Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

If not hyperbolically.

Nothing hyperbolic about it. In fact, the opposition was doings omething even worse, in that they were protecting their own bank accounts (the public funding subsidy was going to disappear).

Posted (edited)

By the time 08 rolled around Harper had blown the surplus Martin handed him and was well on his way into deficits.

Yes, the crashing world economy would tend to do that.

Edited by Smallc
Posted

Are you trying to say Harper cut spending back then, or am I just not hearing correctly.

He couldn't. Apparently you have a very short memory.

Posted

By the time 08 rolled around Harper had blown the surplus Martin handed him and was well on his way into deficits.

That myth has been beaten do death. Martin and Chretien used $50 billion in EI funds and cut back transfers to provinces in order to generate that "surplus" - all on the backs of over-taxed Canadians and the provinces.

Back to Basics

Posted (edited)

He couldn't. Apparently you have a very short memory.

My memory is just fine. Harper put the budget into deficit first off by cutting the GST. Then he drove it higher with his attempt at applying Keynesian economics. However, this sees to be a bit of thread drift.

Edited by On Guard for Thee
Posted

My memory is just fine. Harper put the budget into deficit first off by cutting the GST. Then he drove it higher with his attempt at applying Keynesian economics. However, this sees to be a bit of thread drift.

Harper didn't ever want to spend the money he did, actually, and after the GST cut, the budget was still in surplus. A very poor memory indeed

Posted

Harper didn't ever want to spend the money he did, actually, and after the GST cut, the budget was still in surplus. A very poor memory indeed

Better check your facts.....budget of 08-09 was in deficit by about 6 billion, mostly due to lot GST revenue.

Posted

Better check your facts.....budget of 08-09 was in deficit by about 6 billion, mostly due to lot GST revenue.

Complete nonsense. The recession was responsible for lost revenue.

Posted

Nothing hyperbolic about it. In fact, the opposition was doings omething even worse, in that they were protecting their own bank accounts (the public funding subsidy was going to disappear).

You don't think 'coup détat attempt' is hyperbole?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

That's total BS since the previous 4 or 5 governments all had a hand in racking up debt, with Chretien taking the lead. I suppose you think WW3 is just around the corner.

You've been paying attention to things going on around the world? We just might be on the edge of that. Ukraine, Middle East, China-Russia against USA NATO, with China vs Japan mixed in. Africa having issues with Boko and Al-Queda types. Not to mention the Middle East and ISIS with another Saudi US NATO against the Russian-Iran-China batch .. I dunno. Sure looks like peace is breaking out all over the place.

Posted

You don't think 'coup détat attempt' is hyperbole?

I don't believe that's what it was. The stated reasons are spot on.

Posted

Better check your facts.....budget of 08-09 was in deficit by about 6 billion, mostly due to lot GST revenue.

The recession started during that fiscal year, and the slowdown started as soon as two years prior. Better check your facts.

Posted

Complete nonsense. Already in deficit prior to the recession.

Yes, economies start to slow down rapidly months before an official recession.

Posted

Well check your facts. Dont just blurt out, he said, she said.

You've already been called on it - repeating your mantra over and over as you usually do will not change the facts.....

Back to Basics

Posted

They're the responsibility of the provinces (with the help of the already massive Canadian Social Transfer) and already get more than most of us should be comfortable with. In this country, you have to try hard to be extremely poor.

Actually, all you have to do is have a chronic illness.

$1000/month and virtually no coverage of medical expenses needed to keep a person as healthy as possible. It's disgusting how Canada treats disabled people.

Posted

This visit was pure election time politics. Anyone who isn't a partisan hack can see that.

Posted

Thanks for proving my point. It clearly started in 2008, when the recession hit, was at it's biggest in 2009, and has been shrinking ever since. You're "it clearly started well before the recession" is completly and utterly false.

A 13 billion dollar surplus turned into a 6 billion dollar deficit in 2 budgets, mostly by cutting gst. Its not calculus...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...