Derek 2.0 Posted September 22, 2016 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2016 (edited) And there we go, the two Trudeau cronies.......Butts and Telford: Two of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s top aides billed taxpayers more than $200,000 in moving expenses, mostly for legal and real estate fees covering the sale of their million-dollar Toronto homes, The Globe and Mail has learned. Gerald Butts, the Prime Minister’s principal secretary, and Katie Telford, his chief of staff, were reimbursed for moving their families from Toronto to Ottawa, a source told The Globe. One move cost almost $127,000, while the other was more than $80,000, although it’s not clear which expenses were associated with which aide. Over $200K to move the two from Toronto to Ottawa..........because its 2016. Edit to add Liberal integrity: Public land records show Mr. Butts sold his million-dollar Toronto home for $630,000 more than he paid for it, while Ms. Telford made close to $500,000 on the sale of her $1,005,000 Toronto home earlier this year. Edited September 22, 2016 by Derek 2.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted September 22, 2016 Report Share Posted September 22, 2016 If those homes were sold for about $1 million each, that would make real-estate fees around $50k for each. When were real-estate fees included in reimbursable relocation expenses, that rule needs to be changed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallc Posted September 22, 2016 Report Share Posted September 22, 2016 They were sold for well over a million going by those numbers. That definitely needs to change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poochy Posted September 22, 2016 Report Share Posted September 22, 2016 Even if it was 50k in fees, another 50k to move 4 hours down the road? What was he moving, another whole house, the actual, physical house? Two years of Duffy for 90k that was paid back and this guy, charges us 100k to move a few hours down the road to a job he volunteered to do, he wasn't force transferred. It's ridiculous. This guy is a member of the far left intelligentsia, former head of the world wildlife fund, but considering his million dollar home, environmental activisim, aka, doing whatever you can to kill our economy, seems to pay pretty well. It's this guy who is writing the job killing pipeline and carbon tax polices for this country, some pigs surely are more equal than others. Everything about this government is the embodiment of hypocrisy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek 2.0 Posted September 22, 2016 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2016 This guy is a member of the far left intelligentsia, former head of the world wildlife fund, but considering his million dollar home, environmental activisim, aka, doing whatever you can to kill our economy, seems to pay pretty well. It's this guy who is writing the job killing pipeline and carbon tax polices for this country, some pigs surely are more equal than others. Didn't Butts help craft the Ontario clean energy program too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted September 22, 2016 Report Share Posted September 22, 2016 progressives see absolutely nothing wrong with these Liberal "mole hills"What makes you think all progressives are Liberals? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted September 22, 2016 Report Share Posted September 22, 2016 The bulk of the costs were real-estate and legal fees. Here are the rules, established back in the 70's and last updated in 2009. Time to fix this, perhaps setting a ceiling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Macadoo Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 The bulk of the costs were real-estate and legal fees. Here are the rules, established back in the 70's and last updated in 2009. Time to fix this, perhaps setting a ceiling. Its like anything else...what compensation packages are available to executives? Talent retention....blah blah blah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PIK Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 The new liberal trick ,steal till you get caught then just pay it back, and the sheep will be happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 Pretty much what I thought, too. The ol' hand in the cookie jar....bad children. But Mike Duffy...let's rant on and on and on and on and on and on... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 Well, at least they are going to look into closing the cookie jar. Something Conservatives had the opportunity to do but failed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msj Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) Interesting that Butts says he will repay about $20,000 or so in land transfer tax. I consider that a legitimate expense to be reimbursed as compared to the BS "personal" items. But maybe he is throwing this in because he can at least deduct it and save 50 cents on the dollar while making this all go away. A small price to pay. Lots smaller than coming up with $90,000 to pay someone else's expenses. Edited September 23, 2016 by msj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 I consider that a legitimate expense to be reimbursed as compared to the BS "personal" items. Both he and Telford are returning the "personal" items. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msj Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 Both he and Telford are returning the "personal" items. I know. I saw a story where Butts stated he was going to return the land transfer tax - which I think is a legitimate expense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Army Guy Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 Sad day really. when someone as much as admits to stealing federal tax dollars, "grins, shrugs a shoulder, asks to Much" here take some back.... Even sadder day when the liberals in the crowd, know there is a problem but just lower their heads , and murmur well at least now they are going to look at the problem....better than the cons did......Sure it is.....But I left here scratching my head...Did these people file false claims.....if so whats is the consequence's to that ? and if not Why are they returning the money, if they are legally entitled to have it.....why return it..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 Can we all objectively agree that Butts is a loathsome human being? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Guy Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 I wonder how these costs compare with the private sector. How much would a corporation pay in compensation for moving a executive of the company to a new location? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 Sad day when the Liberals provide transparency, and the crying Conservatives haven't for the past 9 years while they increase the cost of the PMO exponentially. Why can't we get the same information from the crying Conservatives? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Guy Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 Some interesting stats about moving expenses at: Moving Expenses This fall within the guidelines? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Army Guy Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 Is that what you think went on here....2 high ranking Liberals stuck their hands up and asked parliament I think I got to much for my moving claim.....i'd like to give some back? Is that what you meant by transparency.....or was it uncovered some how by a 3 rd party..... And to counter your point....This entire issue ....is not what the Cons did for the last 9 years.....but rather what current Liberal MP's are doing now.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 Is that what you think went on here....2 high ranking Liberals stuck their hands up and asked parliament I think I got to much for my moving claim.....i'd like to give some back? Is that what you meant by transparency.....or was it uncovered some how by a 3 rd party..... We don't have a clue about the previous government because even though it increased to cost of the PMO many fold, every time we asked for details we were stonewalled. Transparency is what the current government is offering, providing the details that the previous government hid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PIK Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) Well, at least they are going to look into closing the cookie jar. Something Conservatives had the opportunity to do but failed. When you read it. It is up to the minister to use their indiscretion and negotiate with the person moving. It was also said on CBC or CTV that Harper cap it at 30,000 dollars for the PMO. The minister that signed off on this was Trudeau himself. And the funny thing is, these 2 are in charge of keeping Trudeau out of trouble and win the next election. Edited September 23, 2016 by PIK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 It was also said on CBC or CTV that Harper cap it at 30,000 dollars for the PMO. Has that been verified, or is it still just a statement from a Conservative MP? If it was capped, then why was the cap not specified in the rules? What specifically was capped? The incidentals that were returned were below $30k in each case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msj Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 I wonder how these costs compare with the private sector. How much would a corporation pay in compensation for moving a executive of the company to a new location? I agree - this is why it is not much of an issue for me. People with similar jobs do get this type of money for moving reimbursement and if it is good enough for the private sector then I am ok with it in the public sector. So, meh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PIK Posted September 23, 2016 Report Share Posted September 23, 2016 (edited) It is up to the minister in charge when it comes to the PMO, which is the PM. Trudeau said yes to this scam. Kenney in a Interview said the most he approved was 5g's for a staffer to move up from DC. Tells me the PM has very poor judgment, but then what would he know, everything has been look after for him since he was born. Edited September 23, 2016 by PIK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.