Wilber Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 Of course. But again my point is, without the video would there even be a trial. How many other trials do you think don't happen because there is no video? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Je suis Omar Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 Theres a word for this comment...Im not sure exactly but I think Ill go with CREEPY. Do you think it's any creepier than B_C screaming out his unreserved support for the long history of USA war crimes and terrorism? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Je suis Omar Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 They were going to try to peddle a story that wasn't true. . And all of a sudden, you find Dog, Boges. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 How many other trials do you think don't happen because there is no video? I would have to think quite a few. Or at least trials with poor outcomes due to tainted evidence as it seems was attempted here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 Yes, the hockey reference is somewhat flippant and typical BC but the man has been charged with murder. So far the system is working in this case. Yes, what's the problem ? Are flippant comments only allowed when cops shoot white people ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 Do you think it's any creepier than B_C screaming out his unreserved support for the long history of USA war crimes and terrorism? It's not just B_C...it is Canada as well....to the tune of about $2 billion in trade each day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 Yes, what's the problem ? Are flippant comments only allowed when cops shoot white people ? Who said they weren't allowed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 (edited) Who said they weren't allowed? Great...go Canucks !! The cop's trial won't happen for many months. Edited April 8, 2015 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 All this thread needs is someone to bellow indignantly how there was insufficient evidence that "hands up don't shoot" was entirely accurate. It was all a LEFTIST MSM LIE! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Macadoo Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 All this thread needs is someone to bellow indignantly how there was insufficient evidence that "hands up don't shoot" was entirely accurate. It was all a LEFTIST MSM LIE! I think they are violating the cop's religious freedom rights......someone should fund that litigation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiderfish Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 How many more unarmed blacks need be shot by white cops before somebody perhaps takes a closer look at racism in US police forces. Has there been something released determining that this shooting was racially motivated? What happened to Mr. Scott appears to be an indefensible case of murder, however immedtiaely jumping to the conclusion that his death was the result of a racist police force seems a bit premature. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 Look around. You'll find the answer to that question all over this forum and a lot of other places on the internet too. Another entry to the Law and Order thread I created. You are correct, there are lots of examples like this out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 Yes, what's the problem ? Are flippant comments only allowed when cops shoot white people ? Yes, because .. Canada. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 Has there been something released determining that this shooting was racially motivated? What happened to Mr. Scott appears to be an indefensible case of murder, however immedtiaely jumping to the conclusion that his death was the result of a racist police force seems a bit premature. Sure. Maybe he just wanted to kill somebody. But naivete does run deep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 I could suggest something a little more helpful be done than simply tuning into the friggin hockey game. How many more unarmed blacks need be shot by white cops before somebody perhaps takes a closer look at racism in US police forces.Unarmed means nothing. Michael Brown was unarmed and deserved to be shot. This particular person was unarmed and didn't dserve to be shot at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 Has there been something released determining that this shooting was racially motivated? What happened to Mr. Scott appears to be an indefensible case of murder, however immedtiaely jumping to the conclusion that his death was the result of a racist police force seems a bit premature.Not at all. In fact most shootings aren't racially motivated. It's hard for people to imagine, but some people can act terribly wrong, without being racist. But we have thought police in this forum. They can read minds. So they know the exact intent of every incident. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 All this thread needs is someone to bellow indignantly how there was insufficient evidence that "hands up don't shoot" was entirely accurate. It was all a LEFTIST MSM LIE! Hands up don't shoot never happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 Not at all. In fact most shootings aren't racially motivated. It's hard for people to imagine, but some people can act terribly wrong, without being racist. But we have thought police in this forum. They can read minds. So they know the exact intent of every incident. You do realize how you just made a complete and utter contradiction, in classic Shady style... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 You do realize how you just made a complete and utter contradiction, in classic Shady style... I'm following your lead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 I'm following your lead. Nawm youre on your own there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 Another entry to the Law and Order thread I created. You are correct, there are lots of examples like this out there. Right, there are literally dozens, in a country of 350 million people, where there are tens of thousands of police interactions with the public every day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LemonPureLeaf Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 Why was this guy running from police? If he didn't run he wouldnt have been shot. I think people should look at the victim. He has responsibility too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 Why was this guy running from police? If he didn't run he wouldnt have been shot. I think people should look at the victim. He has responsibility too. Well after all he did have a burned out tail light. You cant have people driving around with that sort of thing going on. I agree, if you cant keep your damn tail lights working properly, and you are black, you need to be shot and killed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacee Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 (edited) Why was this guy running from police? If he didn't run he wouldnt have been shot. I think people should look at the victim. He has responsibility too.But he's dead.Police can only shoot you in the back for running away if they believe you pose a significant risk to people's safety. Oh ... did you see how the cop put the taser near the body so he could lie and say he was in danger? And the cop's been fired and charged with murder. . Edited April 9, 2015 by jacee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted April 9, 2015 Report Share Posted April 9, 2015 Right, there are literally dozens, in a country of 350 million people, where there are tens of thousands of police interactions with the public every day. Dozens, every day. How many do you think get light shed on them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.