Jump to content

Suspected terrorist attack in London 4 dead including the attacker


kactus

Recommended Posts

Just now, Michael Hardner said:

Only if you have already made up your mind as to the 'cause'.   If your phobias were reality, then we would already all be dead.  Instead, this is just the same dislike of outside peoples that has existed forever.

Sorry...history disagrees with you.

 

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

Sorry...history disagrees with you.

 

Any attempt to apply objective rules that implicate Islam as the cause of violence fails.  Therefore Islam can't be shown to be the cause.

For all of the complaints about people being called racist for airing their views, there hasn't been a solid proof made that this religion causes anything.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Michael Hardner said:

Any attempt to apply objective rules that implicate Islam as the cause of violence fails.  Therefore Islam can't be shown to be the cause.

For all of the complaints about people being called racist for airing their views, there hasn't been a solid proof made that this religion causes anything.  

 

Islam, from the start, was spread by the sword. It was sort of like the guy on the beach getting sand kicked on him...it's about revenge and sticking it to the unbeliever.

It's basic history starting with Mohammad and carried on by his Companions. Your denying it doesn't make it disappear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Muslim_conquests

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DogOnPorch said:

 

Islam, from the start, was spread by the sword.  

This is where I come back with descriptions of other religions, then you add a qualification to your reasoning.  In the end, these discussions don't go anywhere because you're essentially building a logical proof to rationalize people you don't like under any conditions.

As I said, we've seen this tact used before and it doesn't fly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Argus said:

Does that mean no religion is bad?

 

I think he's taking it on faith that all religions are ultimately good and peaceful.

;)

1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said:

That's how I feel.  If anything, "bad" is such a reductive binary term.   

...and there it is.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Any attempt to apply objective rules that implicate Islam as the cause of violence fails.  Therefore Islam can't be shown to be the cause.

For all of the complaints about people being called racist for airing their views, there hasn't been a solid proof made that this religion causes anything.  

Do you really not see any pattern to these terrorist attacks...really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hal 9000 said:

Do you really not see any pattern to these terrorist attacks...really?

One would have to be an idiot to deny Islamic terrorism isn't behind it.  Of course, the groups goals are to divide people along religious lines so you'd also have to be an idiot to fall for their plan, while detesting the group themselves.  Wouldn't you ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Michael Hardner said:

One would have to be an idiot to deny Islamic terrorism isn't behind it.  Of course, the groups goals are to divide people along religious lines so you'd also have to be an idiot to fall for their plan, while detesting the group themselves.  Wouldn't you ?

 

Of course, this would all hinge on all this fuss being caused by a few 'bad apples'.

AKA: the Bad Apple Defence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

Of course, this would all hinge on all this fuss being caused by a few 'bad apples'.

I've never heard such a defence.  If a group is involved in crimes, tell me what makes you select certain group characteristics over another ?  When do you decide that religion, or race for that matter is actually a cause ?  Or just a cofactor ?  I'm asking sincerely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, blackbird said:

Wasn't he influenced by some extremist group(s)?

Maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. We don't know, it's all speculation. It's not like the Ander's Breivik or Dylan Roof killings where the motives were very clear. Now if the killer were to release a manifesto, confession or statement explaining the reasoning and motivation, we would probably be able to make more definitive conclusions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

One would have to be an idiot to deny Islamic terrorism isn't behind it.  Of course, the groups goals are to divide people along religious lines so you'd also have to be an idiot to fall for their plan, while detesting the group themselves.  Wouldn't you ?

I used to be one of you "don't fall for their plan" types, but after watching this for years, I've changed quite a bit.  If we react or change our lifestyle, they win...right?  How do we win?  When do we win?  Well, our lives have changed dramatically since 9/11, and I don't see the west as "winning" anything.  4 innocent people are dead, 4 families dealing with a dead family member and another 40 will have their lives drastically altered - so, is this what you'd call a win for England.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...