Topaz Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 THe Liberals are thinking of a snap no-confidence vote over governments refusual to disclose advice and info. on costs of series ovf crime bills, the in and out Tories scheme,the Bev Oda misleading the House. Rumours of the cost of the prisons are from 2-8 billion and going to the provinces not the Feds. http://www.thehilltimes.ca/page/view/noconfidence-03-07-2011 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PIK Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 Bring it on, but you know that would not happen ,libs are to gutless, they only growl when the know someone else will stop a election. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scouterjim Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 THe Liberals are thinking of a snap no-confidence vote over governments refusual to disclose advice and info. on costs of series ovf crime bills, the in and out Tories scheme,the Bev Oda misleading the House. Rumours of the cost of the prisons are from 2-8 billion and going to the provinces not the Feds. http://www.thehilltimes.ca/page/view/noconfidence-03-07-2011 It always amazes me how politicians can point out all the faults of another party, but turn a blind eye, and deny any wrong doings by their party. I guess one must become totally indoctrinated to a party's agenda before you can run for office. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keepitsimple Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 Can you just imagine Scott Brison as Canada's Finance Minister? Talk about scary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shakeyhands Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 It always amazes me how politicians can point out all the faults of another party, but turn a blind eye, and deny any wrong doings by their party. I guess one must become totally indoctrinated to a party's agenda before you can run for office. You can add party supporters (specifically CPC members)to that list as well... funny ain't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 Replying to Liberals considering no-confidence vote Again? Does Ignatieff keep count of his "considerings"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scouterjim Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 You can add party supporters (specifically CPC members)to that list as well... funny ain't it? how soon supporters of the Liberals forget all the backroom deals, pork barreling and corruption that occured under the Liberal admin. A fountain in Shawinigan, anybody? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Battletoads Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 I'm confused why cons won't tell us what their needless crime bill costs? I'm sure it will be a reasonable like all conservative legislation.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry J. Fortin Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 I'm confused why cons won't tell us what their needless crime bill costs? I'm sure it will be a reasonable like all conservative legislation.. Toe in the water experiment by Iggy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Battletoads Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 Toe in the water experiment by Iggy. Maybe so but it still doesn't explain why the cons are hiding costs from Canadians. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry J. Fortin Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 Maybe so but it still doesn't explain why the cons are hiding costs from Canadians. Because they are the ones that are supposed to be fiscal conservatives. In reality they are not. Thats why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topaz Posted March 7, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 Can you just imagine Scott Brison as Canada's Finance Minister? Talk about scary. ....and why is that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topaz Posted March 7, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 It always amazes me how politicians can point out all the faults of another party, but turn a blind eye, and deny any wrong doings by their party. I guess one must become totally indoctrinated to a party's agenda before you can run for office. I guess the Tories will fit that bill when they are seating on the left side of the House. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonbox Posted March 7, 2011 Report Share Posted March 7, 2011 (edited) I guess the Tories will fit that bill when they are seating on the left side of the House. Maybe in another 3-4 years. It's hilarious that you think it might be soon. Is that what they're saying at rabble Topaz? LoL. Edited March 7, 2011 by Moonbox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capricorn Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 I guess the Tories will fit that bill when they are seating on the left side of the House. Is that the left side of the House as you're watching CPAC? Or is it on the right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shakeyhands Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 Can you just imagine Scott Brison as Canada's Finance Minister? Talk about scary. It couldn't be any worse than Flaherty. Serious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Battletoads Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 It couldn't be any worse than Flaherty. Serious. Very true. The man took a 9.1 billion dollar surplus and turned it into a defecit... before the recession even hit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a.gee Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 Apparently, all they're waiting for is the Speaker's verdict on Bev Oda. Until then, it's empty threats to the government. But how impressive would the Liberals be if they can actually carry out a no-confidence motion, and make a statement out of it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 It couldn't be any worse than Flaherty. Serious. The man who oversaw the best managed economy in the world over the last couple of years. Serious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 The man who oversaw the best managed economy in the world over the last couple of years. Serious. Yes, and an economy less robust than the one Mr. Martin handed to him might not have survived such 'oversight'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shakeyhands Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 The man who oversaw the best managed economy in the world over the last couple of years. Serious. Puuuuhlease.... Not one single policy introduced by the CPC had anything to do with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 Puuuuhlease.... Not one single policy introduced by the CPC had anything to do with that. It just happen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrGreenthumb Posted March 9, 2011 Report Share Posted March 9, 2011 Can you just imagine Scott Brison as Canada's Finance Minister? Talk about scary. not as Scary as Lepracaun Jim and his "magically malicious" budgets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capricorn Posted March 9, 2011 Report Share Posted March 9, 2011 not as Scary as Lepracaun Jim and his "magically malicious" budgets. Canadian economy ends year with a bangThe Canadian economy grew by a robust 3.3% annualized in the final three months of 2010, Statistics Canada reported Monday, as exports did the heavy lifting in the quarter. The data suggested the economy ended the year with a bang, as real GDP advanced 0.5% in December on a month-over-month basis. Overall, this was a strong reading, above market expectations of a 3% annualized gain in the quarter. The Bank of Canada had forecast growth in the fourth quarter of 2.3%. As a result, the Canadian data indicate the economy grew at a faster clip than the United States, based on the headline number. Last week, U.S. figures showed the American economy grew at a 2.8% annualized rate, slower than previously calculated and less than forecast as state and local governments made deeper cuts in spending. Furthermore, Statistics Canada revised upward the country’s third-quarter economic performance, to growth of 1.8% annualized from the previous 1% reading. For all of 2011, the Canadian economy grew 3.1%, following a decline of 2.5% in 2009. “All told, the last quarter of the year erased the disappointment of a sluggish summer, and points to a healthy start to the new year,” said Avery Shenfeld, chief economist at CIBC World Markets. http://business.financialpost.com/2011/02/28/canadian-economy-ends-year-with-a-bang/ Let me guess. It's all because of Chretien and Paul Martin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saipan Posted March 9, 2011 Report Share Posted March 9, 2011 It couldn't be any worse than Flaherty. Serious. Yes, it could - with Scott Brison. But worse than that still with NDP shoplifter Svend Robinson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.