Michael Hardner Posted May 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 That's right...we booted the king in the ass, and then started a biker's club. Certainly if he wasn`t half crazy he wouldn`t have let you go. Ah well... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 Certainly if he wasn`t half crazy he wouldn`t have let you go. Ah well... He didn't have much choice, as there were more pressing issues at hand. To this day, we shoot redcoats without warning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted May 22, 2010 Report Share Posted May 22, 2010 He didn't have much choice, as there were more pressing issues at hand. To this day, we shoot redcoats without warning. Looks like the red coats got the first one in..a smear campaign...and BC - when you become a socialist you don't notice..it is so incrimental and insidiously delicious that you go for it like a bee to sugar...Here comes the first wave - oil...and not in your red car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted May 22, 2010 Report Share Posted May 22, 2010 Looks like the red coats got the first one in..a smear campaign...and BC - when you become a socialist you don't notice..it is so incrimental and insidiously delicious that you go for it like a bee to sugar...Here comes the first wave - oil...and not in your red car. Oil we can handle..and lots of it. Even incremental socialism needs oil in a very big way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 Preventing phobias (fears) is a daunting task my friend - most people function in a state of fear - that is how the world is governed. I really think that homo-phobia is a mis-nomer - most people do not have a fear of gay people.. It probably is. We need a better term, like "heterosexist," or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 It probably is. We need a better term, like "heterosexist," or something. Nothing wrong with being a strong man (male) - strong men are now being persecuted - if you wonder how a strong man is at risk? It is the sheer numbers of progayers that will over whelm him and swarm the natural man into social oblivion. REAL men are about honour. I have a new term concerning modern urban metrosexual hipster males....they behave like females..but are not homosexuals..they have no honour or sense of real dignity.they are dishonest - I call them "hetrophags". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 Nothing wrong with being a strong man (male) - strong men are now being persecuted - if you wonder how a strong man is at risk? It is the sheer numbers of progayers that will over whelm him and swarm the natural man into social oblivion. REAL men are about honour. I have a new term concerning modern urban metrosexual hipster males....they behave like females..but are not homosexuals..they have no honour or sense of real dignity.they are dishonest - I call them "hetrophags". 1. Being a "strong man" has nothing whatever to do with one's views about homosexuality. 2. "Strong men" are not being "persecuted" in any way. No matter what you're notion of a "strong man" is, it's not happening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted May 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 He didn't have much choice, as there were more pressing issues at hand. To this day, we shoot redcoats without warning. More pressing issues at hand than paying attention to America... exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 1. Being a "strong man" has nothing whatever to do with one's views about homosexuality. 2. "Strong men" are not being "persecuted" in any way. No matter what you're notion of a "strong man" is, it's not happening. Yah I know - but it is not about the "views" that describe a strong man - It was the natural thing I was talking about - being a good father - being able to make love to a woman...honour...and not walking funny and fighting like a girl--screaming and scratching the eyes out of competing transvest-not so tights.....but if you were to gayify the world and create as many gay promoters and protectors that they out numbered the natural strong breeding man -- then like fire ants the man might be destroy because he is out numbered..for instance if I were to stand on your average street corner and say --- gay is inferiour--and they are weaker than the strong man - I would be swarmed by gangs of screaming and emotional liberals. Just saying if we get to lax and to liberal - natural might become extinct and the nation would breed out of test tubes - It could get very Orwellian - and by the way..gay is now a socialist concept. It makes everyone equal and no one belongs to anyone - so pile on like dogs if you wish.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dre Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 Yah I know - but it is not about the "views" that describe a strong man - It was the natural thing I was talking about - being a good father - being able to make love to a woman...honour...and not walking funny and fighting like a girl--screaming and scratching the eyes out of competing transvest-not so tights.....but if you were to gayify the world and create as many gay promoters and protectors that they out numbered the natural strong breeding man -- then like fire ants the man might be destroy because he is out numbered..for instance if I were to stand on your average street corner and say --- gay is inferiour--and they are weaker than the strong man - I would be swarmed by gangs of screaming and emotional liberals. Just saying if we get to lax and to liberal - natural might become extinct and the nation would breed out of test tubes - It could get very Orwellian - and by the way..gay is now a socialist concept. It makes everyone equal and no one belongs to anyone - so pile on like dogs if you wish.. but if you were to gayify the world and create as many gay promoters and protectors that they out numbered the natural strong breeding man Actually "strong breeding men" are pretty secure with themselves and could care less about gay issues for the most part. Homophobes for the most part are the weak not the strong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keepitsimple Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 (edited) you can sense the same thing on this forum, those furthest to the right generally have one foot in the grave... this is natural social progress, when I was a kid the entire country was much further to the right than we are now (yesteryears liberals are todays conservatives and todays liberals were yester days NDP)and by the time my kids are my age the country will be much more tolerant and further to the the left than we are today... prepare for a massive shift to the left once us "Boomers" are dead and buried and the politcal power base moves to a more socially enlightened and educated generation... That's hilarious - you've been at this board long enough to read the tea leaves. I'm a perfect example - when I was younger, I voted Liberal. As I got older I veered back and forth.....and now in general, I'm a Conservative. As you get older, your values start to firm up......family becomes even more important, you simply tend to become more...well...Conservative. It's just a general fact of life....not everybody - but in general, it happens. Forget about Harper - or Iggy - or Dion or Preston Manning or any of the personalities - they'll all be gone 25 years from now.......and you'll likely be kicking the tires of a Conservative candidate. Although you may feel like throwing up right now at the thought of it, don't be afraid - it's a natural progression for many people....and 25 years from now, you'll see a brand new bunch of fresh-faced Liberals. Edited May 27, 2010 by Keepitsimple Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted May 28, 2010 Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 Actually "strong breeding men" are pretty secure with themselves and could care less about gay issues for the most part. Homophobes for the most part are the weak not the strong. You miss the point my friend..the term homophobe does not apply to the average male or female that looks upon homosexuality as a weaker and inferiour . They like I understand it and know that the gayification and promotion of the life style is part of the international socialist plan..that it is anti - personal sovereignty...against people creating kingship and queenship - it is promoted to weaken - you wanna be a slave go head. JUST don't come crying when you find yourself powerless - and all your gay buddies finally realizing they got used for political purpose - one of human domination and subjugation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted May 29, 2010 Report Share Posted May 29, 2010 (edited) That's hilarious - you've been at this board long enough to read the tea leaves. I'm a perfect example - when I was younger, I voted Liberal. As I got older I veered back and forth.....and now in general, I'm a Conservative. As you get older, your values start to firm up......family becomes even more important, you simply tend to become more...well...Conservative. It's just a general fact of life....not everybody - but in general, it happens. Forget about Harper - or Iggy - or Dion or Preston Manning or any of the personalities - they'll all be gone 25 years from now.......and you'll likely be kicking the tires of a Conservative candidate. Although you may feel like throwing up right now at the thought of it, don't be afraid - it's a natural progression for many people....and 25 years from now, you'll see a brand new bunch of fresh-faced Liberals. True. I was far more conservative as a young man. Now, at 43, with three grown, wonderful children, I've learned a lot,and become increasingly leftish in my views. In short, I've grown up. Edited May 29, 2010 by bloodyminded Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.