Jump to content

America under President Trump


Recommended Posts

President Trump had a great time at the Gridiron Dinner in Washington D.C.:

 

Quote

"I just want to say this, this is one of the best times I've had with the media — this might be the most fun I've had since watching your faces on election night."

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-gridiron-dinner-1.4561507

 

Trump is right about that...it was a lot of fun on that night.

Edited by bush_cheney2004
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2018 at 10:25 PM, Omni said:

I suspect congress will block the recent tariffs Trump is babbling about on steel and aluminum. They have the power and the brains to know this would cost the US a lot of jobs. 

With seven more years to go for Trump this obsessive hatred that you have for Trump every day may just end up giving you the seven year itch. Just saying. Chuckle-chuckle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/4/2018 at 1:57 AM, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

No big deal...same is true for Canada's present prime minister...hell...he has already been found guilty of four (4) ethics violations.

Still some ways to go with the likes of Bush, Cheney, Obama, and that guy Clinton.  Not just ethics either. Fucking war crimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either Trump is extraordinarily difficult to work with or his shit at appointing good support staff. More likely it's both. 

Another adviser quits today over this whole Steel Tariff stupidness. 

Only one original member of the Trump team is still with him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Boges said:

Either Trump is extraordinarily difficult to work with or his shit at appointing good support staff. More likely it's both. 

Another adviser quits today over this whole Steel Tariff stupidness. 

Only one original member of the Trump team is still with him. 

 

This is consistent with Trump blowing up the D.C. beltway.  

Eventually staff can't/won't support his aggressive policies, so they have a duty to resign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

This is consistent with Trump blowing up the D.C. beltway.  

Eventually staff can't/won't support his aggressive policies, so they have a duty to resign.

And eventually no one will work with him. John Kelly seems next as it appears Trump has told the Mootch to make the media rounds trashing him. 

These are his own people, not the DC establishment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Boges said:

And eventually no one will work with him. John Kelly seems next as it appears Trump has told the Mootch to make the media rounds trashing him. 

These are his own people, not the DC establishment. 

That's the most interesting part in my view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Boges said:

And eventually no one will work with him. John Kelly seems next as it appears Trump has told the Mootch to make the media rounds trashing him. 

These are his own people, not the DC establishment. 

 

And that's fine...Trump has his agenda and many staffers don't have the stomach for it.

Loyalty is very important to President Trump, as it is to many "CEOs" in corporate America.

It is expected that being very unconventional will force conventional people to bail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

And that's fine...Trump has his agenda and many staffers don't have the stomach for it.

Loyalty is very important to President Trump, as it is to many "CEOs" in corporate America.

It is expected that being very unconventional will force conventional people to bail.

Some people just cannot take the heat like Trump can. Even though many Trump people are running for the hills at least Trump still has his millions of followers on twitter. They are not abandoning him. I wish that the next guy to go would be Sessions. That guy is a Hillary, Comey and Mueller swampster supporter not a Trump supporter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Boges said:

And eventually no one will work with him. John Kelly seems next as it appears Trump has told the Mootch to make the media rounds trashing him. 

These are his own people, not the DC establishment. 

Taking on a well established swamp will be quite the task to try and clean that swamp out. It is sad that so many people have left. It just shows that they could not take the heat or were never with Trump at all but were more on the side of the swampsters. I heard that Kushner had to leave because he had too many business entanglements on the go. Gary Cohn left and went back to Goldman/Sachs. I think that Gary Cohn was one of those zionist globalists banksters supporters myself. The outfit Goldman/Sachs that gave plenty of moola to Hillary and Obama. The traitors to America are everywhere. I for one do not envy Trump at all. The guy is surrounded by enemies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, taxme said:

Some people just cannot take the heat like Trump can. Even though many Trump people are running for the hills at least Trump still has his millions of followers on twitter. They are not abandoning him. I wish that the next guy to go would be Sessions. That guy is a Hillary, Comey and Mueller swampster supporter not a Trump supporter. 

Trump can fire Sessions anytime he likes. He won't though.

Sessions was part of the Trump team very early, but because he recused himself as to not investigate something he was involved in, he's a Hillary supporter. That's funny. 

