Jump to content

Gov. Sarah Palin's Keynote at CPAC 2014


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 221
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You do realize that many of the most advanced western countries have the same system, I hope. It seems to work rather well.

I believe that 'working' is an illusion. When we have corporate interests mixed in with government interests, we have a form of corporate fascism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We (Trudeau and QE II) signed the BNA into law in 1982.

Er, no. There were many BNA acts. These (and other constitutional laws) were patriated via the proclamation of the Constitution Act 1982, which is what EIIR and PET signed on 17 April.

We are pretty much a democracy.

We are a democracy. Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, he's actually half "white". People really seem to (want to?) forget that.

I don't understand your point here. Why would anyone want to forget that and who cares? He does have a white parent but he clearly has black skin, and grew up with black skin, hence, he grew up as a black child, teenager, adult etc. He married a black woman, has 2 black daughters. So to say he his 'half' white is a bit silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand your point here.

.........Did you read the post I was responding to?

but he clearly has black skin

No, he doesn't.

So to say he his 'half' white is a bit silly

No, it's not. Well, if you consider the silliness of "white" and "black", then, yes, it's a bit silly. But, otherwise, no.

[ed.: +]

Edited by g_bambino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand your point here. Why would anyone want to forget that and who cares? He does have a white parent but he clearly has black skin, and grew up with black skin, hence, he grew up as a black child, teenager, adult etc. He married a black woman, has 2 black daughters. So to say he his 'half' white is a bit silly.

Off topic...post and response are both quite "silly".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.........Did you read the post I was responding to?

No, he doesn't.

No, it's not. Well, if you consider the silliness of "white" and "black", then, yes, it's a bit silly. But, otherwise, no.

[ed.: +]

Yes, i saw the post you were responding to. Again, I don't understand the point you were making. Can you explain it further?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama is not "non-white". How that relates to a comment about non-"white" war heroes no longer being ignored because the president is now non-"white" is self-evident.

I hope that's the end of that.

Well, I don't speak for who you were responding to but I found it odd that you would respond with what you did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...