Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Michael Ignatieff:

When asked if he’s prepared to form a coalition, Mr. Ignatieff replied by saying voters have a choice between the “blue door” (the Conservatives) and the “red door” (the Liberals).

“I’m here to form a Liberal government with this incredibly talented caucus. That is the only game that I am, or will be, playing.”

When pressed further at the news conference about whether he is prepared to accept the verdict of voters if they elect a minority Conservative government, Mr. Ignatieff returned to his previous answer.

“There’s a blue door. There’s a red door. We’re going to form a Liberal government. Is that clear enough for you?” Mr. Ignatieff then abruptly ended the news conference and walked off.

National Post

WTF? "Clear"?

-----

Given how this thread has been hijacked and merged with other threads, I have edited the title to more accurately reflect the discussion.

Edited by August1991
  • Replies 529
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

Michael Ignatieff:National Post

WTF? "Clear"?

Must be living in some sort of "matrix"! Has he said he wants to be known as "Neo"?

Edited by Pliny

I want to be in the class that ensures the classless society remains classless.

Posted
When pressed further at the news conference about whether he is prepared to accept the verdict of voters if they elect a minority Conservative government, Mr. Ignatieff returned to his previous answer.

What does that question even mean? "Accept the verdict of voters?"

Is Ignatieff going to seize power in a military coup and install himself as President-for-Life if voters elect a minority Conservative government? :rolleyes:

Coalition!Coalition!Coalition!Coalition!Coalition!Coalition!Coalition!Coalition!

<_<

Your political compass

Economic Left/Right: -4.88

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15

Posted

I'm not sure if this is from the same Ignatieff scrum, I suspect it is.

“You go through the Blue Door and you get jets, you get jails, you get corporate tax cuts, and you get miserable knockoffs of the real article,” he said.

“But, you go through the Red Door and you get compassion, you get fiscal responsibility, and you get a government relentlessly focused on the real priorities of Canadian families."

http://www.ottawasun.com/comment/columnists/mark_bonokoski/2011/03/23/17733386.html

Typically, Ignatieff's words require translation.

Walk through the blue door, you're in the land of unspeakable evils.

Walk through the red door, you're in the land of milk and honey.

In essence, he kinda, sorta hinted in a nuanced way he's not endorsing a coalition of the losing parties. But this is Ignatieffspeak, so it's difficult to tell.

"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

Posted (edited)

Typically, Ignatieff's words require translation.

Walk through the blue door, you're in the land of unspeakable evils.

To be fair, he only pointed out the Conservatives party's own stated priorities.

Edited by SF/PF

Your political compass

Economic Left/Right: -4.88

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15

Posted

Omg, I hope he campaigns that way! I want him touring the country explaining to Canadians the two door theory. How entertaining would that be! :lol:

Posted

Michael Ignatieff:National Post

WTF? "Clear"?

Another prime example of Ignatieff saying stupid things.Not the first time.

Thats why Harper says very little

But at the same time he is not going for the true blue votes.He knows that they are a waste of time.He is targeting a more narrow group of swing voters.And possibly trying to provoke the conservatives into a race to the biggest blunder.

WWWTT

Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!

Posted

I really don't see what is not clear, let alone stupid, in what he is saying. You have two choices, thats it.

"They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Posted

I really don't see what is not clear, let alone stupid, in what he is saying. You have two choices, thats it.

Two choices in a 4 party system?

I choice is to vote Conservative..the other choice? To vote for one of the other 3 parties....?

*sniff*

Smells like coalition ...

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted

Two choices in a 4 party system?

I choice is to vote Conservative..the other choice? To vote for one of the other 3 parties....?

*sniff*

Smells like coalition ...

LOL... yes, thats it.

"They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Posted

I don't get it. I thought Ignatieff handled the question very easily. He's pumped unlike Harper who lost his cool at his scum and ran away after 2 questions when his handlers lost control of the questioners.

Posted
In essence, he kinda, sorta hinted in a nuanced way he's not endorsing a coalition of the losing parties. But this is Ignatieffspeak, so it's difficult to tell.

There is no hinting or nuance in Igantieffs position.

Ignatieff knows he simply cannot endorse a colaition publicly because a) it's an admission he expects to lost the election even though it is obvious he will and B) he will form a colaition aat his earliest opportunity because it is the only way he will ever become PM or remain as leader of the Liberals beyond May 3.

