a fake then? Yes, a CNN video. No, it is not new. How is it possible for that to happen? Quote What about the people on the ground? Mass hypnosis? When you actually check you find that there are a lot of people who said they never saw a plane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 31, 2017 Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 1 minute ago, hot enough said: Yes, a CNN video. No, it is not new. How is it possible for that to happen? When you actually check you find that there are a lot of people who said they never saw a plane. Well, I certainly didn't, but I was in Kamloops. I bet you find a lot of people in New York who did, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted July 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 12 hours ago, bcsapper said: Or leave the wrong jet engines on the road under the towers... One engine. You can see it flying from the north side of WTC 2. Its speed and trajectory have been calculated. The only problem is it is not an engine that was put in the 767-200. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted July 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2017 11 minutes ago, bcsapper said: Well, I certainly didn't, but I was in Kamloops. I bet you find a lot of people in New York who did, though. That would require that you did some research. There is no research required to know that a building cannot self heal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts