GostHacked Posted March 16, 2014 Report Share Posted March 16, 2014 In other words, you don't know what you're talking about. Our government is a constitutional monarchy. Which is a form of democracy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_monarchy I fail to see how a person in another country can have ultimate say in parts of our government. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallc Posted March 16, 2014 Report Share Posted March 16, 2014 Yes, it is a form of democracy, which is completely at odds with what you said earlier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted March 16, 2014 Report Share Posted March 16, 2014 Yes, it is a form of democracy, which is completely at odds with what you said earlier. Both statements are true. Wondering how free I am being a subject of her majesty. Usually in democracies we grow beyond the need for a monarchy of any kind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallc Posted March 16, 2014 Report Share Posted March 16, 2014 You do realize that many of the most advanced western countries have the same system, I hope. It seems to work rather well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 You do realize that many of the most advanced western countries have the same system, I hope. It seems to work rather well. I believe that 'working' is an illusion. When we have corporate interests mixed in with government interests, we have a form of corporate fascism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallc Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 Working in comparison to most places, yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 Usually in democracies we grow beyond the need for a monarchy of any kind. False. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 We (Trudeau and QE II) signed the BNA into law in 1982. Er, no. There were many BNA acts. These (and other constitutional laws) were patriated via the proclamation of the Constitution Act 1982, which is what EIIR and PET signed on 17 April. We are pretty much a democracy. We are a democracy. Period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Er, no. There were many BNA acts. These (and other constitutional laws) were patriated via the proclamation of the Constitution Act 1982, which is what EIIR and PET signed on 17 April. We are a democracy. Period. Correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 If it feels like abuse, it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 Obama earning respect? Now THAT'S funny! I think he earned a little respect today. How much longer would the US have ignored their non-white war heroes if not for the fact they elected (twice) a non white president? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 I think he earned a little respect today. How much longer would the US have ignored their non-white war heroes if not for the fact they elected (twice) a non white president? The world views him as a laughingstock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 The world views him as a laughingstock.Cite? ...Didn't think so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
On Guard for Thee Posted March 19, 2014 Report Share Posted March 19, 2014 Are you sure you haven't got Obama and Rob Ford mixed up somehow? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReeferMadness Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 The world views him as a laughingstock. I'm sure your world views him as a laughingstock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 How much longer would the US have ignored their non-white war heroes if not for the fact they elected (twice) a non white president? Well, he's actually half "white". People really seem to (want to?) forget that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoastRunner Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 Well, he's actually half "white". People really seem to (want to?) forget that. I don't understand your point here. Why would anyone want to forget that and who cares? He does have a white parent but he clearly has black skin, and grew up with black skin, hence, he grew up as a black child, teenager, adult etc. He married a black woman, has 2 black daughters. So to say he his 'half' white is a bit silly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 (edited) I don't understand your point here. .........Did you read the post I was responding to? but he clearly has black skin No, he doesn't. So to say he his 'half' white is a bit silly No, it's not. Well, if you consider the silliness of "white" and "black", then, yes, it's a bit silly. But, otherwise, no. [ed.: +] Edited March 20, 2014 by g_bambino Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 I don't understand your point here. Why would anyone want to forget that and who cares? He does have a white parent but he clearly has black skin, and grew up with black skin, hence, he grew up as a black child, teenager, adult etc. He married a black woman, has 2 black daughters. So to say he his 'half' white is a bit silly. Off topic...post and response are both quite "silly". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoastRunner Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 Off topic...post and response are both quite "silly". Of course it's ok for you to go off topic when it suits you. I get that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoastRunner Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 .........Did you read the post I was responding to? No, he doesn't. No, it's not. Well, if you consider the silliness of "white" and "black", then, yes, it's a bit silly. But, otherwise, no. [ed.: +] Yes, i saw the post you were responding to. Again, I don't understand the point you were making. Can you explain it further? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 Of course it's ok for you to go off topic when it suits you. I get that. Somebody had to get this thread back on track. Please start another thread if President Obama's "skin" colour is so important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoastRunner Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 Somebody had to get this thread back on track. Please start another thread if President Obama's "skin" colour is so important. Are you moderating this thread? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 Can you explain it further? Obama is not "non-white". How that relates to a comment about non-"white" war heroes no longer being ignored because the president is now non-"white" is self-evident. I hope that's the end of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoastRunner Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 Obama is not "non-white". How that relates to a comment about non-"white" war heroes no longer being ignored because the president is now non-"white" is self-evident. I hope that's the end of that. Well, I don't speak for who you were responding to but I found it odd that you would respond with what you did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.