Edited by Boges
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, taxme said:

Taking on a well established swamp will be quite the task to try and clean that swamp out. It is sad that so many people have left. It just shows that they could not take the heat or were never with Trump at all but were more on the side of the swampsters. I heard that Kushner had to leave because he had too many business entanglements on the go. Gary Cohn left and went back to Goldman/Sachs. I think that Gary Cohn was one of those zionist globalists banksters supporters myself. The outfit Goldman/Sachs that gave plenty of moola to Hillary and Obama. The traitors to America are everywhere. I for one do not envy Trump at all. The guy is surrounded by enemies. 

So you concede Trump appointed people in the swamp he wanted to drain. If these people were so "swampy" why were they appointed? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Boges said:

So you concede Trump appointed people in the swamp he wanted to drain. If these people were so "swampy" why were they appointed? 

It would appear as though some of the people that Trump appointed were not quite with Trump on his agenda for America and draining the swamp. So some left because they could not take the heat or disagreed with Trump and his agenda. Hey, everyone makes mistakes now and then. Even you, fella. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Boges said:

Trump can fire Sessions anytime he likes. He won't though.

Sessions was part of the Trump team very early, but because he recused himself as to not investigate something he was involved in, he's a Hillary supporter. That's funny. 

Well, there is something wrong with Sessions and his lack of not willing to start up another special council as so many people have asked or want him to do. There appears to be enough evidence to go after the real Russian collusion people like Hillary and Obama. That is funny alright. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I don't really think Canada has much to worry about.  The steel and aluminum industry in Canada is vital to the U.S. and putting a tariff on it would cause the loss of hundreds of thousands of U.S. jobs.  So what would be the point?  Canadian negotiators at NAFTA just need to stay cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, blackbird said:

 I don't really think Canada has much to worry about. 

 

But Canada will continue to worry about this and many other aspects of Trump's agenda for trade, NAFTA, "reciprocal taxes", etc.   Protectionism for dairy (300% tariffs on the U.S.) will come under pressure.    Crying by Trudeau and Freeland only goes so far, and it is election season for the U.S. and Mexico, when "nationalism" is peaked.

75% of Canadian exports go to a single nation...the United States....always something for some Canadians to worry about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

But Canada will continue to worry about this and many other aspects of Trump's agenda for trade, NAFTA, "reciprocal taxes", etc.   Protectionism for dairy (300% tariffs on the U.S.) will come under pressure.    Crying by Trudeau and Freeland only goes so far, and it is election season for the U.S. and Mexico, when "nationalism" is peaked.

75% of Canadian exports go to a single nation...the United States....always something for some Canadians to worry about.

And many of those states that brought Trump to power do a great deal of trade with Canada. 

I actually agree with the Dairy farmer thing. Supply Management is socialism and it keeps our price of dairy uncompetitively high. Is the US willing to kill rust belt jobs with a Steel Tarrif to try and force Canada to ruin its dairy farmer industry? I'm not sure. 

Edited by Boges
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Boges said:

And many of those states that brought Trump to power do a great deal of trade with Canada.

 

And many others did not bring "Trump to power"....like California, New York, Illinois, Washington.   Even a state like Michigan is not nearly as dependent on trade with Canada as are provinces dependent on U.S. trade, up to a staggering 50% of GDP.   Canadian provinces export far more as a percentage of GDP to the U.S. than states to Canada, which is why Trump has more NAFTA leverage, and why Trudeau/Freeland are so desperate to keep the status quo.

 

image.jpg

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/how-much-trade-leverage-does-canada-really-have-with-united-states/article34014567/

 

Quote

I actually agree with the Dairy farmer thing. Supply Management is socialism and it keeps our price of dairy uncompetitively high. Is the US willing to kill rust belt jobs with a Steel Tarrif to try and force Canada to ruin its dairy farmer industry? I'm not sure. 

 

Canada's protectionist supply management for dairy has been attacked several times by other nations (WTO), long before Trump became president.    Rust belt jobs went away for other reasons long before Trump.   President Bush also imposed tariffs on steel for nearly identical economic and political reasons, with wider support, but without much success.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_United_States_steel_tariff

Edited by bush_cheney2004
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,721
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    paradox34
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • SkyHigh earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Proficient
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • gatomontes99 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...