Jump to content

Moral Machine


Guest

Recommended Posts

Its every car for itself.

I agree. It would only be an extension of existing practice. From what I have read, many people will purchase an SUV because it will better survive a car crash than other cars:

SUV advantage

Conversely, I have a neighbor who owns one of those small smart cars. He will not drive on the highway and will not allow anybody in the family to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. It would only be an extension of existing practice. From what I have read, many people will purchase an SUV because it will better survive a car crash than other cars:

SUV advantage

Conversely, I have a neighbor who owns one of those small smart cars. He will not drive on the highway and will not allow anybody in the family to do so.

Yeah, after driving a pickup for work I don't think I'm ever going back to a car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can give more simple every day scenarios.

I commute about an hour each way to and from work. Several times a day, lane changes are made with no signal and no shoulder check. Often resulting in two cars merging into the same lane at the same time, only to narrowly avoid each other and each goes back into the lane they came from. Merging from off ramps at 60 KPH when people are doing 100 KPH or more.

Distracted drivers because of phones, eating, smoking, ect.

But still I do not advocate for self driving vehicles. The main problem there is technology that is not secure. It's bad enough when computer systems and such get hacked and vehicles have proven to be hackable in several ways. The more tech that gets put into a car, the more likely this will result in massive incidents. (a cascading scenario I keep talking about) ..

Think of it, you have all this stuff on your PC and phone to protect from viruses/malware. Do you think this is a good trend to go full tilt into automated cars driven by computers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A sky train full of passengers is heading to the next station. It has a ticking time bomb on board and all the passengers will die if it doesn't get to the next station in time so they can offload. But on the way there, there are innocent people tied to the tracks, in the same number as the sky train passengers. If the train stops, these innocents will be spared but the passengers will die. What should the sky train do?

Here is what would happen if the train is stopped other than stations. That is not a lot of room to evacuate a train full of people. You have a crap scenario either way.

li-bc-140721-skytrain-kiran-hothi.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,722
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    phoenyx75
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • User went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • User went up a rank
      Contributor
    • User earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Fluffypants earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...