Note that Layton has openly stated he will back a coalition immediately after an election that returns a Tory minority govt. And of course we know Duceppe would be absolutely delighted to join any coalition for obvious reasons.

The government should do something.

Posted

Two choices in a 4 party system?

I choice is to vote Conservative..the other choice? To vote for one of the other 3 parties....?

*sniff*

Smells like coalition ...

There are more then 4 parties. And there are also independents. People have their choice of who to vote for as their MP.

Ignatieff has made a huge concession as a Liberal during an election. They usually think their is only one party, one choice and one traditional governing party and that is NOT the Conservatives.

I thought you were smarter then to be a chicken nodder to Coalition copouts.

:)

Posted

I don't get it. I thought Ignatieff handled the question very easily. He's pumped unlike Harper who lost his cool at his scum and ran away after 2 questions when his handlers lost control of the questioners.

Can u link me to that? I am unaware of Harper losing his cool?

:)

Posted

I thought you were smarter then to be a chicken nodder to Coalition copouts.

I happen to believe that a coalition is a real option that the Liberals with the NDP will effect if they have a chance.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted

I happen to believe that a coalition is a real option that the Liberals with the NDP will effect if they have a chance.

Happen to Believe? You'd have to be brain dead not to think it ineviatble if Hrper does not get a majority. Layton and Duceppe are not coy about their support for a Coalition, and Ignatieff is making stange about it only because he has to continue to pretend he can form a govt on his own.

And of course the Bloc will be a full partner, there cannot be a Coalition without the Bloc Quebecois.

If I was a Quebec voter, and decided that the Tories could not win a majority, I'd be voting Bloc for sure. You'd be crazy to do otherwise. With 50 or 60 seats, the Bloc would be a force in the Commons as a charter member of The Coalition, and everybody in La Belle Province knows it.

The government should do something.

Posted

Happen to Believe? You'd have to be brain dead not to think it ineviatble if Hrper does not get a majority. Layton and Duceppe are not coy about their support for a Coalition, and Ignatieff is making stange about it only because he has to continue to pretend he can form a govt on his own.

And of course the Bloc will be a full partner, there cannot be a Coalition without the Bloc Quebecois.

If I was a Quebec voter, and decided that the Tories could not win a majority, I'd be voting Bloc for sure. You'd be crazy to do otherwise. With 50 or 60 seats, the Bloc would be a force in the Commons as a charter member of The Coalition, and everybody in La Belle Province knows it.

Your magic 8 ball filling you in on a coalition?

"They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Posted

Can u link me to that? I am unaware of Harper losing his cool?

It was at his 11:30 AM press briefing yesterday in the House of Commons Foyer.

Harper has constantly been fighting with the press as he always trying to manage the press questions having one of his handlers decide who gets to ask the questions. Well that did NOT happen yesterday, and needless to say it was quite obvious that he was not pleased. It's election time, and he had better get used to it.

Posted

Quote of the day???

"Coaliton"..."CO-A-LITION"...

"A reckless coaliton!"

"Coalition?"

"coaliton!"

"Coalition,coalition,coalition.."

The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!

Posted

I don't get it. I thought Ignatieff handled the question very easily. He's pumped unlike Harper who lost his cool at his scum and ran away after 2 questions when his handlers lost control of the questioners.

Good reply Harry and very true!

Some people only think Harper is smart because he has not said anything stupid.

Not saying something stupid is not evidence you are brilliant.

Some people here can't get their heads around this.

WWWTT

Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!

Posted

Good reply Harry and very true!

Some people only think Harper is smart because he has not said anything stupid.

Not saying something stupid is not evidence you are brilliant.

Some people here can't get their heads around this.

WWWTT

Before anyone else says it "It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and confirm it."

As I say, Harper ain't my man anymore, but Iggy still needs to learn the above.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted

Not saying something stupid is not evidence you are brilliant.

Chauncey Gardener...

"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"

— L. Frank Baum

"For Conservatives, ministerial responsibility seems to be a temporary and constantly shifting phenomenon," -- Goodale

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,861
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    SteveJohnson14
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Cyfar earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • JVDZD earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • A Freeman went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...