Saipan Posted March 30, 2011 Report Posted March 30, 2011 Paranoia - talk of conspiracies, delusions of 'coalitions', obsession, maglomania, etc.. That's why we got rid of Liberals. Quote
ToadBrother Posted March 30, 2011 Report Posted March 30, 2011 That's why we got rid of Liberals. And apparently replaced them with people who have active hatred of Parliament and constitution. Quote
William Ashley Posted March 31, 2011 Report Posted March 31, 2011 (edited) Why don't you stop screaming and inciting name calling ? It would help your argument you know. The constant misinformation given by Harper and his cronies is insulting and aggravating. I wish people would just shut up with their - he plans on doing it, he's gonna do it.. 1. That is harper saying 1 Ignateiff will win (harper conceeding defeat this early) and 2. Ignateiff for the last 2 and half years has hottly spoken against coalition. It shows people and Harper to be extremely uneducated to block out such an obvious history. This constant perversion of reality by harper really bothers me because it characterizes his government one of distortion and lies, and it gets me more that people believe what he says and try to pass it off as fact. It makes me mentally vomit. Edited March 31, 2011 by William Ashley Quote I was here.
punked Posted March 31, 2011 Report Posted March 31, 2011 The constant misinformation given by Harper and his cronies is insulting and aggravating. I wish people would just shut up with their - he plans on doing it, he's gonna do it.. 1. That is harper saying 1 Ignateiff will win (harper conceeding defeat this early) and 2. Ignateiff for the last 2 and half years has hottly spoken against coalition. It shows people and Harper to be extremely uneducated to block out such an obvious history. This constant perversion of reality by harper really bothers me because it characterizes his government one of distortion and lies. But doesn't the question really become does the person who replaces Ignateiff after he loses support the coalition? I mean he is going to lose he is going to be 64 in may not getting any younger and the Liberals don't like leaders who lose elections much. So does that person support coalition? I think I could deal with a coalition depending on the terms. Quote
William Ashley Posted March 31, 2011 Report Posted March 31, 2011 (edited) But doesn't the question really become does the person who replaces Ignateiff after he loses support the coalition? I mean he is going to lose he is going to be 64 in may not getting any younger and the Liberals don't like leaders who lose elections much. So does that person support coalition? I think I could deal with a coalition depending on the terms. WHAT THE F ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? THE ELECTION IS like a month away--- Ignatieff still has 2 years until retirement that is a whole different landscape. The coalition is just some mumbo junk the way tides turn if Harper is in government for 2 years especially a majority one people will be begging for the bloc to run Canada solo, even in alberta. Edited March 31, 2011 by William Ashley Quote I was here.
Keepitsimple Posted March 31, 2011 Report Posted March 31, 2011 Where's Kevin Page when you need him? Quote Back to Basics
Scotty Posted March 31, 2011 Report Posted March 31, 2011 The constant misinformation given by Harper and his cronies is insulting and aggravating. Yes, well, they invented the tactic, you see, and they alone use it. So I could see why you'd be so upset. Quote It is an inverted moral calculus that tries to persuade the world to demonize one state that tries its civilized best to abide in a difficult time and place, and rides merrily by the examples and practices of dozens of states and leaderships that drop into brutality every day without a twinge of regret or a whisper of condemnation. - Rex Murphy
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.